PRE:***Local, state, federal, and US supreme court judges ignore corruption(pics67,68), allow innocent man stay imprisoned(pic78), and presume he can be in two places at once(pic75)*Please sign this petition and then follow the FOOTER/SHARING section near bottom*

Marc Brown calls on the community to enforce justice in a free society wherein liberty and justice are guaranteed, without delay, as justice delayed is justice denied.

We need your continued support. If you would like to help/have ideas please email or text/call us, or sign this petition, in order to be placed on a subscription list so that we can keep in touch with you for updates or requests of the community. If you have a legal license (paralegal or lawyer) and can assist in any way please message us.

Please scroll down to the FOOTER/SHARING section to share this page.
We also ask that you sign the petition.

Facebook forum: facebook.com/profile.php?id=61565565552702
facebook.com/profile.php?id=61565565552702&mibextid=LQQJ4d

Email: 

Phone: 240-712-4083
Gofundme Link: https://gofund.me/e9b8bd62a
Change.org Link: chng.it/R7vG8Tvrhw
Picture Links:
Intended Law Firm: 410-352-0818

SUMMARY: Local, state, federal, and supreme court judges ignore corruption (which is abetting), leaving an actually innocent person in jail. As the courts mocked Marc Brown's false imprisonment by stating "noted" on numerous documents, or using OPTIONAL procedure to deny Marc his Constitutional RIGHTS, Marc's father and grandmother die in the process [March 2025 (Marc's birthday month) and June 2024] despite Marc filing his actual innocence and habeas corpus petitions in June 2023. Meanwhile, the media and government tend to the Menendez Brothers, convicted killers who may become rich and famous, have been prioritized by the government to expeditiously released despite countless lies, and whose story inspired a child to murder his own parents. The same is happening for a black male who is recommended for release despite murdering and then eating the eyeball of his victim. It appears Marc case isn't popular enough for media coverage. The United States Supreme court, which in recent times asserted to the media that the constitution matters, has failed to even file Marc's documents despite picking them up from the post office as certified mail. Marc Brown, an actually innocent person who can prove his innocence with time-stamped pictures and computer records, continues to sit in jail with no bail nor hearing date in sight. No court or person has refuted Marc's alibi. Additionally, the witness in the case described the suspect as white/fair-skin black, Marc is medium-brown.
Maryland Court Rules 8-412d(on court's initiative), 8-521b(on court's initiative), 15-303e2("may", not "shall" deny. "May" permit), 4-331c(no minimum wait), 4-332f(90-day wait), Maryland Constitution->Declaration of Rights->Article 2, and Daniels v. Williams, 474 US 327 above 332 (oppressive acts prohibited even if procedure fair), U.S. Supreme Court, #84-5872, prove, in Marc's situation, statewide corruption since the state was never required to deny an innocent due process, could have accelerated release, and is oppressing Marc and aiding a conspiracy through delay/concealment.

HISTORY:From the onset Marc Brown asserted his innocence. He argued that it's not possible for 30+ pieces of glass from a crime scene to end up in his bookbag when no bookbag was used in the crime, and tried to inform his public defenders about his alibi(picture 23). It appeared no one was interested in innocence, only closing a case, even if meant wrongfully convicting Marc, a self-employed techie who only wants to make people's day better. Despite Marc being arrested in a few hours, charged in 36 hours, and placed on national news within 48 hours, the courts fail to offer Marc equal protection by dismissing the case with the same excitement, the same as Alec Baldwin or Adnan Syed(has a hearing in fall of 2024 after supreme court decision in summer of 2024). Marc continues to assert that arresting Charles County detectives Hakim Burgess #589 & Jenna Smith #555 planted the crime scene glass evidence in Marc's bookbag during arrest. That would explain why Marc was a person of interest within hours despite no leads reported by police nor any connection to victim, why detectives collected 100+ camera angles instead of the 2 angles which would have shown Marc and the detectives together(witnesses testified that they did have working cameras covering the arrest and gave a copy to detectives), and why arresting detectives needed to make the arrest instead of calling local patrol which was miles closer. Marc sits in jail despite 2 years of requests for hearings(pics 34,44,50).

A simple hearing would introduce a physical, time-stamped alibi(pics 7,8) against probable cause (pics 9-13), and compare Marc's medium-brown complexion to the suspect's white/fair-skin black complexion, as described by the victim (pics 24-26). Marc initially filed a Petition for Writ of Actual Innocence(pics  3,20-23), filed June 23, 2023. Since then, Marc has filed countless documents in all courts (local, state, federal, and supreme) attempting to prove his innocence (pics 29,43,47,52,61,63,64,66,67). The courts never adjudicate Marc's alibi, using optional procedure to oppress an innocent (pics 29,30,38,68), making a mockery of the judicial process(pics 27,28,40,45,50). Hopefully, the governor of Maryland will act soon(pic 53). In the end, something is critically wrong with Charles County Circuit Court Case C-08-CR-20-000020(pic 51).

PICTURE DESCRIPTIONS: 

Flickr links: 
PRIMARY: https://flic.kr/s/aHBqjBGrxK 
file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/db/11/27595C6A-22CB-4D06-B77C-19ABBDAA344C/staples_scan.pdf

SECONDARY: facebook.com/profile.php?id=61565565552702
facebook.com/profile.php?id=61565565552702&mibextid=LQQJ4d

https://flic.kr/ps/42XA8X

Picture 0: An easy way for supporters to share this page in their area. You simply print out the qr-code and post around your city.

Picture #1- Clerk's reject letter to Marc telling him they rejected his Habeas Corpus Petition and are aware they improperly filed it in his criminal case instead of creating a new civil case just how they did years ago in Marc's old Habeas Corpus case in Charles County Circuit Court case #c-08-cv-21-000110.

 

 This letter also shows that they only send back one form, the request for waiver of prepaid costs, and not the notice of restricted information as required by check box #6 despite Marc requesting both in his letter, picture #2.

Picture #2-Marc's letter to the clerk asking if his Habeas Corpus Petition was filed properly and him requesting needed documents clerk willfully failed to send in picture #1. Filed date is July 17,2023.

Picture #3-Marc's case search link. NOTICE: case takes a while to load. casesearch.courts.state.md.us OR google Maryland case search. Shows how quickly a date for postconviction was setup (within 45 days after Marc requested a hearing September of 2021) (postconviction filed 6-16-2021, hearing set for June of 2022 which was 7 months after clerk notified Marc November of 2021)

Picture #4-Clerks stamp mail to Marc on July 19,2023 (top-right corner) but he doesn't receive the mail until August of 2023. See dates in pictures #1&2.

Picture #5-Judge is quick to stop a hearing by granting Marc's motion to withdraw his post-conviction petition, but took no action to hear his alibi in picture #6.

Picture #6-Judge takes no action to hear alibi, but granted motion to withdraw post-conviction petition in picture #5.

Pictures #7&8- Computer records time-stamp in top-left corner of paper. Marc's alibi document proves he was using a computer when the suspect was on camera at an ATM at 2:15 & 2:20 AM on December 12,2019 in pictures #10&11.

Picture #9-Proof detective Burgess #589 of Charles County, Maryland was involved in the arrest of Marc. Page 10 report.

Pictures #10&11- Proof that Marc wasn't involved because the suspect was using an ATM, on camera, around 2:15-2:20 AM December 12,2019, while Marc is using his computer as supported by pictures #7&8. Pages 12&13 report.

Pictures #12&13- Proof that detective Smith #555 of Charles County, Maryland was involved in the arrest of Marc and that she and Burgess collected no surveillance camera footage of the arrest despite the store owner being present and even bringing out some of Marc's property. Pages 88&89 report.

Pictures #14&15: Denied Habeas Corpus despite Maryland Rule 15-303(e)(2) requiring release if probable illegal confinement and Marc having witnesses waiting to be called for testimony. The denial is the "court" concluding, without a scintilla of evidence, Marc doesn't have an alibi. Why doesn't the court legally and factually disprove Marc's alibi with a hearing?

Pictures #16&17: Second denied Habeas Corpus also assuming Marc doesn't have an alibi despite witnesses waiting to testify. Why doesn't the court legally and factually disprove Marc's alibi with a hearing?

Picture #18: Maryland Supreme Court refuses to grant Habeas Corpus relief without calling witnesses testify.

Pictures #19-22: Marc's Petition for Writ of Actual Innocence sitting in limbo despite Maryland Rule 4-332(j)(1) requiring a hearing if requested and if the petition is in compliance. Page 4 of the petition requests a hearing and Marc has requested hearings 8+ times afterwards. "Judge" makes a mockery of the Constitution by stating "noted. Case closed" on the top-right corner of first page;implying they cant hold a hearing because the case is closed, but will not "reopen" the case.

Picture #23: Public Defender office actually refused to attempt to collect Marc's alibi document, the signs, knowing they are critical to his case, but are willing to waste time looking for useless surveillance video. Denied counsel "performance" and due diligence. 3-point Mickens test failure.

Pictures #24&25: Suspect is described by the victim as either white or a light-complexion black male/fair-skin black. Description is near the bottom for officer McKenzie's report and at the middle or bottom for the officer's notes.

Picture #26: Marc is clearly not white nor fair-skin.

Picture 27: Marc writes administrative judge Hayward James West requesting the removal of Donine Carrington-Martin to no avail despite the judge being aware of the unnecessary and extended delay in holding a mandatory, maryland rule 4-332j1 hearing for a person claiming actual innocence. This implies having an innocent person wait, clearly without cause, is judicially acceptable.

Picture 28: Donine Carrington-Martin officially denies Marc justice when she refuses to hold a mandatory evidentiary hearing pursuant to Maryland rule 4-332j1. Marc motions for a recusal and evidentiary hearing in the sentence above the first signature. She must deny the petition in order to refuse a hearing, which she didn't do.

Pictures #29&30: The administrative judge of circuit court and attorney general of maryland lie about Marc not having an affidavit in his petition, picture 14&15, despite the petition including "history-affidavit" and "under penalty of perjury". Maryland rule, title 1 only requires " under penalty". This, by legal definition, is conspiracy under color of law.

Picture #31: Despite the record being small in size the appellate court still hasn't made a decision on a 2 page petition in over a year.

Pictures #32&33: Attorney general calls Marc's alibi "ostensible", which is a fancy way of saying fake. 

Picture #34: Appellate court denies an evidentiary hearing but still doesn't make a decision.

Picture #35: A different judge properly answered Marc's request to remove a judge in 2021, but the same judge intercepts their own recusal when Marc is actually innocent, delaying justice in pictures 27&28.

Picture #36: State's attorney is quick to oppose release after conviction, but silent when innocence is asserted in pictures 19-22.

Picture #37: Commission of Judicial Disabilities is useless even though judge ignored required rule in picture 28.

Picture #38: Appellate court refuses to explain the delay or grant release. They set a hearing for next year instead of now or when Marc requested a hearing in picture 34.

Picture #39: Mandamus filed to compel judge to follow obviously required rule 4-332j1

Picture #40: Public defenders joke about Marc being "handled" & the case.

Pictures #41&42: Circuit court doesn't send the relatively small picture 31 record on time, in addition to the lies in pictures 29&30

Picture #43: Federal court waits nearly two months to tell Marc his writing is illegible, ordering him to redo or risk denial of relief.

Picture #44: Appellate court doesn't think actual innocence is priority.

Picture #45: Appellate court refuses to offer relief and tells Marc to go back to the very court which is failing to hold a hearing.

Picture #46: Court is quick to setup date for postconviction, picture 3, but still hasn't set an actual innocence hearing, picture 6.

Picture #47: Maryland's highest court doesn't consider exposing corruption as something the public would care about.

Pictures #48&49: Appellate court and attorney general lie about Marc using his newly discovered evidence earlier, though they don't provide proof and specific derails of that "evidence". LexusNexus appellate case csa-reg-1384-2021, there is no mention of any alibi.

Picture #50: Donine Carrington-Martin continues to leisurely make "noted" references to Marc's filings; and innocent person wrongfully imprisoned.

Picture #51: Private investigation takes notes proving citizen gave arresting detectives critical surveillance video, something not mentioned by detectives in pictures 9-13.

Picture #52: Court states Marc's claims of having an alibi as frivolous.

Picture #53: The governor may have more important things to tend to than a wrongfully imprisoned individual.

Pictures #54-60: Marc's most recent Habeas Corpus sent to the United States Supreme Court, Maryland District Court, and Maryland Appellate Court Chief Judges.

Picture #61: Same judge on Marc's actual innocence claim still NOTES Marc's papers without providing any process or updates.

Picture #62: Appellate Court sets a hearing date for ACM-REG-2400-2023 for the year 2025 instead of doing now.

Pictures #63,64: District court denies all of Marc's filings requesting disposition of case, because the court can make its own determination without Marc, but fails to make a decision after a year of inactivity.

Pictures #65&66: United States Supreme Court Justice John Roberts abhors, to CNN, corruption in the judicial system but has as of yet to respond to Marc's corruption claims in his Picture 54-60 Habeas. Mail returned despite correct address.

Picture #67:US Supreme Court collects Marc's certified mail, which is proven by tracking number, but hadn't made any filings. United States Postal Service tracking number "7021 2720 0000 9280 9737" and "9590 9402 6047 0069 7324 48"  (9590 9402 8216 3030 0180 93)(9589 0710 5270 0648 5408 73)

Picture #68:Maryland's chief judge Fader declines to release Marc because the judge doesn't know where he is located, despite writing him back...

Picture #68: Chief judge of Maryland Supreme Court denies Marc release because he cannot locate him, despite writing him back at his address.

Pictures #69-72: Marc's timestamped alibi pictures. The suspect clearly isn't taking pictures while committing the crime, so that cannot be Marc.

Pictures #73,74: Judge denies Marc's actual innocence in case c-08-cr-20-000417. Both trial and appellate judges refuse to explain their reasoning, which makes it a vague order.

Picture #75: Judge implies Marc can be in two places at once. Judge didn't rebut Marc's alibi and we must conclude that the timestamps are valid and the program that printed them reliable. ***On June 18, 2025 (picture 75) judge in Charles County Circuit Court case c-08-cr-20-000020 implies that Marc can be in two places at once. She uses Maryland Annotated Code -> Criminal Procedure -> 8-301a as reason for denial, which means all of subsection "a". 8-301a(1)(i) says that the "claimed" evidence must have a substantial effect on the verdict. Because Carringtion-Martin didn't rebut Marc's alibi, we must conclude that the timestamps are valid and the program that printed the timestamps is reliable. As such, Marc must have been on his computer while the suspect is on ATM camera. Anyone can see the ATM video online and confirm no computer in use. The judicial system is defunct and we must rely on the Governor for a pardon. Please follow the Sharing/Footer section below.Sept6 pre sec:
***Additionally, the judge is obstructing justice and aiding a conspiracy by failing to a.) Deny the actual innocence petition since it is invalid, which is preventing Marc from appealing her corrupt action or b.) Giving Marc the chance to fix the petition in order to progress the case, which is inexcusable delay. Please follow the Footer/Sharing section below.

Picture #76:US federal court conclusively stated there is no record of delay due to 18 month wait with no progress, without showing how the judge is progressing the case. They have also ignored Marc's bail request.

Picture #77: Maryland Appellate Court states Marc can continue to wait/he isn't "due course" as an innocent person.

***Proof the courts are allowing, therefore aiding, a conspiracy(pic 78)***

Pictures
Picture #78: In a civil/financial case unrelated to Marc's innocence a judge, without being asked, vacates/invalidates an order which dismissed Marc's case, causing the case to reopen and proceed. This shows a judge can quickly review a case and then, for any notable reason or error and by themselves, reopen it to do justice. This proves that Marc is being denied his chance to prove his innocence because they personally want him falsely imprisoned. To date, no one has invalidated Marc's alibi.

FOOTER/SHARING:
We need our supporters to get this into the public space. Local, state, and federal judges are failing the constitution, the country, and the people. Follow the below steps.
Step 1:Sign this petition
Step 2:Open you email, create a new email, and put into the subject ->
(change.org) Community abhors wrongful imprisonment
Step 3:Place into the email body ->
chng.it/R7vG8Tvrhw OR change.org/innocence-denied
The community calls on Maryland Governor Wes Moore to act on Marc Brown Jr's initial and supplemental actual innocence clemency/pardon petitions, sent June 3 and July 7 of 2025, and for the release of Marc Brown Jr of Charles County, Maryland, undoing a miscarriage of justice and enforcing the constitution. We also ask that the media give Marc Brown updated television and website coverage, which was done when the case first arose, and share this change link and case changes/filings. These updates will give full coverage for both sides, since crime isn't entertainment, and a solid explanation as to why Marc is still waiting for an innocence hearing, without bond, two years later; we need the truth and immediate action by public service members.
chng.it/R7vG8Tvrhw
Step 4:Put into the "To" field ->
lt.governor@maryland.gov, david.turner@maryland.gov, amanda.laforge@maryland.gov, wttgassignmentdesk@fox.com, tips@nbcwashington.com, desk@wusa9.com, newsdesk@wjla.com, news@wbaltv.com, news@smnewsnet.com
Step 5:Send the email, then share this page across social media as #innocencedenied.

LEGAL:

This is a list of cases/judges involved in the false imprisonment conspiracy. Due to the sheer number of cases, it's unlikely the law was misinterpreted. Maryland Rules->15-303e says a judge "may" deny. But, Maryland Constitution->Declaration of Rights->Article 2 says all judges "shall" follow U.S. constitution. Also, oppressive acts are prohibited even if the procedure is fair-> DANIELS V. WILLIAMS, 474 US 327 above 332, us supreme ct, #84-5872. And, justice delayed is denied-> judge Digges in Stanford v. District title insurance company, 260 md 550 at 554, Maryland Court Appeals, #224, 2-2-1971
Charles Cty. Cir. Ct.: c-08-cr-20-20, c-08-cr-20-417, c-08-cv-23-713[714,724,731,896]
Maryland Supreme ct.:scm-misc-10-2023, scm-misc-23-2024, scm-pet-48-2025[190-2024, 186-2025]
MD Appellate ct.:acm-reg-2400-2023[2315-2023, 1253-2024, 757-2025], acm-misc-60-2025
U.S. District ct: 1:24-cv-00250-tdc, 1:25-cv-00514-dlb
U.S. Appellate ct. 4th cir.:25-1427
Allegany Cty. Cir. Ct.:c-01-cv-25-247[244,245,246,248,249,250]
U.S. Supreme ct.: SEE picture 68

-Trial courts must focus on protecting the interests of defendant -> Davis v. USX Corp, 819 F.2d 1270, U.S court of appeals for the 4th circuit, #86-3705, 6-3-1987 CITED IN Aventis Pasteur, Inc v. Skevofilax, 396 md. 405, Maryland court of appeals, #15, 1-8-2007
-Defendant has liberty interest in justifiable expectation of liberty due to actual innocence -> Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S 238, Supreme Court of U.S., #81-1581, 4-26-1983
-Government has no legitimate interest in punishing the innocent -> U.S. v. U.S. Coin and Currency, 401 U.S. 715, Supreme Court of U.S., #5, 4-5-1971, Brenhan, J CONCUR
-Disclosing corruption in public interest -> Pickering v. Board of education of township high school district, 205 Will county , Supreme court U.S., #510, 6-3-1968
-Government interest in preventing corruption and the appearance of corruption -> Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, Supreme court U.S., #75-436, 1-30-1976
Maryland court rule 4-332j1 requires requested hearing on valid petition 

-Maryland court rule 4-332f gives state 90 days to respond. They didn't respond and that deadline expired a year ago.
-Maryland court rule 18-102.15 allows for misconduct inquiry and basic remedies such as ordering the judge to setup a basic hearing
-Maryland court rule 5-403 excludes evidence that is prejudicial, such as the testimony of the detectives who planted evidence
-Maryland court rule 15-303e2 requires granting of writ if showing of probable illegal confinement. An alibi and fair-skin suspect description is a well enough innocence claim
-Federal Rule 4 of rules governing section 2254 requires expedited writ grant or denial. No decision for basic writ grant, which means probable illegal confinement, from Federal court for 8 months
-Federal rule 2254d & advisory committee rules requires a hearing if evidence in dispute
-Maryland constitution, declaration of rights, article 24 prevents deprivation of liberty without due process of law or judgement of peers. Fabricated evidence prevented court from effective due process and jury of proper decision.
-Due process clause/doctrine prevents defendants from being subjected to criminal charges on the basis of evidence fabricated by the state.

 

Google and search engine key words:
marc brown waldorf maryland 2019 amf bowling alley bowlera atm