Actualización de la peticiónEssex Police: Release ALL Documents Withheld under PII to #JeremyBamber’s Legal Defence"NO ONE told the Jury they were only looking at a tiny amount of available evidence" #JeremyBamber
Heidi HawkinsJersey, Jersey
13 sept 2015 — http://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/public-interest-immunity A frequently asked question is: “Why has it taken thirty years to discover how Essex Police manufactured the case against Jeremy?” The best way to answer this question is with a simple analogy. Most people are familiar with jigsaw puzzles, the more pieces there are the harder they are to do. The easier puzzles also have a picture on the box lid which helps when putting the pieces together. Using this analogy, Jeremy’s case is like a one million piece jigsaw puzzle, and the picture on the box lid which the Jury was given was quite unlike the true picture that’s revealed once all one million pieces of this jigsaw puzzle has been connected together. At Trial, Essex Police and the Crown Prosecutor presented the Jury with perhaps ten thousand jigsaw pieces, which the Trial Judge connected up for them during his summing up. No one told the Jury that they were only looking at a tiny amount of the available evidence, so the material that the Judge set out before them was passed off as the complete picture. Once the Trial finished, a rushed Police Enquiry was carried out by DCI Dickinson for the Home Secretary. This investigation looked at a further hundred thousand pieces of the jigsaw. During the Dickinson Enquiry, evidence came to light that the integrity of the crime scene had been very seriously compromised due to thirty-eight Police Officers being allowed into the house prior to 10:00am. It was not until then that the scene photographer and the Scenes of Crime Police Officers were allowed into the house themselves. It also came to light that at 09:00am six Firearms Officers had arrived at White House Farm for an Informative. This training exercise by them continued until 09:50am. Once these Officers had left the house, S.O.C.O. were then allowed to begin their examination of the scene. This information only came to light during this post- Trial Dickinson Enquiry, but it was kept out of Dickinson’s final report which was submitted to the Home Secretary. Therefore the Home Secretary knew nothing about the disturbance of the Crime Scene by Essex Police Officers. All of the documents generated during Dickinson’s investigations were subject to a Public Interest Immunity Order and were only disclosed after the end of the 2002 Appeal hearing. In 1987, The Central Detective Unit (Fraud) received a number of Criminal complaints concerning the Bamber Estate (Case Number 253). According to the Case File, allegations of Criminal fraud had been made to Essex Police against some of Jeremy’s relatives. In a letter dated 10th June 1988 contained in the Fraud Squad Policy File it stated: “This complaint was received in 1987 but not proceeded with pending the appeal of Jeremy Bamber.” The Trial Jury had sent a Question to the Trial Judge asking: “If Jeremy was found guilty, who would be the beneficiaries of the Bamber Estate? Could it be his Uncle and family?” The Jury may have benefitted from knowing that Robert Boutflour organized for Mabel Speakman (Jeremy’s grandmother) to change her will, to disinherit Jeremy before she was even informed of the death of her daughter June and family. Furthermore when Mrs Speakman was eventually given this tragic news, Jeremy’s relatives allowed her to believe that Jeremy had also been killed by his sister during this tragedy. The Jury should also have known that the Eatons and Boutflours inherited the whole of the Bamber Estate, much of which they had seized before Jeremy had even been convicted. The Appeal Judges in 1988, may have felt that the Jury ought to have known about who inherited the Bamber Estate and who tricked Mabel Speakman into changing her will to disinherit Jeremy. The files from Case 253 were also subjected to P.i.i. and were only disclosed to the Defence after the 2002 Appeal Court hearing. Once disclosed, using the same analogy, another fifty thousand pieces came into play revealing yet more of the big picture of corruption within Essex Police. In 1991 the City of London Police carried out yet another investigation, this time on behalf of the Police Complaints Authority. During this Enquiry Essex Police Officers, Forensic Scientists and civilian witnesses were extensively interviewed. Almost all of the key prosecution witnesses were interviewed multiple times, which resulted in many of these individuals writing five or more draft witness statements. These draft statements then underwent wide scale editing to ensure the removal of any evidence that was beneficial to the Defence Case. A key discovery during this 1991 C.O.L.P. Enquiry was that the case featured a silencer and a sound moderator, two distinct exhibits. Both of these exhibits had been removed from the gun cupboard at White House Farm on or after 7th August 1985. C.O.L.P. also discovered that DCI Ainsley had deliberately misled the D.P.P. in 1985 regarding many of the central Issues in this case. However a Policy decision was taken not to make public any wrong doing by any Police Officer, Forensic Scientist or any other Prosecution witness who gave evidence during this Enquiry. All of the case files became subject of a Public Interest Immunity Order as a result of this decision Policy. Another five hundred thousand pieces of the jigsaw came to light due to the C.O.L.P. Enquiry. However these were only disclosed to the Defence after the close of the 2002 Appeal Court hearing. During the 1990’s the Criminal cases Review Commission took over the investigation of alleged Miscarriages of Justice from the Home Office and in 2001 the C.C.R.C referred Jeremy’s case to the Court of Appeal. To assist the C.P.S and the Court, the Metropolitan Police were appointed to catalogue all the case files and investigate anything they were asked to do. Prior to the 2002 Appeal Court Hearing, the Defence were given access to a warehouse containing three and a half million pages of case documents. The Defence were told that this constituted disclosure of all the evidence in the case. It was not until after the Appeal Hearing had ended that the C.P.S. admitted to the Court that three hundred and forty thousand pages of case documents had been withheld from the Defence as they were subject to a Public Interest Immunity Order. The Appeal Court Judges ruled that this material should be disclosed to the Defence and in 2011 these files were disclosed to Jeremy. Between 2002 and 2011 The C.C.R.C, Essex Police, The Home Office, and the Forensic Science Service disclosed large amounts of case material to Jeremy directly. Between 2011 and 2015 Jeremy has been putting together this million piece jigsaw puzzle. having completed this gargantuan task it emerged that Essex Police were still concealing numerous items of evidence that supported the Defence case. Hence the creation of the petition. The material being requested has been documented numerous times within the case files, and referred to throughout all of the various Police investigations by Dickinson, C.O.L.P., Essex Police Fraud Squad and the Metropolitan Police but the actual material listed on the petition remains undisclosed. P.i.i. has been grossly misused in this case during the last thirty years in order to cover up that Essex Police manufactured every aspect of the evidence against Jeremy. Since the end of the Trial each Police Investigation discovered some aspect of the corruption within Essex Police, but Policy decisions were taken to subvert Justice and conceal this wrong doing behind P.i.i. Who made these Policy decisions to misuse P.i.i. is unknown. But as Edmund Burke so rightly said: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to know and then do nothing.” This million piece jigsaw puzzle is now completed. Essex Police have an opportunity to comply with the requests listed on this petition, and show the public that they are no longer willing to sanction any form of Police corruption and do so by supporting Jeremy’s case going back to the Court of Appeal. Essex Police now know that the truth about this case is in the Public Domain, evil won’t triumph because this time, the people who do know, are doing something to ensure that evil will not triumph. Please Support ThunderclapIt in order for more people to know the truth about this shocking case. I'm sure they will be as outraged as you are... Many thanks, The Jeremy Bamber Official Campaign.
Apoyar ahora
Firma esta petición
Copiar enlace
WhatsApp
Facebook
X
Email