As was the case the last year, the Separations Act was a discussed topic during the Budget Appropriation Hearings with the Department of General Services. In the Senate, DGS Secretary Topper was asked questions about the Act by Senator Folmer. The gist of the Secretary's comments related around DGS experiencing increased administrative costs but they are unsure if total cost is more. DGS would like to continue to study the issue more. As for the House, Representative Everett led the way. Topper echoed his comments from the Senate - increased administrative overhead but he felt there was a need for more studying of the issue. Everett countered with hints about a new legislative strategy that allows for the current multiprime delivery system to be used if that's what the public owner chooses; however, the public owner can also select from other delivery options too. Personally, I think if the DGS was serious about wanting to study the issue more they should make three phone calls to Pitt, PSU & Temple. When these schools receive state funds they have to abide by the Separations Act and build as the school's call it: 'the DGS way' but when these schools build with their own money they build using Design-Bid-Build with Single Prime; Design Build; Construction Management At Risk; and PSU is even trying IPD. All DGS would have to do is review projects built on these campuses using multiprime compared to using a variety of single prime. End of 'we need data' story. Click on the link below to hear DGS Topper answer questions from Senator Folmer.