It is doubtful that we’ll see any response from Attorney Huntley representing the CDC as everyone is taking the 5th. None of our public health officials are answering the difficult questions; questions that should be asked through a congressional investigation.

2nd Letter to Attorney Heather Huntley:

---------- Original Message ----------
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: hhh1@cdc.gov
Cc: tickbornedisease@hhs.gov, (92 Undisclosed recipients)
Date: March 2, 2020 at 10:33 AM
Subject: Three additional questions for CDC attorney Heather Huntley

March 2, 2020

Attorney Heather Huntley
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
1600 Clifton Road NE M/S D-53
Atlanta, GA 30329

Attorney Huntley,

While you contemplate an answer to Dr. Lee’s open letter regarding Lyme Disease and COVID-19 laboratory testing perhaps you could answer three additional questions on behalf of the US Centers for Disease Control?

Question #1

1.    Why did it take the CDC 35 years to recognize mother-to-fetus transmission of Lyme disease when it was reported back in 1985 per the attached list of twenty six references?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/z10em0szgpm8bll/Congenital%20Transmission%20of%20Lyme%202015.doc?dl=0

U.S. health agency acknowledges Lyme disease mother-to-fetus transmission    Published: Feb 11, 2020
https://www.thechronicleherald.ca/news/provincial/us-health-agency-acknowledges-lyme-disease-mother-to-fetus-transmission-409641/

It should be noted that transmission of Lyme to the new born occurred despite antibiotic treatment.

Borrelia burgdorferi in a newborn despite oral penicillin for Lyme borreliosis during pregnancy.
Published 1988 Paul H. Duray, Infectious Diseases
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3130607

Question #2  

2.    Why has the CDC suppressed evidence of persistent infection after extensive antibiotic treatment as identified in the attached 2012 letter addressed to past CDC Director Brenda Fitzgerald, MD?

Letter to Fitzgerald:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xaul84dqmqgbre0/Brenda%20Fitzgerald%20MD%20Director%20CDC.docx?dl=0

The 1991 Positive CSF Culture Report identified in that letter (performed by the CDC’s Fort Collins laboratory) should have set off a red flag but was ignored while the focus remained on discrediting the sick and disabled Lyme patient population. [1] The autopsy report shows the destructive nature of Borrelia evident in the liver (nutmeg liver), kidneys, heart, lungs and brain. The patient died after the insurer refused additional IV antibiotic therapy. (Medical execution)

Patient testimony all across America is describing a disease that is destroying lives, ending careers while leaving its victim in financial ruin and yet the disease is classified as a low-risk and non-urgent health threat.

Six of the seven defendants of the Lisa Torrey vs. IDSA racketeering lawsuit were authors of the Lancet article below. It is no secret that the CDC has aligned themselves with these defendants and supplied the financing of the ‘Enterprise” through taxpayer funds under CDC Grant# RO1 CK 000152

NIH Online Reporting Tools

https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_history.cfm?aid=8707215&icde=48502354

Question #3

3.    Does sovereign immunity protect government health officials involved in acts of atrocity?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Sincerely,

Carl Tuttle

Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

Cc: The Tick-Borne Disease Working Group

Daniel Dutko, Lead attorney of the Lisa Torrey vs. IDSA lawsuit

Reference:

 1 Lyme disease antiscience  Published Sept 1, 2011

http://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(12)70054-3/fulltext

Authors: [Names in bold are defendants in the RICO case]

Dr Paul G Auwaerter, MD

Johan S Bakken, MD, PhD

Prof Raymond J Dattwyler, MD

Prof J Stephen Dumler, MD

Prof John J Halperin, MD

Edward McSweegan, PhD

Prof Robert B Nadelman, MD

Susan O'Connell, MD

Prof Eugene D Shapiro, MD

Prof Sunil K Sood, MD

Prof Allen C Steere, MD

Prof Arthur Weinstein, MD

Prof Gary P Wormser, MD