Town of Cary: Preserve 600 and 604 Kildaire Farm Rd.

1,168

The Issue

Dear neighbors, please consider adding your name to this petition to show your support for preserving downtown Cary's little enchanted forest!

Address to Cary Town Council in response to Mayor Weinbrecht's blog post entitled "Sell Properties at 600 and 604 Kildaire Farm Road" posted August 23, 2026. Click here to read the blog.

Casey Midkiff

August 27, 2026

The mayor recently posted on his blog about the potential sale of property at 600 and 604 Kildaire Farm Rd. This property is a large swath of wooded land between Cary Elementary and Shirley Dr. It is my understanding that this property was purchased by former town manager Sean Stegall without the permission of town council for a little over one million dollars. 

While I absolutely agree that transparency and good stewardship of taxpayer dollars is extremely important, I would like to ask that the council consider some of the other priorities of citizens in this matter. From the wording on the blog, it’s clear that selling this land would be primarily a face-saving measure after the devastating audit, but I believe this could be an opportunity to show the public that you hear their concerns about overdevelopment and that you prioritize natural and historic preservation.

This land is one of the last natural areas in downtown Cary. It is pristine. The pine trees create an incredible canopy, providing shade and habitat for innumerable wild critters. My home on Shirley Drive is adjacent, and in these woods we have seen deer, opossum, raccoons, squirrels, box turtles, rabbits, and even coyotes, if you can believe it. I have an app on my phone that identifies birds by their calls, and I have a record of 21 songbirds in these woods. Additionally, I’ve recorded three different types of woodpeckers, several red-tailed hawks, and one amazing, majestic barred owl. If you walk along the neighboring Higgins greenway in summer evenings, the woods are teeming with fireflies - a wonder of nature that we all remember from our childhoods but that we struggle to share with our own children because of their depleted numbers. 

Speaking of the greenway, my neighbors and I are puzzled over why the town would build a beautiful greenway and then almost immediately allow it to be un-greened by development. It doesn’t make sense. It’s like giving us a gift and then taking it away. 

As Cary continues to grow and change, many of us are reaching back to the town’s colorful history and making sure its roots are understood and preserved. The land in question is the original site of Cary's first African American church, founded in 1883. The remnants of this church can be found along the greenway corridor. We ask that you do more to commemorate this site rather than allow it to be destroyed. 

In the blog post, the mayor admits that the sale could potentially be at a loss to the town. It seems evident that trying to offload it would indeed be tricky and almost definitely not lucrative. The forest hides very rough terrain and a steep gully that collects stormwater. This land would be incredibly difficult and expensive to improve enough for development, likely requiring a reduced price to make it attractive to developers. And of course we would lose drainage around our properties, something that so many of our neighbors struggle with after the clear-cutting for the greenway.

One of the mayor’s regrets about the purchase of this property is the lack of opportunity for public input. Let’s do it right this time. I’d like to take the lead on assessing and providing for you citizen response to this potential sale. Since I just recently learned about this, I’d like some time to collect some comments and some data to help you and the council make a decision that reflects the will of the public and not just the desperation of town government in the wake of Stegall’s foolishness.

In short, don’t make a big mistake even bigger. Protect this downtown treasure. 

The Decision Makers

Cary Town Council
5 Members
2 Responded
Lori Bush
Cary Town Council - At Large
Thanks to everyone who is engaging, signing the petition and emailing Council with your thoughts. When the Mayor and Councilmember Bansal presented this as a council-initiated item, I responded to that request with an email containing the following information, below: "My main issue isn't process; it's outcome. These parcels are zoned OIP, which allows a fairly wide range of office, institutional, and professional uses. If we sell, we lose any say in what actually gets built there, and this land sits right against the greenway in the heart of downtown. A future owner building to the full extent of what OIP allows could end up putting something right against that trail corridor that none of us would choose if we had a say in it. That's an important consideration to selling the land, and one that doesn't show up in a straight financial comparison of purchase price versus sale price. I'd also push back gently on the framing that holding the land automatically means bad fiscal management. None of us likes how this purchase was made, the transparency that wasn’t there, and the process. But fiscal responsibility isn't only about freeing up dollars for the next line item; it's also about not giving up a strategic asset in a location we can't replace once it's gone. Downtown, greenway-adjacent land doesn't come back on the market. There are legitimate transparency questions about how the original purchase was handled and communicated to Council; I think that deserves its own conversation, separate from what we do with the land itself. Those are two different problems with two different fixes, and has already been addressed in council-initiated real estate requests." (I have more, but that is the crux of the email.) I don't believe we should let the fact that money has already been spent force us into a second decision that may not serve Cary well. That is what economists call the sunk cost fallacy: making the next choice primarily to justify or recover a cost that has already occurred. I believe public ownership has lasting value. These lots are in a developed part of Cary, near Cary Elementary and on a major corridor. Despite initial review of the plats saying much of the land is not buildable, addition review by a Cary staff member identified that there is no real stream running through the property. Nothing shows up on the standard federal topographic maps or survey - so the "no buffer" requirement applies. He also found an old 2021 report on a nearby property, confirming that no buffers applied there, either. So for folks that say that the property value is not worth much, IMHO, that is incorrect. While the site is currently zoned for office use, keeping it in Town ownership allows us to determine its future through a public process and in response to future community needs. If we sell now, we receive money once, but we give up control of the land. A private developer would make the future decisions about the property within the zoning and regulatory process. Thinking about worst case scenarios is one way to look at it, as permitted uses could be an office building, day care, veterinary hospital, or bank, and can be built and the Council and public would have no say. However, if we keep it, Cary residents retain a voice and Council retains the ability to use this asset strategically for generations. For me, the right question is not simply, ‘What did we pay?’ It is, ‘What is this land worth to Cary’s future?’ I believe it is worth more in public hands. Lori Bush Mayor Pro Tem, At-Large Councilmember, Town Council [Note: The Change.org Civic Engagement Team reaches out to decision makers to let them know about petitions in their community and to help facilitate engagement with supporters. The above was an email response we received regarding this petition.]
Sarika Bansal
Cary Town Council - District D
Thank you for sharing the petition with me. I appreciate you taking the time to share your concerns and perspective. As you know, this is a Council-initiated item, with the Mayor serving as the primary initiator and me as the second. The item will come before the full Council for discussion and deliberation, and ultimately, the Council will determine the outcome through a vote. Given the growing needs of our town, these are not easy decisions. As the Mayor has shared during Council meetings and in other forums, we will likely face the need for another tax increase next year if we are unable to identify alternative funding sources to support critical infrastructure and other community priorities. One approach is to carefully review assets the Town has acquired over the years, evaluate how they are currently being used, and determine whether retaining them continues to serve the best interests of our residents. For me, this property is part of that broader conversation. My goal is to explore whether we can recover taxpayer funds from this investment and redirect those resources toward current priorities, rather than relying solely on additional tax increases. I recognize that you and I may view this issue differently, and I respect that. I also want you to know that my perspective is informed by additional context and information available to me through my role on Council, some of which may not yet be part of the broader public discussion. I will continue to approach the matter thoughtfully and with the best interests of Cary residents and taxpayers in mind. Thank you again for reaching out and for being engaged in the conversation. Sarika [Note: The Change.org Civic Engagement Team reaches out to decision makers to let them know about petitions in their community and to help facilitate engagement with supporters. The above was an email response we received regarding this petition.]
Carissa Johnson
Cary Town Council - At Large
Harold Weinbrecht
Cary Town Mayor
Bella Haung
Bella Haung
Cary Town Council - District C

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates