Subject: Urgent Appeal for Redress, Justice, and Exposure of Corruption in the North Butte County Courthouse Probate and Family Division

 

(MY STORY LISTED BELOW PETITION)

Honorable Board of Supervisors,

I, Michelle Olson, urgently address this petition to your esteemed office, seeking redress, justice, transparency, and the exposure of corruption within the North Butte County Courthouse Probate (Guardianship Div 11) and Family Division in Chico California.

My situation is deeply personal and involves the safety and well-being of my two beloved children, (9-year-old - Ivee Quinn) and (6-year-old - Lilah Mae).

In this challenging and deeply personal nightmare, I find myself entangled in a legal battle that revolves around the safety and well-being of my two beloved children, Ivee Quinn and Lilah Mae.

 The heart of the matter lies within the North Butte County Courthouse, specifically:

• THE PROBATE DIVISION 11 -PRESIDED OVER BY : JUDGE CLARE KEITHLEY.

 The gravity of this circumstance intensifies with the looming threat of a permanent loss of my parental rights, a prospect that hangs over me without apparent justification.

Adding complexity, the case has been transferred to Los Angeles, presenting new challenges and heightening the risk of losing control over the fate of my children.

This description encapsulates a challenging journey marked by heartache, legal complexities, and a fervent desire for a fair resolution that ensures the safety and well-being of my family. It is a poignant plea for justice, transparency, and accountability within the legal system. It is an urgent call to expose corruption, particularly the actions of Judge Clare Keithley and former court investigator Julio Quinones, not only for the sake of my family but to prevent similar injustices from befalling others.

• The personal toll on me is immeasurable, as I grapple with the anguish of separation, the fear for my children's safety, and an ongoing battle against a seemingly biased and unyielding legal system.

In the wrongful separation of my children from me and the potential abuse they face under the guardianship of my half-sister, and her husband.

• This situation had emerged from a series of unjust legal proceedings where my due process rights were violated, and I was denied a fair defense.
  
  
• The probate guardianship was obtained fraudulently, involving the former court investigator Julio Quinones,
  
  
• and my children were placed in an environment that was proven to be harmful to their physical and emotional well-being.

The legal proceedings have unequivocally established that my two beloved children, are currently residing in an environment that has been deemed abusive. 

This distressing revelation is a stark testament to the urgency and critical nature of the situation. The evidence presented in court, including photos and videos showcasing injuries sustained by my eldest child, Ivee, and the deteriorating physical condition she endured, paints a harrowing picture of the circumstances they are subjected to.

Despite these alarming findings, the legal system has seemingly failed to address the imminent danger my children face daily. The abuse allegations, supported by substantial evidence (thus including a 10-day sexual assault by the guardian's husband for molesting his siblings apparently being recorded with a case no. within the CWS system and provided to the Judge by Former Court investigator Julio Quinones reports and recommendations), have been consistently ignored, downplayed, or brushed aside by Judge Clare Keithley, the very figure entrusted with safeguarding the best interests of my children. 

This glaring oversight in acknowledging and rectifying the abusive conditions is not only a failure of the legal system but also a grave injustice to the well-being of my children.

This as well as the secrecy of it all commencing without ever informing me and ignoring my warnings that the signature to consent had been forged, and many other instances, underscores the pressing need for a thorough and unbiased investigation, transparency in legal proceedings, and a swift redress to ensure the immediate removal of my children from this harmful environment.

The legal system of the North Butte County Courthouse and its failure to act upon compelling evidence of abuse adds an additional layer of urgency to the demand for justice, transparency, and a comprehensive investigation into the corrupt practices surrounding the probate guardianship case in North Butte County Courthouse.

The personal toll on me is immeasurable, as I endure the anguish of separation from my children for three years now, the fear for their safety, and the continuous battle against a legal system that seems never-ending, as I am ghosted as if I had never played a significant role in my children's lives.

1. This petition is my way of standing up against the injustices I have faced and seeking a fair resolution for my family.
2. It is a plea for support from the community to join me in demanding redress, justice, transparency, and exposure of corruption within the North Butte County Courthouse Probate and Family Division.
   
   
   
   

I/We, the undersigned, demand the following:

1. A thorough and unbiased investigation into the alleged corruption within the North Butte County Courthouse Probate and Family Division.
   
2. Transparent legal proceedings that uphold the principles of FAIRNESS, JUSTICE, and THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS!
   
   
3. Immediate redress for the violation of due process rights and a fair opportunity to present a defense.
   
   
4. Exoneration from any unfounded accusations and a review of the probate guardianship obtained through fraudulent means.
   
   
5. Swift reunification of the family and the return of my children to a safe and nurturing environment.

This petition is a collective call for change, justice, and the exposure of corruption within our legal system.

We urge you to consider our plea and take decisive action to rectify the injustices faced by my family and potentially countless others.

Sincerely,

Michelle Olson

By signing this petition, you will be joining a collective voice advocating for justice, transparency, and the exposure of corruption within the North Butte County Courthouse Probate and Family Division. Your signature is a powerful endorsement of the following:

Demanding Investigation: Your support calls for a thorough and unbiased investigation into alleged corruption, ensuring a fair and transparent legal process.

Upholding Fairness and Justice: By signing, you endorse the principle of transparent legal proceedings that prioritize fairness, justice, and the protection of fundamental human rights.

Supporting Due Process: Your signature stands for the immediate redress of due process violations and advocates for a fair opportunity to present a defense.

Denouncing Unfounded Accusations: By signing, you contribute to the call for exoneration from any unfounded accusations and the review of probate guardianship obtained through fraudulent means.

Advocating for Family Reunification: Your support pushes for swift action to reunite families and ensure the return of children to a safe and nurturing environment.

Your signature is more than ink on paper; it is a symbol of SOLIDARITY, demanding ACCOUNTABILITY, FAIRNESS, and JUSTICE within our legal system.

Together, we can expose corruption and ensure a better future for families affected by unjust legal practices. 

 

 

MY STORY IN FORM OF LETTER SENT OFF TO NUMEROUS AUTHORITIES SEEKING ASSISTANCE 

 

Subject: Urgent Matter - Allegations of Fraud and Custody Issues (Three-Year Situation)

 

To whom it may concern,

 

My name is Michelle N. Olson, a 31-year-old mother of two wonderful children, Ivee Quinn Olson and Lilah Mae Olson. I am writing to bring to your attention a deeply troubling situation that has persisted for three years, leaving me desperate for help. Despite my efforts, including contacting the Butte County District Attorney's office, I have been unable to find a resolution.

 

I reach out to you now, fearing for the well-being of my children. I cannot allow my sister to take them away and potentially adopt them, severing all ties between them and their family. My children's safety and well-being are at stake.

 

If you are unable to assist me directly, I kindly request your guidance on the appropriate steps I should take to address this urgent matter.

 

The crux of the issue revolves around my sister, Christine, who has obtained custody of my two minor children through fraudulent means, a severe violation of my parental rights, and fraudulent documentation orchestrated by Christine Olson (Luhr) and the North Butte County Courthouse.

 

In summary, my ordeal began during a crisis when my children were taken out of state by my youngest daughter's father, David Green, who was subsequently arrested for child stealing. In my pursuit of temporary assistance for my children during their absence, I unwittingly consented to a “caregiver's authorization” without fully comprehending its implications, trusting my sister's word. Regrettably, my sister clandestinely obtained a legal guardianship for my children by falsifying consent forms (GC211) at the North Butte County Courthouse. I firmly believe that she has committed acts of forgery and fraud to gain custody of my children.

 

In August 2020, she illicitly affixed my signature onto a GC211 Consent and Waiver of Notice form, an act I was entirely unaware of and certainly did not authorize. Together with my father, Michael Olson, I promptly reported these deceitful actions to Officer Passmore of the Butte County Police Department. This wasn't the first time Officer Passmore was alerted to my apprehensions; I had previously contacted him when I suspected my sister might abscond with my children, especially after serving her a termination of guardianship notice in 2021.

 

Regrettably, both of these incidents reported to Officer Passmore seemed to fall on deaf ears. To compound matters, just days prior to the evidentiary hearing for the termination of guardianship, my sister swiftly sold her residence and disappeared with my children. Astonishingly, there were no repercussions for her actions.

 

On November 30, 2020, the day she obtained legal guardianship of my children, I personally appeared in court, vehemently contesting the proceedings. It was disheartening to witness Presiding Judge Clare Keithley dismiss my objections, asserting that I was tardy and refusing to lend an ear to my side of the story. This marked the inception of a distressing pattern where my voice has been systematically stifled and my concerns entirely overlooked by the judicial system.

As a result of her actions, I have not seen my children for nearly three years and have had no communication with them for an extended period. Furthermore, Christine obtained a fraudulent Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) against me, which has been in effect for three years. This DVRO has prevented any contact or communication between me and my children, despite my unwavering assertion that I have never engaged in the alleged misconduct. This situation has caused immense pain and suffering for me and, more importantly, for my children.

 

The circumstances surrounding the DVRO are deeply concerning. I was provided with inaccurate information about the hearing time, resulting in my arrival a mere 10 minutes late. Compounding this misunderstanding is the fact that I reside five hours away from the court. As a result, the DVRO remains in effect, unfairly denying me access to my children.

 

Additionally, she deceitfully enrolled herself, her husband, and my two children in the Safe at Home Program administered by the Secretary of State. This further obscures their whereabouts, leaving me in the dark. Despite my repeated attempts to request reconsideration, my pleas have either been ignored or outright denied.

 

Before I proceed, it's imperative for all individuals, particularly fellow parents or siblings, to grasp the significance of what I'm about to share. My intention is to prevent anyone from making the same mistake that led to a nightmare every mother fears. I implore anyone reading this to recognize that my children and I had an extraordinary, unbreakable connection from the moment I discovered their presence. Each day, I wholeheartedly devoted myself to being a full-time mother to my two closest companions. Every moment with them was cherished, and life felt utterly fulfilling with them by my side. I could never have foreseen that everything could change in the blink of an eye.

In the blink of an instant, my world transformed. The daily sights of my children's beautiful faces, the warmth of their hugs, the melodious sound of their voices, their laughter, and the gentle rhythm of their tiny feet on our hardwood floors in the morning vanished. I eagerly anticipated their morning visits to my bedroom, where they'd leap onto my bed, playfully trying to rouse me, oblivious to my feigned slumber. I never fathomed that I would find myself on my knees in a grocery store, overwhelmed by the sight of a toy or the laughter of another child. I couldn't have imagined being paralyzed in my own car, surrounded by a deafening silence. Each day now feels like an agonizingly slow-motion reel, with even the simplest tasks like rising from bed becoming painful. Stepping into my own backyard has become unbearable due to the weight of the painful memories.

 

I'm a 31-year-old mother whose children have been unjustly kept from me by my own sister. She has concealed her true, malevolent nature behind a facade that deceives everyone she encounters. I placed my trust in her, believing she would honor her promises and shield my children from harm. Due to this misplaced trust, I haven't laid eyes on my children since my eldest, Ivee, was 6 years old, and my youngest, Lilah Mae, was 3. It's been nearly two years since I last had the privilege of speaking with my children, and nobody knows the reasons behind this cruel separation. My sister, Christine Marie Olson, is solely responsible for this injustice.

 

I know I'm not supposed to display my emotions, but this situation is a stark, painful reality. I challenge anyone in my shoes not to shed a single tear. I've shed countless tears, feeling helpless in my inability to reunite with my children and share in their growth and development. Every day, I question why I'm not with them and where I've gone, unable to discern the truth because Christine Olson obstructs it. She has isolated my children from their familiar home and the people they've always known. I apologize, but it's nearly impossible not to get emotional when faced with this, particularly considering I have no means to rectify it. I can't embrace them, offer comfort, or even ascertain their whereabouts. Their appearance, their voices, their activities—all remain a mystery to me, for no discernible reason. This situation unjustly deprives my children, my family, and me, transcending comprehension and expression. How can anyone accept this as acceptable? Why was I perceived as a worse individual than a child abuser or worse, with no opportunity to present my side of the story and regain custody of my children?

 

The welfare of my children is being overlooked in this matter. If this is what the courts deem as in the best interest of the children, then a serious reevaluation of their judgment is in order. I went from sharing every waking moment with them to not even being permitted to hear their voices or catch a glimpse of their faces. I find myself in the depths of darkness, unaware of their current whereabouts. No one provides me with updates about my children, and I am left in this heart-wrenching situation without any clear justification. It all stems from my sister's self-serving and deceitful actions, coupled with the court's failure in Butte County to diligently uphold their responsibilities.

 

This court has essentially granted custody to my sister without prior notice to me, effectively erasing my presence and significance in my children's lives from the very moment I became aware of the court's involvement. I refuse to surrender or be coerced into giving up on my children under any circumstances. This entire situation deviates far from what is considered normal, and even without extensive knowledge of legal proceedings, I can confidently assert that there is an unsettling element, something dubious, permeating this entire process. It raises suspicions of negligence, misconduct, or possibly even corruption. This court does not instill confidence or trust.

 

There were several concerns raised during the November 30th, 2020 hearing regarding the challenge to the guardianship by David L. Green, the biological father of Lilah Mae Olson:

1. **Lack of Legal Assistance Opportunity:** Just two days before the hearing, which happened during the Thanksgiving weekend, I attempted to meet with David to understand his perspective on the situation. However, due to the holiday, I had no opportunity to seek legal assistance or advice. During this meeting, David shared the Investigator and Social Workers Reports & Recommendations from August and September 2020. These reports contained erroneous and degrading statements made by the Guardian (my sister), the investigator, and social workers. Notably, these reports contained false claims, such as the assertion that I had heavy meth usage during one of my pregnancies, for which there was no evidence.

 

2. **Concerning Discovery:** Upon reviewing these reports, I was shocked to learn that my sister, who I believed was helping my children as a temporary guardian, had different intentions. Her intentions appeared to be the opposite of what I initially thought, as she had made damaging statements about me. If David hadn't shown me these reports, I might not have attended the court hearing, as Christine had provided various excuses to deter me and my mother from attending. However, I still attended the hearing, albeit late, due to a navigation error.

 

3. **Contesting Guardianship and Signature Forgery:** Upon entering the courtroom, I immediately contested the guardianship and alleged that Christine had forged my signature on GC211. However, the judge disregarded my claims and stated that she would not entertain my arguments because I was late for a hearing I didn't even know was mandatory for my attendance.

 

4. **Unequal Access and Visitation Rights:** During the hearing, it was decided that David would have more extensive access to Ivee, despite him not being her biological father, while I was granted limited contact, only one call per week and physical visits at the discretion of the Guardian.

 

5. **Inaccurate Assumption Regarding David's Consent:** The judge, Clare Keithley, stated that David had consented to the guardianship, but he had not signed the GC211 form. If he had signed it, he wouldn't have been served in person by a police official since GC211 involves consent and waiver of notice. However, the judge made an assumption without investigating this matter further.

 

6. **Allegations of Signature Forgery:** I separately stated in court on November 30, 2020, that Christine had forged my signature on the GC211 form. This serious allegation should have prompted further investigation by Judge Keithley.

 

I have serious concerns regarding the actions and behavior of the court investigator, Julio Quinones. I wish to address a series of deeply troubling events related to the conduct of the court investigator, Julio Quinones, in my case. These events have raised serious concerns about his professionalism, integrity, and impartiality.

 

Firstly, Mr. Quinones failed to adequately investigate a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) event that supposedly occurred. It is puzzling that he did not make the effort to contact the facility where this incident was said to have taken place. However, he did contact them when it came to obtaining a statement from the therapist regarding my contact with my children. I would like to see proof of this statement from the therapist, as Mr. Quinones' reports and recommendations do not support the claim that my children and I have no contact. Furthermore, if it were indeed the case that my children and I should have no contact, why would the legislator assert that it is in the best interest of children to be in frequent and continual contact with their parents? This inconsistency raises concerns.

 

Secondly, I've noticed a pattern in Mr. Quinones' reports where he claims to have difficulty contacting individuals who play vital roles in my case, such as Lilah Mae's therapist. It's puzzling to me that he would have trouble reaching a therapist, who one would assume frequently answers calls and returns messages, especially those from a court investigator. This raises questions about whether Mr. Quinones made genuine efforts to contact these individuals or if there were other reasons behind his purported inability to reach them. For example, he mentioned having difficulty contacting Mr. Luhrs' mother and the alleged victim of sexual abuse/molestation, which are critical aspects of the case.

 

Moreover, during a meeting in March 2021, Mr. Quinones told me that he had attempted to call me numerous times without success, suggesting that there may have been an issue with the contact number he had on file. However, when he dialed my number in front of me during that meeting, the call went through without any issues. This raises questions about his credibility and whether he made legitimate attempts to contact me.

 

Mr. Quinones' behavior also raises concerns about his impartiality and integrity in handling my case. He expressed doubt that the judge would terminate the guardianship, indicating that he did not believe in the possibility of a fair outcome. He also advised me not to bother bringing binders of evidence, as he believed the judge would not consider them.

 

Perhaps most concerning is Mr. Quinones' breach of confidentiality. He discussed my private concerns and requests with the opposing party, Christine Olson, which jeopardized my child's safety and undermined the integrity of the investigation. This lack of discretion is deeply troubling.

 

The top event I would like to highlight occurred when Mr. Quinones produced a report and recommendations for the court without ever speaking with me or informing me of the court's involvement in my case. I was completely unaware of the court's actions because Christine, the opposing party, continued to communicate with me regularly as if everything were normal. She never once mentioned her actions or intentions in this matter.

 

Furthermore, the former court investigator, Julio Quinones, had never contacted me before issuing his reports, which contained false and damaging accusations such as being associated with a violent fugitive ex-boyfriend wanted for suspected armed robbery and murder. He also alleged that I used drugs during pregnancy and while parenting my children, leading to cognitive delays in my children. It is crucial to note that all these allegations were entirely baseless and untrue. Astonishingly, the court accepted Quinones' report without proper scrutiny or investigation.

 

Adding to the injustice, the appointed guardian unlawfully severed all contact between me and my children just one month after the court order, despite her knowledge of my whereabouts and her false claim that I was unresponsive. The court severely restricted my visitation rights for three years, granting privileges and access to individuals with concerning backgrounds, including David Green and Joshua Ludwig.

 

Moreover, when I exposed the guardian's dishonesty about her arrest history, the judge attempted to label me as a vexatious litigant, threatening repercussions if I dared to raise the issue again. This, despite the fact that her deception should have resulted in a misdemeanor charge

 

 by law. It was instead weaponized against me. The court investigator, who came under investigation due to my complaints, promptly retired after a three-month investigation. The only other investigator in the entire courthouse also retired, raising significant suspicion. Additionally, the self-help clerk handed me a human trafficking pamphlet and encouraged me never to give up on my children.

 

When I began highlighting the court's errors, they transferred and consolidated the cases with the LA County Court. In retaliation, the guardian filed for my children to be declared free for adoption, effectively closing the Butte County case. Unfortunately, the LA County case lacks records of this transfer and consolidation, as such cases are not typically consolidated, and it lacks access to the probate case.

 

In the reports that Mr. Quinones prepared without proper investigation or prior communication with me, he made assumptions and false statements against me. These statements were not only deeply offensive but also highly degrading, disgusting, and, most importantly, untrue. His reckless and baseless accusations have caused significant harm to my reputation and well-being.

 

Furthermore, Mr. Quinones' failure to engage in a thorough and unbiased investigation has undermined the integrity of the entire legal process. His actions have left me feeling unheard and unfairly treated by the court, as he failed to provide me with an opportunity to defend myself against the damaging allegations he included in his reports.

 

These events have left me with serious reservations about Mr. Quinones' competence and suitability as a court investigator. His lack of proper communication, impartiality, and investigative rigor have cast a shadow of doubt over the proceedings. I urge you to thoroughly review these concerns and take appropriate action to ensure a fair and just resolution to my case.

 

I am writing to address a significant violation of my constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution in the handling of my case.

 

The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment safeguards a parent's fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody, and management of their children. However, in my case, I was denied the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner regarding the issue of legal decision-making authority related to a guardianship being granted, whether temporary or permanent. Due process mandates that parties involved in a dispute over the best interests of a child be allowed to present evidence. Unfortunately, I was never informed that legal proceedings had commenced, and I had no notice of the court's involvement.

 

In order for legal decision-making authority to be determined, both parents must receive notice, have adequate time to prepare, and be given the opportunity to present all relevant evidence. My case proceeded without adhering to these essential principles of due process. I was not given notice of the court's involvement, and I had no meaningful opportunity to be heard on this critical issue. Consequently, the court's ruling did not adhere to the requirements of due process.

 

The Supreme Court has recognized that a parent's interest in the companionship, care, custody, and management of their child is among the most fundamental of civil rights. Therefore, before the state can deprive a parent of this interest, it must provide adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard. The failure to provide proper notice and an opportunity to be heard is a clear violation of due process (Stanley v. Illinois (1972) 405 U.S. 645, 651; Lois R. v. Superior Court (1971) 19 Cal. App. 3d 895, 901).

 

In my case, the guardian was aware of my whereabouts and could have easily obtained my address for notice. I had voluntarily provided her with an address in September of 2020 while awaiting a court hearing in Nevada. However, she made no effort to deliver notice to me, and she withheld information about my whereabouts from the court. This lack of notice and absence of any reasonable effort to find me cannot satisfy the requirements of due process. Insufficient or dishonest notice is equivalent to no notice at all.

 

Furthermore, Rule 7.51 regarding the service of notice of the hearing on August 3, 2020, reveals a disturbing inconsistency. The guardian claimed that I was on the run from the police and could not be contacted, yet she also stated that I had been informed online and did not contest. This contradiction is deeply troubling. How could I contest if I could not be reached because I was allegedly evading the police, which I was not? The guardian's actions, including withholding information from me and the court, constitute a breach of my rights.

 

Additionally, the guardian's actions may have violated several criminal statutes, including perjury (Penal Code 118), tampering with evidence (18 U.S.C. § 1519), and falsifying evidence. Her false statements and withholding of information influenced officers of the court and constituted obstruction of justice.

 

I request a thorough investigation into these matters to ensure that justice is served and my rights are upheld.

 

Christine's deceptive actions and abuse of legal processes are deeply troubling. She has made false statements to various parties, including child protective services and therapists, to maintain her control over my children. She even fabricated events and conversations to justify her actions, further harming my reputation and credibility.

 

The guardianship obtained by my sister is based on fraud and deception. She convinced the court that I willingly consented to the guardianship, even though I had never been informed or consulted about it. The court's decision to grant her custody without any prior communication with me is alarming and unjust.

 

Additionally, I have uncovered information suggesting that my sister may have engaged in similar deceptive practices in the past, including concealing information from the courts and using fraudulent means to manipulate legal proceedings. In summary, the November 30th, 2020 hearing was marred by a lack of legal opportunity for me, concerning revelations in the reports, allegations of signature forgery, and unequal treatment of visitation rights. These issues raise significant concerns about the fairness and due process of the proceedings. Keithley to stop in her tracks and second the Guardian certainly. I have serious reservations about Mr. Quinones' conduct and actions in my case. I believe there are significant issues with his professionalism, impartiality, and integrity that warrant further investigation and scrutiny. I hope that these concerns will be taken seriously and addressed appropriately.

 

In conclusion, my constitutional right to due process was egregiously violated throughout this case. I want to emphasize that this case extends beyond the termination of parental rights (TPR) or guardianship termination. It is a matter of justice, one that I firmly believe is unquestionably a criminal case characterized by child abduction, forgery, and fraudulent activities. I have sought justice through various channels, reporting the issues to the North Butte County Court, local law enforcement, Child Protective Services (CPS), justice centers, and even the FBI. Regrettably, I have been ignored due to Christine's legal guardianship. This case transcends TPR or guardianship termination-it encompasses the violation of rights, rules, conduct, and human rights. It is a criminal matter, and I am determined to seek justice for my children and me. They deserve to have their biological mother and extended family actively involved in their lives, as was the case before this wrongful guardianship and forgery of legal documents without my consent.

 

Despite her actions, this remains a case of child abduction as she fraudulently obtained guardianship by forging my consent. The legitimacy of her guardianship is not only questionable but highly dubious, if not outright fraudulent. I am resolute

 

 in my belief that my children deserve to be reunited with their biological mother, and justice must be served.

 

I am urgently seeking your assistance, guidance, and intervention in this matter. My children's well-being, safety, and happiness are of paramount importance, and I am committed to doing everything within my power to ensure they are reunited with me and their extended family.

 

I kindly request that you investigate this matter thoroughly, taking into account the serious allegations of fraud, forgery, and deception that have plagued this case from its inception. I implore you to review the evidence and circumstances surrounding this case, including the concerns raised about the conduct of the court investigator, Julio Quinones. I ask that you take appropriate action to rectify the injustice that has occurred and to ensure that my rights, as well as the rights of my children, are upheld.

 

I am willing to provide any additional information, evidence, or documentation that may be required to facilitate a thorough investigation into this matter. I am also open to participating in any proceedings or hearings that may be necessary to address this issue and ensure a just and fair resolution.

 

Please know that time is of the essence, as every day that passes without my children in my life is a day they are denied the love, care, and support they deserve from their biological mother.

 

I am grateful for your attention to this urgent matter, and I look forward to your prompt response and assistance in rectifying this grave injustice.

 

Sincerely,

Michelle olson