Bruce Vincent Rauner is an American businessman, philanthropist, and politician. He is the 42nd and current Governor of Illinois, serving since January 12, 2015.
Bruce Vincent Rauner is an American businessman, philanthropist, and politician. He is the 42nd and current Governor of Illinois, serving since January 12, 2015.
Prevent Illinois from killing their police dogs.
In Illinois, a police dog trainer is threatening that legalizing marijuana in the state will lead to the euthanization of police K9 dogs — and an Illinois Sheriff is agreeing with him. This is a horrible attempt to use animal cruelty to stop marijuana legalization. In March, voters in Cook County, Illinois where Chicago is located passed a measure in support of legalizing marijuana. Marijuana is now legal in nine states and Washington, D.C. and 61% of Americans now favor of legalization. For Illinois law enforcement to say that they will kill dogs they no longer need for smelling marijuana is awful. No other state has done this and it is completely cruel and unnecessary. They are using these dogs as a scare tactic for the public so they won’t have legal marijuana. Join in me in calling on Illinois Governor and lawmakers to stop any attempt to kill police K9 dogs. These police dogs can absolutely be retired or trained of focus on more harmful drugs.
Help Us Save Mikey
STOP CHILD ABUSE! Since infancy, Mikey was abused and neglected "allegedly" at the hands of his mother and her paramours. He was frequently subjected to criminal activity, trauma, and violence on a daily basis. Reports to DCFS were not properly investigated, so it went ignored even though there was substantial proof within police and medical reports. Mikey had been burned, beaten, thrown, and tied up so tightly he had rope burns. Close to twelve complaints had been relayed to DCFS concerning Mikey’s care; and yet, those investigations were all deemed “unfounded”. Shortly thereafter, however, Mikey’s mother was arrested for manufacturing a meth lab in her home and Mikey was removed on an emergency order. Since, four year old Mikey has been living in a loving, structured and supportive environment with his father. But this home is now being threatened. HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN? The judicial system in McClean County Illinois failed to protect him. They barred testimony from crucial witnesses in his custody battle, citing that the “case is not about the best interest of the child”, and ordered the father who had previously been awarded sole physical and legal custody to return to the state with the boy or face contempt of court. This order came two years after Michael Cadena Sr. and his son relocated to Massachusetts due to numerous threats of physical harm by the maternal grandfather and male friends of the mother in Illinois as allowed by the UCCJA and PKPA laws. The court did this knowing that returning the child could re-traumatize him and went against the recommendations of Mikey’s pediatrician, psychologist, and play therapist combined. This is not the first time the McClean County judicial system or Illinois DCFS have failed to protect children in these circumstances. In March of 2009, Amy Leichtberg lost her two young children after the same State’s Attorney and judges ignored her continual pleas for help. Similarly with Mikey’s mother, they instead aided Amy’s ex-husband as he worked toward supposed redemption. Despite his odd behavior and criminal record, her husband received the benefit of the doubt from police, prosecutors and a family court judge. Her husband, (a man who vowed often to harm her, himself, and violated a protective order 56 times) killed himself and the children while out on a court ordered unsupervised visit. In April of 2017, 17 month old Semaj Crosby was found dead under a couch in her home hours after a DCFS well-being check. Semaj and others within the home were subjects of half a dozen Illinois DCFS investigations, some in relation to drug abuse or corporal punishment. Like in many of Mikey’s investigations, hers were also deemed “unfounded”. It was later discovered by the Chicago Tribune that the agency purposefully filed delayed reports related to Semaj’s case to make it appear as though they had been actively investigating claims of child abuse and neglect all along. In addition to Semaj’s case, then Illinois DCFS director George Sheldon came under fire for controversial contracts and hires. Also that year, a state child welfare probe uncovered that Illinois DCFS investigators had launched contests that awarded $100 gift card to workers who closed the most cases in a month. Most often it was discovered that these cases would be closed without basic information being gathered leaving the children involved in dangerous situations. George Sheldon has since resigned. WE NEED YOUR HELP! Currently, Mikey’s case is under review by Chief Justice Judge Casey of Norfolk County, Massachusetts and he has a chance for a fair hearing in a state that is known to always look out for a child’s well-being. Child abuse should not be tolerated. The system failed Mikey once and we can’t let them do it again. Now more than ever, Mikey’s story needs to be told. We need the public to see the injustice this poor boy has endured and continues to face. No child should ever be forced back into the arms of their abuser. PLEASE SUPPORT OUR CAUSE! While we wait for a ruling, we are fighting to give Mikey a voice. Please sign our petition to help keep Mikey safe in his father’s care and raise awareness of child abuse. To learn more about his story or to follow our campaign, click the Mikey's Story link below or visit us at Help Us Save Mikey on Facebook. Mikey's Story
New trial for an innocent man
Detective Richard Zuley may be most famous for his notorious interrogations at Guantanamo Bay, but he first learned his torture techniques in the interrogation rooms of Chicago. Now, this 30-year veteran of the Chicago PD is under investigation for using illegal methods to coerce confessions that have put several possibly innocent people behind bars. One of his cases has already been overturned, and a man who spent 23 years in prison is now finally free. But while officials slowly make their way through the pages of evidence against this corrupt cop, my friend Lee Harris -- another of Zuley’s many victims -- still wastes away in prison. My name is Robert. From 2000-2001, I shared a cell with Lee. We became good friends. Like a lot of people in prison, he would go on about how he was innocent and how he had been wrongly accused, but I never knew what to believe. However, when I received letters from the “witness” who put him away, apologizing for lying on the stand, I started digging: Lee’s conviction doesn’t add up. And now that I am on the outside, I am doing everything I can to get him a new trial so he can prove his innocence. I am asking Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office to grant my friend Lee Harris a new trial, so he can prove his innocence. He shouldn’t spend one more day behind bars while the true criminal is allowed to walk free. At first, Lee collaborated with Detective Zuley to help him find the real killer in the crime he is doing time for. Facing public pressure to find the killer, they pressed Lee for information using both threats and rewards. In one instance, Zuley offered him a $20,000 reward, and in another, he threatened to stop providing protection for his family, exposing them to retaliation. When they couldn’t find the real killer, they turned on their informant and charged him with the crime. They had no murder weapon or evidence connecting Lee to the crime. Yet, even with all these legal missteps and the lack of evidence, they still threw Lee behind bars for 90 years. He remains in jail to this day for a crime I am sure he didn’t commit. And I am not the only one: Chicago attorney Jennifer Blagg, who has won many exonerations in the US, is now taking a closer look at Harris’ conviction. It’s time to grant my friend Lee Harris a new trial and let true justice be served. We cannot continue to keep this man behind bars while the real killer could be walking the streets. Please sign my petition and help me fight for justice for Lee Harris.
Dog Protection Act - Illinois
A horrifying headline as written in December 2016 by Fox News in Denver after two companion animals were shot in Battle Creek, Michigan: Federal court rules police can shoot a dog if it moves or barks when officers enter a home. The Department of Justice estimates that nearly 25 dogs are killed by law enforcement every day in the United States, which makes a total of 10,000 per year. It is as simple as this - in Illinois there is currently no means to protect companion dogs, including in your very own home, from being shot and killed if local law enforcement, in any way, deems your dog a threat to their safety. This is a petition to Illinois State Senate and House to put forward legislation that protects dogs from this possible fate. The statute would require local law enforcement to undergo training in order to prevent the shooting of dogs by local law enforcement officers in the line of duty. Specifically, this statute would put forth assistance in the training of law enforcement officers so that they can differentiate between threatening and non-threatening dog behaviors, as well as to employ non-lethal means whenever possible. I urge you to read Colorado's new legislation, Dog Protection Act, which was developed for exactly this reason: Colorado's Dog Protection Act. I am asking for replication of these efforts in Illinois and, eventually, U.S. wide. I have a Boxer who loves to bark and even run at the door. She would rather lick you to death than harm you, but it is a huge fear that if law enforcement needed to enter my home and my dog ran at them or barked that she could be killed for it. It is for this reason, and for all of the other dogs out there, that I propose this legislation.
Get Justice for Kenneka Jenkins
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/ct-woman-found-dead-rosemont-hotel-20170910-story.html I believe this girl was intentionally murdered by her friends the night before she was pronounced dead. They are not being charged with murder and should be investigated and charged.
Don't let my sisters killer be released on parole.
One of the satanic group that killed my sister (and others) is getting out of jail, serving only half of his sentence. Read this and you'll question why on earth our government would let this happen: http://www.mysuburbanlife.com/2017/07/31/chicago-ripper-crew-member-convicted-of-elmhurst-murder-to-be-released-in-september/a27vqon/
We want to make September 11th, Patriots' Day, a federal holiday.
The purpose of this petition is to get the United States government to recognize September 11th, Patriots' Day, as a federal holiday. A moment of silence does not do justice to the 3,000 people that were slaughtered on September 11th and then the military service members and government workers who died in the wars since September 11th. It should be a day to spend with friends and family, celebrating our freedom and life here in this wonderful country. We hold a minute of silence and lose the significance of the day as we do our usual work. Friends and family, especially those who lost people on September 11th or in the wars, should be able to spend the time together, to remember and celebrate the lives of those that have died. It should be a federal holiday for everyone to take time off to recognize the significance of that day. I served 9 years in the army prior to September 11th, fighting in one war and 3 deployments. My oldest son fought as a Marine in 3/5 Marines for 4 years, serving as a machine gunner in Afghanistan. He came home alive but many of his friends didn't and we've lost people every year since September 11th. That day is the most significant day in the history of this country in the 21st century. Not since the attack on Pearl Harbor have we seen our country attacked on our own land. This should be a day to celebrate all of us, but particularly the 3,000 that died on September 11th, 2001. 3,000 innocent people that were working at their jobs or taking a flight, killed mercilessly. We celebrate life and heal the wounds that we, as a country, have suffered and it helps in reinforcing the fortitude needed by Americans to continue our battle to bring peace about.
METRA DISCOUNT FOR COLLEGE STUDENTS
For all of the commuter students who have been taking the Metra to get downtown from the Rock Island District, Electric Line, Southwest Corridor, etc. who are tired of increased ticket prices each year. I understand fully that public transportation in Chicago needs appropriate funding in order to continue to provide round the clock transportation via bus, train, or subway train. But it is inappropriate to continue to charge these commuting students, and in some cases the family of these students, higher and higher fare cost simply because Metra has a monopoly on train transportation. This petition is for a reduced fare cost (-$3.00) off of Chicago Metra Train tickets for qualifying students who are taking classes full time at a University within the Chicago metropolitan area. So if a ticket is $6.75, you should be able to show your ID, give your UPASS for scanning, or show your student status through the Metra App to the train Attendant for the discount and only pay $3.75. If you are a part-time student, the same rules will apply as for full time students only you will receive a discount of (-$1.50) off of tickets. The students of Chicago, as well as suburbanite students who frequent Chicago for college classes are fed up with this borderline coercive monopoly called the Metra. We need change and now! - Cedric Ngwa
Abolish the Felony Murder Rule in America!!
Abolish the Felony Murder Rule in the USAFelony Murder Thousands of people are growing old in prisons for crimes they did not commit! Some are even doing life... for murders they did not commit. This Law charges anyone involved in a felony in which a person is killed. (720 ILCS 5/9-1) (from Ch. 38, par. 9-1)Sec. 9-1. First degree Murder (a) A person who kills an individual without lawful justification commits first degree murder if, in performing the acts which cause the death: (1) he either intends to kill or do great bodily harm to that individual or another, or knows that such acts will cause death to that individual or another; or (2) he knows that such acts create a strong probability of death or great bodily harm to that individual or another; or (3) he is attempting or committing a forcible felony other than second degree murder. First degree murder holds a mandatory sentence of 20-60 years in IL You do not have to be found guilty of the underlying felonies, you have to have been in the "commission of"... which means; attempting to, and even fleeing from. Many states have amended the felony murder rule, some have abolished it all together. Some states have what is called agency theory; which states that a felon can't be found guilty for the death of a co-felon only the death of an innocent party. Illinois follows the proximate cause theory of felony murder. Under this theory, there is no requirement that a defendant be the person who both attempts or commits the felony and who performs the act that kills the victim. From JUSTICE McMORROW, "The majority provides no explanation for how the purpose of the felony-murder doctrine is served by applying it in cases such as this. Rather, the majority’s holding is simply that the proximate cause theory ‘compels’ this result. I disagree with this conclusion. Where a co felon is killed by a third party, the most direct cause of the death is the co felon's participation in the felony, not the defendant’s acts. Contrary to the majority’s characterization, this distinction does not go to the ‘guilt or innocence’ of the decedent. Rather, this distinction pertains to the ‘proximate cause’ of the death. Significantly, we are not here considering an issue of tort liability, but an issue of imposing criminal liability for first degree murder with the severe consequences that entails. In my view, the distinction between a third party killing an innocent party and a third party killing a participant in the felony must be accorded weight. It is illogical to conclude that the same degree of guilt should attach where a defendant's felony results in the death of an innocent party and where it results in the death of an active participant in the felony.” Examples;two people decide to rob a store, store owner kills one... other one charged with murder. one man gives his friend a ride, friend decides to rob someone and is killed in the process... friend in car is charged with murder.two men attempting to rob, police apprehend one... he's in the back of police car. Police pursue other and end up shooting him, his friend in the back of the car... charged with murder. There are SO MANY ... thousands more, these are just a few. PLEASE HELP ME AMEND THIS LAW BY SIGNING THIS PETITION! ALL STATES THAT STILL HAVE FELONY MURDER LAW SHOULD BE AMENDED AT THE VERY LEAST TO THE "AGENCY THEORY" How can one be charged with the actions of another? OR ABOLISHED ALL TOGETHER! Americans should not be charged with murder unless they've committed a murder!! The rule is unjust because it requires no intent to kill! The Felony Murder Rule originated in England, it's purpose was to deter people from committing crimes with other people. It doesn't work!! In fact England abolished it decades ago! "In Canada, it has been held to be unconstitutional, as breaching the principles of fundamental justice." Imagine for a moment one of your children, decides to take a ride with some kids... ONE of them does something stupid and now your child is facing the rest of his life in prison. If a person does fear for his life, or uses deadly force to stop a felony from occurring... how can a shooting that would normally be called justifiable, end in a murder charge? They charge people with murder that were justified shootings by the police. It doesn't make sense that a killing could be legal and illegal at the same time! It would make more sense to give harsher sentences for the crimes that are committed, not a crime that wasn't. How can a law act as a deterrent if people in this country do not even understand it or how it works? It simply can’t. I am asking for fair justice. Smart justice. The felony murder rule is neither. "It is wrong to accuse and convict someone for a crime they NEVER committed, it is wrong to accuse and convict someone for murder when they never intended to murder anyone." Illinois' felony murder rule is among the broadest in the nation, it is out of step with modern criminal and sentencing codes! The answer is not to charge someone who did not commit a murder and to punish them equally with those that do! The time should fit the crime! Definitions:First-Degree Murder - A premeditated (planned) killing accompanied by the intent to kill, malice aforethought (planning to kill a particular victim or anyone who might try to prevent such a killing).Second-Degree Murder - A non-premeditated killing resulting from an assault in which death is probable or highly likely.Voluntary Manslaughter - Killing in the heat of passion or while committing a felony.Involuntary Manslaughter - Death which occurs accidentally or in violation of a non-felony, such as reckless driving.Homicide - The killing of a human being due to the act or omission of another. Non-criminal homicides include killing in self-defense, accidents, such as a hunting accident, or a traffic accident where there is no violation of the law, such as reckless driving. Intent is the criterion, which elevates a homicide, which may be innocent or criminal, to murder.Felony Murder Rule - allows a defendant to be charged with first-degree murder for a killing that occurs during a felony, even if the defendant is not the killer. The felony murder rule is an exception to the normal rules of homicide. Normally, a defendant can be convicted of murder only if a prosecutor shows that the defendant acted with the intent to kill or with a reckless indifference to human life. Under the felony murder rule, however, a defendant can be convicted of murder even if the defendant did not act with intent or a reckless indifference; the prosecution must show only that the defendant participated in a felony where fatalities occurred. What is Wrong With The Felony Murder Rule:From Change.org: Abolish the Felony Murder Rule Worldwide. by Themis Papaioannou Shoreham⦁ The felony murder rule relieves the prosecution of its burden of proving intent to kill, which is a necessary element of murder.⦁ The felony murder rule removes the relation between criminal liability and moral culpability in that it punishes all homicides in the commission, or attempted commission, of felonies, whether intentional, unintentional, or accidental, without proving the relation between the homicide and the perpetrator's state of mind.⦁ The intention to commit a felony does not equal the intention to kill, nor is the intention to commit a felony, by itself, sufficient to establish a charge of murder.⦁ Under the felony murder rule, the defendant's state of mind is irrelevant. Because intent is a characterization of a particular state of mind with respect to a killing, felony murder bears little resemblance to the offense of murder except in name. ⦁ Holding one or many criminally liable for the bad results of an act which differs greatly from the intended results is based on a concept of culpability which is totally at odds with the general principles of jurisprudence.⦁ It is fundamentally unfair and in violation of basic principles of individual criminal culpability to hold one felon liable for the unforeseen and un-agreed to results of another felon's action.⦁ The basic rule of culpability is further violated when felony murder is categorized as first-degree murder because all other first-degree murders (carrying equal punishment) require a showing of premeditation, deliberation and willfulness, while felony murder only requires a showing of intent to do the underlying felony.⦁ The purpose of creating degrees of murder is to punish with increased severity the more culpable forms of murder, but an accidental killing during the commission or attempted commission of a felony is punished more severely than a second-degree murder.⦁ While the felony murder rule survives in some states, the numerous modifications and restrictions of it by some states' courts and legislatures throughout the United States reflect dissatisfaction with the basic harshness and injustice of the doctrine and call into question its continued existence.⦁ The felony murder rule can be used by prosecutors in a manner so as to cause grossly disproportionate sentencing, depending on the circumstances of each individual case.⦁ The felony murder rule is unconstitutional because presumption of innocence is thrown to the winds. The prosecution needs only to prove intent to commit the underlying felony; that done, first degree-murder becomes part of the underlying felony because intent to commit murder does not have to be proved. (a) The felony murder rule is unconstitutional because in some cases it violates the Eighth Amendment: cruel and unusual punishment, grossly disproportionate to the crime(s) actually committed. (b) The felony murder rule holds unequally involved parties equally accountable and punishable. Again, cruel and unusual punishment if you're only the lookout for a robber who happens to kill in the process of the robbery.⦁ The felony murder rule violates the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process because no defense is allowed on the charge of first-degree murder, only the underlying felony.⦁ The felony murder rule bears no rational relationship or equity in its two penalties, with the penalties of other murder laws, including, at times, the charge of first-degree murder.⦁ It is no longer acceptable to equate the intent to commit a felony with the intent to kill." This is an unjust law in the USA!! From, Criminal Law Wayne R. LaFave, Austin W. Scott, Jr. Hornbook series:"Long ago Holmes, in his book "The common Law" discussing the felony murder doctrine, supposed the case of one who, to steal some chickens, shoots at them, accidentally killing a man in the chicken house whose presence could not have been suspected. The fact that the defendant happened to be committing a felony when he shot is an illogical thing to fasten onto to make the accidental killing a murder, for the fact that the shooting is felonious does not increase the likelihood of killing people. "If the object of the (felony murder) rule is to prevent such accidents, it should make accidental killing with firearms murder, not accidental killing in the effort to steal; while if its object is to prevent stealing, it would do better to hang one thief in every thousand by lot.""Although the felony murder doctrine is well entrenched in American Law, the future may witness its gradual disappearance from the criminal law scene, as it has disappeared in England, the country which created it." From, The injustice of the Felony Murder Rule- Columbia Undergraduate Law Review:"The felony murder rule makes it easy... gives a more sufficient method of plea-bargaining, as mentioned in the Tennessee Supreme Court Case; State v. Anderson. The case asserted that the felony murder rule's purpose was to "give prosecutors flexibility in presenting and obtaining plea deals" The decision reasoned that when faced with the possibility of a first degree murder conviction, criminals are much more likely to admit to their guilt and accept a plea bargain- the court decision states that this outcome facilitates the "prompter imposition of punishment on acknowledged offenders" and helps "conserve scarce judicial resources" However there is little to no evidence of any such increased efficiency within the justice system. In fact, this supposed defense of the rule can easily be turned on its head, to reveal damning legal consequences. Although it is unclear whether or not the threat of a first-degree murder conviction expedites legal processes, one thing is certain: that increased pressure on the defendant makes him or her more vulnerable to proprietorial pressure. Because they know that the risk of a first-degree murder conviction is too high for most defendants to take, prosecutors can set the most abusive plea bargain possible. Defendants are too scared to risk a first-degree murder conviction, plead guilty to a lesser charge even if they aren't guilty of it! Considered another way, because the plea bargains are so abusive, some felons are irrationally incentivized to risk the first-degree murder conviction. Such was the case with Ryan Holle, who lent his car to his roommate and was convicted of first-degree murder when his roommate used the car to drive to a person's house and kill them. Holle, who had no idea that his roommate was murderous, was technically an accessory to the felony and therefore charged under the felony murder rule. He was offered a 10-year plea bargain but mistakenly assuming the court would uphold his innocence, he rejected it. He is now serving life without parole!" "Now, in our age of woefully overcrowded jails, skyrocketing recidivism rates, and a criminal justice system seen by much of the public as broken, it is more important than ever for us to carefully consider our laws: to ask ourselves what they stand for and whom they affect. A law that is ineffective, manipulative, and principally unjust has no place in our Penal Code. A law that threatens the very foundation of our legal philosophy -the mens rea requirement- has no right to remain in our legal system. And a law that crudely equates unarmed robbers with premeditating murders, throwing them both into the same, overflowing prison cell, certainly has no role in our criminal justice system." Please help by signing this petition, Thank you. mens rea requirement- It is a necessary element of many crimes. The standard common law test of criminal liability is expressed in the Latin phrase actus reus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, i.e. "the act is not culpable unless the mind is guilty". Weak mens rea requirements and felony murder go against the notion of basic principles of criminal law... a person must know that he or she is committed a crime in order to be prosecuted for it. We as Americans have a right to a fair trial, we have a right against cruel and unusual punishment and we have the right to Just Laws!! We are to be presumed innocent, until proven guilty!! Unless a person is guilty of 1st degree murder, they should not be convicted of 1st degree murder!! Do not wait until this affects someone that you love!! Thomas Jefferson's statement in the Declaration of Independence, "...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government...," Sources:Criminal Law, Wayne R. LaFave Austin W. Scott, Jr. Hornbook seriesThe injustice of the Felony Murder Rule- Columbia Unergraduate Law Review:Tribune, Chicago. "Illinois' Felony-murder Law Overreaches." Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia / LII / Legal Change.org: Abolish the Felony Murder Rule Worldwide. by Themis Papaioannou ShorehamJUSTICE McMORROW, illinoiscourts.gov/opinions/supremecourt/2006/june/opinions/html/100257.htm
Namibian police, stop assaulting people. End police brutality NOW. #Help_me_find_Michael!
I was a assaulted and kicked by a group of police officers and thus almost lost an eye on Saturday the 11th of August 2018 for taking pics of a police officer by the name Michael who assaulted me before the severe attack with his colleagues on and threatened him of posting his pictures on social media. They confiscated my phone and handcuffed me and thus kicked me in the abdomen and face. They demanded for the pics to be deleted for them to hide their identity. I know one of the Police officers that was present at the scene and she works at Katutura Police station. I opened a cased against Michael for perpetrating violence but the Police officers refused to help me. I explained everything to the station commander and later they agreed that I can open a case. I opened a case. Police officers are now threatening me on Facebook that my docket will be lost coz they will never investigate their colleagues for assaulting people. Some of these are officers that were present when I opened the case. I want the police to investigate this case urgently and help identify Michael, a member of the City police . Michael must apologize and compensate for the damages and misery he caused. I want the police to investigate and bring Michael to order. I want justice. We are tired of docket getting lost when it's police officers involved but they keep locking up taxi drivers each an everyday struggling to put bread on the table. I want JUSTICE.