TERMINATE DEFAULT JUDGEMENTS FOR COURT NON APPEARANCE.

I am determined to amplify the voices of those who have endured injustice at the hands of those in power. To a judge, your case may be just another file to close, but to you, their decisions have a lasting impact on your life. Let's ensure that your story is heard and justice is served.

 I am a survivor of domestic violence who has been further victimized by a flawed judicial system, presided over by Judge Allende. Despite numerous warnings about her biased conduct, I was subjected to ridicule and disrespect in her courtroom. My landlord was permitted to commit perjury during his initial appearance, Judge Allendes response to him turning off my water for days was cruel mockery. My experience as a domestic violence victim was scandalously diminished.

Default judgments on non-appearances amplify this injustice. They essentially allow one side to win by default, simply because the other party wasn't present. This creates an open opportunity for dirty play and manipulation. According to the Civil Justice Council, default judgments account for nearly 70% of all credit-related county court judgments (source: Money Advice Trust). This must change.

Reasons for Terminating Default Judgments:

1. Denial of Fair Hearing

• Default judgments deny defendants the opportunity to present their case, leading to decisions made without a comprehensive examination of the facts.

This goes against the fundamental right to a fair hearing.

2. Impact on Vulnerable Populations

• Many defendants, particularly those from vulnerable populations, may not be able to respond to legal actions due to a lack of resources, knowledge, or access to legal counsel. Default judgments disproportionately affect these individuals, exacerbating social inequalities.

3. Potential for Abuse

• The current system can be manipulated by plaintiffs who are aware that defendants are unlikely to respond within the required time frame. This can lead to unjust outcomes and an abuse of the judicial process.

4. Lack of Merit-Based Judgments

• Default judgments are not based on the merits of the case but rather on procedural technicalities. This can result in unjust decisions that do not reflect the true nature of the dispute.

Proposed Alternatives

1. Mandatory Hearings

• Implement mandatory hearings where both parties must appear, ensuring that judgments are made based on a thorough examination of the facts.

2. Extended Response Periods

• Provide defendants with extended response periods and better access to legal assistance, ensuring that all parties have a fair chance to present their case.

3. Mediation and Arbitration

• Encourage the use of mediation and arbitration as alternatives to default judgments, promoting mutually agreeable solutions and reducing the burden on the court system.

Sadly, my story is not unique. Countless others have been disempowered and cornered by this system, which is prone to bias and abuse.  This practice of default judgments for non-appearances not only overlooks the valid reasons that might prevent someone from attending court but also obscures the pursuit of justice.

It's time we addressed this imbalance. This petition calls on the legislature to review and terminate the use of default judgments for non-appearances. Let's ensure our judiciary is an unbiased sanctuary of justice, not a tool for oppression. Sign this petition to put an end to the practice of default judgments and help pave the way for a more fair and understanding judicial system.