24,010 signatures
National Government
- 34,255,983 supporters taking action on this topic.
- 445 petitions started in this community.
Start a petition
Explore 445 petitions in National Government
Topics related to National Government
Stories and updates from petition starters
Ban School Uniform in Pornographic Content
Next goal: 50,000! #BanSchoolUniformInPornOvernight we hit the significant milestone of 20,000 signatures for this important campaign and the numbers are still rising today…Read full update
No School Fines- don't prosecute when children can't, not won't go to school!
Four and a half years on - we’re still here, and still campaigningHello everyone,
More than four and a half years have passed since we launched this petition on 16 February 2022. We wanted to reco…Read full update
Guarantee the Triple Lock on State Pensions
Victories in National Government
10 supporters are talking about petitions related to National Government!
I'm a carer for my wife. The health service does not have the money to give her the support she needs so she sits at home crying while my life is destroyed. How much would Harry's protection cost? He chose to leave Royal duties so therefore shoukd be treated exactly the same as any other rich 'celebrity' and get his own security. How much money will be taken from the public purse (I.e our health service/social service etc) in order to allow the already privaledged to swim in an even larger pool ofluxury
Steve supported: Private Stay, Private Pay: No Taxpayer-Funded Security for Prince HarryAs an Australian, and part of the Commonwealth, I'm thoroughly disgusted with the completely vile behaviour of the Sussex's. They couldn't be further from the genuine Royal family (and what the Institution represents) if they tried.<br>
<br>
These two have no compassion, duty or loyalty, to their families or to the Monarchy. Their attitude has always been, "how can we monetise this?" Meghan said it herself, while on tour in Australia in October 2018 (overheard by dozens of the public at the Sydney Opera House) .. "I can't believe I'm not getting paid for this".<br>
<br>
Not only, but also Meghan told our Governor General (Sir Peter Cosgrove at that time) to F**k off, when he handed her the itinerary of their engagements while in Sydney. She used the full f word. Meghan had her BFF Jessica Mulroney on the trip to Australia with her, and they had planned their own sightseeing tour of Australia. That's why she was so pissed off, as she was wanted to use the Australian tour as a freebie holiday.<br>
<br>
Meghan also told Lady Lynne Cosgrove to "F**k off", when Lady Cosgrove was escorting the couple to their own private wing within the Governor General's residence, Admiralty House, Sydney. Meghan expected that Harry and herself would have the entire mansion to themselves. Hence the Meghan's expletive, directed at Lady Cosgrove.<br>
<br>
I'm retired now, but I worked in 'blue collar' (factory / manufacturing) jobs all my life. My former work colleagues (some disabled) were genuine people who did the right thing by others. Harry and Meghan have zero decorum, manners, appreciation, character, morals or self control.<br>
<br>
The Sussex's don't deserve, nor do they appreciate, what they've been given. Yet they continually put their insatiable 'hands out' for more, more and more. When is it ever enough?<br>
<br>
They are the most un-Royal couple of the British Royals for at least the past 400 years. The King needs to allow them to continue digging their own hole. When they've finally hit rock bottom, leave them to find their own way out. Only then, will they actually learn the essential lessons of life. Pandering to middle aged 'kidults' is counter productive to the Royal family, the Institution and the Commonwealth.<br>
<br>
Cut them loose (sans all titles) and set them free. Sink or swim, that should be the Sussex's option. Beyond that, I'll predict another Andrew and Fergie scenario 20 years from now.<br>
<br>
Your call, King Charles.
Ann supported: Private Stay, Private Pay: No Taxpayer-Funded Security for Prince HarryMatt Brittin really does need a better plan. Content is a mess. It’s getting bigger and bigger with more and more hot air. Every one of those people in top content jobs don’t stand up to scrutiny.
Nic supported: Create stronger scrutiny for BBC content and commissioningLindsay Salt gets £325,000???? For what??? Her drama commissioning record is not good. How can such a salary be justified? Likewise commissioning editors underneath her are getting exorbitant amounts. I’m stunned.
C supported: Create stronger scrutiny for BBC content and commissioningThings really do need to change. This oversight committee/scrutineer is much needed. I have just read the broadcast article about Kate’s silent revolution. What revolution?d<br>
<br>
She’s brought in a deeply underwhelming director of entertainment, who now needs three new heads underneath him. We all know one is going to Michael Jochnowicz and the other probably to Clodagh. There’s still ten or more comm eds. It seems Chris Suzzman is likely to be manoeuvered into the comedy director job, else it’ll be a poach from the other broadcasters. It’s hardly a revolution. It’s the same old tired story. Commissioning keeps growing and bad decision after bad decision hammers the industry. I’m furious.
L supported: Create stronger scrutiny for BBC content and commissioningThis is an elegant solution to a profound systemic issue. Unfortunately, BBC content rewards mediocrity and offers too many sops. Numerous editors who failed, on grounds of merit to advance, get pay rises as unnecessary compensation. Favoured personalities get moved around big jobs regardless of suitability. Let’s not forget the Chief Content Officer role was created because Charlotte Moore was unsuccessful in her director general application. This is a role too big for any human. This is continued with the appointment of Matt Brittin, who may well offer brilliant new direction but seemingly has a real deficit in public service and broadcasting experience as BBC have highly paid role that did not previously exist in the deputy director general. These are ludicrously highly paid roles that in some cases should not exist and in others should not be operating at this expense to the public.
Roger supported: Create stronger scrutiny for BBC content and commissioningEntertainment is in dire straits. I'm sorry writing this, but Ed Havard... What has he ever done that has stood out or lasted? Nice man. I wish no ill will, but he's not a leader of entertainment commissioning. Also, wasn't that job meant to be based in Scotland or Manchester? Another job for a friend?? Kate needs to do much better. Will we be surprised if Chris Susman pops up in comedy?
Z supported: Create stronger scrutiny for BBC content and commissioningOne wonders how Fiona Campbell can go from News, to apparently running a youth channel and then into a newly created role overseeing factual entertainment and arts. I rather thought those in charge should be proven specialists. The quality of factual entertainment is not as sharp as it was. Maybe that will change?
N supported: Create stronger scrutiny for BBC content and commissioningI grew up in Brisbane. I took holidays in surfers paradise and Broadbeach. I went to dreamworld and wet ‘n’ wild as a child. My favourite place was “Infinity.” I went to schoolies there. It’s not a place for something like this. People say it’s not about politics but anything with Trump’s name on it makes it about politics. We are getting kicked out of America for not supporting Trump and yet you want us to endorse and support his buildings in Australia; in a tourist destination known for community and beautiful beaches. Australia shouldn’t be involved in anything that has his support.
Laura supported: Stop the Proposed Trump Tower Development on the Gold CoastYou’re not alone — a community of supporters is ready to back you.
Start a petition