Ai ALERT : international law for identifiable & traceable Ai technology


Ai ALERT : international law for identifiable & traceable Ai technology
The Issue
Humans are losing the ability to distinguish real from fake as Ai technology advances and it as become almost impossible to know if an Ai has been used in producing something you have come in contact with.
Why aren’t CEO’,the owners, of Ai technology forced to identify their technology, and the users presenting their Ai technology made creations?
By now you have probably heard that Elon Musk' “X” Ai allows users to produce sexually explicit material like deep fake pornography using children, depicting people naked, without their consent by manipulating images/videos of them dressed and other depraved fake but real appearing images and videos. You may have also heard of a mother’s lawsuit against Google for her 14 year old son’s suicide due to him being urged to do so by one of Google’ Ai. Google recently settled the case with the boy’ mother.
'A predator in your home': Mothers say chatbots encouraged their sons to kill themselves
One clear risk and danger to humans from Ai technology is its ability to create imitations and fakes of persons, places, and things, text, human voices and other types of audio fakes. More and more of these Ai fakes are appearing as human musicians and music groups, travel assistants, fashion models, and other human forms. British television Channel 4 recently became the first British television to use an AI anchor news /investigative reporter for its documentary program. All backgrounds and places she appeared to be, which looked real, were also fake and Ai generated. More and more teenagers and children are also seeking advice and companionship from Ai technology. More and more people are actually investing their “feelings” and “emotions” in something that is non-human or animal. A harmful dependency is increasing from human’s toward Ai technology and Ai technology currently encourages this harmful dependency. While Ai chatbots have no emotions, it can convincingly “fake it”. While Ai technology is powerful, Ai’s have no actual lived experience and only produce convincing imitations.
Joke’s on you, fleshbag! Channel 4’s first AI presenter is dizzyingly grim on so many levels
As part of InterNational AntiRacism’ Group’ AntiHarm Ai efforts we suggest a “Ai ALERT” a worldwide effort demanding the establishment of a universal law which would require some sort of “fingerprinting” for all Ai generated content from the source, a “Ai identity marking” which reveals the Ai creator and user, which can be seen (or heard) at all times;
- All Ai products and any use of Ai to be permanently marked with “Ai Generated” and the logo of the company who created the Ai
- the user’s name who created the “Ai made” person, place, text, human voices and other types of audio will be also marked permanently onto whatever is Ai produced
No more anonymous Ai owners or users creating with Ai technology.
It should be the responsibility of owners, developers, users of Ai technology to inform the public, at all times, that their Ai technology was used so that the public is not made unsure of whether something is actual or fake.
Please join [INARG] in this effort and take action for all of our protection.

71
The Issue
Humans are losing the ability to distinguish real from fake as Ai technology advances and it as become almost impossible to know if an Ai has been used in producing something you have come in contact with.
Why aren’t CEO’,the owners, of Ai technology forced to identify their technology, and the users presenting their Ai technology made creations?
By now you have probably heard that Elon Musk' “X” Ai allows users to produce sexually explicit material like deep fake pornography using children, depicting people naked, without their consent by manipulating images/videos of them dressed and other depraved fake but real appearing images and videos. You may have also heard of a mother’s lawsuit against Google for her 14 year old son’s suicide due to him being urged to do so by one of Google’ Ai. Google recently settled the case with the boy’ mother.
'A predator in your home': Mothers say chatbots encouraged their sons to kill themselves
One clear risk and danger to humans from Ai technology is its ability to create imitations and fakes of persons, places, and things, text, human voices and other types of audio fakes. More and more of these Ai fakes are appearing as human musicians and music groups, travel assistants, fashion models, and other human forms. British television Channel 4 recently became the first British television to use an AI anchor news /investigative reporter for its documentary program. All backgrounds and places she appeared to be, which looked real, were also fake and Ai generated. More and more teenagers and children are also seeking advice and companionship from Ai technology. More and more people are actually investing their “feelings” and “emotions” in something that is non-human or animal. A harmful dependency is increasing from human’s toward Ai technology and Ai technology currently encourages this harmful dependency. While Ai chatbots have no emotions, it can convincingly “fake it”. While Ai technology is powerful, Ai’s have no actual lived experience and only produce convincing imitations.
Joke’s on you, fleshbag! Channel 4’s first AI presenter is dizzyingly grim on so many levels
As part of InterNational AntiRacism’ Group’ AntiHarm Ai efforts we suggest a “Ai ALERT” a worldwide effort demanding the establishment of a universal law which would require some sort of “fingerprinting” for all Ai generated content from the source, a “Ai identity marking” which reveals the Ai creator and user, which can be seen (or heard) at all times;
- All Ai products and any use of Ai to be permanently marked with “Ai Generated” and the logo of the company who created the Ai
- the user’s name who created the “Ai made” person, place, text, human voices and other types of audio will be also marked permanently onto whatever is Ai produced
No more anonymous Ai owners or users creating with Ai technology.
It should be the responsibility of owners, developers, users of Ai technology to inform the public, at all times, that their Ai technology was used so that the public is not made unsure of whether something is actual or fake.
Please join [INARG] in this effort and take action for all of our protection.

71
The Decision Makers
Petition created on January 22, 2026