To all advocates of traditional petrol and diesel vehicles, the time to make our voices heard is now. As we approach the pivotal years of 2030-2035, it is imperative that we confront the impending ban on combustion engine cars with resolute determination. This issue demands our immediate and urgent attention, for the consequences of such a ban are both far-reaching and deeply concerning.

I categorically reject the notion that banning petrol and diesel vehicles will have a significant positive impact on climate change and global warming. This perspective, held by some policymakers, is not only misguided but dangerously naive. Contrary to popular belief, electric vehicles (EVs) are not the panacea for environmental issues. In fact, the production and disposal of EV batteries pose severe environmental hazards. The extraction of materials for these batteries is a process heavily reliant on fossil fuels, leading to substantial CO2 emissions and environmental degradation.

Furthermore, the silent operation of electric vehicles introduces new safety risks. The absence of engine noise, even with artificial sound enhancements, makes EVs a potential danger on the roads. Pedestrians and other road users are at a higher risk of accidents, as the quiet approach of an EV can be imperceptible, especially in complex traffic situations or around blind bends.

The logistical challenges associated with electric vehicles are equally troubling. The current infrastructure for charging EVs is grossly inadequate. Charging stations are sparse, particularly in rural areas, and the time required to fully charge an EV—often up to an hour—is impractical for many users. This inefficiency is a stark contrast to the quick refueling process of traditional vehicles, which allows for longer, uninterrupted journeys.

Additionally, the economic burden of electric vehicles cannot be ignored. The high cost of EVs places them out of reach for many consumers. The depreciation and potential battery failure in second-hand electric cars further complicate their marketability, leading to increased waste as these vehicles are prematurely scrapped.

There is also a significant mental health aspect to consider. The forced transition to electric vehicles can cause undue stress and frustration among car enthusiasts, dealership owners, and consumers who prefer the reliability and convenience of combustion engine vehicles. The mental toll of this policy shift is an often overlooked but critical factor.

I am confident that many dealers and manufacturers share my concerns. The mandate to produce and promote electric cars, particularly in supercar showrooms and dealerships, is widely viewed with apprehension. These stakeholders recognize the challenges and risks associated with the forced adoption of EVs and often prefer the proven technology of traditional combustion engines.

In light of these compelling arguments, it is clear that the blanket ban on combustion engine cars is an ill-considered policy. We must advocate for a more balanced approach that considers the full spectrum of environmental, safety, and economic impacts. The global sale of traditional vehicles will continue, rendering the UK's unilateral ban ineffective in the grand scheme of climate change.

We urge policymakers to reconsider the 2030-2035 combustion engine car ban. By doing so, we can ensure a more sustainable and practical transition to greener technologies while preserving the freedoms and preferences of motorists. Let us act now to protect our future, our safety, and our environment.