Expel the members responsible and show commitment to gender equality

The Issue

Following yesterday's (5/06/13) hearing of the two accused of sexist heckling at the Annual Ancient's Debating Competition 2013 the Senate have ruled that there was "no case to answer" - despite eyewitness accounts, an audio recording, and person admissions from the accused on social media. 

These Glasgow University Union (GUU) members brought the University of Glasgow into disrepute over the incident at this year’s Annual Ancient's Debating Competition. Female participants faced sexist abuse under the guise of "heckling": from the constant response of "Shame,women" throughout their speech to sexual comments about their appearance. They were told that women should expect this abuse if they choose to participate in debating and yet the severity of this abuse is confined to the GUU.

The Code of Student Conduct is clear on what behaviour warrants disciplinary action:

iii) Disrupting, or interfering with, any academic, administrative, sporting, social or other University activity;
iv) Obstructing, or interfering with, the functions, duties or activities of any Person;
v) Behaving in a disorderly, threatening, offensive, indecent or violent manner or using threatening, offensive or indecent language (whether expressed orally, in writing, or conveyed by electronic means), without prejudice to a student's right to the freedom of thought or expression;
vii) Discriminating against any Person on grounds such as age, disability, gender, political or religious beliefs, race, ethnic or national origin, sexual orientation or socio-economic background;
viii) Harassing any Person;
xvii) Conduct that brings the reputation of the University into disrepute;

This is not an isolated incidence, but a symptom of an ongoing structural issue. Members of the GUU have attracted public attention on repeated occasions for their attitudes towards women and persist in annually celebrating the men who voted against admitting women into the Union in 1980. [http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/2012/12/07/lamb-still-on-the-menu/].

The women targeted for this abuse have instigated a complaint to the Senate in regards to the iniquituous methods of the investigation; the women did not have access to legal aid, anonymous witness statements were disallowed, and key witnesses were unavailable as the investigation ran through the exam period. [http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/home-news/men-cleared-of-sexist-heckling-at-university.21270098?_=a6c9edb2a1d1f81e4f3a5fbb78a3c8fe6f978453]

Furthermore, a statement from the GUU claims that any action they take will be in light of the Senate's conclusions [http://banishtheboysclub.wordpress.com/responses/] - which is nothing. 

The University of Glasgow Senate have failed to take these allegations seriously and the result of their investigations is unjust. Please sign and share this petition to demand that the complaint of Ms Meredith and Ms Valles be taken seriously and that action be taken against those responsible for this sexist behaviour.

It's time for zero tolerance on misogyny - The GUU is not a Boys' Club anymore

#EnoughisEnough #SexismOffOurCampus #debategate

To see a collection of media and responses on this issue please visit: http://banishtheboysclub.wordpress.com/

Victory
This petition made change with 5,213 supporters!

The Issue

Following yesterday's (5/06/13) hearing of the two accused of sexist heckling at the Annual Ancient's Debating Competition 2013 the Senate have ruled that there was "no case to answer" - despite eyewitness accounts, an audio recording, and person admissions from the accused on social media. 

These Glasgow University Union (GUU) members brought the University of Glasgow into disrepute over the incident at this year’s Annual Ancient's Debating Competition. Female participants faced sexist abuse under the guise of "heckling": from the constant response of "Shame,women" throughout their speech to sexual comments about their appearance. They were told that women should expect this abuse if they choose to participate in debating and yet the severity of this abuse is confined to the GUU.

The Code of Student Conduct is clear on what behaviour warrants disciplinary action:

iii) Disrupting, or interfering with, any academic, administrative, sporting, social or other University activity;
iv) Obstructing, or interfering with, the functions, duties or activities of any Person;
v) Behaving in a disorderly, threatening, offensive, indecent or violent manner or using threatening, offensive or indecent language (whether expressed orally, in writing, or conveyed by electronic means), without prejudice to a student's right to the freedom of thought or expression;
vii) Discriminating against any Person on grounds such as age, disability, gender, political or religious beliefs, race, ethnic or national origin, sexual orientation or socio-economic background;
viii) Harassing any Person;
xvii) Conduct that brings the reputation of the University into disrepute;

This is not an isolated incidence, but a symptom of an ongoing structural issue. Members of the GUU have attracted public attention on repeated occasions for their attitudes towards women and persist in annually celebrating the men who voted against admitting women into the Union in 1980. [http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/2012/12/07/lamb-still-on-the-menu/].

The women targeted for this abuse have instigated a complaint to the Senate in regards to the iniquituous methods of the investigation; the women did not have access to legal aid, anonymous witness statements were disallowed, and key witnesses were unavailable as the investigation ran through the exam period. [http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/home-news/men-cleared-of-sexist-heckling-at-university.21270098?_=a6c9edb2a1d1f81e4f3a5fbb78a3c8fe6f978453]

Furthermore, a statement from the GUU claims that any action they take will be in light of the Senate's conclusions [http://banishtheboysclub.wordpress.com/responses/] - which is nothing. 

The University of Glasgow Senate have failed to take these allegations seriously and the result of their investigations is unjust. Please sign and share this petition to demand that the complaint of Ms Meredith and Ms Valles be taken seriously and that action be taken against those responsible for this sexist behaviour.

It's time for zero tolerance on misogyny - The GUU is not a Boys' Club anymore

#EnoughisEnough #SexismOffOurCampus #debategate

To see a collection of media and responses on this issue please visit: http://banishtheboysclub.wordpress.com/

Victory

This petition made change with 5,213 supporters!

Share this petition

The Decision Makers

Dr Jack Aitken
Dr Jack Aitken
Director of Senate Office
Responded
The University of Glasgow has this morning placed the following statement on our website: "The University of Glasgow has reacted to the reports of misconduct at this year’s Glasgow University Union (GUU) Ancients Debating Championship with serious concern. The University authorities welcome the full and unreserved apology that has already been extended by the GUU President. The University is also supporting the GUU in its investigation into the disruptive behaviour during the contest. The University will not tolerate abusive, threatening or sexist behaviour. "The University of Glasgow operates a clear code of conduct for registered students and any breaches of the code will be dealt with through a well-established procedure whereby any complaints received by the University against individual registered students will be investigated fully, and the resulting investigation reports considered by the Senior Senate Assessor for Student Conduct. "The code of conduct covers harassment. It also covers disorderly, threatening, offensive, indecent or violent behaviour and the use of threatening, offensive or indecent language. The Code also requires action to punish discrimination on grounds of age, disability, gender, political or religious beliefs, race, ethnic or national origin, sexual orientation or socio-economic background." The Senate Office has requested a report from the President of the GUU on the reported misconduct for consideration under the terms of the University's Code of Student Conduct. Jack Aitken Director of the Senate Office University of Glasgow
Ms Helen Clegg
Ms Helen Clegg
Senior Academic Policy Manager (Senate Office)
Glasgow University Union
Glasgow University Union
Gavin Tulloch
Gavin Tulloch
President, GUU
Petition updates