

Boycott Amazon because they have a conflict of interest with Trump.


Boycott Amazon because they have a conflict of interest with Trump.
The Issue
The airing of Trump's The Apprentice by Amazon represents a dangerous nexus between the White House and major media corporations. The potential for conflicts of interest in this arrangement is immense, posing a risk to the independence of the media and threatening to turn beloved television programs into mouthpieces for propaganda.
This issue is deeply personal to me. A free and independent press is crucial in any democratic society. It's our safeguard against the abuse of power and encroachment on freedoms. When companies like Amazon provide a platform for such potential conflicts of interest, they inadvertently weaken the foundations of free speech and press freedom. The alignment of political figures with media outlets blurs the lines of journalistic integrity and can significantly skew public perception with biased or misleading narratives.
Let's consider the magnitude: as one of the world's largest online retailers, Amazon has an unparalleled reach into millions of homes. Couple this with the influence Donald Trump wielded as the former President of the United States, and the scale of potential propaganda becomes staggering. This is not just about a single show—it is about setting a precedent. Do we allow the simulation of governance and entertainment to converge so openly?
We need to be vigilant and proactive in upholding the values of transparency and impartiality. By boycotting Amazon's support of Trump's The Apprentice, we make a statement against the erosion of media independence. We urge Amazon to reconsider its programming choices and align them with the ethical and societal responsibilities expected of such a significant player in the industry.
If you, like me, value a free press and oppose the dissemination of propaganda through entertainment, I urge you to join this cause. Sign this petition to demand that Amazon withdraw its support for a program that stands at odds with the integrity of the free media.
There was a time when boycotting a company meant taking a moral stand against a specific atrocity—unsafe working conditions, environmental destruction, or funding a brutal regime. Today, the call to boycott Amazon is different. It isn't about one scandal; it’s about the fact that Amazon has decided to swallow American democracy whole, digest the remnants of a free press, and spit out a "reality" show that is nothing more than a White House infomercial. This time, the catalyst is the grotesque plan to reboot The Apprentice with Donald Trump Jr. as its host. But this isn't just bad television—it is a flashing neon sign that Jeff Bezos has fully transformed his trillion-dollar empire into a patronage machine for the Trump family, obliterating any ethical boundaries between the White House, the media, and Silicon Valley. It’s time to cancel your Prime subscription. Here’s why.
1. The Art of the Quid Pro Quo
A good place to start is the math, because it suggests that Amazon’s entertainment division has somehow become the least savvy negotiator in the streaming wars. Why else would the company pay into marketing the project, despite the fact that the film was critically panned and grossed a pathetic $16 million at the box office. The financial logic evaporates unless you view this payout as what Sen. Elizabeth Warren bluntly calls it: “bribery in plain sight.”
That from The Apprentice alone. By rebooting the show with the president’s eldest son at the helm, Amazon is not just creating content; it is constructing a pipeline that converts your subscription fees into direct payments for the First Family. This is a company that doesn't just sell products; it now effectively pays protection money to the most powerful political office on Earth.
2. The Shredding of the Fourth Estate
The rot doesn’t stop at the doors of Amazon Studios. It has metastasized into the newsroom of The Washington Post. Bezos’s ownership of the Post used to be a matter of civic pride; now it is a case study in journalistic surrender. Bezos blocked the paper’s planned endorsement of Kamala Harris, a move followed by the appointment of an editor specifically tasked with refocusing the opinion pages on “personal liberties and free markets”—a polite way of saying it must stop criticizing Donald Trump. The result was predictable: over 75,000 subscribers canceled in the ensuing weeks, and a hemorrhage of top editorial talent resigned in protest.
Meanwhile, the Post’s editorial board has repeatedly been caught failing to disclose Amazon’s financial ties to the Trump administration when praising Trump’s policies. When the paper defended Trump’s controversial demolition of the White House East Wing, it "forgot" to mention that Amazon was a major corporate donor to that very project. The firewall between the newsroom and the boardroom has been bulldozed. The Post, once the paper that brought down Nixon, is now running cover for a president its owner is financially tethered to.
3. Consolidation: The Truth Social Vector
Don’t ignore how the digital infrastructure is lining up. While Amazon primes its audience for Trumpian "entertainment" on Prime Video, another deal ensures the president’s grip on our screens: Trump Media & Technology Group successfully launched its Truth+ streaming platform onto Amazon Fire TV. The arrangement was announced in the very same window that Bezos killed the Post’s Harris endorsement, leading former Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan to call it a blatant “quid pro quo.” We are no longer dealing with a marketplace of ideas; we are dealing with a corporate collusion that ensures the president’s personal propaganda network is seamlessly delivered through Amazon’s hardware, while Amazon’s studio bankrolls the president’s family.
This consolidation forms a dark triad. The White House wields executive power. The Washington Post provides a veneer of journalistic legitimacy. Prime Video and Truth Social provide the propaganda platform. By participating in the Amazon ecosystem, consumers are funding all three.
4. The Big Lie of "Just Content"
Amazon’s response to this backlash has been corporate gaslighting of the highest order. Regarding the documentary, they claimed they bought it “because we think customers are going to love it.” Regarding the potentially catastrophic reboot of The Apprentice, they claim it’s merely “preliminary internal discussions.” Don’t believe it. This is the same playbook the company uses to deflect unionization efforts or warehouse safety concerns. The internal timeline betrays them: executives began talking about the reboot "around the time Trump was sworn in for his second term." This isn’t a creative brainstorm; it’s political hedging.
If a reboot with Don Jr. moves forward—and every indication suggests Bezos is too deep into "Planet Trump" to pull out—it won’t merely be a relapse into the kind of reality-TV buffoonery that helped create the political crisis in the first place. It will be a state-funded (via your subscription) revision of history, recasting the Trump dynasty as savvy business magnates even as the administration dismantles the regulatory state that might dare to hold Amazon accountable.
Fire Them
In a healthy democracy, the merger of a president’s personal business interests and the nation’s most powerful information distributors would trigger an immediate constitutional crisis. But we don’t live in a healthy democracy; we live in one where wealth protects wealth.
Legislators like Elizabeth Warren have asked the right questions, demanding transparency from Amazon, but the company simply ignores them. Since Congress won't act to sever this corrupt contract, the power lies solely with us. If you keep your Amazon Prime membership—whether it’s for the shipping, the music, or the video—you are paying a tax to the Trump family. You are bankrolling the demise of the Washington Post’s integrity. You are voting "yes" for a world where a billionaire’s media empire serves as the propaganda wing of the White House.
Cancel your subscription. It’s not just a boycott. It’s the only "firing" that still matters.

26
The Issue
The airing of Trump's The Apprentice by Amazon represents a dangerous nexus between the White House and major media corporations. The potential for conflicts of interest in this arrangement is immense, posing a risk to the independence of the media and threatening to turn beloved television programs into mouthpieces for propaganda.
This issue is deeply personal to me. A free and independent press is crucial in any democratic society. It's our safeguard against the abuse of power and encroachment on freedoms. When companies like Amazon provide a platform for such potential conflicts of interest, they inadvertently weaken the foundations of free speech and press freedom. The alignment of political figures with media outlets blurs the lines of journalistic integrity and can significantly skew public perception with biased or misleading narratives.
Let's consider the magnitude: as one of the world's largest online retailers, Amazon has an unparalleled reach into millions of homes. Couple this with the influence Donald Trump wielded as the former President of the United States, and the scale of potential propaganda becomes staggering. This is not just about a single show—it is about setting a precedent. Do we allow the simulation of governance and entertainment to converge so openly?
We need to be vigilant and proactive in upholding the values of transparency and impartiality. By boycotting Amazon's support of Trump's The Apprentice, we make a statement against the erosion of media independence. We urge Amazon to reconsider its programming choices and align them with the ethical and societal responsibilities expected of such a significant player in the industry.
If you, like me, value a free press and oppose the dissemination of propaganda through entertainment, I urge you to join this cause. Sign this petition to demand that Amazon withdraw its support for a program that stands at odds with the integrity of the free media.
There was a time when boycotting a company meant taking a moral stand against a specific atrocity—unsafe working conditions, environmental destruction, or funding a brutal regime. Today, the call to boycott Amazon is different. It isn't about one scandal; it’s about the fact that Amazon has decided to swallow American democracy whole, digest the remnants of a free press, and spit out a "reality" show that is nothing more than a White House infomercial. This time, the catalyst is the grotesque plan to reboot The Apprentice with Donald Trump Jr. as its host. But this isn't just bad television—it is a flashing neon sign that Jeff Bezos has fully transformed his trillion-dollar empire into a patronage machine for the Trump family, obliterating any ethical boundaries between the White House, the media, and Silicon Valley. It’s time to cancel your Prime subscription. Here’s why.
1. The Art of the Quid Pro Quo
A good place to start is the math, because it suggests that Amazon’s entertainment division has somehow become the least savvy negotiator in the streaming wars. Why else would the company pay into marketing the project, despite the fact that the film was critically panned and grossed a pathetic $16 million at the box office. The financial logic evaporates unless you view this payout as what Sen. Elizabeth Warren bluntly calls it: “bribery in plain sight.”
That from The Apprentice alone. By rebooting the show with the president’s eldest son at the helm, Amazon is not just creating content; it is constructing a pipeline that converts your subscription fees into direct payments for the First Family. This is a company that doesn't just sell products; it now effectively pays protection money to the most powerful political office on Earth.
2. The Shredding of the Fourth Estate
The rot doesn’t stop at the doors of Amazon Studios. It has metastasized into the newsroom of The Washington Post. Bezos’s ownership of the Post used to be a matter of civic pride; now it is a case study in journalistic surrender. Bezos blocked the paper’s planned endorsement of Kamala Harris, a move followed by the appointment of an editor specifically tasked with refocusing the opinion pages on “personal liberties and free markets”—a polite way of saying it must stop criticizing Donald Trump. The result was predictable: over 75,000 subscribers canceled in the ensuing weeks, and a hemorrhage of top editorial talent resigned in protest.
Meanwhile, the Post’s editorial board has repeatedly been caught failing to disclose Amazon’s financial ties to the Trump administration when praising Trump’s policies. When the paper defended Trump’s controversial demolition of the White House East Wing, it "forgot" to mention that Amazon was a major corporate donor to that very project. The firewall between the newsroom and the boardroom has been bulldozed. The Post, once the paper that brought down Nixon, is now running cover for a president its owner is financially tethered to.
3. Consolidation: The Truth Social Vector
Don’t ignore how the digital infrastructure is lining up. While Amazon primes its audience for Trumpian "entertainment" on Prime Video, another deal ensures the president’s grip on our screens: Trump Media & Technology Group successfully launched its Truth+ streaming platform onto Amazon Fire TV. The arrangement was announced in the very same window that Bezos killed the Post’s Harris endorsement, leading former Post editor-at-large Robert Kagan to call it a blatant “quid pro quo.” We are no longer dealing with a marketplace of ideas; we are dealing with a corporate collusion that ensures the president’s personal propaganda network is seamlessly delivered through Amazon’s hardware, while Amazon’s studio bankrolls the president’s family.
This consolidation forms a dark triad. The White House wields executive power. The Washington Post provides a veneer of journalistic legitimacy. Prime Video and Truth Social provide the propaganda platform. By participating in the Amazon ecosystem, consumers are funding all three.
4. The Big Lie of "Just Content"
Amazon’s response to this backlash has been corporate gaslighting of the highest order. Regarding the documentary, they claimed they bought it “because we think customers are going to love it.” Regarding the potentially catastrophic reboot of The Apprentice, they claim it’s merely “preliminary internal discussions.” Don’t believe it. This is the same playbook the company uses to deflect unionization efforts or warehouse safety concerns. The internal timeline betrays them: executives began talking about the reboot "around the time Trump was sworn in for his second term." This isn’t a creative brainstorm; it’s political hedging.
If a reboot with Don Jr. moves forward—and every indication suggests Bezos is too deep into "Planet Trump" to pull out—it won’t merely be a relapse into the kind of reality-TV buffoonery that helped create the political crisis in the first place. It will be a state-funded (via your subscription) revision of history, recasting the Trump dynasty as savvy business magnates even as the administration dismantles the regulatory state that might dare to hold Amazon accountable.
Fire Them
In a healthy democracy, the merger of a president’s personal business interests and the nation’s most powerful information distributors would trigger an immediate constitutional crisis. But we don’t live in a healthy democracy; we live in one where wealth protects wealth.
Legislators like Elizabeth Warren have asked the right questions, demanding transparency from Amazon, but the company simply ignores them. Since Congress won't act to sever this corrupt contract, the power lies solely with us. If you keep your Amazon Prime membership—whether it’s for the shipping, the music, or the video—you are paying a tax to the Trump family. You are bankrolling the demise of the Washington Post’s integrity. You are voting "yes" for a world where a billionaire’s media empire serves as the propaganda wing of the White House.
Cancel your subscription. It’s not just a boycott. It’s the only "firing" that still matters.

26
The Decision Makers

Supporter Voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on May 2, 2026



