Gatineau's Mayor Maude Marquis-Bissonnette has an intriguing way to deal with her city's mounting human rights complaints against police officers, which now includes a class action lawsuit.  Like Donald Trump south of the border, you betray a basic disrespect of human rights.  You, Madame Mayor, like the now infamous Trump, have shown that you choose a crass show of power over negotiation.  You also apparently choose coercion and manipulation over the rule of law which manifests in the destruction of human lives as a result of the human rights abuses under your watch.

You lead a sham government that continues at the peril of the very values of ethics and Quebec Charter values that you pledge to defend.

You proclaim that your city epitomizes racial harmony and "tolerance" for all Quebecers.  Then you preside over the following scenario when your police officers face an assessment of 44,000 in damages adjudicated by the Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse (CDPDJ), regarding racial profiling and discrimination.

Your municipal council takes a lesson from the very bad press you got when $18,000 was awarded a couple years ago to a different victim of police abuse and racial profiling by co-opting the media to preside over a media blackout over your current human rights crimes.  That way owners of local media will get their journalists to look the other way when your minions cover-up the on-going abuses of your police and your efforts to use the city's lawyers to manipulate local judges to disregard civil rights.

You then get your lawyers to terrorize the human rights victim of your police which amplifies the original human rights abuses of your municipality.  You then terrorize the opposing Government of Quebec appointed human rights lawyer to wrote up the $44,000 claim against your municipality to resign, after your lawyers demand that medical records and university transcripts over 20 years before the human rights abuse are turned over to them.  That way your municipality can further punish the human rights victim by being able to publish all their medical history and grades earned in university as a further act of retribution against your morally corrupt governance.

If that doesn't work in getting the human rights victim to withdraw their Government of Quebec agency-approved $44,000 claim against your rogue cops and corrupt operatives, you then turn your attention to the immoral manipulation of judges.  First, you try to get one Quebec Superior Court Judge to declare the Government of Quebec endorsed human rights victim to be a "vexatious litigant".   However, when that honourable and ethical judge of the court rejects your advances and declares that the human rights victim not to be a "vexatious litigant" you become even more desperate.

In your apparent playbook,  if that ethical judge fails to bow to the will of your lawyers, why not just find a judge who has an apparent stake in the case because they are an apparent relative of one of your police defendants who both bare the same surname?  Then you get that judge apparently related to the Gatineau police officer defendants who perpetrated the abuse to round-up their fellow local judges to concoct a Show Trial that you have scheduled for this February 24, 2024, that was re-scheduled only four days after it was illegally scheduled on a religious day of observance for the human rights victim.

You then in the timing of your sought Show Trial, deprive the human rights victim of legal representation and the right to a court interpreter while your municipal government lawyer who is so fluent in English actually writes articles in English, can address the court entirely in French.  That way, the English-speaking litigant will be even further deprived of his civil rights in the Show Trial you seek to perpetrate, because he will be able to understand relatively little of the lies your lawyer will repeat in front of a judge whose presence was manifested from a relative of one of your police defendants.

You then get these band of judges to effectively concoct what some people may describe as an illegal Kanagaroo Court which seeks to unconstitutionally retrial the human rights victim as a "vexatious litigant" after he was already acquitted by the previous ethical judge whose name is The Hon Justice Azimuddin Hussain.

Your municipality, Madame Mayor, seeking to declare a Government of Quebec-endorsed human rights victim, who has been a self-represented litigant due to the immoral actions of your municipality that would suspend the constitutional rights of a victim of human rights abuses, underscores the essential immorality of your hypocritical leadership.  Angel in front of the camera, and anything but angelic when the camera lights turn off.

However, your Municipality then seeking to perpetrate an illegal Show Trial under an orchestrated media blackout which violates Section 37.1 of the Quebec Charter points to the essential criminality of your government inclusive of your complicit municipal councillors.

Let's also not forget to mention that your municipality apparently previously got the presiding judge of the Quebec Human Rights Tribunal to make a ruling while your municipal lawyer knew that the human rights victim would not be there because of a religious observance.  This was done after your lawyer got the judge to totally ignore the human rights victim's motion.  This was done in complete violation of the Quebec Rules of Civil Procedure.

We the undersigned people of Gatineau, concerned Canadians and all people who support a just society for all appeal to the men and women of integrity and valour in the National Assembly pursuant to Section 21 of the Quebec Charter, ask for an investigation in the public interest toward the prospective resignation of Gatineau's Mayor Maude Marquis-Bissonnette and any complicit officers of the court.

Mayor Marquis-Bissonnette whose actions not only desecrates the Quebec Charter but also the sensibilities of Quebecers and Canadians regarding the ethical conduct of government, is the very symbol of a moral decay in our leadership that we must oppose if we aspire to a just society for all.