Moratorium on data centers in Shelby County

Recent signers:
Chelsea Schwering and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Haven't you heard? Big tech is after our precious farmland. They are trying to build data centers on every 100 acre plot they can get. However, the proposal for Shelby county is for a 500 acre hyperscale project that would more than triple the energy demand in our county. A moratorium would delay or prohibit the building of these projects, and protect the people in our county. These multi-billion dollar corporations work exclusively through quiet backroom negotiations to try to secure the tax-free deal with officials before the public has a chance to research or understand the negative impacts that these projects have on quality of life and the local environment, and how they drain local resources and contribute nothing to the local residents. Many projects have been rushed through around the country, so we know now that the water needs of these projects drain the local aquifers and produce toxic wastewater. They create such a behemoth demand for energy that the slim available supply becomes more costly for residents. They are exempt from taxes and EPA emissions requirements for their huge diesel generators, which number in the hundreds and run one day every month, unless the grid is down, in which case they run 24/7, indefinitely or until power is restored. The diesel plume alone would make the surrounding neighborhoods undesirable, and kill the property value. They also emit a lot of noise. Active operations produce between 55 to 85 decibels of industrial noise, which is about like a busy city street. And to make matters worse, Indiana has recently rushed through approvals to build nuclear facilities in our state to power these obscene developments.  Soo... if you could lend a hand in letting them know that Shelby county doesn't want or need ANY of these data centers here, that'd be great. It is obvious that they are a net loss for the community and a net gain for the tech oligarchs, (like they really need our help) Plus, imagine the growth if we are the only place left with out one of these parasitic eyesores! ! Anyhow, all of this begs the question.. why would ANY community leader approve these types of deals?  NOTE: THIS POST WAS WRITTEN BY A HUMAN. ZERO AI TECH WENT INTO THE CREATION OF THIS PETITION

880

Recent signers:
Chelsea Schwering and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Haven't you heard? Big tech is after our precious farmland. They are trying to build data centers on every 100 acre plot they can get. However, the proposal for Shelby county is for a 500 acre hyperscale project that would more than triple the energy demand in our county. A moratorium would delay or prohibit the building of these projects, and protect the people in our county. These multi-billion dollar corporations work exclusively through quiet backroom negotiations to try to secure the tax-free deal with officials before the public has a chance to research or understand the negative impacts that these projects have on quality of life and the local environment, and how they drain local resources and contribute nothing to the local residents. Many projects have been rushed through around the country, so we know now that the water needs of these projects drain the local aquifers and produce toxic wastewater. They create such a behemoth demand for energy that the slim available supply becomes more costly for residents. They are exempt from taxes and EPA emissions requirements for their huge diesel generators, which number in the hundreds and run one day every month, unless the grid is down, in which case they run 24/7, indefinitely or until power is restored. The diesel plume alone would make the surrounding neighborhoods undesirable, and kill the property value. They also emit a lot of noise. Active operations produce between 55 to 85 decibels of industrial noise, which is about like a busy city street. And to make matters worse, Indiana has recently rushed through approvals to build nuclear facilities in our state to power these obscene developments.  Soo... if you could lend a hand in letting them know that Shelby county doesn't want or need ANY of these data centers here, that'd be great. It is obvious that they are a net loss for the community and a net gain for the tech oligarchs, (like they really need our help) Plus, imagine the growth if we are the only place left with out one of these parasitic eyesores! ! Anyhow, all of this begs the question.. why would ANY community leader approve these types of deals?  NOTE: THIS POST WAS WRITTEN BY A HUMAN. ZERO AI TECH WENT INTO THE CREATION OF THIS PETITION

The Decision Makers

Shelby County Council
3 Members
1 Responded
Jeremy Ruble
Shelby County Council - At Large
Clarification on my role in the potential Data Center discussion Over the past several days I have seen my name tagged and referenced as a “decision maker” regarding a potential data center project being discussed in Shelby County. I want to take a moment to clearly explain how local government works and what my actual role is in this process. The potential project being discussed is located on land that is currently in the process of being annexed into the City of Shelbyville. Because of that, the governing body that would ultimately make land use and zoning decisions for this project is the City Common Council. County government functions differently. If this same project were proposed on land that remained in the unincorporated county, the decision makers would be the County Commissioners, not the County Council. As a member of the Shelby County Council, my role is as part of the county’s fiscal body. My responsibilities are financial in nature. That includes approving and amending the county budget, setting tax rates, approving the transfer of funds between departments, establishing wages and benefits for county employees, and voting on financial ordinances that govern how taxpayer dollars are raised and spent. In short, my job is to ensure the county is financially stable, responsible, and positioned to meet both current and future needs. Because of that responsibility, I spend a great deal of time evaluating the potential fiscal impacts of large projects. I can clearly see the significant benefits that a project of this magnitude could bring. That includes transformative revenue for local schools, relief on tax rates over time, and long-term financial stability for essential services. Those are real positives and they deserve serious consideration. At the same time, none of those benefits matter if there are environmental or quality-of-life impacts that cannot be responsibly mitigated. As a community, we have an obligation to protect our residents, our water, and our environment. That is why it is critical that strong, well-written ordinances exist to set clear expectations and safeguards before any project moves forward. With that in mind, I have been working diligently to draft an ordinance that can serve as a starting point. I have shared that work with the City so they have something concrete to reference if they choose to use it. My goal is not to dictate outcomes, but to ensure that if a project is considered, the community is protected by clear and enforceable standards. I also believe it is just as important to be prepared on the financial side. That means having a thoughtful plan for how revenue is maximized and how leverage is used to negotiate the strongest possible economic agreement for our community. Preparation matters. Waiting until the last minute does not serve taxpayers well. While I am not a final decision maker on this specific project, I take my responsibility to be prepared very seriously. If the actual decision makers choose to move forward with a project, I want our community to be ready with both a strong ordinance and a sound financial plan that reflects our values and protects our future. Jeremy Ruble County Council - At Large jruble@co.shelby.in.us
Charity Mohr
Shelby County Council - At Large
Troy Merrick
Shelby County Council - At Large

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates

Share this petition

Petition created on January 18, 2026