With hypocracy on full display, Democratic Governor, Maura Healey of Massachusetts, seems vested in aiding a group of high ranking politicos from being outed in a recent brothel raid. The relatively small group of upper crusty “Johns”, (as the DOJ has referred to them) are reportedly comprised of attorneys, lawmakers and possibly includes Judges, their affiliated clerks and any number of other legal support staff. 28 sex customers busted at three locations have been cited, but the count may ignore a larger group that may be indicated in the ubiquitous “little black book.” The issue is that these well-healed defendants, (some of whom could be Gov. Healey appointees), had been collectively asking for judicial protection from being exposed as patrons of an exclusive, high end brothel with locations in Watertown, Cambridge and Dedham from the self-same judiciary, that should be prosecuting them and whose laws some of the defendants have sworn to uphold.

Considering this is also the same MA judiciary within which some of the defendants could rotate through, this may be the definition of a “Conflict of Interest”. The DOJ official I spoke with, informed me that the “Johns” were referred for local prosecution to the Massachusetts AG, while the “Pimps”, who crossed state lines (and possibly internationally), were handled federally through the United States Attorney General. While indictments for the three related traffickers took place, in February this year, Massachusetts AG, Josh Levy announced in December 2023, that the “probes” were on going regarding the “Johns”. A request by these 28 Massachusetts defendants, to sequester the record was subsequently made known to the public, allowing a possible spectacle of judicial double standards to be bantied around. 

While AG, Josh Levy, has put on a show of wanting transparency, members of the same legal community are working dilligently to undermine and deregulate transparency in a seemingly lopsided Court system on a broader basis with this being one of the many dangerous precedents dubious sources have attempted to set during what appears to be a judicial identity crisis. (Read the article below on Secret Courts of Massachusetts). So, no surprise that the currently, unamed, local participants of these illegal sex trade practices, had asked so politely, that their identities remain private. Supposedly this was for the "safety of the public." Really? There have to be some very big names in that little black book for that to be true. While a recent ruling has denied this request to cloak the identities of the known 28 “Johns”, no mention has been made of the black book, the sex workers themselves, whose safety may not be assured and AG Levy has neither confirmed, nor denied the presence of Judges and/orLawmakers on a list of alleged clientele.

Even though there a surprisingly low rate of prosecution for solicitors of prostitution in Massachusetts, certain male lawmakers (and apologies if it wasn't all men, since the identities are hidden), knowingly exposed themselves to potential blackmail, by entering these brothels and participating in Human Trafficking.  However, these “pillars of the community” are certain they are above the consequences…. and why wouldn’t they be? Whether representing the law, or subverting it, regarding any non-federal litigation, any attorney may conduct blatant misinformation in legal filings and a lower court judge may seemingly cherry-pick, applicable statutes, evidence, rules of court, etc…. in any Decision, with apparent impugnity and then bury the court records through a willing underling, making the inevitable reinterpretation of case-law by other lawyers, their paralegals, law students, the media, future litigants, or by private publishing sites, even more ambiguous. In any event, the “Ministry of Disinformation,” is keeping the Appellate Courts busier than ever.

This particular case may be getting spun as being about a bunch of naughty grandpa’s wild night out, but it presents a much stickier situation for Massachusetts Courts, in that, should any of the involved defendants be Judicial apointees, Members of the House/Senate or AG/DA Offices and are subsequently indicted for soliciting sex from an organized Human Trafficking ring (especially if it ends up an international affair), it’s inevitable their identities will be revealed and there is a good possibility that besides the public embarrassment, any number of previously decided legal cases, litigated by any of these legal eagles, could be riddled in all manner of conflicts, possibly neccessitating recusals, restaffing, retrials, or (gulp) judicial reform. As well, any lobbyist caught in the sting, taking big government subsidies may need to be auditted. Any rumored Military chiefs ensnared would also possibly, have to stand down, if National Security and Intelligence have been compromised , or cultivated as a foreign asset. What a clusterf*ck for AG, Levy and Governor, Healey. Literally.

“Freedom of Information Act” will have to wait, because as of this date, it is unlikely that any indictments of these alleged "Johns" have been levied by AG Levy, which means no accessible paper trail yet exists and the compromised parties are still possibly deciding on your Civil rights and criminal complaints. And this is just referencing the 28 found on-premises of a brothel. As of now, there may not be a clear path to exposing our own local PDiddy/Epstein scandal.

Is it too soon to say “QPQ alert?” However, Justice is not supposed to be convenient for the few, the priveleged and the powerful. This is an uncomfortable situation for everyone who is comfortable. But if the law doesn’t apply to everyone, and there are no defined rules, then there is no law at all and it’s a free for all. Has this train already derailed? As a lifelong Democrat, I was under the impression, that our party stood for freedom, truth and justice. Maybe not.

Whether, or not, any of these accused lawyers, politicians, possible judges, or their clerks, are (or were), deciding/tanking my own bizarre, landmark privacy invasion/libel case in Middlesex Courts, is relevant to me, but is irrelevant to the larger issues. This is “need to know” information for all of Boston’s citizen’s who value access to a fair and impartial trial (supposedly afforded to every citizen by the United States Constitution.) Maybe if the “Johns” were private citizens they could have argued “privacy rights,” but many in this group chose to be public figures, and therefore, to relegate their own lordly activities up for public scrutiny. Now that they have been busted, however, they are, of course, attempting to legislate themselves right out of the guidelines they purportedly signed up to protect and the AG seems to be delaying the creation of a record. Will he indict? Will the defendants appeal? Will he release the names? We will have to wait until 2025 to find out if a new ruling disallowing the request to sequester the record will actually manifest and whether these 28 are just scapegoats for a larger community. A community who don’t think the rules they enforce on others, apply to themselves. Time will tell But it’s not just the bigwigs we need to worry about. In a world where a court clerk can scuttle a legal case with your $100k investment sunk into it, just by hiding paperwork for a few months, it would be helpful to know if anyone on the bench is compromised, what support staff may be leveraged and why the audits have not already begun? 

This petition is not some puritanical rant about what is acceptable forms of sex. I have some sympathy, having had my own privacy rights violated, egregiously. But these guys walked themselves into a situation where they would be both perpetrator of crime, a potential victim of blackmail and possibly be forced to continue a cycle of abuse by being leveraged into abuses, or into accepting quid pro quo, in order to deny other people their civil rights and protections. Any Lawmaker caught in this scheme should speak up. 

It has been nearly a year since this case hit the headlines, so, how much more probing does Josh Levy require and just who is probing who? This subject of who the law applies to, is a hotly debated topic, currently and this decision on whether to cloak law-breaking lawmakers has wider ramifications. If the AG refuses to indict and does not eventually release these full list of names, it could impact more than just our legal protections in Massachusetts, as it could set a dangerous national precedent. Keeping these defendant’s names hidden is a slippery slope, as it may perpetuate the ability of bad actors to infiltrate the lower Courts nationally, through blackmail, or as the kids like to say: “sextortion”, giving a nod to prostitution and pedophilia, aka: “Human Trafficking”, creating ripe conditions for money laundering, murder and let’s be real, authoritarianism. Is this what is behind the glossy veneer of Governor Healy’s Boston? 

Because of the known widespread misinformation campaigns that are being implemented  within our national borders by unregistered foreign agents, who knows what hornet’s nest is pulling the strings through these “honey pots”? Setting aside the likelihood that this particular brothel, possibly had the protection of employees of Mass Courts, or lawmakers, through these same unamed “Johns”, let us consider the fact that Governor Healey has also, visibly, been turning a blind eye to a group of ruthless attorneys, (with curious International ties,) implementing hostile take-overs of a variety of Boston’s well endowed, “not for profits” in order to radically "restructure" some of these cultural and financial institutions, (their disappearing endowments, obscenely expensive centerpiece "renovations”, wafer thin annual reports and rigorous votes of “no confidence.”) As well, some of these attorneys are known to be associated with AG Levy. While association does not prove anything, it still warrants a look-see. However, with a high powered roster covering their assets, is it any wonder the same group are all working overtime to deregulate transparency on a broader scale?

Specific disruptions in the Courts, Banks, Museums and Universities, alike, have drawn massive public outcry, to no avail. I mean, haven’t you heard? The Commonwealth seems to be up for grabs. I’ve seen it firsthand and when I have attempted to provide testimony, I suddenly became targeted with some pretty extreme personal attacks. That’s what happens when you kick a hornet’s nest. Because of this I have every reason to be concerned for the well being of the larger community, not just the Trafficked humans belonging to brothels. I have to wonder whether the prostitutes were even US citizens at this point and could  they have been deported? In an age where disinformation rules, will any questions or complaints to the current AG, or former AG, (now Governor) about legal opacity matter?

What is considered complicity in this instance? Some of the people who we rely on to define the law could be defendants in this case, (or at least on the periphery) and their supporters seem intent on muddying the waters. So if you want to fight to retain transparency on the Courts, in our Government and our Cultural Institutions, in Boston (and elsewhere) and realistically want to retain our own Constitutional and Civil Rights and protections, do not hesitate to sign this Petition and share it with as many people who you know. Speak up if you want transparency in the public forum and before you find your rights being subsumed by ruthless hypocrites.

AG Levy and Gov. Healy: Indict and Release the names of the 28 defendants and those otherwise implicated.

Dox Compromised Massachusetts Judges and Lawmakers.

 

Thanks very much for your consideration, 

Sam Starr Cole; making friends.

 

other petitions on this platform:

EndAnonymousDonations2Museums

AuditPEMNow

EndCharitableImmunity4ShamCharities

DemandERsTest4HeavyMetals