Today was another illustration of the failures in our judicial system.

It was my date to go to the magistrate's court to plead to the ridiculous charges now laid against me, the very same ones that had been dismissed out of hand at least four times previously and then suddenly arrived out of the blue a short time ago.

I was told I could apply to have them dismissed and had prepared a case for the magistrates to consider & made the appropriate representations to the court ahead of time.

Instead, counsel for the CPS who had admitted *not looking at my application evidence*, was allowed to repeat as fact the same old gross distortions of events as invented by the real aggressor's *copper schoolmate*, including fictitious allegations about some previously undisclosed bail breaches. (How very convenient)

None of my challenges where allowed to be heard, the magistrates accepted only the CPS story and then placed the old set of vague police bail restrictions on me from last year.

The prosecution made a fundamental error in law which was accepted as true and our challenge to this was also ignored, Usual situation, the CPS brief for the prosecution just assumed they knew the law better than we did.

Under s.1(1) Criminal Damage Act 1971, where the value alleged is under £5,000, (prosecutions own papers say NONE value) so the offence is summary-only without aggravating factors.

As such, s.127 Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 applies and proceedings must be instituted within six months of the alleged offence. 

(The allegation made out relates to March 2024, so any summary prosecution is absolutely out of time.)

[There are exceptions for aggravating factors e.g arson, damage is to religious memorials, or racially motivated or where this forms part of a larger set of offences the total value exceeding the £5,000 threshold. 

None of which apply to this hysterical allegation]

The lesson here seems quite clear, however innocent you are, if the CPS have been mislead by currept officers who are determined to pursue a hopeless case against you, there is practically nothing to stop them.

Again the law protecting the strong at the expense of the week.

Those restrictions once again leave me wholly unprotected from further bullying, antisocial behavior or physical assault, either by my aggressor, and / or the police.

The problem now is that the aggressor can come back and assault me and/or my elderly father again (he has previously done both), and if I do *anything* to stop such attacks or if I suffer from an autistic meltdown., I could be breach of these same old vaguely worded bail conditions that they had me on illegally for thirteen months! (And the year before that on the previous illegal charge)