Why a lawyer can get away with using a forged police report (because of how it was obtained it is to be considered a FORGED POLICE REPORT USED UNDER OATH) to evict an innocent person at home? WHile that innocent person cannot prove she has not committed those crimes to keep her roof over the head?

 

Can someone explain to me why a lawyer can in every effect become by accepting forged documents and false allegations, a  legalised assassin of people at home, maybe for 2 pounds that they got from the counterparty to do a very filthy job, whereas the defendant that will be expoed to death and assaults and the deprivation of a home, cannot pay in this racist and revolting country even for legal defence ?

 

Can someone explain this to me and the silence all around it? Why the Dutch law does not apply to the ILLECIT THREATS of Police misuses and to my disabilites but it does apply to Dutch people otherwise the law would not be there.

Like eye witnesses count only if they are Dutch apparently.

 

Please sign not only for me but for all Immigrants , as well as all vulnerable and disabled or people from all walks of life not fitting mainstream society who get discriminated, targeted and become victims of hate crimes at home to the purpose of eviction.

 

I never did a diet in my life and I am starting to be a little hungry. It is urgent that you sign even if this petition still needs work to be properly presented, because time there isn't much left and I do not have any professional petition maker to my aid.

 

I am doing this to say NO to legalised assassins that put immigrants in the streets based on false police reports of white and racist criminals, in this case literally. 

 

 

¨I was evicted on false allegation through an emergency summons that was illegal in that it was based on a police report that was deceitfully fabricated and thus used to evict me by committing 9 separate offences all criminal in nature as described below.

 

I was caused miscarriage by the tremendous stress of receiving criminal allegations however shortly and therefore taken to court via an illegal summons based as well as on the aforementioned document on a false charity contract that denied to the fact that I paid and that for 10 months my bank payments were accepted and that our first rental contract had been registered at the municipality as early as July 2025, thus denying to my statuary rent rights, to receive reasonable notice, especially in view of  the damages caused by me by other residents in the property (read on). 

 

My shock was. that a lawyer could use in Court under oath without conseguence to evict a pregnant immigrant who had committed no crime at all and was regularly paying rent, a police report that was obtained through several criminal offences not least forgery and misrepresentaiton of identity, that led to charges that were dropped after 3 days as inherently false. My shock is in the general indifference, in the mocking attitude towards an hunger strike that is for someone who hates diets like myself the sole means to affirm a NO that has been turned into yes by illegitimate police threats on the 10th of April after a trial that on the misuse of police forces was based, with the irreparable damage that that misuse has already caused to me, with neither an apology from the landlady, from her lawyer, or from the offender behind the false allegations and privacy breaches a person whom I have tried to restrict via a formal no contact request as early as Ocotber 2025 and through restraining order as early as 10-02-2026.

 

I would like to try and convey with this petition the sense of unbearable injustice that makes me use hunger strike (though a healthy Ayurvedic one that works with collective sinergy and not antagonism) is the sense of injustice that this can be done to an immigrant, and even a pregnant one by a Court of the modern and "all inclusive" NL. As someone who is not a petition maker and an activist in the way of petitions and upfront policy change of this manner I wish just  to really express here in the way I am able to,  the fact that from a scenario of life that was giving birth and recovering my professional career after head repeated head injuries in recent years  preventing my abilities to continue research, I found myself to a scenario of death where I do not know how to survive homeless in my current health conditions, with a life that was meant to live  is no longer, which I do not mean as the "pro-life" preachers against abortion, but I mean as someone who has initiated the formation of a life that she has chosen to give birth to and is forced to death by the  unnecessary and undue distress caused by undue privacy breaches from a disturbed resident who has involved in persecutory acts of coercitive control against my person to the purpose in fact to slander first to the landlady in order to break the trust on which the rental agreement was based, and therefore with the poilce and court authorities to evict me, via the legal means and status of the landlady herself.

 

I therefore ask that there are no more protected classes, and that lawyers are disbarred to an immediate effect when demonstrably using false police reports in courts or otherwise premeditated ones obtained via criminal offences against the tenant. The law should pay special attention to protecting the rights of protected categories such as those defined by the Equality Act 2010 UK and comparable EU laws relating to immigrants, ethnic minorities, refugees, LGBT, etc. In particular I point to the rights of maternity of immigrants at home, the right to live a pregnancy undisturbed and safely at home, from acts of hate that includes  harassment for mere reasons of discrimination or racism through the misuse of Dutch citiziens of their police forces or court authorities against immigrants and otherwise protected categories generally victim of social stigma or discrimination for their "diversity as such".

 

My strike however insignificant it may be in its individual resonance now, is to ask for no more immigrant pregnant women, vulnerable adults, refugees, victims of stalking and vulnerable adults at home emergency evicted on false allegations and false police reports that are but the fruit of hate and xenophobia. My strike is in the disbelief that these things can still happen nowadays in everyone indifference. I am not a professional petition maker obviously and each time I re read it it seems I should spend days working on it when there is only a few days left for the appeal.

If that fails, in a few days I will be homeless literally for the first time in my life, though I never had a long term home I never went completely homeless. THis is happening all very fast and so spare with me as the text here changes because I notice typing errors and faulty syntax.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In these times of global emergency I ask that there is no more protected categories up above in the socio economic pyramid, in the face of protected categories (ie. Equality Act 2010 and Dutch equality laws 2003) including refugees, immigrants, ethnic or cultural minorities, especially pregnant women, LGBT, vulnerable people with disabilities, people of colour, the elderly etc. are protected in their inviolability at home and that it may be laid on lawyers of the Claimant asking for emergency eviction  based on criminal allegations the burden to prove the validity and truthfulness both of the police report upon which the claim is based, as well as the fact that criminal charges still stand. The lawyers that fail to do that should be disbarred. The courts that sign literally death sentence of vulnerable individuals based on false or forged documents without first checking the viability of the allegations, should be suspended and investigated by the Higher Court for evicting fragile or marginalised individuals from their home without sufficient time and compensation to do so safely, without a direct risk to their life and survival, especially after aggravating health conditions or within six months from recent injuries. 

 

 

 

A draft of the Appeal

---------------------------In Italiano (below you also find it in English translated with Deepl. I do apologise, I did not have time to check the English translation yet, due to the short time still available to appeal and pack my things in case it is unsuccessful.)

 

 

 

Alla Gentile Attenzione Di

 

Objection and Appeal Department

Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden »
 Locatie Leeuwarden
 

Wilhelminaplein 1

8911BS

Leeuwarden

 

 

In copy to : 

 

Vrouwe Justitiaplein 1
3511 EX Utrecht

 

e in copia a

 

Civil Court of Groningen

Guyotplein 1

postal code 

Groningen

 

<Emmen, 27.04.2026>

 

Decision reference: <decision number>

 

Object: Direct Appeal (Hoger Beroep), and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction of immediate relief to prevent irreparable damage

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Egregio Tribunale,

 

Con la presente presento opposizione alla Sua decisione del 10.04.2026, numero di protocollo C/18/254746/KG ZA-26115, unitamente a una richiesta di ingiunzione preliminare per un provvedimento immediato volto a prevenire danni irreparabili (“Preliminary Injunction of immediate relief to prevent irreparable damage”) ossia alla mia salute, sopravvivenza e sicurezza) che non potrebbero essere compensati in seguito con un risarcimento monetario. Allego inoltre un atto di appello per la copertura delle spese legali, in quanto beneficiario del patrocinio a spese dello Stato.

 

Allego la memoria difensiva , l’accordo che ho firmato

 

Premesso in Fatto che la sottoscritta

1. In data 13 marzo 2026 é stata citata in giudizio davanti al tribunale di Groningen per il Giorno 10 aprile 2026 con la seguente richiesta di sfratto, ovvero che io vacassi gli immobili entro il 18 marzo 2026 per motivi di urgenza sostenendo che io fossi ospite senza alcuna forma di contratto.[1]

 

2. La scrivente ha affidato la sua difesa all’avvocato X, il quale si é costituito nel suo interesse chiedendo di respingere le richieste della locatrice (allegato 2 la comparsa di costutituzione di Martjin Vandale) in particolare allegando l’esistenza di due contratti scritti di cui il primo è stato registrato con la mia residenza in data 17 luglio 2026, e plurimi pagamenti dal 15 giugno 2026 tramite banca.[2] 

 

3. In via transattiva il mio avvocato X, mi aveva garantito di essere fiducioso di poter ottenere un rilascio in almeno 3 mesi con un risarcimento danni di 6/7000 euro.

 

4. Dopo di che il giorno prima dell’udienza nel tardo pomeriggio circa ricevevo da parte della locatrice un nuovo ordine di comparizione davanti al tribunale diverso sostenendo ora invece l’esistenza di un rapporto di comodato gratuito a titolo caritatevole.[3] 

 

5. E nell’incertezza della possibilitá di trovare una soluzione conciliativa tramite il mio difensore Italiano, avvocato Umberto Fantini, ho fatto pervenire all’Avvocato X una mia autodifesa sottoscritta come previsto per legge anche al fine di evitare una mia interrogatorio  diretto nelle mie condizioni di salute mi avrebbe potuto provocare grave stress ed episodi neurologici inerenti a  due disturbi neurologici concomitanti,[4]  ed difficoltá di comunicazione anche perché non conosco la lingua officiale. 

 

6. Nonostante le rassicurazioni del Difensore sono stata  interrogate dal Giudice, senza che sia stata depositata la mia auto-difesa scritta, cosa che ha comportato per me un grave disorientamento anche emotivo, non essendo in grado da sola, senza quell’importante supporto cartaceo con relative prove documentali di sostenere le ragioni principali delle mie difese di cui avevo preventivamente discusso in data 7 aprile  e sottoposto all’attenzione dell’Avvocato X, prima delle ore 15 come da lui richiesto.[5]

 

7. A questo punto il Giudice dopo avermi sentita ha chiesto di procedere a un tentativo di conciliazione nonostante l’avvocato mi avesse prospettato che l’udienza avrebbe avuto ad oggetto solo la discussione sull’esistenza o meno di un rapporto di locazione provata ad ogni modo dai pagamenti accettati dalla controparte dal 15 giugno 2025 fino al 24 febbraio 2026 e  spostamento della causa a una corte di competenza .

In tale contesto ho insistito con il Giudice per depositare la mia difesa scritta, senza che venisse immotivatamente acquisita. Tale sostanziale rifiuto da me percepito come ingiusto e illegittimo un grave disagio sfociato poco dopo in un meltdown autistico allorquando mi è stato impedito di chiamare mio padre e il difensore italiano che assistita nel redigere la memoria difensiva per chiedere consiglio su come comportarmi di fronte una inaspettata e assolutamente inagibile richiesta di rilasciare l’immobile in 6 settimane con un risarcimento irrisorio di 500 euro.

8.In questa situazione dopo essermi rifugiata in bagno per il suddetto meltdown neurologico su intervento della polizia sono rientrata in sede di negoziazione e nonostante i miei dichiarati rifiuti, su insistenti pressioni da parte della controparte relative nuovamente all’abuso delle forze di polizia a casa riferitemi dal mio avvocato olandese,[6] sono stata mio malgrado costretta a sottoscrivere tale vessatorio accordo che mai liberamente avrei accettato laddove fossi stata messa in condizione di consultarmi con mio padre e il legale di famiglia.

9. Ad epilogo di tale controversa vicenda dopo avere conferito con mio padre sono immediatamente rientrata in tribunale circa un’ora dopo e ho chiesto ufficialmente di invalidare l’atto di transazione per vizio di consenso come da lettera allegata depositata in tribunale per nullificare la mia firma.[7]

 

Nelle more in piu riprese ho sollecitato il mio difensore Avvocato ad annullare il contratto[8] a impugnare il predetto accordo non ricooscendone la validitá in quanto mi ritroveró tra pochi giorni senza altra abitazione, esposta a danni alla salute e alla mia incolumitá pregiudicando anche il mio equilibrio psicofisico per vulnerabilitá mediche certificate di cui sono affetta.[9] 

Diritto:

A seguito di tali fatti, in prossimitá della scadenza dell’appello non avendo avuto risposta affermativa da parte dell’avvocato Vandalen e non disponendo di altri legali mi trovo quindi costretta a depositare la presente impugnazione personalmente, come consentito dalla Legge, riservandomi di nominare un difensore per la discussione dell’Appello. In diritto tengo a sottolineare che la nullitá dell’accordo vidimato dal tribunale trae la sua ragion d’essere anche dalle circostanze legali e fattuali che seguono.

 

Vizi procedimentali e lesione del diritto di difesa

in primo luogo va sottilineato che il repentino spostamento di competenza del tribunale comunicato il giorno prima senza che io mi potessi capacitare delle implicazioni legali che ció comportava, ha leso in radice il mio diritto di difesa, impedendomi addirittura durante l’udienza di consultarmi telefonicamente con mio padre e il legale di Milano che aveva predisposto le mie difese.

 

Immissione di prove false nel processo:

a)     Il cambiamento della domanda, fondata non piu sull’assenza di qualsiasi contratto, bensi su un rapporto di comodato gratuito a titolo caritatevole, trae origine da false attestazioni rese all’autoritá giudiziaria. Infatti non ho mai sottoscritto il contratto depositato dalla controparte il giorno prima dell’udienza che non ho neppure modo di visionare prima di essa, e che comunque disconosco in quanto ho sempre pagato, come dimostro dai pagamenti bancari richiesti e accettati dalla controparte fino a pochi giorni prima precedenti alla richiesta di sfratto. [10]

b)     Inoltre  la domanda di sfratto si fonda su presupposti calunniosi[11] come evidenziato nella memoria di autodifesa a cui per brevitá si rinvia [12] in particolare su una denuncia pretestuosa scaturente dalla sottrazione di un pacco postale rilasciabile solo su firma e identificazione, con falso di firma e interpretazione di identitá[13] che è stato utilizzato per mettermi in cattiva luce davanti al tribunale e farmi passare come soggetto pericoloso, quando in realtá la mia persona nel luogo della sua residenza è stata vittima di una serie gravi violazioni della privacy, calunnie e maltrattamenti su basi puramente discriminatorie.

 

 

Domanda Cautelare 

In considerazione dell’imminente data di rilascio fissata per il 22 maggio 2026 chiedo in via preliminare una “injunction di immediate relief to prevent irreparable damage” chiedendo nuovamente l'annullamento della mia firma non consensuale.

 

 

 
[1] (allegato 1),
[2] (allegati 2 e 3 e 4 pagamenti)
[3] allegato 5
[4] Allegati 4,5,6)
[5] (allegato 7)
1)     [6] In the Netherlands, lawyers are bound by strict ethical rules (Gedragsregels) that prevent them from pressuring any client—autistic or otherwise—into accepting a settlement or action they have already rejected and to protect the interests of their clients according to their desires and personal means. A contract is voidable if, at the time of signing, a person was pressured and/or unable because of a less than calm state of mind to understand and consensually agree to the nature and the full extent of the consequences of the document due to a mental impairment or extreme distress (like autistic meltdown, shutdown or sensory overload that neuroscientific studies have compared to torture and found to incapacitate the brain from processing decisions as well as information correctly ), or if the document was written in a foreign language without a sworn translation that is a legal requirement. Unconscionability: If the other party took advantage of your vulnerable state to gain an unfair advantage, a court may deem the contract invalid. The other party was well aware of my autism as well as the rest of the fact undue police visits to the house, had been causing me massive distress culminating in the recent miscarriage.

 

2)     Consent and Contracts Signed Under Duress 

Under Dutch contract law, a contract must be based on free consent and mutual understanding. If a contract is signed under duress, coercion, or if the individual lacked the capacity to fully understand the terms, it may be voidable. In the Netherlands, lawyers (advocaten) are bound by strict ethical rules (Gedragsregels) that prevent them from pressuring any client—autistic or otherwise—into accepting a settlement or action they have already rejected. I have said No more than once to my Solicitor Mr Vandlen regarding the unatenable proposal of the counterparty (6 weeks and 500 euros compensation) which in fact caused me a severe meltdown that was further used to obtain my denied consent. Under the Code of Conduct of the Netherlands Bar Association (NOvA), the following principles apply:

(i)                Duty of Care and Independence: A lawyer must act in the best interests of the client. If a client clearly states "no" to a proposal, pressuring them against their will violates this duty.

(ii)               Informed Consent: Similar to medical ethics, legal representation requires that the client understands and agrees to decisions. A "no" indicates a lack of consent, and forcing a decision negates the autonomy of the client.

(iii)              Protection of Vulnerable Clients: While not specific to autism, the law does not allow lawyers to take advantage of a client’s potential difficulties with communication or high-pressure situations.If an attorney pressured an autistic person into signing or agreeing to something after they said no, it could be considered a breach of professional ethics, for which a complaint can be filed with the local disciplinary board (Raad van Discipline).

·       Vitiating Factors: Contracts signed under duress (pressure or threats) can be challenged and potentially annulled in court if it can be proven that consent was not given freely.

·       Supported Decision-Making: Under the UN CRPD, which the Netherlands has ratified, people with disabilities have the right to supported decision-making, ensuring that the person’s own "will and preferences" are respected.

·       Challenging Contracts: If a contract was signed because of "undue pressure" or if an autistic individual was not given sufficient opportunity to understand the terms, this constitutes grounds to challenge the agreement. 

 
[7] Allegato 8
[8] (allegato 9 email del 10 aprile e di Fantini ) On the 10th of April whilst in the Court to nullify the signature (10.04.2026)  I have sent a Formal Notice (Buitengerechtelijke Verklaring)  to the counterparty,[8] as required by the Dutch Law, in this case an email (aangetekende brief) to the other party lawyer and to my lawyer  stating that the contract is null and void (vernietigd) on the grounds it was signed under "misbruik van omstandigheden" (Art. 3:44 BW) because of autism/vulnerability (3:44, lid 4 BW) or "bedreiging" (i.e. excessive coercion, as an autistic person should never be pressured after the first no, that should be considered final or else the ability to consent will be compromised).
Content: Clearly explain the duress, the meltdown, or the threat, and mention the autism diagnosis
[9] (allegati 5, 6 e 7)
[10] (allegato pdf pagamenti che da soli giá stabiliscono il rapporto d’affitto secondo la legge). This is established through a combination of Dutch Contract Law (Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 6) and Dutch Tenancy Law (Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 7), which recognize that verbal agreements are legally binding. When a tenant pays rent via bank transfer, and the landlord accepts it, this serves as strong evidence of a "mutual agreement of intent" (wilsovereenstemming) that a tenancy exists. Article 7:201 Dutch Civil Code (BW): Defines a rental agreement as one party providing property and the other providing a payment (quid pro quo). Article 6:217 Dutch Civil Code (BW): Establishes that a contract is formed through an offer and acceptance, which can be done in any form—written, verbal, or, in this case, implicitly through action (payment). Bank payments are legal proof of the existence of a lease, even if a written contract does not exist. The Good Landlordship Act (Wet goed verhuurderschap) furthermore since July 1, 2023, mandates that while an oral agreement is still legally binding, the law mandates that the landlord must provide a written contract, particularly to ensure the tenant has security of tenure and clear terms. Protection: Even without a written contract, tenants who can prove their tenancy (e.g., through bank records, registered address, or correspondence) are fully protected under Dutch law.
[11] The points raised concerning the need for accountability in legal proceedings, illegal eviction being treated often as a civil case when they are in some states (i.e. New York in the USA) and cases in the EU where the irreparable harm was established after-or before death, by a good lawyer, as criminal cases when attacking vulnerable adults or protected categories (e.g. the disabled, ethnic minorities , pregnant immigrants and ethnic minorities, where even the theme of genocide may be seen to play a fierce role along with that of prevented maternity) the due verification of allegations by police and lawyers, and the protection of disabled defendants’ rights in emergency evictions touch upon fundamental principles of access to justice, fair trial rights, and equality. 

Key considerations regarding these issues include Due Process & Verification, in that Legal systems generally do require public prosecutors to investigate and verify evidence in an emergency eviction summon employing furthermore the misuse of police forces,[11] and before it reaches court, allowing defendants to challenge evidence and present their side, thus limiting the viability of False accusations: While taking action on knowingly false allegations by police or lawyers is already subject to professional misconduct rules and criminal laws regarding perjury or perverting the course of justice, strengthening mechanisms for verifying the validity of allegations before emergency actions is a recurring topic in procedural law reform involving procedural Rights for Vulnerable Individuals: Legal systems often should and do have provisions, such as mandatory legal representation or specialized hearings, to ensure disabled individuals can participate effectively in court proceedings, including eviction cases. This include the right  to Reasonable Accommodation: The principle of providing reasonable accommodation in legal processes—similar to educational settings—aims to allow individuals with disabilities to prepare a defense, secure legal counsel, and protect their rights to housing, safety, and life.  Ensuring the validity of charges and providing necessary time for defense, particularly for vulnerable individuals, are central to the fair trial rights protected under various national and international laws.

 

 
[12] (allegato 7)
[13] PL001….. Laws that were broken Key Legal Aspects solicitor Vlierhuis should have known and the Court should have checked before trial along with the validity of the claims against an autistic pregnant person:

 

It is illegal in the Netherlands to deliver weapons purchased online without a signature under the Wet wapens en munitie (WWM - Weapons and Ammunition Act). Specifically, the law requires strict identification and verification upon delivery to ensure weapons do not fall into unauthorized hands. Key legal points include: Mandatory Verification: According to the WWM, sellers must verify the identity and age (18+) of the recipient. The Seller, SEM Schietport, had indeed verified my identity prior to delivery, as well as sending the parcel on 23.03.2026 after my cancellation on 21.03.2026, less than 24 after accepting the offered replacement.

(i)                                       Signature & Personal Delivery: Orders involving weapons (including airsoft and certain knives) are 

          typically sent via specialized courier services that require a signature from the person who ordered     

          them, preventing delivery to neighbors or leaving them at the doorstep. Categories I-IV: The WWM 

          classifies weapons into categories. Delivering Category I (prohibited weapons like butterflies) or       

          Category II/III (firearms) without strict verification is illegal. Consequences: Violation of these regulations 

          can lead to criminal prosecution, forfeiture of the weapon, and heavy fines or imprisonment for the 

          sender and courier under the WWM.

(ii)                                      Forgery of Documents (Valsheid in geschrifte): According to Article 225 of the Dutch Criminal Code, it is    

          illegal to forge a document (including a police report) or to use a falsified document with the intent to    

          deceive others, particularly . Using a document that you know (or should know) is forged is treated as   

          severely as creating the forgery itself, with a maximum penalty of up to six years in prison or a significant  

          fine.

(iii)                                     False Report (Aangifte): Making a false report to the police is a criminal offense. The act of filing the report   

          itself is an investigation that, if dishonest, can lead to charges of fraud or perjury. 

(iv)                                     Definition of a False Report: A report is legally "false" if the reporter knows the information is untrue or 

     fabricated when providing it. Malice and Intent: A report is often considered a false report or "public   

     mischief" if it is done out of revenge or to divert suspicion from oneself, rather than from a genuine belief 

     that a crime occurred. Legal Consequences: Knowingly making a false report is a criminal offense, 

     potentially leading to charges such as public mischief, wasteful employment of police time, or perverting 

     the course of justice.

(v)                                      Evidence Admissibility: While Dutch courts have a relatively flexible approach to evidence and may not always automatically exclude illegally obtained documents, intentionally using a forged document is a separate criminal act, and the court can exclude evidence that is found to be unreliable or obtained through serious breach of procedure. 

 

 

 
[

-----------

 

 

To

Objection and Appeal Department
Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwarden » 
Location Leeuwarden

Wilhelminaplein 1
8911BS
Leeuwarden

In copy to:

Vrouwe Justitiaplein 1
3511 EX Utrecht

Go to

Civil Court of Groningen
Guyotplein 1
postal code
Groningen

<Emmen, 04.27.2026>

Decision reference: <decision number>

Object: Direct Appeal (Hoger Beroep), and Motion for a Preliminary Injunction of immediate relief to prevent irreparable damage

 

 

 

Dear Court,

I hereby file an appeal against your decision of April 10, 2026, file number C/18/254746/KG ZA-26115, together with a request for a preliminary injunction for immediate relief to prevent irreparable damage (i.e., my health, survival, and safety) that could not be compensated for later with monetary compensation. I also attach a notice of appeal for coverage of legal costs, as I am a recipient of legal aid.

I attach the defense brief, the agreement I signed.

Whereas, the undersigned
1. On March 13, 2026, I was summoned to appear before the Groningen court for April 10, 2026, with the following request for eviction: that I vacate the premises by March 18, 2026, for reasons of urgency, claiming that I was a guest without any form of contract.

2. The undersigned entrusted her defense to attorney X, who appeared on her behalf, requesting that the landlord's requests be rejected (Annex 2: Martjin Vandale's statement of appearance), specifically alleging the existence of two written contracts, the first of which was registered with my address on July 17, 2026, and multiple payments made via bank since June 15, 2026.

3. As a settlement, my lawyer, X, assured me that he was confident he could obtain a release within at least three months with compensation of €6,000-€7,000 in damages.

4. Afterwards, around the late afternoon of the day before the hearing, I received a new summons from the landlord to appear before a different court, now claiming instead the existence of a charitable loan agreement.

5. And given the uncertainty of the possibility of finding a conciliatory solution through my Italian lawyer, Umberto Fantini, I sent Attorney X a signed self-defense statement, as required by law, also to avoid direct questioning of me, given my health conditions, which could have caused me severe stress and neurological episodes related to two concomitant neurological disorders, as well as communication difficulties, especially since I do not know the official language.

6. Despite the Defense Attorney's assurances, I was questioned by the Judge without having filed my written self-defense. This caused me serious disorientation, including emotional disorientation, as I was unable, on my own, without that important paper support and related documentary evidence, to support the main arguments of my defense, which I had previously discussed on April 7 and submitted to Attorney X before 3:00 PM, as requested.

7. At this point, after hearing me, the Judge asked for a conciliation attempt, despite the attorney's explanation that the hearing would only focus on the existence or otherwise of a rental agreement, proven in any case by the payments accepted by the opposing party from June 15, 2025, to February 24, 2026, and that the case would be transferred to a competent court.
In this context, I insisted the Judge file my written defense, but it was not unreasonably accepted. This substantial refusal, which I perceived as unfair and illegitimate, caused serious distress that soon afterward resulted in an autistic meltdown when I was prevented from calling my father and the Italian lawyer who assisted me in drafting the defense brief to ask for advice on how to deal with an unexpected and absolutely uninhabitable request to vacate the property within six weeks with a paltry compensation of €500.
8. In this situation, after having taken refuge in the bathroom due to the aforementioned neurological meltdown, I returned to the negotiation session upon police intervention.

 

Despite my stated refusal, under persistent pressure from the opposing party, again regarding the abuse of police force at my home, as reported to me by my Dutch lawyer, I was reluctantly forced to sign this vexatious agreement, which I would never have freely accepted had I been able to consult with my father and the family lawyer.
9. As a conclusion to this controversial matter, after conferring with my father, I immediately returned to court about an hour later and officially requested that the settlement agreement be invalidated due to a lack of consent, as per the attached letter filed in court to nullify my signature.

In the meantime, I have repeatedly urged my lawyer to annul the contract and challenge the aforementioned agreement, rejecting its validity, as in a few days I will find myself without another home, exposed to harm to my health and safety, and also jeopardizing my psychophysical balance due to certified medical vulnerabilities from which I suffer.
Legal:
Following these facts, as the appeal deadline approaches, having received no affirmative response from Attorney Vandalen and having no other lawyers, I am therefore forced to file this appeal personally, as permitted by law, reserving the right to appoint counsel for the hearing of the appeal. Legally, I would like to emphasize that the invalidity of the agreement certified by the court also derives its rationale from the following legal and factual circumstances.

Procedural Defects and Violation of the Right to a Defense
First, it should be emphasized that the court's sudden shift of jurisdiction, communicated the day before without my being able to fully understand the legal implications, fundamentally violated my right to a defense, even preventing me from consulting by telephone with my father and the Milan lawyer who had prepared my defense during the hearing.

Introduction of false evidence into the proceedings:
a) The change in the application, no longer based on the absence of any contract, but rather on a free loan agreement for charitable purposes, stems from false declarations made to the judicial authorities. In fact, I never signed the contract filed by the opposing party the day before the hearing, which I have no way of even reviewing beforehand, and which I, in any case, disown because I have always paid, as demonstrated by the bank payments requested and accepted by the opposing party up until a few days prior to the eviction request.
b) Furthermore, the eviction request is based on defamatory assumptions, as highlighted in the self-defense brief, to which reference is made for brevity. This concerns a specious complaint arising from the theft of a postal package that could only be released upon signature and identification. This false signature and identity theft were used to discredit me in court and make me appear dangerous, when in reality, I was the victim of a series of serious violations of privacy, slander, and mistreatment at my place of residence on purely discriminatory grounds.

Precautionary Request
In light of the imminent release date of May 22, 2026, I seek a preliminary injunction of immediate relief to prevent irreparable damage, again requesting the annulment of my non-consensual signature.

-----------

My complaint a Juridish Locket:  In Italiano and English (below)

 

L'attivita svolta dall'avvocato X in data dal 7 al 10 aprile 2026, ritengo gravemente carente della difesa dei miei interessi principali e piú immediati in quanto ha privilegiato un accordo transattivo piú proteso ad una sommaria risoluzione della controversia come sollecitato dalla controparte (rilascio entro 6 settimane  e liquidazione di un danno simbolico) piuttosto che la conservazione della locazione per un periodo equo rispetto alla natura del rapporto locativo e alla legislazione vigente che privilegia l'interesse del conduttore quale soggetto piú debole. 

 

Ritengo infatti che non mi sia stata fornita una adeguata informativa in quanto mi sono trovata costretta a sottoscrivere mio malgrado nonostante ripetuti rifiuti, una transazione che non avrei mai liberamente accettato se non fossi stata sottoposta a ripetute pressioni e non mi fosse stato prospettato l'ingiusto male di venire perseguita con accuse false e ulteriore abusive richieste di intervento delle forze di polizia presso il mio domicilio con ingerenze nella mia vita privata.

Tutto ció, senza informarmi che se avessi accettato la (inaccettabile) transazione la causa sarebbe durata un periodo certamente molto piú lungo di sei settimane, nel corso del quale avrei potuto espletare il mio diritto di difesa e depositare prove sulla falsitá delle accuse e la falsitá delle denunce criminali a mio carico su cui si basava, oltre alle irreogolaritá procedimentali, che l'avvocato X si é rifiutato ingiustificatamente rifiutato di produrre, ostacolandomi anche la richiesta da me fatta attraverso il giudice che mi invitava a depositare l'atto tramite il mio difensore.

 

----ENG-------------

 

I believe that the work carried out by attorney X from April 7 to 10, 2026, seriously failed to protect my primary and most immediate interests, as he favoured a settlement agreement aimed at a summary resolution of the dispute, as requested by the opposing party (release within six weeks and payment of nominal damages), rather than maintaining the lease for a period that was fair given the nature of the rental agreement and current legislation, which favours the interests of the tenant as the weaker party.

 

In fact, I believe that I was not provided with adequate information, as I was misled and pressured into signing, despite repeated refusals, a settlement that I would never have freely accepted had I not been subjected to repeated pressure and warned of the unjust harm of being prosecuted on false charges and further abusive requests for police intervention at my home, thus interfering in my private life.

All this, without informing me that if I had accepted the (unacceptable) settlement, the case would certainly have lasted much longer than six weeks, during which I could have exercised my right of defense and presented evidence of the falsity of the charges and the use of a false police report, as well as the procedural irregularities, which Attorney X unjustifiably refused to produce, also obstructing my request through the judge to file the document through my attorney.

 

Sincerely,

Onstwedde, 05-05-2026

 

 

 

A long story made relatively short here. 

 

I was evicted in court with an emergency eviction injunction in 6 weeks, on the basis of two specious and premeditated police reports to the police and Court authorities to the purpose of eviction containing massively defamatory and criminalising false allegations and obtained by knowingly and intentionally committing 9 criminal offences to my damage. I point out what they are and what the punishment according to the Dutch Criminal Code is simply because the offender whom I have been trying to get a Restraining Order from since October 2025 is still here at large in the garden gardening and living with no penalty whatever while I will go in the streets in a few days if my appeal is unsuccessful, after the fear and terror of losing my freedom due to his false criminal allegation with the police that came to announce a criminal trial, caused me miscarriage.

 

I am an immigrant victim of retaliatory stalking and for 5 years in a row I have been illegally evicted or otherwise forced out of my registered residence address by hate crimes including murder attempt, aggravated trespasses, libel and slander, extensive and documented theft of private correspondence in 3 different countries, extreme vandalism acts including property arson and entire destruction or violation of entrance doors, massive defamation both online and offline, via identity theft both with the landlords and neighbours as well as with social services and the police authorities. I have been caused miscarriage by stalking and defamation 3 times from 2022. I am doing an ayurvedic hunger strike to advocate my rights at   a time I feel my rights and voice has been taken from me and to point out under what circumstances I signed my death contract under "duress", that is during an overwhelming neurological episode  after receiving illegitimate police threats from the counterparty lawyer, where the counterparty continued to threat to misuse the police forces against me, rather than acknowledging the non patrimonial damages such misuse of police forces has already caused me in the past year, culminating in the recent miscarriage.

 

 The crimes committed to obtain the specious police reports in object are in this order:

1. Stalking (Article 285b of the Dutch Penal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht), which defines the offense of intentionally intimidating, or coercing someone through repeated, systematic violations of their private life.); 

2. Online identity theft  (Article 231b (Identity Fraud): Wilfully and unlawfully using another person's identifying data (excluding biometric data) with the intent to misappropriate that identity or conceal one's own, creating a risk of disadvantage, is punishable by up to 5 years in prison. Article 326 (Fraud/Oplichting): Using false identity data to trick another person into handing over goods, services, or money. Article 138ab (Computer Trespass/Hacking): Accessing automated systems (hacking) to obtain personal data, which often precedes identity theft, can incur up to 4 years imprisonment. Article 225 (Forgery); Sharing personal data online with the intent of intimidating someone is a criminal offense.); 

3. misrepresentation of my identity (intentional/premeditated) demonstrated by UPS evidence for the purpose of misappropriation of special goods deliverable only on signature and ID check (Signing for an air pistol in someone else's name in the Netherlands involves two distinct criminal acts: forgery and violation of the Weapons and Ammunition Act. Article 225 Paragraph 1: Criminalizes falsifying a document intended to serve as evidence of a fact (like a weapons permit or purchasing log) with the intent to use it as genuine. Article 225 Paragraph 2: Criminalizes the intentional use of a falsified document. Maximum Penalty: This is a serious offense (misdrijf) punishable by up to 6 years imprisonment or a fine of the fifth category (up to €103,000 as of 2026).Weapon Violation: In addition to forgery, this act violates the Weapons and Ammunition Act (Wet wapens en munitie – WWM).

 4. Opening of private correspondence (demonstrated by the summons) i.e. opening private correspondence ( Article 460 of the Dutch Criminal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht). Prohibiting the violation the secrecy of correspondence by opening a letter or other sealed document meant for someone else, or by taking possession, with additional, more severe offenses under the Arms and Munitions Act 1989)

 

6. Using the thus obtained police reports  to mislead a Dutch court and secure an eviction is a criminal offence to intentionally use forged documents, including a police report obtained by intentionally committing a crime, which implies premeditation and the fact the person knew ahead the contents of the parcel he was to break the law for to the purpose of using it to evict me.  The actions described—forgery, theft, and opening private mail—constitute serious crimes under the Dutch Criminal Code (Oplichting - Section 326): Using a "tissue of lies" or an "artful trick" to deceive a court into granting an eviction to deprive a tenant of their property is a serious criminal offense. The fact that the original charges in the report were dropped does not make the act of obtaining or using it legally permissible if it was achieved through forgery, theft, or mail tampering. Based on legal principles similar to those in the Netherlands and the UK, here is a breakdown of the criminal offences involved:1. Offences in Obtaining the Report. Forgery (Art. 225/226 Sr): Creating a false document or altering a genuine one with the intent to use it as genuine is a criminal act, often punishable by up to 6–7 years in prison. Theft (Art. 310 Sr): Theft and Breach of Privacy (Diefstal/Schending briefgeheim): Intentionally opening another person's mail and stealing contents to gather information for the forgery is a crime. [Stealing a package or private mail to obtain the document constitutes theft.Mail Tampering: Opening private mail, particularly using forgery to misrepresent oneself to receive another's parcel, is a federal/national offence. Identity Fraud (Art. 231b Sr): Using another person’s personal data to hide your identity or for illegal purposes is a criminal offence. 2. Offences in Using the ReportUsing a False Document (Forgery): Intentionally using a forged document—or a document obtained via fraudulent, forged identification—as if it were genuine is treated with the same severity as the forgery itself. Receiving Stolen Goods (Art. 416 Sr): Possessing or using a document that you know was obtained through a criminal offence is a crime against property. 3. Legal Consequences Criminal Record: Conviction for these offenses will lead to a criminal record. Imprisonment: Depending on the jurisdiction, forgery of official documents can carry significant prison sentences, often extending up to 6–10 years.  

Regarding the impact on the Eviction Case: Even if the charges in the report were dropped, utilizing the document in court knowing it was obtained via illegal means and contains false information is a serious violation. If the landlord used forged papers for an emergency evction injunction the eviction can be contested. Legal Aid: Tenants in the Netherlands have the right to defend themselves in court and legal aid is available. I was adviced by the lawyer and state legal advisor If I  suspect a police report obtained by intentionally committing the above offences was used to file police report for valsheid in geschrift (forgery) and oplichting (fraud) so to Inform the Court: Immediately inform in the eviction proceedings that the evidence provided is forged, providing proof that the previous criminal charges were dropped, although no evidence given to me that the charges were dropped.

Civil/Administrative Consequences: If this report is used in court, it may be deemed inadmissible. The user could face contempt of court or legal action for harassment, and it could negatively affect their ability to obtain a Certificate of Good Behaviour (VOG).Even if the original charges were dropped, the illegal methods used to acquire and use the document are independent crimes that the authorities would normally take very seriously, if only the law was the same for all.

 

 

As many immigrants do nowadays, I used a "safe" platform of work exchange in exchange for Legal Housing, Fair treatment, cooked meals and cultural integration. One would imagine it to be the ideal platform to find a house and a job in a country. Not so.

Because if something goes wrong your word in the Netherlands is nothing, the police will favour the property owner, your story won't be heard, your police report won't be taken, you will be tried on a comproved fabricated police report or more and won't get appropriate criminal defence, but just a state lawyer that will not act in your interests but in that of the State employed worker you were abused from and illegaly rented to up until the eviciton when the "Owner" will claim you were a charity case to strip you of your human rights, while the Municipality instead of fining them will send you social services, but not to help you really but to ask you questions on  your private life and not offer practical support to navigate the situation, apart from a few phone numbers that you wont probably be able to handle unless you are fluent in Dutch because those work on answer machines that direct you to the right departments only if you speak dutch.

 

This text will change now and again because when I check it and find there is some incomplete sentence or the text got misplaced by the pictures I will correct it. I am no professional petition maker but I am not too small for my NO to be crushed by police reports. This refers to an illegal eviction I signed for under duress, because I was illegaly therathened for the police to be sent to my house again after such misuse of police forces had recently caused me miscarriage. 

I am one of those people that to feel at home needs her privacy and freedom which means no unwanted or unplanned visits by anyone, let alone the authorities or social services intruding in my personal life and sense of safety quite frankly as the false police report from my offender was to lead to arrest and jail time. As it is often the case when the dominant group (the White Dutches here) harrasses the minorities groups through misuse of police forces because the minorities groups are vulnerable in a foreign country and easy to criminalise and be made redundant, thus target of unequal treatment from the authorities.

 

A story as old as that of ethnic and cultural repression. I just wish I was a better petition writer but if you want to help me save my life while saving that of those who in teh future will find themselves in the hands of a Dutch who misuses workaway to get work done cheaply while abusing all your rights sign and read on. 

 

 

My petition launched with 6 weeks Ayurvedic hunger strike is also for Lisa Temple who was put in prison for trying to defend herself when 19 men in baklava from the Bank on a public duty came to evict her and her daughter, at the time 18, by being dragged out of bed and hit half naked, by 19 men. Now she is the one in prison. This petition is a prayer for no more innocent women target of organised crime to be evicted, criminalised and psychiatrised by the same groups of organised criminals who presume to be "happy communities" of normally functioning people. You can follow her here https://fb.watch/GTq7XP4jBU/

 

as I update this petition for both of us I will add more links about Lisa and more information about her story from her own suppressed voice, because believe it or not, not only she was evicted by organised criminals on public duty for a public bank but she was also imprisoned without a lawyer. 

 

I guess this is the normality nowadays, pure psychosis. The victims in jail and in the streets, the "law-yers" with money in their pockets, while criminals keep maintaining their appearance of normality, unsuspected, amongst friends and family, protected and apparently invulnerable. Apparently because the truth always does come out eventually and it will kneel the sheer corruption of the judicial" system. My petition is to say no to protected classes, and for lawyers and judges to be unable and evict people based on criminal allegations without the defendant getting proper, thorough and truthful defence, no matter if the accusations come from the bank or the police, or from the friend of a person with status. In these time of global emergency I claim on the inviolability of tennants at home and for immigrants not to be done away with claims that we was "on charity" basis when nobody does even give a smile for free nowadays and we have bank payments to demonstrate rent, let us to be treated and tried as tennants , and people who work double with double the expertise often and half the money, not as charity cases, that for sure there is no white saviours out there giving charity for free, instead what there is in the NL is legalised self sale, with taxes on that too, that is a very different story from the charity white saviour and the "bad" immigrant that misbheaved because she did not let the guy do as he pleased. The same story of colonialism over and over, when the men misbehave with the women immigrants, or with the women in general, take the blame  for the reaction to the violence and never the violence itself under obejct. 

the stalker after 8 months no contact request first thing in the morning

 

 

 

-----------------------------------------------

My petition and current Ayurvedic hunger strike is also for Lisa Temple an arbitrator in Ireland who was illegally evicted by 19 men in baklava on public duty for an Irish bank and by them criminalised, attempted "psychiatrised" and successfully arrested with charges of 10 years. I do this for all women evicted by organised crime stalking, dressed up by "normal" people, and unfortunately by real unknowing and probably permanently unwitting "normal" people covered up.

2 words about Lisa Temple. Please support her. Like and share her videos and posts to counteract the masonic driven media that speak of her as a psychiatric case.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BI8OIHbO-4

 

please share it, help her say NO to legalised ASSASSINS too. Because if they can do evict women like this and put us to prison and psychiatrise us, it can be done to us all, and like Lisa said, she felt if she signed no woman would be safe in Ireland. The same I feel about the revolting "settlement" I was pressured and broken into sign after being caused neurological failure and miscarriagee by police misuse I was still threatened , my third one by disgusting stalkers legalised assassins like the fake activists that work for the masons and the accessories women they use like objects for their male driven distopian reality where doing this to women's lives and our children born and unborn is considered normal because at home, or at the seed exchange day, they can pull it up to be eco activists, off the grid bullshitters with the hands in the police and in the courts. Lisa, she said NO for all of us, to maintain her integrity that she is free with all of us.