What one should expect from a change in the law? In cases like Tempi or Mati, for which there is strong supporting suspicion (or evidence) for ministers’ criminal offences due to negligence or otherwise, one should expect ministers (with prosecutor’s order, i.e., EPPO) to be judged in the court of law from “real” judges and not from committees which “operate” as if they were judges; not from committees which are elected in the parliament and take the important decision for the waiver of immunity and the decision for referrals, and are responsible for examining the witnesses; not from committees which depend on the correlational power between political parties; not from committees that pretend to investigate their own colleagues. Contrary, one should expect that ministers are referred to justice without immunity, the abolition of which will be decided by a judge, and that they prove their innocence in the court of law.