Judge Wells' anarchy has reached new heights where the clerk of the court is now refusing to notify parties by mail as required by law and has not filed the relevant certificate of mailing (Proof of service) CCP 1013a (4) specifies 'In case of service by the clerk of a court of record, a certificate by that clerk setting forth the exact title of the document served and filed in the cause, showing the name of the clerk and the name of the court of which he or she is the clerk, and that he or she is not a party to the cause, and showing the date and place of deposit in the mail, the name and address of the person served as shown on the envelope, and also showing that the envelope was sealed and deposited in the mail with the postage thereon fully prepaid. This form of proof is sufficient for service of process in which the clerk or deputy clerk signing the certificate places the document for collection and mailing on the date shown thereon, so as to cause it to be mailed in an envelope so sealed and so addressed on that date following standard court practices. Service made pursuant to this paragraph, upon motion of a party served and a finding of good cause by the court, shall be deemed to have occurred on the date of postage cancellation or postage meter imprint as shown on the envelope if that date is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing contained in the certificate." The court files OSCs, without a certificate of mailing "proof of service "and a hearing is set, although the hearing is not reflected on the set date. The cases are IND 13000449, IND 13000499 Riverside Superior Court.