Petition Closed

Articles of Impeachment presented by Capitol Hill Blue ranter CALIFORNIA RICK:

 

* Justice Thomas knowingly and willingly falsified information on a federal form

* This matter happened consistently over the course of five years

* Failed to recuse himself when the supreme court oversaw cases he and his wife had clear conflict of interests

* Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly states that a Supreme Court Justice that “lacks good behavior” can be impeached

* The Nixon impeachment debates and Clinton impeachment hearings were ample proof that the constitutional phrase of “good behavior” embraces not only indictable crimes but “conduct ... grossly incompatible with the office held and subversive of that office and of our constitutional system of government.”

* perjury

* 18 U.S.C. § 1001: [Non-applicable exception excluded] ....whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully - (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

* Federal ethics rules are very specific regarding conflicts of interest and potentials for influence

* The last time a supreme court justice was impeached was in 1806 for openly campaigning for federalist candidates from the bench

Letter to
U.S. House of Representatives
U.S. Senate
President of the United States
We, the People, of the United States of America are demanding a full investigation and introduction to articles of impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas for the following reasons:

* Justice Thomas knowingly and willingly falsified information on a federal form (See here: http://legalschnauzer.blogspot.com/2011/01/will-clarence-thomas-get-away-with.html)

* This matter happened consistently over the course of five years

* Failed to recuse himself when the supreme court oversaw cases he and his wife had clear conflict of interests (See here: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/74-members-congress-call-justice-thomas-recuse-health-reform-lawsuits/)

* Article III, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly states that a Supreme Court Justice that “lacks good behavior” can be impeached

* The Nixon impeachment debates and Clinton impeachment hearings were ample proof that the constitutional phrase of “good behavior” embraces not only indictable crimes but “conduct ... grossly incompatible with the office held and subversive of that office and of our constitutional system of government.”

* perjury (See first link)

* 18 U.S.C. § 1001: [Non-applicable exception excluded] ....whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully - (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.

* Federal ethics rules are very specific regarding conflicts of interest and potentials for influence

* The last time a supreme court justice was impeached was in 1806 for openly campaigning for federalist candidates from the bench

In an America where justice is supposed to be blind, the Supreme Court above all others, should practice this in due diligence. This is not the case with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.All of these reports above (thanks to Capital Blue's "California Rick") can be found broadly online and throughout most media outlets. We the People are demanding a full investigation and introduction to articles of impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

Thank you in advance for protecting the Legal Justice System, the Highest Court of the Land, and the United States Constitution on behalf of the American Citizens of the United States of America.