We all know what (CPS) puts families through, the (Hoops), making families jump through, only to make more (Hoops) before families/us. It's protocol. Such is this case when filing a lawsuit on the Federal level according to 28:1331which was filed by the Valdez family through District Court in Nebraska, as seen on the previous post of Federal case Filed against Montana CPS and Butte Police. Citizens, must obtain and jump through the (Hoops) by challenging the law, at the first (Hoop), still a Federal matter by a District Court agreeing there is evidence that there is substantiated evidence that there's a violation of the Constitution. That is backbone. Detailed interviews were taken by the Valdez family, who did flee the state of Montana for what was left of their family, after they were threatened by CFSD (CPS). The first child taken illegally was the son of Christian, who even met with the Butte Police with a tape recording (In our possession) of a life threatening in home invasion surrendered to the Butte Police, who one officer was dating his ex-wife. That Dept, had his son removed and said he was on drugs, hallucinating. He was tested, NO drugs in his system and the tape was heard by the Police of the in home invasion, threatening his life and that of his son. The Butte Police, refused to forward that tape to the DOJ Crime Lab, though it was evidence. According to the FBI, it was (Murder for hire) a Federal Crime, but Butte never sent it to the state Department of Justice and "Swept it under the rug." It became evident, that considering a Butte cop was dating his ex, that perhaps one of the intruders was actually a Butte cop. A fee was mentioned of 10,000 dollars to end the plaintiffs life, also, no fear of prison, but was decided to just keep him away from his own son. Valdez passed the CFSD urine test, NO DRUGS, and wanted his son back. Nope! As he and his new wife questioned their authority, they (CPS) threatened to even take away his new wife's kids!! They left their home, furniture, belongings to save what was left of their family. CFSD is now threatening to terminate his parental rights, even as of TODAY. One of the Defendants at CPS, Sara Crowson advised the Valdez family that "You left Montana voluntarily," thus denying that they were under attack by CPS. No, they didn't leave here "Voluntarily," they fled for their lives and who can blame them? The issue here, is our (Hoops.) Yes, the Valdez have to jump though a new set of hoops under section 28:1331 before their District Court, in order to open up the Federal charges, which are, still Federal charges under that docket number. The Valdez chose Omaha, due to being the center of the Civil Rights achievements in Law. They have been contacted as of this day, by the Press and we pray for their courage, tenacity. bravery and endurance to the end in helping all of us to bring to light the horrific treatment we suffer under the Montana Child Protective Services, which is neither. Now, jump through the hoops. The Ninth Circuit Court decision (Federal Court overseeing Montana) against Child Protective Services was sent to the Press and the Valdez family. If you haven't read it in the previous posts, it's in the link below. It is EXACTLY what (We the People) are asking, (WHY DIDN'T MONTANA HONOR THE FEDERAL COURT'S DECISION AND DO SOMETHING?) Montana ignored a Federal Judge and our kids are dying under CFSD care. CHILD PROTECTION SERVICES AND FAMILY SERVICES MAY LOOSE POWER TO TAKE CHILDREN ACCORDING TO NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS by MONTANA NEWS ASSOCIATION What the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals said about CPS and Family Services. ( Camreta v. Greene ) 1. " The court held the seizure under these circumstances VIOLATED the Fourth Amendment" 2. " Several Circuit courts have found that Child Protective Services (CPS) Agents investigating child abuse are the functional equivalent of police officers conducting such investigations and should, therefore, be governed by the same Fourth Amendment standards" 3. " The juvenile dependency system in this country is DYSFUNCTIONAL." 4. " Even Justice Carlos Moreno of the California Supreme Court has noted that the system is in need of A MAJOR OVERHAUL" 5. "The problem stems in part from CPS agents lack of proper education, training, accountability, and oversight." 6." An unwarranted intrusion upon a family may be as devastating to a child as any failure to act in a case of severe abuse." 7. Through misuse of this power - whether intentional or negligent social services agencies have become feared institutions in the minds of many Americans. This compels adoption of a constitutional standard adequate to insure CPS agents and police officers carry out their mandate- to protect children and preserve families where possible- without denigrating the rights of those they are charged to protect." 8. " Judicial Review is essential in the absence of emergency or parental consent" 9. " Experience demonstrates that when CPS agents and police or sheriffs investigating alleged child abuse bypass judicial review, violations of constitutional rights of children and parents often occur." 10. " Allowing CPS agents and policemen to interview children at school in the absence of exigency, parental consent, or a warrant as Petitioners urge, will undoubtedly lead to many more abuses of families.." 11. " The joining of forces, required by CAPTA, between CPS agents and police creates doctrinal confusion under the Fourth Amendment because of the mixed motives of government officials" 12. " One could surmise the only reason these agents went to the school to interrogate this little girl was that they were trying to skirt the constitutional warrant." 13." This has become a widespread practice among police and CPS Agents 14. " No remedy Exists in the juvenile courts for abuse of Constitutional rights" 15. " The vast majority of CPS agents lack the education and training required to qualify as a "professional" 16. " As stated earlier, CPS agents in general are not professionals. The word professional implies a certain level of expertise, education, and training that is lacking in those who generally work for CPS." 17. "This means that 84% of caseworkers who work for CPS have no education, background, or training to work in a field that allows them to make momentous decisions about whether children should be removed from their parent's care, custody and control. By comparison to police officers, CPS agents are undereducated, undertrained, and poorly versed in constitutional principles" 18. "Other systemic issues illustrate the need for a check on the power of CPS agents" 19. " The government's vital interest in preventing child abuse does not require sacrifice of Fourth Amendment protections" 20. ' Money creates a perverse incentive in the juvenile system" 21. " Since the funding is tied to the removal and adoption of children, little effort is made to keep children at home with services to the parents. The longer children remain out of the home, the more money CPS agencies receive. 22. This funding under Title IV-E of the Social Security Act has spawned a huge child abuse industry. 23. "It is the function of the neutral magistrate, not CPS agent, to determine what constitutes probable cause as required by the Fourth amendment."