Andrew Snowden is the public elected Police and Crime Commissioner (the PCC) for Lancashire.

One of the PCC's roles is to investigate and hold the Chief Constable to account if any evidence is presented to him of such misconduct.

Evidence has been provided to the PCC that shows the former Chief Constable, Andy Rhodes brought a legal case against me, (Paul Ponting), with proven falsified evidence by one of his constables, DC Karen Harrison.

The perjured evidence was brought to the attention of the Chief Constable before a civil hearing where it was shown that DC Harrisons' statement of truth was false (and known to be false)  and that this amounted to Perjury contrary to the Perjury Act 1911, however, Lancashire police refused to record the offence and therefore refused any investigation adding that 

the falsified evidence 'must' be tested in court.

There is no place in UK law to test known perjured evidence before a court in the hope it may deceive the court.

It is alleged that the Chief Constable, Andy Rhodes has committed Misconduct in Public Officer contrary to Common Law by knowingly allowing a Lancashire police constable to submit falsified evidence to a UK Court of Law.

PCC Andrew Snowden has been provided with this evidence and has refused to investigate, stating that the Chief Constable did not make the 'decisions' and that he had delegated the responsibility to others. 

Firstly, PCC Andrew Snowden has not ascertained who made the decision so cannot be sure 'who' made the decisions.  Snowden has only made an assumption that it was not Andr Rhodes who was at all material times the Claimant calling of the civil hearing, the subject of the complaint and the Officeholder making the decisions.

In any event, Andrew Snowden has been shown in law that irrespective of the Chief Constable being granted the power to delegate, this does not give him any power to delegate responsibility and case law Carltona Ltd v. Commissioners of Works [1943] makes it clear that the Office Holder retains the responsibility for decisions made under delegation. it is 'he who is responsible, as stated by Lord Green.

Please sign this petition to pressure the PCC to review the evidence and investigate the offences committed.  A failure by a PCC to do this is a failure to undertake their role as the PCC.  It could be argued that the PCC is intentionally Perverting the Course of Justice by failing to investigate serious allegations of corruption.