Petition updateStudents and community members against reporting weighted GPAs for the 2016-2017 cycleWeighted GPA decision to be discussed further; Community input wanted
Education 2020CA, United States
Nov 4, 2016
The School Board and Superintendent are now seeking community input on the weighted v. unweighted GPA issue. From Superintendent McGee's letter posted today: "Looking at the week in review, aside from the adorable Halloween parades at our elementary schools, this week has been dominated by the Grade Point Average (GPA) conversations. I have received over 100 emails and two petitions regarding the reporting of Weighted Grade Point Average (WGPA), and I think our Board members and principals have as well. Here is where we stand: 1. Students who have completed college applications due November 1 for Early Admission, Early Action, and Early Decision may file a written request with their school to have a transcript showing their weighted GPA to the schools to which they have applied. The weighted GPA is determined by the current (and historical) practices each school uses. 2. In conducting further fact-finding and data analysis, we have determined that it is not in the best interest of several students to automatically issue second semester transcripts with both a weighted and unweighted GPA. This is because the UC weighting system used at Paly for the last several years actually generates a WGPA lower than the unweighted GPA for some students. I will be reporting on this issue and some of the other problems we have encountered to the Board at a future meeting. Also, I will be listening to staff, parents, and students, as well as identifying relevant research and best practices in similar districts in order to craft a revised recommendation for this year. During the next few weeks, I will be scheduling a few sessions – both via webinar and open forums – to gather additional feedback. 3. Sometime before April 1, I will be making a recommendation to the Board for reporting grades on transcripts beyond this current school year in accordance with our existing Board Policy BP 5121 Grades/Evaluation of Student Achievement, which states: “. The Superintendent or designee shall recommend to the Board the methodology to be used in calculating students grade point averages … The Superintendent or designee shall also recommend to the Board whether extra grade weighting will be assigned for honors courses that are substantially similar in breadth and rigor to an Advanced Placement course, an entry-level college course or a community college level course.” Again, prior to making any recommendation for the long-term, we will provide ample opportunity for community input via open forums, webinars, and surveys. Reporting weighted GPAs on transcripts is a significant change in past practice and deserves thoughtful deliberation. Among the many considerations we need to address are: What are the pros and cons of using either the UC system (Paly model) or the Gunn model for weighting grades? What are the pros and cons of models used in similar districts and neighboring districts? What courses get weighted grades? Is it just AP courses that get weighted? What about rigorous electives and advanced courses? What about dual credit courses at Foothill? What about AAR? How can we assure ALL students have access to courses with weighted grades? If weighted classes have prerequisites, will they be accessible to all students? Should we put a limit on how many weighted grades a student can receive? How much weight should a particular course receive? Should Honors courses get a 0.5 weight and AP courses a 1.0 weight? (New Trier High School has three different weights for each letter grade – an A can be a 4.0, 4.67, or 5.33 depending on whether the class is “College Prep, Honors, or High Honors.”) What are the unanticipated well-being issues? Will reporting WGPA increase or decrease student stress? Will weighted grades create more academic competition and pressures among students? If so, how can we mitigate some of these pressures? What grades gets reported on the transcript? (Mountain View-Los Altos high schools report four different grades.) With which class would implementation begin? Can a weighting system be designed to: Value STEM, humanities, arts, and languages equally Encourage students to pursue highest level of learning in their area of passion Encourage students to choose courses based on student interest and talent Maintain enrollment in pathways classes and electives To illustrate the complexity of the matter, we ran a simulation for our current 474 Paly seniors using both the UC system and the Gunn system. A total of 269 students had higher WGPAs with the Gunn system than with the UC system, and 205 students had higher WGPAs with the UC system than with the Gunn system. This is not a simple matter. Throughout this protracted discussion, we will continue to remind parents and students of what we know about the college admissions process. GPA is one of several components of the admissions process and most colleges recalculate a weighted GPA according to their own criteria and not ours! The teacher recommendations matter a great deal, as do the student essay, SAT/ACT scores, and especially the rigor of the classes that students take – regardless of their grade. We also know that most colleges take a holistic approach to evaluating students. They want to understand what drives and engages each student and GPA does not tell them that. I constantly remind our students that they are so much more than a number, and the time spent worrying about GPA points is time wasted because they could be using that time to pursue or explore some topic that captures their interest. That said, we want a grade reporting system that will assure the best possible outcomes for our students, assure we continue to have a credible relationship with our colleges and universities, and assure that we take into account all voices." https://www.pausd.org/explore-pausd/news/superintendents-weekly-message-nov-4-2016 From Principal Diorio's post to Schoology this afternoon: "Good afternoon and TGIF! I'm writing with new information regarding the Board of Education's vote earlier this week to report weighted CSU/UC grades on our senior's mid-year transcripts. Please read this info carefully. Yesterday afternoon, our district Department of Technology Services, led by Chief Technology Officer Derek Moore, was able to pull the data for the Paly class of 2017 to determine the exact number of students whose weighted CSU/UC GPAs are lower than the cumulative unweighted GPA. The data were very compelling. After reviewing this new information, Superintendent Dr. McGee, Derek Moore, and I consulted with the Board of Education Agenda Setting committee and determined that we do need to return to the Board with a short-term recommendation for second semester transcripts. . In an e-mail sent to the Board of Education last evening, here is what Superintendent Dr. McGee and I recommend instead: "We will not be sending WGPA transcripts to schools to which students applied for early decision or have already been admitted on a rolling basis unless the student fills out a written request that we do so. ...We are reconsidering the necessity for reporting both weighted and unweighted grades on second semester transcripts because we do not want to disadvantage any student's college application or scholarship opportunities and will report back to our students and families following the next Board meeting. Prior to the next Board meeting, we will strive to have a staff recommendation for the short term that will assure the best possible outcomes for our students, assure we continue to have a credible relationship with our colleges and universities, and assure that we take into account all voices." To reiterate, we will be taking no further action before the next Board of Education meeting. However, if you have already submitted a college application and would like to send a revised transcript that contains the weighted CSU/UC GPA to colleges before January 1, we will do so. To request for us to send a hard copy of your revised transcript, please complete this google form. Keep in mind the deadline for us to send this information isDecember 2nd, so please be sure to let us know before then. Finally, I apologize for the confusion and any anxiety this week has caused and am grateful for your continued support and understanding as we work toward an optimal solution. We love our seniors and have confidence that in the end, things will work out. Remember, "college is a match to be made, not a prize to be won." In my time at Paly, I've seen over 4,000 seniors graduate from our school and "find their match." I have faith that the class of 2017 will distinguish itself with amazing accomplishments beyond graduation too. I am so proud of our seniors. And boy, am I looking forward to an extra hour of sleep this weekend! Take care, Ms. D "
Copy link
WhatsApp
Facebook
Nextdoor
Email
X