Fund Free Legal Representation for Windrush Compensation Claims

Recent signers:
Barbara Baldeh and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Seven years after the Windrush scandal broke, survivors are still being failed by a compensation scheme that systematically denies them justice. Over 5,500 eligible claims have been rejected. That is a 60% refusal rate with approximately 33% of applicants receiving compensation. 

While Windrush survivors struggle alone through complex immigration law, every other major scandal provides free legal representation:

✅ Horizon Post Office scandal survivors - entitled to free legal representation
✅ Infected Blood scandal survivors - entitled to free legal representation
❌ Windrush survivors - forced to navigate alone

Double Standards Must End

Our Story:  After both arriving in the UK from the Caribbean as children in the 1960s, my husband, Vaun, and I met in the 1970s. While in the UK, we had three children, I joined the British Army and we both worked hard to buy a house in East London.  Vaun, who is of Scottish descent, had a British passport but when he applied to renew it in the 1980s he was told he was not British. Vaun subsequently lost his job as he could not prove his status. We began to struggle financially due to Vaun being unable to find long term employment and we lost our home, this was devastating. As a family we made the difficult decision to return to the Caribbean so Vaun could find work. 

My children later returned to the UK for University.  Both Vaun and I tried to return to the UK and establish that we had a right to live in the UK. However, we failed and throughout the 1990s were only allowed  to enter on  short term visas. The visa did not allow us to work and which meant we had to return to the Caribbean every 6 months. Our children worked part time alongside their studies to help support the family. 

After the Windrush scandal broke in 2018, our lawful right to live in the UK was finally recognised and after all those years and we were given British citizenship.  We made a claim to the Windrush Compensation Scheme and tried to get help from We Are Digital (a Home office funded organisation which supposedly helps victims), but they were useless and in fact not legally qualified.  Our first application for compensation was refused despite our significant submission of evidence, I was shocked.  We were lucky to find a  pro bono lawyer at the Windrush Justice Clinic at Southwark Law Centre. Supported by a team of Law students at King’s College London, our pro bono lawyer spent many hours preparing our claim.  After exchanging many letters with the Home Office and gathering a huge amount of evidence, I was finally awarded £40,000 in January 2025.  However, they are still refusing Vaun’s application for compensation; my pro bono lawyer is continuing to challenge this decision. 

In some ways, I am one of the lucky ones in that I was able to find a pro bono lawyer who gave me free support, there is  very little free support available. So many Windrush Scandal victims struggle by themselves, are refused compensation or simply don’t make a claim, despite their eligibility. 

The Evidence is Clear
New research by JUSTICE, Dechert LLP and the University of Sussex reveals the devastating impact of this injustice:

  • Claimants without lawyers receive an average of £11,400.
  • Claimants with legal support receive £83,200 on average - over 7 times more

This isn't just about money - it's about dignity, justice, and ensuring survivors get the compensation they legally deserve.

Why Legal Representation is Essential
The Windrush application is significantly longer and more complex than other compensation schemes.   Many survivors are elderly, ill, or too traumatized to navigate this process alone. Without legal support, they have no meaningful access to compensation.

The Current Support Isn't Enough
The £1.5 million advocacy fund and We Are Group (previously  known as We Are Digital) support provide just 3-hour appointments to help fill forms - lawyers spend 45+ hours on each case. Even the Home Secretary, recognized this gap in 2021 as Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, stating that legal representation was "essential" and would speed up claims.

The Solution is Simple
Fund independent legal representation from the existing ring-fenced Windrush budget. No additional government spending required - just a commitment to justice. The government launched the advocacy scheme in just two months, proving rapid implementation is possible. There's no excuse for further delay.

We call on the Home Secretary to immediately fund free legal representation for all Windrush compensation claims.

Windrush survivors have waited long enough. Justice delayed is justice denied.

Sign now to demand equal treatment and fair compensation for Windrush survivors.

19,415

Recent signers:
Barbara Baldeh and 19 others have signed recently.

The Issue

Seven years after the Windrush scandal broke, survivors are still being failed by a compensation scheme that systematically denies them justice. Over 5,500 eligible claims have been rejected. That is a 60% refusal rate with approximately 33% of applicants receiving compensation. 

While Windrush survivors struggle alone through complex immigration law, every other major scandal provides free legal representation:

✅ Horizon Post Office scandal survivors - entitled to free legal representation
✅ Infected Blood scandal survivors - entitled to free legal representation
❌ Windrush survivors - forced to navigate alone

Double Standards Must End

Our Story:  After both arriving in the UK from the Caribbean as children in the 1960s, my husband, Vaun, and I met in the 1970s. While in the UK, we had three children, I joined the British Army and we both worked hard to buy a house in East London.  Vaun, who is of Scottish descent, had a British passport but when he applied to renew it in the 1980s he was told he was not British. Vaun subsequently lost his job as he could not prove his status. We began to struggle financially due to Vaun being unable to find long term employment and we lost our home, this was devastating. As a family we made the difficult decision to return to the Caribbean so Vaun could find work. 

My children later returned to the UK for University.  Both Vaun and I tried to return to the UK and establish that we had a right to live in the UK. However, we failed and throughout the 1990s were only allowed  to enter on  short term visas. The visa did not allow us to work and which meant we had to return to the Caribbean every 6 months. Our children worked part time alongside their studies to help support the family. 

After the Windrush scandal broke in 2018, our lawful right to live in the UK was finally recognised and after all those years and we were given British citizenship.  We made a claim to the Windrush Compensation Scheme and tried to get help from We Are Digital (a Home office funded organisation which supposedly helps victims), but they were useless and in fact not legally qualified.  Our first application for compensation was refused despite our significant submission of evidence, I was shocked.  We were lucky to find a  pro bono lawyer at the Windrush Justice Clinic at Southwark Law Centre. Supported by a team of Law students at King’s College London, our pro bono lawyer spent many hours preparing our claim.  After exchanging many letters with the Home Office and gathering a huge amount of evidence, I was finally awarded £40,000 in January 2025.  However, they are still refusing Vaun’s application for compensation; my pro bono lawyer is continuing to challenge this decision. 

In some ways, I am one of the lucky ones in that I was able to find a pro bono lawyer who gave me free support, there is  very little free support available. So many Windrush Scandal victims struggle by themselves, are refused compensation or simply don’t make a claim, despite their eligibility. 

The Evidence is Clear
New research by JUSTICE, Dechert LLP and the University of Sussex reveals the devastating impact of this injustice:

  • Claimants without lawyers receive an average of £11,400.
  • Claimants with legal support receive £83,200 on average - over 7 times more

This isn't just about money - it's about dignity, justice, and ensuring survivors get the compensation they legally deserve.

Why Legal Representation is Essential
The Windrush application is significantly longer and more complex than other compensation schemes.   Many survivors are elderly, ill, or too traumatized to navigate this process alone. Without legal support, they have no meaningful access to compensation.

The Current Support Isn't Enough
The £1.5 million advocacy fund and We Are Group (previously  known as We Are Digital) support provide just 3-hour appointments to help fill forms - lawyers spend 45+ hours on each case. Even the Home Secretary, recognized this gap in 2021 as Chair of the Home Affairs Select Committee, stating that legal representation was "essential" and would speed up claims.

The Solution is Simple
Fund independent legal representation from the existing ring-fenced Windrush budget. No additional government spending required - just a commitment to justice. The government launched the advocacy scheme in just two months, proving rapid implementation is possible. There's no excuse for further delay.

We call on the Home Secretary to immediately fund free legal representation for all Windrush compensation claims.

Windrush survivors have waited long enough. Justice delayed is justice denied.

Sign now to demand equal treatment and fair compensation for Windrush survivors.

258 people signed this week

19,415


The Decision Makers

David Lammy
David Lammy
Justice Secretary
Shabana Mahmood
Shabana Mahmood
Home Secretary

Supporter Voices

Petition updates