These projects are being proposed, and note that the percentage of affordable units is much lower, if not absent. Projects, if they would like to boost the density, can agree to add affordable units. Some are at the bare minimum required. If city officials were to counter with a request for more affordable units, 20-30%, with funding incentives, this would be healthier. In an ideal situation, there would be more projects with 100% affordable units, adding to the general inventory.

1529- 1533 State Street (proposed)

Private developer

27 residential units, 3 at below market rates (11%)

501 Garden St. (proposed)

Private developer

7 residential units, 0% affordable

La Cumbre Plaza (proposed)

Private developer - Taylor 

685 residential units, 39 at low income rates (6%), some discussion for adding senior housing, no median income housing

630 Chapala (proposed)

Private developer- Van Wyk

39 residential units,  0% affordable units

121 E. Mason St - SOMOFunk project (proposed)

Private developer

144 residential rental, 27 affordable (19%)

12 residential for purchase, 2 moderate income 

222 E. Canon Perdido St (proposed)

Private developer - Buddha Homes

27 residential units, 3 moderate income (11%)

418 N. Milpas St (proposed)

Private developer

90 residential units, 15 low and moderate income (17%)

219 E. Haley (proposal in process)

Private developer - John Price

34 residential units, 0% affordable

932 De la Vina (proposal in process) 

Private developer

22 residential units, unclear number of affordable units

1815 State St. (status unclear)

Private developer

16 residential units, 0% affordable

113-117 W. Ortega St. (status unclear)

23 residential units, ? affordable