https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1604603543200679&id=100009531453593 We want a follow up! Don't worry we are not asking that you assist in the kidnapping of anyone! Please help as this man is under constant, media attack due to your provocative and bias story, I ask that you do a special follow up on Leith Erikson, The Australian Brotherhood Of Fathers, you need to right your show's wrong by labeling this man a dead beat dad! There are always two sides to every story and this man has saved many of lives and there are thousands that would testify to that!Please Tracy help those who have no voice! The treatment of Australian families dealing with child access issues after separation is shameful and in many instances gender biased. We are seeking better outcomes – it’s time for change. The treatment of Australian families dealing with child access issues after separation is shameful and in many instances gender biased. We are seeking better outcomes – it’s time for change.  The ABF believe these issues include, but are not limited to, child access on separation, support calculations, allowing no fact evidence and delays and rulings in the Family Court system.   The ABF is committed to lobbying government to fix policy so that it provides mandatory access outcomes for fathers, removing the high financial and emotional burden of Family Court involvement. Fathers deserve equal opportunity for shared parenting with shared costs, providing a more equitable child support payment system.  Statistics are very clear regarding the negative social impact children from fatherless families have on our society. The ABF can no longer stand by and allow flawed social policy to damage the future of our nation. Fathers affected by no access or limited child access are more likely to deal with long lasting problems that include emotional distress, anger & domestic violence issues, mental health issues, social isolation, substance abuse and an unwillingness to comply with the courts or the law generally. We believe by providing  a more equatable plan that promotes the role of shared parenting, 50/50 were suitable which would be supported by a flat rate child payment based on national welfare calculations, we could achieve a fair balance in the financial care of children that allows for active participation by both parents  in raising children in a separated family.