Urgent Reforms to Support Children with Additional needs in UK schools


Urgent Reforms to Support Children with Additional needs in UK schools
The Issue
The Cameron Laidlaw Act: Urgent Reforms to Support Children with Additional Needs in UK Schools.
This petition calls for urgent legislative changes to protect and support children with additional needs in UK schools, dedicated to the memory of Cameron Laidlaw. Cameron, a 16-year-old boy with Autism and learning disabilities, took his own life after experiencing repeated suspensions and inadequate support in mainstream education despite having an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP). This document outlines critical reforms needed to prevent such tragedies from recurring, including: prohibiting suspensions for children with special educational needs, improving accountability for SEN funding, enhancing teacher training, implementing mandatory mental health support, and ensuring children's voices are genuinely heard. These changes are essential to create an education system that truly supports every child's right to appropriate education, regardless of their additional needs.
Cameron's Story: A Tragic Failure of the System.
Cameron was the best son a mother could ever ask for. He was kind, caring, full of charm, with the most the most funny, witty sense of humour. He made everyone laugh... he really had a golden heart and would do anything for anyone. Cameron Also helped and supported his freinds who where struggling from there own Mental health. Cameron always put others first and made sure everyone was OK. Cameron really was such a blessing, He give people hope, showed kindness, showed unconditional love. Would never judge a person. Cameron felt a huge need in wanting to help and support people.
Cameron Laidlaw was a 16-year-old boy with Autism and learning disabilities who had dreams of becoming a professional boxer, pursuing bricklaying at college, and driving fast cars. Despite having an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP), Cameron experienced repeated suspensions from his mainstream secondary school—over 15 suspensions between September and January of his final academic year.In the ten days following the Christmas break alone, Cameron was suspended for eight half-days. This pattern of exclusion severely impacted his mental health, leading to expressions of suicidal thoughts that were recorded by his school, GP, and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Despite these clear warning signs, Cameron was eventually removed from the school roll, and in March, was discharged from CAMHS. Tragically, just a week and a half later, Cameron took his own life at the age of 16.Cameron's story represents a catastrophic failure of the education and mental health systems to support a vulnerable young person with additional needs. His voice was not heard, his needs were not met, and the support that should have been provided through his EHCP was not delivered. This petition seeks to ensure that what happened to Cameron never happens to another child. Final OutcomeSystem failures culminated in tragedyFamily Strain Carers lacked resources and guidance Missed Interventions Referrals delayed and ignored
Initial Suspensions School removed support, left him isolated
Guidance Missed Interventions Referrals delayed and ignored.
TragedyFamily Strain Carers lacked resources and guidance.
Final outcome. System failure culminated in tragedy.
The Current Crisis: How Schools Are Failing Children with Additional Needs.
The tragic case of Cameron Laidlaw is not an isolated incident but reflects a widespread systemic failure in how UK schools support children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Current practices demonstrate several critical areas of concern that require urgent reform:
Inappropriate Use of Suspensions
Suspensions Schools are increasingly using suspensions as a behaviour management tool for tool for children with additional needs, rather than addressing the underlying causes of causes of behaviour. This punitive approach fails approach fails to recognise that challenging challenging behaviour is often a form of communication about unmet needs.
Lack of Accountability for EHCP Implementation.
Despite the legal status of Education, Health and Care Plans, there is insufficient oversight to ensure schools are actually implementing the specified provisions. Schools receive additional funding for children with SEND but there is limited transparency about how these resources are utilised.
Inadequate Staff Training
Many teachers and school staff lack sufficient training in understanding and supporting children with additional needs, particularly those with Autism, ADHD, and other other Neurodevelopmental conditions. This knowledge gap leads to inappropriate responses to behaviour and missed opportunities for effective intervention.
Mental Health Crisis
The cumulative impact of these failures is creating a mental health crisis among children with additional needs. Repeated exclusions, feeling Misunderstood, and lack of appropriate support are damaging children's self-esteem and wellbeing, sometimes sometimes with tragic consequences.
These systemic failures are creating an educational environment where children with Additional needs are being marginalised and excluded rather than supported and included. Data from the Department for Education for Education shows that pupils with SEN support are almost six times more likely to be permanently excluded than excluded than pupils with no SEN. This discriminatory pattern must be addressed through comprehensive legislative comprehensive legislative reform.
Prohibiting Suspensions for Children with Additional Needs
A cornerstone of the proposed Cameron Laidlaw Act is the prohibition of suspensions for children with special educationl needs. This radical but necessary measure acknowledges that excluding children with additional needs from education is both discriminatory and counterproductive to their development and wellbeing.
The Current Reality
Current data from the Department for Education shows that children with SEN are disproportionately represented in exclusion statistics:•
Pupils with SEN support are almost 6 times more likely to likely to be permanently excluded than pupils with no SEN
Pupils with an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) are (EHCP) are more than twice as likely to be suspended as suspended as pupils with no SEN.
In many cases, like Cameron's, suspensions occur repeatedly, creating a cycle of exclusion that damages the child's education and mental health
The Proposed Change
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would make it unlawful for schools to suspend or exclude children who.
Have an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP)
Are on the SEN Register.
Have identified additional needs awaiting formal assessment
Instead, schools would be required to implement appropriate support strategies and reasonable adjustments to address behaviour concerns while keeping the child in education.
Implementation Framework
Rather than simply prohibiting suspensions without providing alternatives, the Act would establish a structured support framework
Behaviour as Communication
When a child with additional needs displays challenging behaviour, schools must first assess what need the behaviour is communicating and respond appropriately.
Tailored Support Plan
Schools must develop and implement individualised strategies to support the child, involving external specialists where necessary In-school Support Spaces must provide appropriate calm spaces and time-out options that children can access when needed, without penalty.
Parental Collaboration
Parents must be involved as partners in developing solutions, not merely informed when problems arise.
This approach recognises that keeping children with Additional needs in education is non-negotiable; the focus must shift from must shift from punishment to support and inclusion..
Accountability for SEN Funding and Support
A critical element of the proposed reforms is establishing robust accountability mechanisms to ensure that funding allocated for children with special educational needs is appropriately used to support their education. Currently, schools receive additional funding for pupils with SEN, but there is insufficient there is insufficient transparency and oversight regarding how these resources are utilised.
The Current Funding Gap
Research by the National Audit Office has identified significant issues with the current system.
Insufficient Budget 80%
Unable to implement 65%
Diversity SEN funding 40%
Lack of speclist 70%
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would establish a comprehensive accountability framework to ensure that SEN funding genuinely benefits the children for whom it is children for whom it is intended:
Transparent Funding Allocation
Schools must document exactly how SEN funding is allocated for each child with additional needs, with specific provisions linked to EHCP requirements or identified needs.
Annual Evidence Review
At the end of each academic year, schools must submit evidence to an independent panel demonstrating how funding has been used to support each child with SEN and the outcomes achieved.
Independent Verification
External agencies must conduct spot checks and gather evidence directly from pupils and parents about the support received, not merely accepting school documentation.
Consequences for Non-Compliance
Schools failing to demonstrate appropriate use of SEN funding would face regulatory action, additional monitoring, and potentially financial penalties.
This framework would create a system where schools are held accountable not just for having SEN policies on paper, but for actually implementing effective support for children with additional needs. It would prevent situations like Cameron's, where despite having an EHCP, the necessary support the necessary support was not provided, resulting in a cycle of suspensions rather than appropriate educational provision.
Mandatory Teacher Training in Additional Needs.
A fundamental issue underlying the inadequate support for children with additional needs is the lack of specialised training for teachers and school staff. The Cameron Laidlaw Act proposes comprehensive reforms to teacher training requirements to ensure all educational professionals have the knowledge and skills to support children with various additional needs effectively.
I also believe school teachers need to be educated more with children with Additional Needs. I believe there should be a programme in place every 6 months that educates them so they have more of an understanding. I feel this is vital and important, and again, rather than label a child, this will help them understand without any judgement.
Current Training Deficiencies
Research by the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT) found that 71% of teachers feel they have not received adequate training to support pupils with SEN effectively. This knowledge gap directly impacts how teachers respond to children with additional needs and can lead to inappropriate behaviour management strategies that exacerbate rather than resolve challenges
Proposed Mandatory Training
Initial Training
Ongoing PD
School implementation
Speclist certificate
Framework School Implementation.Specialist Cert Ongoing PD Initial TrainingThe mandatory training programme would include.
Understanding Neurodevelopmental
ConditionsIn-depth training on Autism, ADHD, dyslexia, developmental language disorder, and disorder, and other Neurodevelopmental conditions, focusing on how these these conditions affect learning and behaviour in the classroom.
Behaviour as Communication
Training on recognising challenging behaviour as a form of communication about unmet needs, and developing appropriate responses that responses that address the underlying causes rather than merely punishing the punishing the behaviour.
Adaptations and Reasonable Ajustments
Practical strategies for adapting teaching methods, classroom environments, and environments, and assessment approaches to accommodate different learning styles learning styles and needs
De-escalation and Positive Behaviour Support
Evidence-based techniques for de-escalating challenging situations and implementing positive behaviour support plans that focus on prevention rather than rather than punishment.
This training would be mandated for all teaching and support staff, with refresher courses required every six months to ensure knowledge remains current and effective. The training effective. The training would be developed in collaboration with SEN experts, neurodiversity advocates, and parents of children with additional needs to ensure it reflects best practice reflects best practice and lived experience.By equipping teachers with the knowledge and skills to understand and support children with additional needs effectively, this reform aims to create a more inclusive education system where children like Cameron can thrive rather than being misunderstood and excluded.
Mental Health Support in Schools
The Cameron Laidlaw Act recognises the critical link between educational experiences and mental health, especially for children with Additional needs. Cameron's tragic case highlights how inadequate support and repeated suspensions severely damaged his mental wellbeing, I seen and witnessed that "it worsened cameron mental health and gave him a complex." Despite expressing cameron thoughts to goverment bodies of his suicidal thoughts the support systems failed him.
The Mental Health Crisis in SEND Children
Children with special educational needs and disabilities face significantly higher risks of mental health challenges:
Current Statistics. Children with SEND are 3.5 times more likely to experience mental health problems than their neurotypical peers•
Up to 71% of autistic children develop mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression.
Children who experience multiple suspensions have a 24% higher risk of suicidal ideation•
Despite these risks, only 25% of children with diagnosable mental health mental health conditions currently receive appropriate support.
Key Risk Factors in Schools.
Feeling misunderstood by teachers and peers.
Experiences of exclusion and isolation.
Academic pressure without appropriate accommodations.
Bullying related to perceived differences.
Lack of belonging and acceptance.
Inconsistent application of support measures.
High levels of school-related anxiety.
Proposed Mental Health Framework
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would establish a comprehensive mental health support system within schools.
Embedded Mental Health Professionals
Every secondary school must employ qualified mental health professionals specifically trained in supporting children with additional needs. Primary schools must have access to regular visits from such professionals.
External Agency Partnerships
Schools must establish formal partnerships with external mental health agencies that visit weekly, providing children with access to support from professionals outside the school system.
Prevention-Focused Approach
Implementation of whole-school wellbeing programmes that promote mental health literacy, emotional regulation, and stress management techniques for all students.
Suicide Prevention Protocol
Mandatory suicide prevention protocols that ensure any expression of suicidal thoughts triggers immediate, appropriate responses and continuous support, not discharge from services
Continuity of Care
A critical failure in Cameron's case was the discontinuity of care—being discharged from CAMHS despite documented suicidal thoughts. The Act would mandate.
No child with additional needs and mental health concerns can be discharged from services without a comprehensive risk assessment and transition planand transition plan.
Mental health support must continue even when a child is suspended or changes educational setting.
Regular case reviews involving all professionals supporting the child.
Clear protocols for information sharing between education and health services.
These reforms would create a safety net that ensures vulnerable children like Cameron do not fall through the gaps between different services, recognising that services, recognising that mental health support is not optional but essential for children with additional needs to thrive in education.
Ensuring Children's Voices Are Genuinely Heard
A recurring theme in Cameron's story was that "his voice was never heard" and he was "Misunderstood by many." The Cameron Laidlaw Act would implement would structural reforms to ensure that children with additional needs have meaningful opportunities to express their views and have those views have those views genuinely considered in decisions affecting their education
Current Barriers to Children's Participation
Despite the principle of child participation being enshrined in both the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Children and Families Act 2014, in practice, many children with additional needs face significant barriers to having their voices heard!
Communication Challenges
Children with communication difficulties may struggle to express their views in conventional ways but are often not provided with appropriate alternative communication methods.
Power Imbalances
School structures often position children, particularly those with additional needs, as passive recipients of decisions rather than active participants in shaping their education.
Punitive Responsesto self -Advocac
As in Cameron's case, when children attempt to advocate for themselves—asking questions, requesting time out, or expressing discomfort—they are often met with punitive responses like detentions or suspensions
Tokenistic Consultation
Schools may claim to consult with children but fail to make meaningful changes based on their input, creating a facade of participation without actual influence.
Proposed Participation Framework
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would establish a comprehensive framework for meaningful participation.
Statutory Right to Self-Advocacy
The Act would establish that children with additional needs have a statutory right to:.
Ask questions and seek clarification in class without penalty.
Request and receive time out when feeling overwhelmed.
Express disagreement with staff decisions in a respectful manner
Have a trusted advocate present in meetings about their education.
Contribute to the development of their support plans
Implementation Mechanisms
To make these rights meaningful in practice, schools would be required to:required to.
Implement student councils specifically for children with additional needs.
Provide regular opportunities for structured feedback.
Document how children's views have influenced decisions.
Train staff in supporting children to express their views.
Offer a range of communication methods beyond verbal expression.
Independent Advocacy
Recognising that children may not feel comfortable expressing concerns directly to school staff, the Act would establish a system of independent advocates:independent advocates:
Independent SEND Advocacy Service
Every local authority would be required to commission an independent SEND advocacy service that.
Visits schools regularly to meet with children with additional needs.
Provides a confidential channel for children to raise concerns.
Advocates on behalf of children in meetings with school staff.
Has statutory powers to challenge decisions that fail to consider children's views.
Reports annually on systemic issues identified through advocacy work.
This framework would transform how children with additional needs participate in their education, ensuring that no child experiences what Cameron did—feeling misunderstood and unheard in a system that should have been supporting him.
Call to Action: Support the Cameron Laidlaw Act
Cameron Laidlaw was a kind, caring young man with a golden heart who had dreams and aspirations just like any other teenager. His tragic death at 16 following repeated suspensions and inadequate support from his school represents a catastrophic failure of our education system—a failure that is sadly not unique to Cameron.
"Cameron would want me to fight for changes in his name and I will and I will continue to do so and tell Cameron's story and leave his leave his legacy behind as Cameron's story deserves to be heard and changes need to be made from this being repeated.
"The proposed Cameron Laidlaw Act represents a comprehensive legislative response to ensure that no other child with additional needs experiences what Cameron did—feeling misunderstood, unsupported, and excluded from an education system that should nurture and develop every child, regardless of their needs.
Why Your Support Matters
For Individual Children Every signature represents support for the thousands of children with additional needs currently at risk in our education system—children who deserve to be understood, supported, and included.For System ChangeBy supporting this petition, you are demanding fundamental reform of how how our education system treats its most most vulnerable members—moving from from exclusion to inclusion, from punishment to support.For Cameron's Legacy Your support helps ensure that Cameron's Cameron's story leads to positive change, change, creating a lasting legacy that transforms the educational experiences of experiences of children with additional additional needs.How You Can Help
1. Sign this petition to show your support for the Cameron Laidlaw Act
2. Share Cameron's story on social media to raise awareness of these critical issues
3. Contact your MP to express your support for legislative change to protect children with additional needs
4. Join advocacy groups working to improve educational experiences for children with SEND
5. Support other parents who are fighting for appropriate support for their children
Every child deserves to feel understood, supported, and valued in their education. Every child has the right to learn in an eenvironment that adapts to their needs rather than excluding them when they don't fit the mould. Every child should have theinvironment that their voice heard and respected.r voice heard and Cameron didn't have these opportunities. But with your support, we can ensure that his legacy creates a better future for all children with additional needs in our education system.Sign the petition today for the Cameron Laidlaw Act: Because every child deserves better. Every child voice should be heard . 🩵🥊
1,662
The Issue
The Cameron Laidlaw Act: Urgent Reforms to Support Children with Additional Needs in UK Schools.
This petition calls for urgent legislative changes to protect and support children with additional needs in UK schools, dedicated to the memory of Cameron Laidlaw. Cameron, a 16-year-old boy with Autism and learning disabilities, took his own life after experiencing repeated suspensions and inadequate support in mainstream education despite having an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP). This document outlines critical reforms needed to prevent such tragedies from recurring, including: prohibiting suspensions for children with special educational needs, improving accountability for SEN funding, enhancing teacher training, implementing mandatory mental health support, and ensuring children's voices are genuinely heard. These changes are essential to create an education system that truly supports every child's right to appropriate education, regardless of their additional needs.
Cameron's Story: A Tragic Failure of the System.
Cameron was the best son a mother could ever ask for. He was kind, caring, full of charm, with the most the most funny, witty sense of humour. He made everyone laugh... he really had a golden heart and would do anything for anyone. Cameron Also helped and supported his freinds who where struggling from there own Mental health. Cameron always put others first and made sure everyone was OK. Cameron really was such a blessing, He give people hope, showed kindness, showed unconditional love. Would never judge a person. Cameron felt a huge need in wanting to help and support people.
Cameron Laidlaw was a 16-year-old boy with Autism and learning disabilities who had dreams of becoming a professional boxer, pursuing bricklaying at college, and driving fast cars. Despite having an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP), Cameron experienced repeated suspensions from his mainstream secondary school—over 15 suspensions between September and January of his final academic year.In the ten days following the Christmas break alone, Cameron was suspended for eight half-days. This pattern of exclusion severely impacted his mental health, leading to expressions of suicidal thoughts that were recorded by his school, GP, and Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). Despite these clear warning signs, Cameron was eventually removed from the school roll, and in March, was discharged from CAMHS. Tragically, just a week and a half later, Cameron took his own life at the age of 16.Cameron's story represents a catastrophic failure of the education and mental health systems to support a vulnerable young person with additional needs. His voice was not heard, his needs were not met, and the support that should have been provided through his EHCP was not delivered. This petition seeks to ensure that what happened to Cameron never happens to another child. Final OutcomeSystem failures culminated in tragedyFamily Strain Carers lacked resources and guidance Missed Interventions Referrals delayed and ignored
Initial Suspensions School removed support, left him isolated
Guidance Missed Interventions Referrals delayed and ignored.
TragedyFamily Strain Carers lacked resources and guidance.
Final outcome. System failure culminated in tragedy.
The Current Crisis: How Schools Are Failing Children with Additional Needs.
The tragic case of Cameron Laidlaw is not an isolated incident but reflects a widespread systemic failure in how UK schools support children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Current practices demonstrate several critical areas of concern that require urgent reform:
Inappropriate Use of Suspensions
Suspensions Schools are increasingly using suspensions as a behaviour management tool for tool for children with additional needs, rather than addressing the underlying causes of causes of behaviour. This punitive approach fails approach fails to recognise that challenging challenging behaviour is often a form of communication about unmet needs.
Lack of Accountability for EHCP Implementation.
Despite the legal status of Education, Health and Care Plans, there is insufficient oversight to ensure schools are actually implementing the specified provisions. Schools receive additional funding for children with SEND but there is limited transparency about how these resources are utilised.
Inadequate Staff Training
Many teachers and school staff lack sufficient training in understanding and supporting children with additional needs, particularly those with Autism, ADHD, and other other Neurodevelopmental conditions. This knowledge gap leads to inappropriate responses to behaviour and missed opportunities for effective intervention.
Mental Health Crisis
The cumulative impact of these failures is creating a mental health crisis among children with additional needs. Repeated exclusions, feeling Misunderstood, and lack of appropriate support are damaging children's self-esteem and wellbeing, sometimes sometimes with tragic consequences.
These systemic failures are creating an educational environment where children with Additional needs are being marginalised and excluded rather than supported and included. Data from the Department for Education for Education shows that pupils with SEN support are almost six times more likely to be permanently excluded than excluded than pupils with no SEN. This discriminatory pattern must be addressed through comprehensive legislative comprehensive legislative reform.
Prohibiting Suspensions for Children with Additional Needs
A cornerstone of the proposed Cameron Laidlaw Act is the prohibition of suspensions for children with special educationl needs. This radical but necessary measure acknowledges that excluding children with additional needs from education is both discriminatory and counterproductive to their development and wellbeing.
The Current Reality
Current data from the Department for Education shows that children with SEN are disproportionately represented in exclusion statistics:•
Pupils with SEN support are almost 6 times more likely to likely to be permanently excluded than pupils with no SEN
Pupils with an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP) are (EHCP) are more than twice as likely to be suspended as suspended as pupils with no SEN.
In many cases, like Cameron's, suspensions occur repeatedly, creating a cycle of exclusion that damages the child's education and mental health
The Proposed Change
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would make it unlawful for schools to suspend or exclude children who.
Have an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP)
Are on the SEN Register.
Have identified additional needs awaiting formal assessment
Instead, schools would be required to implement appropriate support strategies and reasonable adjustments to address behaviour concerns while keeping the child in education.
Implementation Framework
Rather than simply prohibiting suspensions without providing alternatives, the Act would establish a structured support framework
Behaviour as Communication
When a child with additional needs displays challenging behaviour, schools must first assess what need the behaviour is communicating and respond appropriately.
Tailored Support Plan
Schools must develop and implement individualised strategies to support the child, involving external specialists where necessary In-school Support Spaces must provide appropriate calm spaces and time-out options that children can access when needed, without penalty.
Parental Collaboration
Parents must be involved as partners in developing solutions, not merely informed when problems arise.
This approach recognises that keeping children with Additional needs in education is non-negotiable; the focus must shift from must shift from punishment to support and inclusion..
Accountability for SEN Funding and Support
A critical element of the proposed reforms is establishing robust accountability mechanisms to ensure that funding allocated for children with special educational needs is appropriately used to support their education. Currently, schools receive additional funding for pupils with SEN, but there is insufficient there is insufficient transparency and oversight regarding how these resources are utilised.
The Current Funding Gap
Research by the National Audit Office has identified significant issues with the current system.
Insufficient Budget 80%
Unable to implement 65%
Diversity SEN funding 40%
Lack of speclist 70%
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would establish a comprehensive accountability framework to ensure that SEN funding genuinely benefits the children for whom it is children for whom it is intended:
Transparent Funding Allocation
Schools must document exactly how SEN funding is allocated for each child with additional needs, with specific provisions linked to EHCP requirements or identified needs.
Annual Evidence Review
At the end of each academic year, schools must submit evidence to an independent panel demonstrating how funding has been used to support each child with SEN and the outcomes achieved.
Independent Verification
External agencies must conduct spot checks and gather evidence directly from pupils and parents about the support received, not merely accepting school documentation.
Consequences for Non-Compliance
Schools failing to demonstrate appropriate use of SEN funding would face regulatory action, additional monitoring, and potentially financial penalties.
This framework would create a system where schools are held accountable not just for having SEN policies on paper, but for actually implementing effective support for children with additional needs. It would prevent situations like Cameron's, where despite having an EHCP, the necessary support the necessary support was not provided, resulting in a cycle of suspensions rather than appropriate educational provision.
Mandatory Teacher Training in Additional Needs.
A fundamental issue underlying the inadequate support for children with additional needs is the lack of specialised training for teachers and school staff. The Cameron Laidlaw Act proposes comprehensive reforms to teacher training requirements to ensure all educational professionals have the knowledge and skills to support children with various additional needs effectively.
I also believe school teachers need to be educated more with children with Additional Needs. I believe there should be a programme in place every 6 months that educates them so they have more of an understanding. I feel this is vital and important, and again, rather than label a child, this will help them understand without any judgement.
Current Training Deficiencies
Research by the National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT) found that 71% of teachers feel they have not received adequate training to support pupils with SEN effectively. This knowledge gap directly impacts how teachers respond to children with additional needs and can lead to inappropriate behaviour management strategies that exacerbate rather than resolve challenges
Proposed Mandatory Training
Initial Training
Ongoing PD
School implementation
Speclist certificate
Framework School Implementation.Specialist Cert Ongoing PD Initial TrainingThe mandatory training programme would include.
Understanding Neurodevelopmental
ConditionsIn-depth training on Autism, ADHD, dyslexia, developmental language disorder, and disorder, and other Neurodevelopmental conditions, focusing on how these these conditions affect learning and behaviour in the classroom.
Behaviour as Communication
Training on recognising challenging behaviour as a form of communication about unmet needs, and developing appropriate responses that responses that address the underlying causes rather than merely punishing the punishing the behaviour.
Adaptations and Reasonable Ajustments
Practical strategies for adapting teaching methods, classroom environments, and environments, and assessment approaches to accommodate different learning styles learning styles and needs
De-escalation and Positive Behaviour Support
Evidence-based techniques for de-escalating challenging situations and implementing positive behaviour support plans that focus on prevention rather than rather than punishment.
This training would be mandated for all teaching and support staff, with refresher courses required every six months to ensure knowledge remains current and effective. The training effective. The training would be developed in collaboration with SEN experts, neurodiversity advocates, and parents of children with additional needs to ensure it reflects best practice reflects best practice and lived experience.By equipping teachers with the knowledge and skills to understand and support children with additional needs effectively, this reform aims to create a more inclusive education system where children like Cameron can thrive rather than being misunderstood and excluded.
Mental Health Support in Schools
The Cameron Laidlaw Act recognises the critical link between educational experiences and mental health, especially for children with Additional needs. Cameron's tragic case highlights how inadequate support and repeated suspensions severely damaged his mental wellbeing, I seen and witnessed that "it worsened cameron mental health and gave him a complex." Despite expressing cameron thoughts to goverment bodies of his suicidal thoughts the support systems failed him.
The Mental Health Crisis in SEND Children
Children with special educational needs and disabilities face significantly higher risks of mental health challenges:
Current Statistics. Children with SEND are 3.5 times more likely to experience mental health problems than their neurotypical peers•
Up to 71% of autistic children develop mental health conditions such as anxiety and depression.
Children who experience multiple suspensions have a 24% higher risk of suicidal ideation•
Despite these risks, only 25% of children with diagnosable mental health mental health conditions currently receive appropriate support.
Key Risk Factors in Schools.
Feeling misunderstood by teachers and peers.
Experiences of exclusion and isolation.
Academic pressure without appropriate accommodations.
Bullying related to perceived differences.
Lack of belonging and acceptance.
Inconsistent application of support measures.
High levels of school-related anxiety.
Proposed Mental Health Framework
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would establish a comprehensive mental health support system within schools.
Embedded Mental Health Professionals
Every secondary school must employ qualified mental health professionals specifically trained in supporting children with additional needs. Primary schools must have access to regular visits from such professionals.
External Agency Partnerships
Schools must establish formal partnerships with external mental health agencies that visit weekly, providing children with access to support from professionals outside the school system.
Prevention-Focused Approach
Implementation of whole-school wellbeing programmes that promote mental health literacy, emotional regulation, and stress management techniques for all students.
Suicide Prevention Protocol
Mandatory suicide prevention protocols that ensure any expression of suicidal thoughts triggers immediate, appropriate responses and continuous support, not discharge from services
Continuity of Care
A critical failure in Cameron's case was the discontinuity of care—being discharged from CAMHS despite documented suicidal thoughts. The Act would mandate.
No child with additional needs and mental health concerns can be discharged from services without a comprehensive risk assessment and transition planand transition plan.
Mental health support must continue even when a child is suspended or changes educational setting.
Regular case reviews involving all professionals supporting the child.
Clear protocols for information sharing between education and health services.
These reforms would create a safety net that ensures vulnerable children like Cameron do not fall through the gaps between different services, recognising that services, recognising that mental health support is not optional but essential for children with additional needs to thrive in education.
Ensuring Children's Voices Are Genuinely Heard
A recurring theme in Cameron's story was that "his voice was never heard" and he was "Misunderstood by many." The Cameron Laidlaw Act would implement would structural reforms to ensure that children with additional needs have meaningful opportunities to express their views and have those views have those views genuinely considered in decisions affecting their education
Current Barriers to Children's Participation
Despite the principle of child participation being enshrined in both the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Children and Families Act 2014, in practice, many children with additional needs face significant barriers to having their voices heard!
Communication Challenges
Children with communication difficulties may struggle to express their views in conventional ways but are often not provided with appropriate alternative communication methods.
Power Imbalances
School structures often position children, particularly those with additional needs, as passive recipients of decisions rather than active participants in shaping their education.
Punitive Responsesto self -Advocac
As in Cameron's case, when children attempt to advocate for themselves—asking questions, requesting time out, or expressing discomfort—they are often met with punitive responses like detentions or suspensions
Tokenistic Consultation
Schools may claim to consult with children but fail to make meaningful changes based on their input, creating a facade of participation without actual influence.
Proposed Participation Framework
The Cameron Laidlaw Act would establish a comprehensive framework for meaningful participation.
Statutory Right to Self-Advocacy
The Act would establish that children with additional needs have a statutory right to:.
Ask questions and seek clarification in class without penalty.
Request and receive time out when feeling overwhelmed.
Express disagreement with staff decisions in a respectful manner
Have a trusted advocate present in meetings about their education.
Contribute to the development of their support plans
Implementation Mechanisms
To make these rights meaningful in practice, schools would be required to:required to.
Implement student councils specifically for children with additional needs.
Provide regular opportunities for structured feedback.
Document how children's views have influenced decisions.
Train staff in supporting children to express their views.
Offer a range of communication methods beyond verbal expression.
Independent Advocacy
Recognising that children may not feel comfortable expressing concerns directly to school staff, the Act would establish a system of independent advocates:independent advocates:
Independent SEND Advocacy Service
Every local authority would be required to commission an independent SEND advocacy service that.
Visits schools regularly to meet with children with additional needs.
Provides a confidential channel for children to raise concerns.
Advocates on behalf of children in meetings with school staff.
Has statutory powers to challenge decisions that fail to consider children's views.
Reports annually on systemic issues identified through advocacy work.
This framework would transform how children with additional needs participate in their education, ensuring that no child experiences what Cameron did—feeling misunderstood and unheard in a system that should have been supporting him.
Call to Action: Support the Cameron Laidlaw Act
Cameron Laidlaw was a kind, caring young man with a golden heart who had dreams and aspirations just like any other teenager. His tragic death at 16 following repeated suspensions and inadequate support from his school represents a catastrophic failure of our education system—a failure that is sadly not unique to Cameron.
"Cameron would want me to fight for changes in his name and I will and I will continue to do so and tell Cameron's story and leave his leave his legacy behind as Cameron's story deserves to be heard and changes need to be made from this being repeated.
"The proposed Cameron Laidlaw Act represents a comprehensive legislative response to ensure that no other child with additional needs experiences what Cameron did—feeling misunderstood, unsupported, and excluded from an education system that should nurture and develop every child, regardless of their needs.
Why Your Support Matters
For Individual Children Every signature represents support for the thousands of children with additional needs currently at risk in our education system—children who deserve to be understood, supported, and included.For System ChangeBy supporting this petition, you are demanding fundamental reform of how how our education system treats its most most vulnerable members—moving from from exclusion to inclusion, from punishment to support.For Cameron's Legacy Your support helps ensure that Cameron's Cameron's story leads to positive change, change, creating a lasting legacy that transforms the educational experiences of experiences of children with additional additional needs.How You Can Help
1. Sign this petition to show your support for the Cameron Laidlaw Act
2. Share Cameron's story on social media to raise awareness of these critical issues
3. Contact your MP to express your support for legislative change to protect children with additional needs
4. Join advocacy groups working to improve educational experiences for children with SEND
5. Support other parents who are fighting for appropriate support for their children
Every child deserves to feel understood, supported, and valued in their education. Every child has the right to learn in an eenvironment that adapts to their needs rather than excluding them when they don't fit the mould. Every child should have theinvironment that their voice heard and respected.r voice heard and Cameron didn't have these opportunities. But with your support, we can ensure that his legacy creates a better future for all children with additional needs in our education system.Sign the petition today for the Cameron Laidlaw Act: Because every child deserves better. Every child voice should be heard . 🩵🥊
1,662
The Decision Makers
Supporter Voices
Petition created on 26 August 2025