Why retail shouldn’t soully go by hear say when doing an investigation on the accused associate

When retail does an investigation on the accused associate they never ask the accusers if they even have physical evidence and proof on the accused associate. When retailers go by hear say only then we have the higher chance of firing and red flag an innocent associate which to me is unacceptable. A lot of times like with me us wrongfully terminated associates who gotten red flag over hear say without our accusers having any physical evidence and proof that then when we call home office/ corporate Human Resources Manager that they don’t believe us nor do they ever dig deeper into it and asking for proof from our accusers. We get told by the Human Resources Manager that unfortunately we cannot remove your red flag and we can’t believe you nor your accusers due to both sides could be lying and they have more numbers than you so we will go with them and we wish you best luck in you’re future indevers. The accused associate at the end gets upset that their side of the story truly wasn’t looked into deeper and they never asked the accusers if they have physical evidence and proof on the accused associate. If retailers went by just like if you were in court we’d have more long term associates working to this day. Back when Ben Faust wrongfully terminated many associates who were customers favorites which made store number 1277 sales drop very low in their market. Us who are favored by customers are treated like celebrities by those people and retailers don’t see that.