Here are some of the latest comments from signatories: Jim McSporran Bracknell, United Kingdom 'The role of a charity should not be to restrict freedom of speech.' Ali Brownlie Bojang Hove, United Kingdom 'This is clearly a political organisation that has no charitable aims. Furthermore it's intention seem to to stifle any criticism of Israel's policies or support for Palestinians. Neither of these are anti-Semitic.' John Allaway Norwich, United Kingdom 'It is utterly wrong for this organisation to get away with claiming that anyone who says anything remotely critical of what the Israeli government is doing to Palestinians, is "anti-Semitic". It is even more wrong that they should have charitable status, and be taken seriously by members of the government.' John Cagan Lambeth, United Kingdom Zionism ≠ Judaism; ergo Zionism ≠ Judaism; ergo Anti-Zionism ≠ Anti-Semitism. Quod erat demonstrandum Below is a good example of how the CAA works - saying if defending one's community is terrorism then she is proud to be a terrorist, the CAA ripped the latter half of the sentence out of context to demonise Malaka Mohammed who was later cleared by Exeter Guild of Undergraduates