This is one of the first statements I will make on this petition dealing with the issues of the case. I will be updating this petition now on a regular bases to present the facts, instead of the perverted view of the DA…. I want to go into each detail of the case in future updates- But you always have to remember this fact. As I always told you, scientific evidence bought out in my investigation that was withheld was the DNA belongs to someone else and that no DNA of the crime scene matched Clair’s. So the DA is building their entire case on a paid witness, Flores, and a tape that Clair sounds guilty. The DA never explains why the DNA isn’t Clair’s. He goes into the explanation of how many people could have the same DNA that was taken at the crime scene, but none of these people share that DNA trait with Clair. However, the discussion sounds interesting at it’s best, but has absolutely nothing to do with Clair’s DNA not being found at the crime scene. Dan Wagner straight out lied. He says that Kenneth Clair admitted that he had blood on his hands after the murder, and admitted he had the jewelry after the murder. Dan Wagner should be ashamed of himself for lying like that. Fact: None of the Jewelry that was supposedly stollen by Margaret Hessling was ever recovered from the murder. So Clair never admitted to them that he had the jewelry. Second, Clair never admitted to anyone that he had blood on his hands after the murder. Clair was never seen by anyone with blood on his hands from the murder scene. All of these things that Dan Wagner talks about never happened. After Pauline Flores was wired to try to get a statement of guilt from Clair, she openly admits that the police was trying to accuse her of the murder and Clair should come clean because her freedom was in jeopardy. There is a missing tape that this documentary and my investigation bought out that was never turned over to the defense. The missing tape was the interrogation of Flores. This is where Flores was threatened that if she didn’t assist them into convicting Clair, they were going to charge her. It is obvious that this occurred, because Flores didn’t decide go to the DA, they called her to come talk to them. Records support show that Flores was called my the DA and Flores was told that they were following up on an assault charge that Flores filed against Clair, not the Linda Rodgers murder. Also what is interesting is that my investigations and inventory of the crime scene evidence, clearly shows that there are two tapes that the DA still has that was never turned over to the defense made from the interview/interrogation. These tape reveal that Flores was coached on how the jewelry looked and what to say. So Wagner straight out lied because to this very day, the DA is still withholding those tapes. However, you know that the DA had to have interviewed her when she was called to their office. Wagner just states that Flores told them these things, but the DA can not produce these things on tape because it is incriminating the DA office, on their “Good Cop”, Bad Cop” interrogations. I will also be supplying Flores interview with me where she verifies what I am saying in her own words. The were two audio tapes made when Flores was wired. The first one they used which made Clair sound guilty, but even the police did not feel that Clair confessed to anything, he just sounded guilty. So Flores was wired a second time because the police knew that Clair never confessed. However the second tape clearly showed that Clair didn’t confess to anything. So the whole court angle was to exploit Clair’s first statements from the first wire, not to mention the second wire, and why the police felt that they needed to wire Flores the second time. This is the reason why the DA is trying to focus on the fact that Clair sounded guilty because they do not have DNA evidence to back up why Clair’s DNA wasn’t found on the crime scene. Statements like “Rubbing things in my sole” were statements used back then as slang. People used that statement when other people were teasing them about something like going out with an unattractive person, or other “Playing the Dozens” issues. All that statement means is “Why are you trying to put that issue or person as part of me…. I used that statement myself back in the days, especially when people would tease me about going out with an unattractive person, and what we would say as “Capping” on someone. It is like the “your mother” jokes. The DA knew that Clair’s statement was street slang, and that is why they wired Flores the second time. Also, when you looked at the statement he said from Clair’s point of view it means something entirely different. His girlfriend came to him and she was seeking his advise on what to do because she told Clair that the police were going to try to convict her of the crime, and she wanted Clair to help her out by admitting the he killed the girl. Clair never admits he killed the girl, and tells her that nobody saw him go in or out and those types of phases, Clair is telling Flores the truth because nobody did see Clair go in or out of that house. He is not telling Flores he committed the crime and nobody saw him, he telling her that no matter what- the police could not produce a witness that saw him do that because he wasn’t there. Clair is also giving Pauline street advice not to talk to the police. Clair gave Flores this advice for her benefit. Clair did not give her this advice because he was saying the he was guilty. So when he was telling her to shut her mouth, Clair was telling Flores that they could not tie her into the crime unless she kept talking to them. Well this concludes the first of many coming updates……… CJ