

Demand Appeal: Non custodial community service given to convicted NSW rapist.
The issue
We are calling on NSW Attorney General ( Hon. Michael Daley) and the Director of Public Prosecutions to immediately appeal the manifestly inadequate sentence handed to the a man unanimously convicted of rape.
Despite facing up to 14 years imprisonment, the offender was sentenced to just 100 hours of non-custodial community service. He walks 'free', his victim is left with lifelong trauma.
Why this demands immediate action :
- Undermining Affirmative Consent laws ( the 2022 reforms to consent legislation): During Sentencing the court noted that no- one else heard the victims cries or protests - effectively resurrecting the abolished myth of 'implied consent' and ignoring human bodies responses to fear and threat.
- Equating Rape to Property damage : This sentence for the crime of rape reduces a grave personal violation to the legal equivalent of damage or destruction to an inanimate object or a traffic infringemnt.
- Setting a damaging precedent: Every sentence dictates what happens to the next victim. This penalty send a harmful message across the community, to offenders it signals they can commit sexual violence with impunity whilst reinforcing the mistrust of the public and victims that coming forward is pointless.
What we are demanding :
The Attorney General to intervene and instruct the ODPP to lodge an appeal before the 28 statutory deadline expires on August 05, 2026 to seek a custodial sentence that befits the crime in the public interest.
Queensland's Attorney General recently stepped in to instruct for an appeal in a sentence similarly too lenient in the public interest. NSW must do the same.
Anastasia fought for years through court proceedings to secure justice, culminating in a unanimously guilty verdict , only to feel utterly failed by the justice system. She continues to fight for further legislative reforms on behalf of victim survivors across NSW , this petition drives immediate action to appeal this sentence now.
Please sign and SHARE today.
For the Decision Makers;
Notice of Public Interest: Request for Appeal Against Manifestly Inadequate Sentence (State of NSW v. Convicted Offender in the Matter of Anastasia Treharne)
Dear Attorney General and Director of Public Prosecutions,
We call on you to immediately lodge an appeal against the sentence recently handed down in the matter of Anastasia, on the grounds that a 100-hour non-custodial community service order for the crime of rape is manifestly inadequate, contrary to law, and deeply against the public interest.
The maximum penalty for sexual assault/rape under the Crimes Act (NSW) is 14 years’ imprisonment. To penalize a unanimously convicted rapist with 100 hours of community service—a penalty routinely handed down for minor property damage or traffic infractions—is to signal that the physical safety, bodily autonomy, and psychological integrity of women in New South Wales are worth little more in the eyes of the law.
1. Undermining the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Consent Reforms) Act 2021
In June 2022, New South Wales took a historic step forward by enacting affirmative consent laws. The legislation explicitly codifies that:
Consent must be active, communicated, and ongoing.
Consent can be withdrawn at any point during a sexual act, and continuing past that withdrawal constitutes rape.
Silence or lack of physical resistance does not equal consent.
In her testimony, Anastasia stated "I asked you to stop, I told you you were hurting me, I said no repeatedly." Consent was unequivocally withdrawn. The offender forced her down and caused significant physical injury.
Despite this, the magistrate commemts during sentencing, minimised the incident by observing that "it didn't appear premeditated" and that no one else heard her scream/protest. Additionally that there was confliction, due some parts were consensual, and thus aligned with the defense that the offense was lower in the scale. These remarks functionally resurrect the abolished defense of "implied consent" under thin legal jargon. By penalizing this crime with community service because the victim did not scream loudly enough, the judiciary undermines the legislative intent of the 2022 reforms and undoes years of public education.
2. Psychological Damage and Re-traumatization
The magistrate’s reasoning displays a lack of trauma-informed understanding. Modern medical and psychological science recognizes that when human beings face immediate sexual threat, the brain’s amygdala triggers automatic, physiological survival responses—including freeze, fawn, and feint.
To treat a victim's instinctual threat response as a mitigating factor for the offender is medically and ethically indefensible. Anastasia endured four agonizing years of court proceedings, subjecting herself to relentless scrutiny to secure a conviction. To then tell her—and all victim-survivors—that a unanimous guilty verdict yields zero custodial time causes profound, compounding psychological harm. It sends a message that the system will demand everything from victims during trial, only to validate their rapists at sentencing.
3. Precedent, Public Interest, and Executive Action
Every sentence sets a precedent for the next. This decision tells sexual predators and offenders that they can commit sexual assault with impunity, while telling victims that seeking justice is pointless. It actively inflames public mistrust in the state institutions bound to protect citizens.
We do not have to look far for principled leadership on this issue. Earlier this month, Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington instructed the ODPP to lodge an appeal against a manifestly inadequate sexual violence sentence, explicitly citing the imperative that penalties must reflect community expectations and the severity of harm inflicted.
New South Wales must do the same.
Justice must not only be done—it must be seen to be done. In the interest of Anastasia, victim-survivors across the state, and a public that expects its laws to be enforced, we urge you to intervene, instruct an immediate appeal, and seek a sentence that carries a mandatory custodial penalty befitting the gravity of rape.
Yours sincerely,
Alishia Fox,
Victim- survivor
Qld 4300
171
The issue
We are calling on NSW Attorney General ( Hon. Michael Daley) and the Director of Public Prosecutions to immediately appeal the manifestly inadequate sentence handed to the a man unanimously convicted of rape.
Despite facing up to 14 years imprisonment, the offender was sentenced to just 100 hours of non-custodial community service. He walks 'free', his victim is left with lifelong trauma.
Why this demands immediate action :
- Undermining Affirmative Consent laws ( the 2022 reforms to consent legislation): During Sentencing the court noted that no- one else heard the victims cries or protests - effectively resurrecting the abolished myth of 'implied consent' and ignoring human bodies responses to fear and threat.
- Equating Rape to Property damage : This sentence for the crime of rape reduces a grave personal violation to the legal equivalent of damage or destruction to an inanimate object or a traffic infringemnt.
- Setting a damaging precedent: Every sentence dictates what happens to the next victim. This penalty send a harmful message across the community, to offenders it signals they can commit sexual violence with impunity whilst reinforcing the mistrust of the public and victims that coming forward is pointless.
What we are demanding :
The Attorney General to intervene and instruct the ODPP to lodge an appeal before the 28 statutory deadline expires on August 05, 2026 to seek a custodial sentence that befits the crime in the public interest.
Queensland's Attorney General recently stepped in to instruct for an appeal in a sentence similarly too lenient in the public interest. NSW must do the same.
Anastasia fought for years through court proceedings to secure justice, culminating in a unanimously guilty verdict , only to feel utterly failed by the justice system. She continues to fight for further legislative reforms on behalf of victim survivors across NSW , this petition drives immediate action to appeal this sentence now.
Please sign and SHARE today.
For the Decision Makers;
Notice of Public Interest: Request for Appeal Against Manifestly Inadequate Sentence (State of NSW v. Convicted Offender in the Matter of Anastasia Treharne)
Dear Attorney General and Director of Public Prosecutions,
We call on you to immediately lodge an appeal against the sentence recently handed down in the matter of Anastasia, on the grounds that a 100-hour non-custodial community service order for the crime of rape is manifestly inadequate, contrary to law, and deeply against the public interest.
The maximum penalty for sexual assault/rape under the Crimes Act (NSW) is 14 years’ imprisonment. To penalize a unanimously convicted rapist with 100 hours of community service—a penalty routinely handed down for minor property damage or traffic infractions—is to signal that the physical safety, bodily autonomy, and psychological integrity of women in New South Wales are worth little more in the eyes of the law.
1. Undermining the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Consent Reforms) Act 2021
In June 2022, New South Wales took a historic step forward by enacting affirmative consent laws. The legislation explicitly codifies that:
Consent must be active, communicated, and ongoing.
Consent can be withdrawn at any point during a sexual act, and continuing past that withdrawal constitutes rape.
Silence or lack of physical resistance does not equal consent.
In her testimony, Anastasia stated "I asked you to stop, I told you you were hurting me, I said no repeatedly." Consent was unequivocally withdrawn. The offender forced her down and caused significant physical injury.
Despite this, the magistrate commemts during sentencing, minimised the incident by observing that "it didn't appear premeditated" and that no one else heard her scream/protest. Additionally that there was confliction, due some parts were consensual, and thus aligned with the defense that the offense was lower in the scale. These remarks functionally resurrect the abolished defense of "implied consent" under thin legal jargon. By penalizing this crime with community service because the victim did not scream loudly enough, the judiciary undermines the legislative intent of the 2022 reforms and undoes years of public education.
2. Psychological Damage and Re-traumatization
The magistrate’s reasoning displays a lack of trauma-informed understanding. Modern medical and psychological science recognizes that when human beings face immediate sexual threat, the brain’s amygdala triggers automatic, physiological survival responses—including freeze, fawn, and feint.
To treat a victim's instinctual threat response as a mitigating factor for the offender is medically and ethically indefensible. Anastasia endured four agonizing years of court proceedings, subjecting herself to relentless scrutiny to secure a conviction. To then tell her—and all victim-survivors—that a unanimous guilty verdict yields zero custodial time causes profound, compounding psychological harm. It sends a message that the system will demand everything from victims during trial, only to validate their rapists at sentencing.
3. Precedent, Public Interest, and Executive Action
Every sentence sets a precedent for the next. This decision tells sexual predators and offenders that they can commit sexual assault with impunity, while telling victims that seeking justice is pointless. It actively inflames public mistrust in the state institutions bound to protect citizens.
We do not have to look far for principled leadership on this issue. Earlier this month, Queensland Attorney-General Deb Frecklington instructed the ODPP to lodge an appeal against a manifestly inadequate sexual violence sentence, explicitly citing the imperative that penalties must reflect community expectations and the severity of harm inflicted.
New South Wales must do the same.
Justice must not only be done—it must be seen to be done. In the interest of Anastasia, victim-survivors across the state, and a public that expects its laws to be enforced, we urge you to intervene, instruct an immediate appeal, and seek a sentence that carries a mandatory custodial penalty befitting the gravity of rape.
Yours sincerely,
Alishia Fox,
Victim- survivor
Qld 4300
The Decision Makers

Supporter voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on 24 July 2026