Dear Valued Supporters,
It is our responsibility to wipe out corruption in Australia Post because we own Australia Post. It is operated for all of us. It is a Government Business Enterprise-GBE.
There are many officials involved in my Identity theft cover up matters. They are from within and also from outside of Australia Post. Numerous Australia Post officials have allegedly run away from their lucrative jobs after failing to stop me from fighting for justice and to get the REAL documents involved in my ID theft cover up matters from Australia Post.
Today, I will be sharing part of my letter dated 18 September 2010 to Mr. Ahmed Fahour- former MD and Group CEO of Australia Post.
This was a comprehensive letter with a detailed response to the Review conducted on this matter by Australia Post after my persistence to get answers on the unacceptable conduct of many Australia Post officials over that period. The Review was dated 22 June 2010. My ID theft cover ups were started by Australia Post officials in June 2006.
My letter had 42 pages where there were simple questions to Mr. Fahour after his numerous officials failed to resolve the matter. My letter had detailed response to the flawed review point by point.
My response proved that the review was baseless, dishonest, full of fabrications, cheating, misleading and deceptive.
I will be updating my supporters and future supporters about the dismal failures of Mr. Fahour to act on documented corruption and crimes cover ups that went on and on for SEVEN long years under his leadership.
Mr. Fahour abruptly resigned and his press conference was considered bizarre by the media when he announced his resignation. The media linked his resignation to his previously undisclosed remuneration which was made public. It was $5.6 million a year. Please see the following link.
The FAKE news that Mr. Fahour resigned because the former Prime Minister the Hon Malcolm Turnbull said that this remuneration was very high for the job that Mr. Fahour does took roots and that perception still continues. Mr. Fahour’s resignation had nothing to do with what he was paid because his remuneration was decided by the Board of Australia Post.
What was boiling behind the scenes was Mr. Fahour’s alleged unacceptable conduct became the knowledge of numerous politicians over the years. It became the knowledge of many in the media but no one wanted do act on the failures of Mr. Fahour in my ID theft cover up matters.
Mr. Fahour and his team failed continuously to address corruption and failed to provide answers to fabricated documents supplied to me. Many of those were certified by a JP who was one of their own. They failed to provide the real documents involved that were accepted by Australia Post to allow my entire family’s mail redirected to a fraudulently obtained PO Box on my name.
Everyone involved, including many Australia Post’s in-house lawyers, acted dishonestly to hide the truth all along.
No one in the media including “Your ABC” wants to investigate the corruption and cover ups despite it is a public interest matter. What are they afraid of? Who is controlling them? Where is their independence and impartiality gone?
Please note that it is not possible to share my entire letter to Mr. Fahour in one single update. I will share it in parts to show to the nation that Mr. Fahour failed to act, failed to respond to the allegations of corruption in Australia Post, failed to provide me with the REAL documents involved despite the fact that fabricated JP certified documents were supplied to me. He allegedly protected the wrongdoers all along and then by his silence on the cover ups allegedly became the part of the team covering up the truth.
Below is the part of my letter that was marked NFA (No Further Action) by the person named Mr. Geoff Williams. He is/was Board & Shareholder Liaison. Shareholder here is the Australian Government. All the corruption to cover up this matter and to protect Australia Post by the people in the Parliament House is fortunately documented. The corruption in watchdogs to protect Australia Post is also documented. Mr. Geoff Williams had no right and authority to write NFA on my letter to Mr. Fahour while he was allegedly part of the cover ups himself. How could my confidential letter to Mr. Fahour end up with Mr. Williams and got filed without a response with NFA and the initials of Mr. Geoff Williams? Why did Mr. Fahour used Mr. Williams to avoid responsibility?
If nobody is above the law then why not test it from Mr. Fahour and his team? Please read my letter in part to Mr. Fahour below.
Vasant S. Wagh
____________________________________________________
xxxx Randolph Street Telephone (02) xxxxxxxx
ROSEBERY, NSW 2018. Fax (02) xxxxxxxx
18 September 2010
Mr. Ahmed Fahour
Managing Director and CEO
Australia Post
GPO Box 1777,
MELBOURNE VIC 3001.
By Registered Post: AP Article Id: 510943863018
STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Mr. Ahmed Fahour,
Subject: 1. Final request for comprehensive response to my letters
2. My response to the Review dated 22 June 2010 by Australia Post
This letter is for your personal use as the Managing Director and CEO of Australia Post. I do not consent you to make any copies of this letter in any shape or form without my prior express written authority. A copy of this letter is forwarded to Mr. David Mortimer, Chairman of Australia Post to make him aware of what I have written to you. The only person who is allowed to have access to this letter and the attached document is the one who will be given official authority by you to respond on your behalf. If you choose not to respond to this letter yourself and appoint someone else to respond on your behalf I request you to choose the person who has impeccable record of working with honesty, integrity, moral and ethical values as this matter has remained unresolved for over four years despite my sincere efforts to resolve it using all the processes that are put in place by Australia Post, State and Commonwealth governments and I intend to continue to use all the possible avenues and processes until the matter is resolved to my satisfaction.
This could be my final request to you to respond to my previous letters and this letter comprehensively and in particular to this letter point by point using the same number sequencing to address each and every question and point raised by me.
This is to bring to your attention that I have been advised to contact Mr. Bob Croxford, State Manager CSG Headquarters by Mr. Paul Burke, Corporate Secretary, Australia Post who has written to me on your behalf and also on behalf of Mr. David Mortimer, Chairman of Australia Post. I have received two letters from Mr. Paul Burke recently where Mr. Bob Croxford’s name and telephone number (03) 9106 7450 have been provided to me. At this point in time, I am not in a position to speak with anyone over the telephone, as I do not want any of the conversations misconstrued as the serious issues are involved. I have been assured by Mr. Paul Burke that Australia Post CSG staff are highly regarded and perform their duties with utmost competence and integrity. My experience so far with the Australia Post CSG officials involved in these matters is not good. My view about the CSG NSW and CSG Headquarters after the release of the recently conducted review dated 22 June 2010 into this matter has left me with no choice than to write to you once again as do not believe Mr. Bob Croxford, who was responsible for conducting the Review, is the right person to deal with this matter any more.
The person selected by you will be required to display courage and will and not engage in anyway in concealing information, documents, files, notes, diary entries, CCTV footages, photographs of the people obtained from their visits to PO Box and Australia Post outlets where those who were involved in using my identity fraudulently have been identified.
I have provided you in the past with copies of the documents released to me under Freedom of Information Act by Mr. Raj Pavarajah, Manager Consumer Services, FOI Co-ordinator (acting) NSW/ACT Customer Contact Centre and Mr. Andy Caprackas Legal Officer/National FOI Officer, Legal Services Group, Australia Post Headquarters.
I have been provided with the copy of the final report of the review completed on 22 June 2010 by Mr. Bob Croxford entitled REVIEW OF 2006 INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE ATTEMPTED FRAUDULENT REDIRECTION OF MAIL along with the letter from Mr. Paul Burke (CSG: 1000257) written on your and Australia Post Chairman Mr. David Mortimer’s behalf. Mr. Paul Burke has written to me that he asked Mr. Croxford to conduct a Review in response to my recent letters to Australia Post.
I consider this matter as the one of great public interest as fraudulently obtained Indonesian Passport on my name was successfully used and accepted by Australia Post by allowing the criminal/s to redirect mail coming on my name and open a PO Box on my name at the Haymarket Post Shop in the middle of the city centre of Sydney using this Indonesian Passport as the only form of identification.
The Questions for you or the person you delegate authority to respond to this letter on your behalf are as follows:
1. Is the signature of Mr. Alan Barwick JP appearing on the documents signed and certified by him as the true copies of the originals is the genuine signature of Mr. Alan Barwick? (Note: Six Documents with Mr. Alan Barwick’s signature were provided to you in the past).
2. Will you be contacting Mr. Andy Caprackas who has made a FOI review determination in this matter as the National FOI Officer/Legal Officer of Australia Post in relation to the documents where Mr. Alan Barwick’s signature appears in the capacity of a Justice of the Peace (JP) to confirm the authenticity of this signature? Mr. Andy Caprackas is expected to know more about this authentication by JP and also who was the State Manager CSG NSW/ACT at the time as he is the one who has released the copies certified by Mr. Alan Barwick JP to me.
3. Will you be contacting Mr. Chris Lenton who is possibly the State Manager, CSG NSW/ACT or Operations Manager CSG NSW, as suggested to me by Mr. Alan Barwick JP, for forwarding the documents to Mr. Lenton so that Mr. Lenton can show them to Mr. Alan Barwick? Mr. Chris Lenton also is expected to be another right person to know if the signature of Mr. Alan Barwick on these documents is genuine. (Note: I had a conversation on the mobile telephone number 0419 293 383 of Mr. Alan Barwick JP on 31 December 2009 and he indicated to me that he has not signed any documents as the true copies of the original that relate to opening of a PO Box or Application to Redirect Mail any time. He suspected that his signature is a forgery and requested me to send these documents to Mr. Chris Lenton CSG, NSW who can then show them to him. I have provided documents signed by Mr. Alan Barwick JP to you in the past. I have not sent any documents to Mr. Chris Lenton. The above mobile telephone number of Mr. Alan Roy Barwick of Roseville suburb/locality is available on Justice of the Peace Register on Attorney General’s Department of New South Wales.
4. Will you be contacting Mr. Alan Barwick directly to find out from him if his signature appearing on these documents is a forgery?
5. Who was the State Manager, CSG NSW on 14, 15 and 16 June 2006 and also on 8 December 2006? Was it Mr. Alan Barwick?
6. Was Mr. Alan Barwick the boss of Mr. Don Kane? (Note: Mr. Don Kane, CSG NSW was the investigator in these matters and said to me on 16 June 2006 that he was going to help me and that was his job during the telephone conversation with me on my home telephone number when he called).
7. What was the period during which Mr. Alan Barwick was the State Manager, CSG, NSW? (Note: As the signature of Mr. Alan Barwick, whether forgery or not, is appearing on the documents with his proper and correct JP Number, which is 175733, it is important for me to know the period during which he was in this managerial role).
8. Mr. Steve Gabell of Alexandria Delivery Facility of Australia Post left a message on my home phone answering machine to call him on 9207 7913 in relation to “Redirection” for the first time on 14 June 2006. The document released to me under the FOI act was Application to Redirect Mail form with CRN 34634229 0. As per this document the Redirection was to commence on 29 May 2006. The actual application was lodged at Haymarket Post Office (Shop) on 23 May 2006 and was received by Alexandria DF on 26 May 2006.
Considering these dates why was the first contact made by Mr. Steve Gabell of ADF on 14 June 2006 (message left on my answering machine on my home telephone number) for a mail redirection that was supposed to be up and running from 29 May 2006?
IMPORTANT NOTE: In the face-to-face meeting on 16 JUNE 2006 with Mr. Steve Gabell and Ms. Roslyn of Alexandria DF Mr. Steve Gabell said the Mail Redirection application was NOT lodged at Haymarket Post office but the mail was redirected to a Haymarket Post Office PO Box that was opened on my name using Indonesian Passport as a Photo ID. There was never ever a mention of the involvement of Two separate Indonesian Passports at any time by anybody.
9. Where is the Application to Redirect Mail form with CRN 39481015 0? (Note: I have been provided with a copy of a transaction receipt under FOI Act for the application to Redirect Mail as the document involved in the fraudulent mail redirection but the copy of the actual form with Customer Reference Number (CRN) 39481015 0 was never supplied to me. Can you please forward the photocopy of the Application to Redirect Mail with CRN 39481015 0 to me? This transaction receipt was generated at Haymarket Post office on 28/04/06 at 15:51 hours. The copy of this receipt, certified by Mr. Alan Barwick JP as the true copy of the original was provided to you in the past.
10. Have you identified the Accepting Officer whose signature appears on the Application to Redirect Mail with CRN 34634229 0 with a Haymarket NSW 1240 Australia Post date stamp with the date 23 May 2006? If not, will you be doing it?
Note: The accepting officer has ticked two boxes, which instructs accepting officer to
(i) attach receipt to customer copy and attach copy of receipt to back of this form and
(ii) Advice customer to keep copy/CRN.
I have not been provided with a photocopy of a receipt with CRN 34634229 0 at any time. The copy of this transaction was also to be attached to the back of this form for Australia Post records. Can you please provide me with the photocopy of the receipt with CRN 34634229 0?
11. Can you please provide me with the name of the accepting officer of Haymarket Post office whose initials appear on the Application to Redirect Mail with CRN 34634229 0 dated 23 May 2006? The copy of the receipt that was to be attached to the back of this form will show the exact details of the lodgement of this form. Where is the transaction receipt of the Application to redirect mail with the CRN 34634229 0? Why did the accepting officer fail to mention the name of the country and wrote only PASSPORT against ID Type? ID was to include the name, address and signature of the person lodging form. The accepting officer has confirmed by ticking the box the passport had a 38 Randolph Street, Rosebery, N.S.W. 2018 written on it somewhere and also the signature on the passport was matching with the one on the Redirection Application form and the passport was on the name of Vasant Wagh. Is this Accepting Officer still the employee or contractor of Australia Post?
12. Is the Passport number recorded on this Application to Redirect Mail is MO 75782 or is MO 15782? If this Accepting Officer worked at Haymarket Post Shop on 23 May 2006, he/she will be able to tell you the correct number by recognising his/her handwriting.
13. What is the response from Indonesian Embassy about these Passport Numbers MO 75782 and MO 15782?
14. Did the Indonesian Government ever issue a passport on the name of Vasant Wagh anywhere in the world from any of their missions including Australia for a person living in Australia? When did Australia Post CSG first contact the Indonesian Embassy or Indonesian government in relation to these passports?
15. Will you be contacting Mr. Steve Gabell to find out the truth after receiving this correspondence?
16. Will you be contacting Ms. Roslyn to find out the truth after receiving this correspondence?
17. Will you be contacting Mr. Don Kane Investigator after receiving this correspondence? Please describe the role of Mr. Don Kane as an Investigator in these matters.
18. Will you be contacting Mr. Andy Caprackas after receiving this correspondence? Did Mr. Caprackas have authority to demand answers where Australia Post employees have failed to respond properly to my concerns which were conveyed to them by Mr. Caprackas?
19. Will you be contacting Mr. Steve Brotherson after receiving this correspondence?
What was the role of Mr. Steve Brotherson in these matters? He has, in my view, attended all the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) hearings with Mr. Andy Caprackas and Mr. Mick Batskos of ‘FOI Solutions’ who was the solicitor hired by Australia Post in these matters.
20. Will you be contacting the Manager of Alexandria DF who was the manager on 14, 15 and 16 June 2006 and till the end of the year 2006 after receiving my correspondence?
What was the role played by the Manager of ADF in these matters who was the boss of Mr. Steve Gabell?
21. Will you be contacting Mr. Alan Barwick JP after receiving this correspondence?
Have you already contacted Mr. Alan Barwick in these matters? If not why not? If yes what was the response of Mr. Alan Barwick in relation to the documents he or his imposter signed as the JP?
22. Will you be contacting Mr. Chris Lenton after receiving this correspondence?
Have you already contacted Mr. Chris Lenton in these matters? If not why not? If yes, did he confirm anything about the authenticity of Mr. Alan Barwick’s signature on the documents?
23. Will you be contacting Mr. Raj Pavarajah after receiving this correspondence?
What was Mr. Raj Pavarajah’s previous experience in making decisions on FOI applications? Who provided him with a transaction receipt of $30.00 cash received against my Money Order for the fees for processing my FOI application? Does he know who took $30.00 cash in this way?
24. Have you obtained the name of the Accepting Officer who has signed the application to open a PO Box form at Haymarket Post Office, Haymarket, NSW? I request you to provide me the full name of this person. Is he still working for Australia Post? Is this Accepting Officer a real person or a fictitious identity?
25. Have you contacted Mr. Paul Gardner who responded to my solicitor’s letter with a letter that had a false date of 23 August 2000 and no reference number? (Note: This was the only letter received by my solicitor from CSG NSW).
Is Mr. Paul Gardner a real person or a fictitious identity? If he is a real person then who directed Mr. Paul Gardner to respond to my solicitor Vincent Pelosi’s letter dated 14 August 2006? Was that person Mr. Don Kane as the letter was addressed to Mr. Don Kane? Was it Mr. Steve Brotherson who was the Corporate Lawyer? or was it the State Manager Corporate Security Group NSW/ACT at the time? The position of Mr. Paul Gardner is shown on this letter as A/g Team Leader, Australia Post Corporate Security Group. Was it proper for the A/g Team Leader to respond to my solicitor’s letter in this way when it was not addressed to him where the serious matters of premeditated fraudulent/criminal activities were involved? What legal qualifications did Mr. Paul Gardner have to be directed to respond to my solicitor’s letter?
26. Is the letter dated 23 August 2000 from Mr. Paul Gardner to Mr. Vincent Pelosi, who acted for me at the time, meet even the basic standards of the communication going out of the Australia Post Corporate Security Group? When was Mr. Paul Gardner made A/g Team Leader? If this date (23 August 2000) is a typographical error then why there was not a single attempt made to correct it and inform me of the correction despite this matter is known to Australia Post for more than FOUR YEARS?
27. As per the letter of Mr. Paul Gardner dated 23 August 2000, which was in response to my solicitor’s letter dated 14 August 2006 to Mr. Don Kane, Mr. Paul Gardner states, “Our investigations are now concluded.”
Note: My solicitor Mr. Vincent Pelosi in his very first letter to Mr. Don Kane, CSG, NSW, which was dated 21 June 2006, wrote as follows in point 4. Please provide us with copies of all documents and more particularly, the redirected envelope, the cheque, correspondence and any application forms in which our client’s name or address is referred and the Indonesian Passport.
In requesting this information and documents, consideration has been given to Section 37 of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 and we respectfully submit that the production of these documents for our perusal and discussion with our client will in no way prejudice the conduct of an investigation of a breach or possible breach of the law to comply with the law relating to taxation or prejudice the enforcement or proper administration of the law.
On the contrary, we are of the opinion that the provision of these documents and the information could assist in bringing the investigation to an immediate conclusion.
We look forward to hearing from you.
No one from CSG New South Wales including Mr. Don Kane, State Manager CSG, NSW or Mr. Paul Gardner has ever responded to this letter. Please provide reasons for this inaction. If this letter was forwarded to the Corporate Lawyer by CSG NSW then there was absolutely no response from the Corporate Lawyer as well. This Corporate Lawyer could be Mr. Steve Brotherson. Was this an acceptable conduct by those who were responsible for providing the requested material even after the investigations were reported as being concluded by Mr. Paul Gardner?
During my telephone conversation with Mr. Don Kane on 16 June 2006 I requested him to provide me with all the documents after the investigations were over. This did not happen. Please provide reasons why the documents were not forwarded to either my solicitor or me.
Dear Supporters,
I will share this letter in full in stages to make my update as concise as possible.
These initial basic questions were never answered despite the answers were known to many Australia Post officials.
Once the cover ups started everyone stuck to the cover ups and continued the cover ups. It is now over SIXTEEN years and the matter is still unresolved.
Mr Fahour’s resignation reasons never added up and will never add up. There is no secret that he is a millionaire. He was ready to work for free after his $5.6 million remuneration became public but then went on to take $10 million in final payout anyway.
The matter is reported to number of media outlets many times by me. They are all silent. The lost trust in the media and the politicians is nothing new. The time will come when the people of this nation will say enough is enough because they will get affected more and more if our country is perceived as getting more and more corrupt every year.
Please continue reading and commenting on my updates. It is my goal to hold the people to account that have played part in the cover ups despite it was against their own rules and against their own Code of Conduct to cover up corruption and crimes that were brought to their attention.
I thank my 41129 strong supporters for signing and supporting my fight for justice for my family and against the systemic documented corruption and cover ups. This support will one day make a real difference and stop our country’s derailing democracy from further deterioration is my confidence. It is important to join hands to bring back our derailed democracy back on its tracks.
I request all of you to share my petition and updates with as many others as possible.
I challenge Mr. Fahour to come clean now because my fight for justice has a potential to expose him more and more in the coming months.
He must explain to the owners of Australia Post-the people of Australia how he could continue to sit on documented corruption and crimes cover ups for seven years and then resign abruptly giving baseless reasons.
Mr. Fahour and his team even hide the death of Mr Bob Croxford from me despite he was my contact person. The cause of the death is suicide. The time frame between the letter dated 23 June 2010 from Mr Paul Burke to me on behalf of Mr Fahour and this death on 11 September 2010 is just 19 days. No new contact person was ever appointed and the cover ups continued. The date of my letter-18 September 2010 to Mr Fahour was the date of Mr Croxford’s funeral. I was completely unaware of this death for years.
Where are Mr Fahour and his team’s Moral and Ethical Standards gone?
For your ease of reference, the link to my previous update where NFA is written on my above-mentioned letter dated 18 September 2010 to Mr Fahour is provided below.
Thanks again for your support.