United Nations and European Conventions on Human Rights dictate that UK citizens are entitled to access to a fair and proper Justice system.
The failure of the UK Justice system to comply with Human Rights conventions should be challenged in the ECHR, and not necessarily the decisions that arise from the corrupt system.
The appointment of multiple conflicted Judges in the Julian Assange case who have then made improper perverse adverse rulings is a breach of UN and ECHR conventions.
There is  clear evidence of conflicts of interest by MULTIPLE Judges who have been allocated to hear the Julian Assange extradition proceedings and who have then made perverse improper adverse rulings against him.

Dame Victoria Sharp-CONFLICTED

Justice Johnson –CONFLICTED

Lord Burnett –CONFLICTED

Justice Holroyde- CONFLICTED

Justice Arbuthnot –CONFLICTED

Justice Swift-CONFLICTED

The appointment of multiple conflicted Judges who have then made improper adverse rulings is a breach of UN and ECHR conventions . 

The corrupt process by which conflicted Judges are appointed to make perverse improper decisions must be exposed and challenged in the ECHR. It is the failure of the system which should be challenged , not the improper perverse decisions that arise from it.

Any complaints of conflict of interest are either dismissed by the conflicted Judges themselves or are ignored by the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office. (see details below in the case of the conflicted Judge who improperly jailed fracking protesters.)

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION AND SHARE