From the image:
When you have to begin criminal proceedings against two Tainan District Court prosecutors, you know the government is corrupt. What are they trying to hide? See the link for the 4 June 2019 submission:
附带的截图如下：
当你必须对两名台南地方法院检察官提起刑事诉讼时，你知道政府是腐败的。他们试图隐藏什么？请参阅2019年6月4日提交的链接：
^ https://drive.google.com/file/d/1okDg55v8pKDTz3nXXsKWQR8IBeyJsl0H/view?usp=sharing
***
中文以下
Remember The Honorable John McCallum, Canada's Ambassador to China?
Canada fired Mr. McCallum because political pressure wanted to end China's ability to learn about our colliding difference in the common internet sphere. It was actually a crass and careless gesture from the Canadian Prime Minister. The gesture mimics his earlier abrupt cancellation of a Philippines Helicopter deal, also without regard for another well-meaning, legally correct, world leader. For order and balance, karma is obliged to trail those who lack in respect.
At what point do news reports correlate the secret N.S.A. surveillances (reference Edward Snowden)? Neither China nor The U.S.A. reveals the extent of their privately public (secret) surveillances. At least China is open about its drive for complete transparency among the international tiers. Canada is completely opaque in its considerations for transparency.
Point in fact, Canada harbors a bigger secret. The written law in Canada is different from the practiced law. Canada compels hundreds of people into prisons for criminal allegations without ever offering a judicial trial.
Mr. Helmerichs is currently compiling a 7 year research project into a legal submission to The Law Society Of Ontario, Canada, directly to correct the ongoing criminal fraud to every Canadian taxpayer.
The Republic Of China (Taiwan) is well aware of the book. A draft of the book title "The Choice: unbecoming conduct of Canadian and Chinese public officials" is available, updated regularly until the final single .pdf document is complete later this month: https://rene4pm.blogspot.com/2019/05/choicebook.html
The question Taiwan must ask itself is: how much longer can the Republic Of China defend for, and try to hide, Canada's legitimate corruption of law?
Is it not logical to assume the greater population of China will permit true transparency to replace what Canada currently allows in its mockery for law?
See the first link, for details of where this story is currently at in the Republic Of China: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1okDg55v8pKDTz3nXXsKWQR8IBeyJsl0H/view?usp=sharing
Rene Helmerichs
5 June 2019
***
Chinese below.
还记得加拿大驻华大使约翰麦卡勒姆阁下吗？
加拿大解雇了McCallum先生，因为政治压力想要结束中国了解我们在共同互联网领域的冲突差异的能力。这实际上是加拿大总理的粗鲁和粗心的举动。这种姿态模仿了他早些时候突然取消菲律宾直升机协议，也没有考虑到另一个善意的，法律上正确的世界领导人。为了秩序和平衡，业力有义务追踪那些缺乏尊重的人。
在什么时候秘密N.S.A.监视（参考Edward_Snowden）提到了吗？至少中国对其完全透明的动力持开放态度。加拿大对透明度的考虑是完全不透明的。
新闻报道在什么时候关联秘密N.S.A.监视（参考爱德华斯诺登）？中国和美国都没有透露他们的私人公开（秘密）监视的程度。至少中国对其推动国际层级完全透明化的态度持开放态度。加拿大对透明度的考虑是完全不透明的。
事实上，加拿大拥有更大的秘密。加拿大的成文法与实践法不同。加拿大在没有提供司法审判的情况下迫使数百人进入监狱进行刑事指控。
Helmerichs先生目前正在编写一份为期7年的研究项目，向加拿大安大略省律师协会提交法律文件，直接向每位加拿大纳税人纠正正在进行的刑事欺诈行为。
中华民国（台湾）非常了解这本书。可以获得书籍标题草案“选择：加拿大和中国公职人员的不良行为”，并定期更新，直到本月晚些时候最终单个.pdf文件完成：https://rene4pm.blogspot.com/2019/05/choicebook.html
台湾必须问自己的问题是：中华民国能够为加拿大合法的法律腐败辩护并试图隐瞒多久？
假设中国更多的人口允许真正的透明度取代加拿大目前允许的嘲弄法律，这是不合逻辑的吗？
请参阅第一个链接，了解该故事目前在中华民国的情况：https://drive.google.com/file/d/1okDg55v8pKDTz3nXXsKWQR8IBeyJsl0H/view?usp=sharing
Rene Helmerichs
108年6月5日