Under these times of global emergency, I ask that there is no more protected Classes (i.e. Judges, Guards Police and Lawayers) in the face of the vulnerable, i.e. the protected categories of the Equality act  2010 UK finding equivalents in EU laws, i.e. immigrants, especially pregnant, disabled, minors, elderly and vulnerable ones, refugees, ethnic minorities or cultures outcasted, LGBT, disabled, people of colour, who are often discrimanated for "their diversity as such" and I include, victims of stalking and feminicide, that is the oldest and most common yet and thus normalised crime.

I ask that it is made a criminal offence for lawyers in particular and police to take reports and act on summons especially to the purpose of emergency eviction, that are based on false allegations or even crimes against the preseumed defendant. This is for the right to equal opportunities, including of housing and legal defence. The crimes alleged should be checked in their validity by the lawyer accusing himself  and by the assessing court itself, as well as the police employed, allowing enough time for the defendant to defend themselves prior to the trial with the relevant police authorities.

Furthermore like universities allow extra time for disabled people for an exam, each according to their needs, even more the courts assessing emergency evictions should give a disabled defendant enough time to protect their rights and elaborate a defence as well as finding a lawyer when their home thus life and safety is at risk.  This is for equal opportunities to life and survival.

I further ask that when housing is involved, in the lighht of global emergency and in view of the inhuman circumstances that the vulnerable would face with homelessens, that 

The issues raised concerning false allegations in emergency evictions, the need for heightened verification by legal professionals and police, and the requirement for increased time for disabled defendants to prepare a defense, touch upon core aspects of civil rights, fair housing, and procedural due process. 
Legal Protections and Potential Criminalization of False Accusations
Illegal Evictions: While illegal eviction is often treated as a civil matter rather than a criminal one, it is illegal, and in some jurisdictions, it is considered a violation of local laws, such as RPAPL section 768 in New York.
False Accusations as Fraud/Perjury: If a landlord or their legal representative knowingly files false accusations to initiate a court eviction, the tenant may have grounds for a lawsuit based on wrongful eviction or fraud. In some contexts, false statements under oath in court proceedings can lead to criminal charges of perjury.
Liability for False Claims: Law firms and lawyers acting on behalf of landlords can be held liable for filing fraudulent or careless eviction cases, with potential liability under laws like the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), particularly when relying on false information.
Police Involvement: False reports of crime to the police, specifically to induce an emergency eviction, can be prosecuted, although it often requires proving intentional deception or malicious intent.  New York State Attorney General (.gov) +4
Equal Opportunities and Disabled Tenant Protections 
Reasonable Accommodations: Under the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), tenants with disabilities have the right to request "reasonable accommodations" to ensure equal opportunity to enjoy their housing.
Time Extensions: A requested reasonable accommodation can include a request for more time to find a new place to live, to seek treatment, or to find a lawyer, especially if the eviction is related to a disability-related issue, such as a hoarding disorder, mental health issue, or behavioral symptom.
Anti-Discrimination: It is illegal for a landlord to evict a tenant solely based on a disability or a behavior related to a disability, provided the tenant can still fulfill the essential terms of the lease with accommodation.  Disability Rights Oregon +4
Procedural Protections and Due Process
Right to Due Process: Tenants have the right to receive written notice of an eviction, detailing the specific allegations, and they have the right to a hearing before a neutral judge.
Burden of Proof: The burden of proving the accusations lies on the landlord, not the tenant.
Contesting Evictions: Tenants have the right to contest allegations in court, which is the proper venue for presenting evidence (such as video surveillance or witness statements) to rebut false claims.  
For individuals facing an immediate, potentially wrongful eviction, immediate steps often include contacting a tenant's rights organization or a legal aid attorney, as well as sending a formal, written request for reasonable accommodation if a disability is involved. 

Consent and Contracts Signed Under Duress 

Under Dutch contract law, a contract must be based on free consent and mutual understanding. If a contract is signed under duress, coercion, or if the individual lacked the capacity to fully understand the terms, it may be voidable. 

 mchip.net

Vitiating Factors: Contracts signed under duress (pressure or threats) can be challenged and potentially annulled in court if it can be proven that consent was not given freely.
Supported Decision-Making: Under the UN CRPD, which the Netherlands has ratified, people with disabilities have the right to supported decision-making, ensuring that the person’s own "will and preferences" are respected.
Challenging Contracts: If a contract was signed because of "undue pressure" or if an autistic individual was not given sufficient opportunity to understand the terms, this constitutes grounds to challenge the agreement. 
 JustAnswer +2

Important Considerations and Challenges

Institutionalization Issues: Some reports have highlighted cases where autistic individuals have faced pressure to enter institutions or, in severe cases of "unbearable suffering" with no prospect of improvement, have legally opted for euthanasia.
Municipal Hurdles: Accessing care requires coordination with a jeugdconsulent (youth consultant) at the local municipality, which can be bureaucratic and sometimes ineffective, depending on the region. 
 Reddit +3

Disclaimer: This information is based on search results and does not constitute legal advice. For specific cases involving contracts signed under duress, consulting a Dutch legal professional (jurist) is recommended.

To have a contract declared null and void (vernietigen) in the Netherlands due to a signature under duress related to autism, you must prove that the contract was signed under "misbruik van omstandigheden" (abuse of circumstances) or "bedreiging" (threat/coercion). In Dutch law, this makes the contract voidable. 

 www.meesterlijk.nl +2

Here is the step-by-step process to appeal or void the contract, specifically targeting the Kantonrechter (Cantonal Court) in Groningen if the case is under €25,000. 

1. Act Immediately (Timeliness)

Under Dutch law, you must act promptly upon realizing you have the right to void the contract to avoid "ratifying" (accepting) it. 

2. Send a Formal Notice (Buitengerechtelijke Verklaring) 

You do not always need a court immediately. You can formally void the contract yourself. 

Action: Send a registered letter (aangetekende brief) to the other party stating that the contract is null and void (vernietigd).
Grounds: State it was signed under "misbruik van omstandigheden" (Art. 3:44 BW) because of autism/vulnerability (3:44, lid 4 BW) or "bedreiging" (coercion).
Content: Clearly explain the duress, the meltdown, or the threat, and mention the autism diagnosis. 
 maakadvocaten.nl +2

3. Gathering Evidence for the Court

If the other party disputes the voiding, you will need to prove your case in the Groningen court. 

Medical Documentation: Provide medical records confirming an autism diagnosis and, if possible, a statement about how stress affects your decision-making capacity.
Evidence of Duress/Meltdown: Collect emails, text messages, or witness statements from people present or aware of the situation at the time of signing.
Proof of Abuse of Circumstances: Show that the other party knew (or should have known) about the autism and used it to pressure you into a disadvantageous contract. 
 maakadvocaten.nl +1

4. Initiate Procedure in Groningen (Gerechtelijke Procedure) 

If the other party ignores your letter or challenges it, you must start a court procedure. 

Court: Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (locatie Groningen).
Procedure: For disputes under €25,000, you can initiate a case at the kantonrechter (cantonal court). You do not technically need a lawyer (advocaat) for this, but it is highly recommended given the complexity.
Costs: Fees are lower at the kantonrechter than the regular civil court. 
 Arbeidsrechter +2

5. Legal Help in Groningen

Because this involves legal concepts like "misbruik van omstandigheden" and mental health, professional assistance is advised.

Juridisch Loket Groningen: Free, basic legal advice to start the process.
Private Lawyers (Advocaten): Firms in Groningen (e.g., PlasBossinade) can represent you if you need to file a formal claim to void the contract. 
 Omnius +1

 

 

 

 

ON THE 10TH OF APRIL AT ABOUT THERE WAS A NEGOTIATION BETWEEN MYSELF AND THE COUNTERPARTY, after a trial I can now fully demonstrate but could not at the time of the trial as the police took only now my report, based crimes committed by the claimants against me, in their entirety. 

I had a neurological meltdown that was loud and strong because the trial turned into something totally different, i.e. in the legalised abuse of my person, from what I had been told the trial would be, e.g.:  

1) just a brief discussion to prove that I have a rent contract that would stand even just as verbal agreement with some 10/11 bank payments pertaining to RENT, which we have proved.

2) I was told I would at least get some 3 months notice and 6000 euros for the damage, with all those defamatory and false statements entirely based on a) data breach of my creative writing thus horribly slandendered in court and b) on the theft of my private parcel with signature forging, which was thus opened, kept for 4 days , then used to file a fake aangifte to the police against me, in which he pretended to have "just found it" in the mail box, when the mail box fits only letters, and this was a sign for as I have demonstrated, he signed in my name.  UPS confirmed it by showing the results also of the map coinciding to our house where it was delivered.

 

3) The lawyer of teh counterparty unlawfully used and discussed a crime against me,  based on the most serious privacy violation, not least the forging of my signature and the violation (ie opening) of my private correspondence, as the main feature of the legalised defamation of my name, the very crime that had just caused me miscarriage. The threats were particularly unlawful because based on the same intentional crime against me, consisting in a fake aangifte committed by forging my signature, stealing and opening my parcel, (while 2 phones were mysteriously reported handed to third on the property other than me and declared “stolen by third parties” by Amazon and Dhl in the previous 3 weeks), thu that caused me miscarriage due to counterparty abuse of police force, and furthermore used for emergency eviction summons the lawyer, without checking the inadmissibility of the lies by De Keizjer told to the police as to have found the parcel (that was by a law a sign for and was signed for as I now demonstrated in full with even a photo of the signature and the map of the location where it was delivered and signed by him at our address).

 I ask if it is not a criminal offence for a person in authority even a lawyer to cause disproportionate damage to the presumed defendant in order to protect their client’s interests, and death because the death of a meant to live child is death. Shouldn't the protection of the interest to the client not be proportionate to the harm caused to the counterparty? As well as the death of the defendant to be faced with unhuman conditions that is homelessness in untanable health conditions. Is it not illegal to make someone under pressure and illegitimate police threats to sign a contract that will cause in effect their likely death and in any case massive discomfort , danger and displacement?

4) The lawyer of th ecounter party refused to use my mediator, my italian trusted family lawyer, who is also my mediator and my legal right to have to communicate with her on my behalf , continuing to send me the information as well which I asked not to due to the distress it caused me

 

5) The Lawyer of the counterparty addressed the wrong courts twice, leading to mismanagement that confused my rent lawyer and prevented my legal defence which I was told i would have time to prepare with the Dutch lawyer because the wrong courts were addressed, first the court wihtout countract,s then when my lawyer showed all the rents and 2 contracts sent via email (the first illegal shed one registered at the Kommun) and payments from the bank mentioning "rent" or "room" or "fees", prior to October to justify rent.

 

6) DUring the transactions I was threatened by the police to call an ambulance because I was crying. the male police actually entered the womens bathroom. The female police should do that, the male police is not allowed in the women's bathroom and should respect people who are crying, that is not illegal, neurological failure is also not illegal. When the police threatens to call the ambulance there is always an implication of psychiatrisation risk because you cannot keep you cool when they are trying to make you sign a death contract, as it was happening, without even allowing me to call my father or trusted family lawyer that was a required "legal adjustment", as the law protecting people with autism and other brain affective neurological disabilities when making legal decisions, without pressure, .

 

7) As I came out my juridish locket lawyer told me if I did not sign I would get nothing, that the guy would not sign no contact, and their lawyer threathened mine that tehy would contine to send the police to my apartment if I did not sign the death contract, and that was an entirely illegal threat, because their false aangifte, as well as being abused in their CRIMINALLY slanderous summons, had caused me a miscarriage, assessed only 1 day earlier because the pregnancy test was still positive and we werent sure until I did the ultrasound the day before the trial. I had just had a miscarriage for abuse of police force (not from the police I am not saying who did not do anything much, apart from askign questions, but from the claimants themselves and in particular from the stalker, the person whom I have obtained a temporary civil restraining order from an italian lawyer that is valid here until I get it transfered, which I will--please before you spread misinformation be awaare that in the EU if a a EU citizen's peace of mind , health or safety is endangered at home by stalking acts, domestic violence or unfair treatment can seek a protection order or TRO from a trusted lawyer in their home country anywhere in EU and transfer it to the hosting EU country through EU injunction. The police did not know this and gave my landlady the very wrong information as well as faililng to take my report for the Christmas Trespass that is a very serious lack of duty)

8) The trial itself was pure legalised criminal slander on the blood of my nth miscarriage, of the nth statement that my life and my pregnancy are not worth the same as theirs, because I am an immigrant, a working class person, and I do not have (nor want for that matter) a man. 

 

9) I signed something in Ducht that i could not even read. They said the dutch lawyer woudl translate it for me but I should have had a translator that i di dnot have time to obtain for free nor for payment. I was told there would  be time for another trial so I was not expecting to defend myself, and had not prepared my defence that was neecessarily to be very long  due to their 21 pages of accusations and about 50 pages of lies and private emails breach against my privacy and dignity being taken to court, again against me. You would sign anything to get out when you have autistic meltdown  and can't breathe in a room full of lies or when you are threatend with a threatening danger (like that admittedly of going to squat somehwere in 4 weeks, as there is no affordable rent in the summer if you have not secured it in Septemebr, everyone knows that, summer rents range from about 2000 here, even for a room , 1500 for a tent pitch) and threats of abuse of police forces  again. 

 

10) I ask the COurt for precise instructions to present my appeal without a lawyer.

11) I ask the court to make a decree that I no longer have to go to the police in Stadskanaal, because I need a neutral police force to take my stalking reports. I have documented to the Court my complaints to the Stadskaanal police for the missing aangifte, as well as that regarding the theft of my ESA which I need because I will never leave the Netherlands without that which will enable me private prosecution of Ms Will and Bertjan de Keizjer, but is to me inaccessible because it was moved as noted in the official complaints aforementioned, without my consent or knowledge  in my  in the name of my landlady without my permission, for which I am still awaing reponse from the Central Police and Outbdsman Nationale. It is my right to do all the missing relevant police reports of the case which the police can only take individually. After the complaints in object and for the disappeared aangifte

 

12) I ask to Juridish Locket for explanation why : 1) their lawyer did not let me deposit my by the court requred defence declaration assessing all points of accusations against me 

b) Why he let the counterparty threaten me with sending more police after I had already demonstrated in any case that the use of police both at Christmas for the keys I used to lock the door to stop Mr De Keijzer from coming to my side of the house and the use of police for a fake aangifte following the theft of my parcel, were illegitimate and therefore the Juridish locket lawyer made a mistake he is to admit which caused me to sign, like I signed on the 23th the police report I attach in Stadskaanal without being able to know what he said, simply because the police told me I had to sign. When I said I wanted to first read it in English at home the police said they wrote what I said. I still dont know what I signed, because I could not read it and this is to signify taht when confronted with the police or threats of others to use the police, my brain is paralised and incapacitated to oppose resistance and to say a firm no that remains a no under pressure. BUt that is not a consent, that is autism and the most severe PSTD. My signatures thus obtained are therefore Null and void.

 

 

In 2026 I got evicted following a signature obtained under neurological failure (an incident that was loud and by all heard) following unlawful threats of further unlawful abuse of police forces.

I am being evicted because of two false police reports made by a legalised Assassin -because an unborn child that was meant with all my heart to live is an actual DEATH  (for the fake police report based on the crime of Mr Bertjian De Keijzer, fake signature, theft and opening of private correspondance-ie. privacy breach-i.e. staling). He caused the very

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is not going to happen that I will let this fall into oblivion . I will fight all my life if I have to, to see this lawyer radiated from the order of lawyers, Julia Will and Bertjiand De Keijzer in jail for stalking, threats, and for the injuries they have caused to my life and maternity, to my ESA pet stolen from my LOCKED room and criminal defamation with the police and courta authorities. I don't do it only for myself, I do it for everyone because I cannot tolerate even the thought that the disgraceful amounts of inhuman abuse I have suffered in this place and in every place where I was defamed with the municipalities of my new home town and with the authorities due to stalking from the very same group of people which I can now demonstrate if there would be just one decent lawyer out there that can work on legal aid. I was told it is almost impossible to find one on legal aid if Juridish locket does not give you one because the police must agree to first to take an aangifte for stalking, which is an almost impossible task in this small provincial village where the police protects the interests of the owners not of the tennants. She showed them a fake charity contract and said I was not renting.  How can she get away with al this? In italy even that is famous for being such bad country for fraud, she would get in endless trouble for renting illegaly. The municipality would send the Finance police, it would be criminal because to deprive someone with disabilities of necessary facilities it is a criminal matter not civil matter.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can you nuliify a signature obtained during or after meltdown, after undue threats to send police to your home?

 

Allmode google:

Yes, a signature obtained during an autistic meltdown, particularly when accompanied by threats of police intervention, can potentially be declared voidable or invalid on the grounds of duress and lack of mental capacity. In legal terms, a contract signed under such circumstances may be invalidated because the party did not voluntarily consent to the agreement, and the threats likely deprived them of the ability to act freely.  Allens +4
Here is a breakdown of the legal principles and steps to consider:
 
Legal Basis for Nullifying the Signature
Duress: If you were forced to sign through threats of violence, imprisonment, or unlawful police action, this is considered duress. A contract signed under duress is voidable by the victim.
Lack of Capacity: A contract is voidable if, at the time of signing, a person was unable to understand the nature and consequences of the document due to a mental impairment or extreme distress (like a meltdown).
Unconscionability: If the other party took advantage of your vulnerable state to gain an unfair advantage, a court may deem the contract invalid.  Lewis Silkin LLP +5
 
Key Considerations and Evidence
To successfully challenge the signature, you will likely need to prove that you lacked capacity at the time of signing and that the other party was aware of this, or should have been.  Anthony Gold Solicitors LLP +1
Medical Documentation: Evidence of a diagnosis and documentation from doctors about your state at the time of the event is highly beneficial.
Evidence of Meltdown/Threats: Any witnesses, security footage, or recordings that show you were having a meltdown and were threatened.
Timeliness: You must take steps to revoke the signature as soon as possible after the meltdown ends to avoid "ratifying" (accepting) the contract.  Sirion +3
 
Recommended Steps
Consult an Attorney: Contact a lawyer to write a formal letter to the other party, stating that the contract is void and unenforceable because it was signed under coercion.
Document the Incident: Write down every detail of what happened, including the threats, the names of witnesses, and the exact time and place.
Do Not Act on the Contract: Avoid performing any actions (such as paying money or accepting goods) that would suggest you agree to the contract, as this can make it harder to invalidate later.  Sirion +2
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. The information provided is for educational purposes based on general contract law principles and should not be considered legal advice. Laws may vary by jurisdiction.

 
 
 

 

 

I suppose not every life is worth the same and not every unborn child. Sure the children of the blond married employee of the local government or police is worth 10000 more than mine and my 8 unborn children.

 

I was evicted on a trial based entirely on privacy breach crimes against me. I will repeat myself here because the shock is beyond human bearing.

Furthermore mocking the immigrant's pregnancy in their criminal summons solely based on crimes, furthermore psychiatrising the woman, to just make sure a child not yet born goes into institution and the "crazy mother" too? Right? Congrats! Well done you! For your clerver use your voice with honour and courage for the weakest in society!

 

The lawyer mocked and psychiatrised an immigrant pregnant woman, survivor of extreme crimes of hate, whose name was changed twice by HER GOVERNMENT FOR PERSECUTORY CRIMES assessed by the same goverment! But of course if it is not Dutch and the Netherlands, whether it an eye witness, a police report, a misccariage or a nullification of signature of a foreigner rather than a Dutch with disablities, the value is not the same, these people when they are in authority, something goes to their brains and they only recognise themselves as deserving of respect. It is a bit like the Comfort Zone story and inferiority complex of them Brits and Vikings alike covered up as superiority obsession. But if you ever go to the Netherlands even on holiday and you are victim of serious crimes like stalking (285b of the criminal code) don't expect they will treat you the same. They will tell you they are busy and let you hang in there for months until you gather your courage, breathe through the refusals of the poice and read them what google says. It is a serious lack of duty for the police not to take a report of stalking, wherever in the country you are and wherever you are resident. 

I repeated to them that  I am going to face the streets and deadly organs infections due to my previous medical history if I go homeless this summer but then there was the pressure for this signature that I did not want to give but under that immense amount of stress, an autistic brain will sign just to get out until you wake up half an hour later and realised what you did. Doesn't matter if you have high or low functioning autism. It's a neurological condition that when there is overload of any manner, the brain cannot process and what you get is not a consent as much as if you take advantage of someone after they got really drunk.

 

Do I need to starve myself to get my NO to be NO?

Hunger strikes are a must when our most vital human and legal rights are violated. 

 I wish an apology from the Court and from the lawyer of the claimants, as it was misguided unhealthy curiosities that got artfully triggered there, while I was accused of being even an IRA terrorist, and then what? Oh pro army! That 's right me a pacifist who did risk her life to do that PhD on non violent societies of peace and their conflict resolutions methods that would heal even the court of Tauton where this all began in 2021 and this one even worse than, that because at least in Tauton they got the landlord to do an undertaking that he could not prevent me from using the bathroom and kitchen nor could he evict me illegaly by changing the locks. 

 

The trial, this trial, was exactly like that 2021 trial where this kind of defamatory stalking really got out of control, was entirely based on a criminal summon based on criminal offences  against me to put my extremely vulnerable existence just needing peace and recuperation,  once again in the streets that is contemptuous and offensive to the dignity of all women and men not only to my own and that of my mother who put me in the world, or of my father who is ill and old and may not even get to say hello to me again before he dies, in knowing me displaced and homeless again victim of the same gang of men that has been stalking me cross country for 4 years.

 

 

 

 

My signature is null and void because I signed under extreme distress and the threats of the counterparty lawyer that otherwise the stalker would not sign no contact, they used the terror he has instilled in me (and in the landlady with my face attached) to make my lawyer make me sign a deadly contract saying that otherwise the police "would keep coming" and this would go on for weeks, yes weeks in which I would have had the time to not lose my home and life, weeks to prove my innocent and do a counterclaim against the psychopat and his protectors. Because of this my signature is null and void like the contract . My signature is null and void because I signed ater being threatened that otherwise the stalker would not sign no contact and keep calling the police against me instead, which is what in the first place had led me to that court with a fresh miscarriage. This is the short of the story.

https://youtu.be/xX8F7VjTiMU

 

I asked can you sue a lawyer for causing you harm and miscarriage by summoning you on false allegations? (i.e. criminal slander with police and court authorities)

All mode google said:

Yes, you can sue a lawyer in the Netherlands for professional negligence or wrongful acts (unlawful act, onrechtmatige daad, Article 6:162 of the Dutch Civil Code) if they deliberately filed a false complaint (aangifte) or acted in bad faith to cause you harm. However, holding a lawyer liable in the Netherlands is challenging and requires proving that they exceeded the boundaries of their professional duties and that their actions directly caused the harm.  Munten Letselschade +1
Key Considerations for Suing a Lawyer in the Netherlands:
Evidence of Knowledge: You must prove the lawyer knew the information in the eviction summons or the aangifte was false and submitted it anyway, rather than simply acting on false information provided by their client.
Proving Negligence vs. Misconduct: While a lawyer has a duty of care, they are generally protected when advocating for their client. To succeed, you must show "abuse of process" or that they engaged in professional misconduct, which may also be reported to the disciplinary council (tuchtraad).
Establishing Causation for Miscarriage: You will need strong evidence (medical reports, expert testimony) to establish a direct causal link between the stress caused by the specifically illegal actions of the lawyer and the miscarriage.
Damages (Smartengeld): You can claim compensation for emotional distress (non-material damages, or smartengeld) and financial loss. However, Dutch courts typically award lower amounts for non-material damage compared to other countries.  ScheerSanders advocaten +4
Steps to Take:
Report to the Disciplinary Board: You can file a complaint with the tuchtraad (Disciplinary Council) if the lawyer violated professional ethics, which is free and often a necessary first step.
Report the Aangifte: If a false complaint was filed with the police, you can report this to the police themselves or file a complaint regarding the aangifte.
Hire a Specialized Attorney: Personal injury and liability lawyers (letselschadeadvocaat) in the Netherlands handle cases involving damages caused by negligence.
Gather Evidence: Collect all medical documents, the eviction summons, and evidence demonstrating the complaint was intentionally false.  Munten Letselschade +4
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a lawyer. Legal procedures in the Netherlands can be complex. Please consult a qualified Dutch legal professional.
 
 
 

 

This is how the hearing of the 10th went, in brief.

 

 

"Dear Counsel, I am I was deeply surprised by the unexpected outcome of today's hearing and that you, too, prevented me from filing a defense brief requesting time limits for my defense and counterclaims. I cried alone for over half an hour, shaken by this unimaginable and hasty conviction, without even giving myself a chance to understand what I was signing, given that I hadn't even had the opportunity to translate the change of claim, which the Landlord served on me only yesterday. The statement that I intend to appeal this scandalous decision immediately, alleging a breach of consent and violation of the right to a fair hearing and the right to a fair hearing. It is indeed unthinkable that in a civilized country like the Netherlands, even the right to file a statement by a party was denied, while also preventing them from having the necessary time to present their arguments at the hearing. Please email me a copy of the hearing minutes and the decision as soon as possible, informing me of the deadline for appeal. I thank you for your efforts on my behalf, and I will reimburse you for any out-of-pocket expenses not covered by legal aid. Best regards

 

La Convenuta

 

 

Yes, in the Netherlands, the police are obligated to take a report (aangifte) of a criminal offense, such as stalking, regardless of where in the country you are or your postcode. While police regions exist, they operate as a single national police force.  lawandmore.eu +1
Here is what you need to know regarding reporting stalking in the Netherlands:
 
1. Emergency vs. Non-Emergency
Emergency (Immediate Danger): If the stalker is currently threatening you, damaging your property, or attempting to enter your home, you must call 112.
Non-Emergency (Recording/History): If the stalking is persistent but not currently life-threatening, you should report it via 0900-8844 or in person at a police station.  Politie.nl +3
 
2. Reporting Outside Your Local Area
Obligation to Accept: The police must process a report regardless of where the incident occurred in the Netherlands.
Recommendation: While you can report anywhere, reporting in the region where the stalking occurred or where you live is generally faster for initiating an investigation. However, you can walk into a 24/7 station in a major city (e.g., Amsterdam, Rotterdam, The Hague) to make a report.  lawandmore.eu +1
 
3. Key Points on Stalking Reports
Bring ID: You must bring identification (passport, ID card) and any evidence (e.g., logbook, photos, screenshots of messages).
Stalking is a "Complaint Offence": Stalking (stalking) is a crime under Article 285b of the Penal Code. The police will generally only investigate if you formally ask them to (called a aangifte), not just by making a general notification (melding).
Stalking Specialist: You can request to speak with a "stalking/domestic violence specialist" (regisseur stalking/huiselijk geweld) at the station, who understands the pattern of this behavior.  Politie.nl +5
 
4. What to Do if They Refuse
If a police officer refuses to take your report, you have the right to request a formal refusal document, which usually makes them reconsider. The Dutch police are obliged by law to process a report of a criminal offense.  ----------------