Petition for an Independent National Oversight Committee on Bio-hacking, Artificial Intelligence, mRNA, Transhumanism,
Biodigital Convergence and Emerging Life Sciences Technologies

To the Parliament of Canada, the Government of Canada
(Prime Minister, Cabinet Ministers), and relevant provincial legislatures:

We, the undersigned citizens and defenders of human dignity, bodily sovereignty and future generations, hereby demand the immediate establishment of an Independent National Oversight Committee endowed with full investigative and subpoena powers to examine, regulate, and, where necessary, prohibit the development, deployment and integration of technologies in the domains of:

Bio-hacking, Artificial Intelligence, mRNA-Based Interventions,
Transhumanist Experimentation, Biodigital Convergence,
Neuro-Technologies, Nanotechnologies, and related emerging sciences.

This Committee must:

Operate independently of corporate,
Military or private interest capture;
Be transparent and publicly accountable;
Prioritize human rights,
Bodily autonomy,
Constitutional freedoms,
And informed consent above profit, secrecy or expediency.

I. The Case for Oversight

Protection of Bodily Autonomy

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Along With Canada’s International
Human Rights Obligations, Safeguard Bodily Integrity and the Right to Free
and Informed Consent.

Yet Rapidly Evolving Technologies:

mRNA Engineering, Neural or Nano-Implants, Bio-Surveillance, Gene Editing in Food or Humans; Pose a Risk of Normalizing Involuntary Participation in Experiments, Altering Biology Without Full Public Consent.

Defense Against Predictive Surveillance and Digital Domination

Canada’s Emerging Frameworks for AI Regulation
(Including the Artificial Intelligence and Data Act Under Bill C-27)
Remain Incomplete, and Existing Guidance Reveals Major Gaps
in Oversight and Rights Protection.

AI Oversight, Accountability and Protecting Human Rights:
https://dais.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/AIDACommentary.pdf

Regulation of AI in Canada
https://www.osler.com/en/insights/reports/ai-in-canada/regulation-of-ai-incanada/

Without Robust and Independent Scrutiny, AI, Biodigital Infrastructures,
and Convergence Technologies May Erode Privacy, Freedom of Thought,
Autonomy of Body and Mind, and Data Sovereignty; Especially for Indigenous Communities.

Canada’s health data is flowing abroad while Ottawa stalls on AI rules
https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2025/10/health-data-sovereignty/

Policy Options

National and Global Security / Sovereignty Risks

Foreign Provinces and Multinational Corporations Are Investing Heavily Into Biotechnology, AI, Neuro-Technologies, and Biodigital Convergence.

Absent Oversight, Canada Risks Ceding Sovereignty, Becoming a Testing
Ground, or Subject to External Manipulation, Surveillance, and Domination
Through Advanced Technologies.

Prevention of Technological Tyranny

History Shows How Unregulated Science Tied to Power Can Lead to Human Rights Abuses, Covert Experimentation, and Degradation of Human Dignity.

Allowing Life-Altering, Mind-Altering, or Body-Altering Technologies to Evolve Unchecked Threatens to Convert Citizens Into Data Points, Bodies Into Bio-Assets, and Minds Into Algorithmic Components.

II. Opt-Out Provision & Legal Protections

The Committee Must Ensure a Binding Opt-Out Right for All Canadians:

No Person May Be Coerced, Directly or Indirectly, Into Participation in
Programs of Bio-Hacking, mRNA Integration, Neuro-Technological
or Biodigital Systems Without Free, Prior, Informed Consent.

Coercion or Forced Participation Must Be Criminalised Under Statutes
Such as the Criminal Code of Canada (e.g., Violations of Bodily Autonomy, Conspiracy Against Rights) and Treated in Line With International Instruments.

Victims of Unauthorised Experimentation, Harmful Biodigital Intervention,
or Forced Integration Must Have Civil Redress:

The Right to Sue for Damages, Injunctive Relief, and Full Accountability.

Entities (Corporations, Agencies, or Individuals) Engaging in Unauthorised or Coercive Experimentation Must Face Strict Liability, Regardless of Government or Corporate Immunity.

III. Mandated Scope of Oversight

The Committee Must Possess Investigative and Subpoena Authority Across Federal Agencies, Private Corporations, Foreign Partnerships,
and Research Institutions in the Following Domains:

Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) & Office of the Chief Science Advisor:

Review of Funded Research in Transhumanism, Convergence,
and Biodigital Science.

Health Canada & Canadian Food Inspection Agency:

Oversight of mRNA-Based Interventions, Nano-Materials in Food/Medicine, Bio-Hacking Approvals, Genetically Engineered Organisms.

Artificial Intelligence and Data Act Implementation, Including Review of AI Systems Applied in Health, Surveillance, Predictive Behaviour, and Neuro-Tech.

The Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) - Companion Document
https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/artificial-intelligenceand-data-act-aida-companion-document

We cannot be left behind: How Canada is balancing AI regulation, innovation
https://iapp.org/news/a/we-cannot-be-left-behind-how-canada-is-balancing-airegulation-innovation

Privacy Commissioner of Canada and Related Frameworks:
Data Sovereignty, Biometric and Neuro-Data Protection,
Indigenous Data Governance (OCAP Principles).

National Security Act, 2017 and Related Oversight Mechanisms
(e.g., National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians)
Must Extend to Neuro-Technologies, Bio-Weapons, and Surveillance Systems With Biodigital Convergence.

National Security Act 2017 (Canada)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Act_2017_%28Canada%29

National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_and_Intelligence_Committee_of_Parliamentarians

Private Corporations, Foreign Research Entities, Public-Private Partnerships (e.g., Neuro-Tech Firms, Biotech Startups) Must Be Within Scope, Especially Where Canadian Citizens, Bodies, or Data are Involved.

IV. Rescission of Directives and Policy Frameworks

The Committee Must Have the Power to Recommend Rescission, Repeal,
or Amendment of Directives, Regulations, or Policies That Facilitate
Unaccountable Biodigital Experimentation, Predictive Surveillance,
or Bio-Hacking Without Public Oversight.

Among Areas of Concern for Review:

Any National Security or Defence Directives That Expand
Neuro-Surveillance, Predictive Mind Control, or Biodigital Convergence
Without Parliamentary Oversight.

Policies Under Health Canada or ISED That Authorise mRNA-Based
Interventionsor Bio-Hacking Experiments Without Full Independent Review and Opt-Out Rights.

AI, Data, and Digital Governance Frameworks That Exempt Government Institutions, Limit Transparency, or Fail to Embed Rights of Refusal, Bodily Sovereignty, or Data Sovereignty.

AI Oversight, Accountability and Protecting Human Rights:

Comments on Canada’s Proposed Artificial Intelligence and Data Act
https://www.mediatechdemocracy.com/all-work/ai-oversight-accountabilityand-protecting-human-rights-comments-on-canadas-proposed-act

V. Consequences of Inaction

If Canada Fails to Establish Robust Oversight Now,
The Consequences May Include:

Exploitation by Rogue Provinces, Corporations, or Malicious Actors
of Bio-Hacking, Neuro-Technologies, or AI Surveillance for Coercion,
Control, or Economic Dominance.

Corporate Capture and Foreign Domination of Canadian Life Sciences,
Digital Infrastructure, and Human Biology,
Undermining National Sovereignty.

Erosion of Human Dignity, Bodily and Mental Autonomy, as Citizens
Become Integrated Into Biodigital Systems Without Full Consent
or Awareness.

A Precedent of Irreversible Coercive Technologies Being Normalized,
Making Freedom of Choice and Autonomy Vulnerable to Permanent Loss.

VI. Enforcement Mechanisms

The Oversight Committee Must Be Vested With Enforceable Powers:
Subpoena Authority to Compel Testimony, Documents, and Evidence From Federal Agencies, Corporations, Research Institutions, and International Partners Under Canadian Jurisdiction.

Criminal Referral Powers:

Where Violations of Bodily Autonomy, Consent, or Human Dignity Are
Found, the Committee Must Refer Matters to the Department of Justice
Canada or the Appropriate Provincial Attorney General for Prosecution
Under Applicable Federal and Provincial Law.

Civil Injunctive Powers:

The Committee Must Be Able to Petition Federal or Provincial Courts for
Immediate Injunctions Halting Any Program That Violates Rights of Bodily Autonomy, Mental Integrity, Data Sovereignty, or Constitutional Protections.

Whistle-Blower Protections:

Individuals Within Government, Industry, or Research Institutions Who
Expose Abuses Must Receive Absolute Protection From Retaliation.

Canada Must Legislate or Designate Protections Accordingly.

Public Transparency Requirements:

All Findings of the Committee Must Be Published in Full, With National Security Claims Not Used to Conceal Human Rights Violations or Unconstitutional Experimentation.

VII. Alignment With Canadian and International Law

This Petition Draws on Canada’s Domestic and International Commitments:

Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:

Protection of Life, Liberty, Security of Person, and Freedom From Non-Consensual Experimentation.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR):

Article 7 Prohibits Non-Consensual Medical or Scientific Experimentation;
Article 17 Protects Privacy; Article 9 Protects Liberty of Person.

Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities (CRPD):

Protection Against Coercive Medical or Technological Intervention.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

Article 3 (Life, Liberty, Security) and Article 5 (No Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment).

Canada’s Commitment to Indigenous Data Sovereignty (OCAP Principles)
and Meaningful Consultation in Emerging Technological Governance.

Policy Options

EXPLORATION OF THE IMPACT OF CANADA’S INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT REGIME ON FIRST NATIONS DATA SOVEREIGNTY
https://fnigc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/FNIGC_Discussion_Paper_IM_Regime_Data_Sovereignty_EN.pdf

Health Data Stewardship Principles
https://www.cihi.ca/en/about-cihi/corporate-strategies/health-datastewardship/health-data-stewardship-principles

Health Data Research Network Canada
Strategic Plan 2021-2026
https://www.hdrn.ca/wp-content/uploads/HDRN-Canada-Strategic-Plan_January-2022_comp.pdf

The First Nations Principles of Ownership, Control, Access,
and Possession
https://fnigc.ca/ocap-training/

Failure to Act Places Canada in Violation of These Rights and Risks Permanent Damage to Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Dignity.

VIII. Final Call to Action

We, the Undersigned Canadians, Demand:

The Immediate Creation of an Independent National Oversight Committee
With Full Investigative and Subpoena Powers.

A Binding Opt-Out Right for All Canadians From Bio-Hacking, mRNA,
Transhumanist, or Bio-digital Programs Without Free and Informed Consent.

Criminalization of Forced Participation or Experimentation in Any Biologically or Digitally Altering System.

Full Transparency, Accountability, and Whistle-Blower Protections in All Matters of Emerging Life Science and AI Technologies.

Rescission or Amendment of Any Directives, Policies, or Regulations
That Enable Predictive Surveillance, Data Exploitation, Forced Biodigital
Integration, or Unauthorised Experimentation.

Alignment of Canada’s Legislative Frameworks With the Highest Standards
of Human Rights, Autonomy, Consent, and National Sovereignty.

This Petition Is Not a Request

It Is a Demand Grounded in the Charter, in Federal and Provincial Law,
and in Canada’s International Human Rights Obligations.

The Future of Freedom, Bodily and Mental Sovereignty, National Dignity,
and Human Dignity Depends on Your Immediate Action.

Sincerely,
Name:
City:
Province:
Date:

Please Help Amplify This Demand for Oversight and Protection.