COURT CASE CONFERENCE ORDERS ON THURSDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2024 JUDGE PAUL R. HOWARD
Praise be to ALLAH in all circumstances. As long as we have made every effort and knocked on the door of the Most Merciful, what has been decreed is indeed good for us, even if it appears otherwise. ALLAH's wisdom is greater, and we are grateful for what He has destined for us.
As a new immigrant, I would like to express my gratitude to Judge "Paul R. Howard", as his kindness is far beyond words. I cannot fully describe the benefits I gained from the last session; it gave me, with ALLAH’s help, more strength than before, along with the determination and resolve to keep fighting until we reach safety.
SOME OF THE THINGS I GAINED FROM JUDGE "Paul R. Howard"'S SESSION INCLUDE:
- The true English meaning of the word "ALL" is:
- The word "ALL" in Judge "Paul R. Howard"'s vocabulary does not mean "ALL" as I previously understood it in English. This was explained to me by the honorable judge during the session, when he insisted on keeping the new children's lawyer, who had been involved to my case by previous lawyers (not by a court ruling based on a disputed motion by both parties, according to Canadian law)! DESPITE A RULING THAT NULLIFIES ALL TEMPORARY ORDERS ISSUED PRIOR TO THE FINAL JUDGMENT IN THE TRIAL ON FEBRUARY 16, 2024, BY JUSTICE TOBIN, regarding the alleged international abduction (as claimed by my ex-spouse), Judge Kiran Sah (in the July 8, 2024 session) and Judge "Paul R. Howard" (in the October 24, 2024 session) persist in bringing Kimberly Douccet into the case by various means, and through unlawful methods to START OVER the investigations from the BEGINNING! (STRANGE!).
2. When I raised my defend on this matter and presented the supporting document attached in my court submissions—showing the court order (with a final court seal) dated February 16, 2024, which cancels all temporary / interim orders issued prior to the final trial judgment (ALL INTERIM ORDERS MADE IN THIS CASE ARE NOW AT AN END. THIS WOULD INCLUDE THE ORDER OF JUSTICE V. MITROW DATED NOVEMBER 29, 2023. Attached as image in this posted update)—the judge did not acknowledge this order and he said:” I cannot see that.” Weird!!!. Despite the final seal from the Superior Court of Justice, he read the judgment issued on the same date and claimed he did not see any ruling regarding this matter. When I pointed out the tab under my document list and the page number (because the endorsement order, regarding the interim orders and some other issues, is separate than the judgment’s order), and read out the order, he kindly explained that the word ALL in English language does NOT necessarily mean ALL. According to his interpretation, and “IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILDREN” he INSISTED that we disregard this phrase, -and told me that I did not understand the meaning of "ALL"- ignore all prior reports from the investigations for more than five years, and disregard everything issued by the father, starting fresh WITHOUT LOOKING BACK. To him, everything that happened before OCTOBER is “ERASED & FORGIVEN.” Honestly, this approach is quite lenient and forgiving! Also, he neither sees nor understands what I mean by the word all in the judgment. (In Canadian law—and based on consultations with several lawyers—it’s common knowledge THAT ANY TEMPORARY ORDER PRECEDING THE FINAL JUDGMENT OF A TRIAL IS AUTOMATICALLY VOID UPON THE TRIAL’S CONCLUSION.) However, Judge "Paul R. Howard" indicated that the Office of the Children’s Lawyer (OCL) must “RE-DO” its investigations from 2023, which spanned months, to “DISCOVER” more details. Apparently, investigations lasting over five years are insufficient EVEN THE JUDGMENT ORDER AT THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE IN CANADA WAS IGNORED BY JUDGE "Paul R. Howard"—perhaps because the findings were favorable to the veiled Muslim mother! Only ALLAH knows.
3.Thank you, Your Honor. Since my native language is Arabic, and although I have graduated from Fanshawe College’s English for Academic Purposes Level 10 program with an excellent level, I will make an additional effort to improve my English proficiency and explore all possible meanings to interpret the word "ALL" in English.
4. Although Canadian law does NOT require the inclusion of a children's lawyer in ALL FAMILY CASES, depending on certain conditions and considering the age of the children, and despite the absence of any reasons listed in Canadian law to introduce a new children's lawyer after the previous investigations and the issuance of a final ruling, Judge "Paul R. Howard"'s compassionate heart and deep concern for the children and their best interests LED HIM TO BYPASS ALL LAWS AND REFUSE TO ADHERE TO THEM, based on what he personally perceives as being in the children's best interest.
Thus, I have learned from the honorable judge that what we have been taught in Canada—that NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW—might have behind the statement ANOTHER meaning on the lawyers and judges perspective that “NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.” I will also seek the possible interpretations of this phrase. Additionally, I have learned from the court that some judges are EXTREMELY LENIENT regarding violations of the law committed by DISHONEST LAWYERS AND BIASED JUDGES, who are SUPPOSED to be upholders of the law. By this standard, even greater leniency should be extended to a mother who does not comply with an order issued in an ILLEGAL AND UNJUST MANNER, especially if that order contradicts the children’s best interest. No human is more compassionate or caring for a child than their mother.
As a recent immigrant to Canada, the mother is undocumented and unfamiliar with the hidden meanings of English (according to Judge Howard's assessment of the meaning of ALL, the involvement of OCL, and granting orders with consents while I did not consent! Furthermore, ignoring the HISTORY & THE ALL THE PREVIOUS ORDERS to start with a plain paper and new chances with the respondent father!). Thus, it is clear that if the system allows legal professionals to violate the law and does not stop them despite all the correspondence I have issued, there will undoubtedly be greater tolerance for mothers and children!
5. Despite my clarification of the issue regarding Doucet’s lack of credibility by submitting a (FALSE) statement to mislead justice, claiming that she was unaware that my children and I had moved from the Cherry Hill area (near Eagle Heights School) more than a year and a half ago to the Northeast area (and thus all documents were submitted to the court updating my address and the names of the children’s schools), and that I am violating the law by hiding the children—she (sadly) contacted Eagle Heights School in October, UNAWARE of our ACTUAL ADDRESS (which has been provided in all my materials in the court) and where the children currently attend school!
It seems I may have hidden them or perhaps abducted them inside London! Or perhaps Doucet suffers from a lack of vision and obscurity that prevents her from reading the information I provided in the court file. MAYBE SHE NEEDS MORE INTELLIGENCE, AS IT HAS BEEN NOTED THAT THE CHILDREN WERE TRANSFERRED TO ONLINE SCHOOL LAST YEAR THROUGH SEVERAL ORDERS ISSUED BY THE COURT ITSELF.
What’s even more remarkable is that there were several contentious emails from the father during the summer months of 2024, which INCLUDED THE CHILDREN'S LAWYER REGARDING THE CHILDREN’S NEW SCHOOL FOR THE 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YEAR. However, of course, her lack of credibility did NOT pose any obstacle for the fair Judge "Paul R. Howard" to halt the false allegations in the file. ON THE CONTRARY, HE CONFIRMED THAT THESE LIES ARE ORDINARY AND HE DOES NOT CONSIDER THEM TO BE WRONG. YES, INDEED.
6. Throughout all of this, the judge was, of course, kind-hearted and forgiving of anything from Doucet or my ex-husband. Even more remarkable, he values peace and reconciliation, going as far as making decisions and recording in the issued ruling that they were made "with the agreement of both parties" (considering me as one of those parties) despite the fact that I did not consent to any of them! Such tolerance, love, and understanding! I learned from Judge "Paul R. Howard" that a judge may disregard the integrity of his professional oath SIMPLY BECAUSE HE BELIEVES IN GOODNESS AND RECONCILIATION, AND IS CONVINCED OF THE IMPORTANCE OF FORGETTING ANYTHING BEFORE OCTOBER (since it is against my ex-husband) and starting anew (by his enforced order), even if I, the concerned party, have not agreed to this!
Perhaps Judge "Paul R. Howard" is still adhering to laws abolished in the 19th century THAT DID NOT CONSIDER OR DEFINE A WOMAN AS A HUMAN BEING! My apologies, Your Honor, but I do not belong to those outdated laws in any place or time. I will not accept anyone forcing me into an agreement made ILLEGALLY (Not only according to the history, but also based on the nature of the session, where no decision can be made without the consent of the other party.)! How can we ignore the entire past and grant my ex-husband special rights as a parent living in Canada when he is outside of Canada? What is the purpose of his control over decisions regarding the children in Canada, despite the evidence of his harm to them in Kuwait, which was one of the reasons for the (withdrawal and restrict) of his parental rights and granting the mother the SOLE GUARDIANSHIP TO MAKE DECISIONS FOR THE WELL-BEING OF HER CHILDREN WITHOUT THE FATHER’S MISUSE OF HIS RIGHTS AGAINST THEM?
7. Your Honor, you also noted in your ruling that the mother requested the children’s lawyer meet with me in my home. In reality, it was the children’s lawyer who made this request, and when you asked if I agreed, explaining that it would be better for the children, I said, “Okay.” However, this does not justify altering the facts in the ruling. My children still completely refuse to speak with Doucet, and given that, as the presiding judge, you have already overstepped the law to uphold your personal opinion without respect the children’s views and history, I believe no one has the right to force us to comply with an order that DOES NOT RESPECT CANADIAN LAWS BECAUSE THERE IS “NO ONE” OVER THE LAW TO ISSUE AN ORDER AGAINST THE LAW!! My children are safe in their home, and NO ONE will breach this sanctuary to intimidate them!
One of the most DEFINING FEATURES OF CANADIAN LAW is its emphasis on protecting children, respecting their feelings and requests. Why, then, are NONE of my children’s rights considered from your perspective?
8. In addition, I received your order (5 pages) in handwritten form, even though rulings issued by the court are typically provided as computer-printed documents. I emailed the court on Friday, October 25, 2024, to request this but received NO response whatsoever. I had to go in person to the court yesterday, October 31, 2024, just to decipher your beautiful handwriting, as a court employee informed me that you had instructed the ruling be delivered in handwritten form! I needed to understand the content of the issued order. While I appreciate the elegance of your handwriting, I cannot fully decipher it—just as I did not understand the meaning of the word "ALL" in the ruling, nor the meaning of “NO ONE IN CANADA IS ABOVE THE LAW.” Perhaps I should consider taking a special course to decode the handwritten orders you so kindly provide!
- The permissible scope under Canadian law for issuing orders during a Case Conference:
9. The law regarding the Case Conference, which PROHIBITS making any orders related to Decision-Making Responsibility, parenting time, contact, or access information without the consent of the other party, does NOT include the consent of THE VEILED MUSLIM MOTHER. Despite the generality of the text, exceptions have been overlooked in the wording. Thank you, Your Honor, for making all the orders in favor of my ex-husband despite the fears and dangers that have been substantiated, along with the (disregard) for Canadian law related to this matter. This is despite the mother’s refusal to grant her consent during this session.
10. Despite the issuance of strange orders that benefit my ex-husband, the child support order remains pending, and the court simply asks the father orally if he is willing to pay support for the children, leaving it at that! This approach from the court means that it cannot see the children’s best financial interests in compelling the father to provide support, BY GIVING EXCUSES THAT I REFUSED THAT INITIALLY BECAUSE WE DO NOT WANT ANYTHING FROM HIM EXPECT LEAVING US ALONE! NOW, I REQUESTED THE CHILD SUPPORT, BUT THE REQUEST HAS BEEN IGNORED! On the other hand, they place the mother under scrutiny, claiming that she is unable to meet the children’s needs—which is not true—but the situation is indeed strange.
I expect that the court's refusal to issue an order compelling the father to pay child support is intended to demonstrate that the mother is not failing in her responsibilities, as the father claims, and that the situation does not require any changes—thank God. As a result, no decisions have been made for over two years (like many other cases in Canada) regarding compelling the father to pay child support. Thank you for confirming my full responsibility for the lives of my children for several years.
11. My ex-husband's aim in provoking the judges regarding religion and the veil, Canadian citizenship—which has nothing to do with the family case—my studies in Canada, and his anger over government assistance related to child benefits, is evident. Are all these complications and acts of racism intended to prevent us from living a normal life and succeeding? He is determined to destroy us even after our separation and independence from him! What a narcissistic psychopath!
- The judge's willingness and transparency to reconsider court procedures if they are (against the interests of a veiled Muslim woman).
12. While the judge insisted on ignoring the final orders issued against the father in Canada and also in Kuwait, he asked me to look forward and think about reconciliation and understanding with my ex-husband (WHICH IS IMPOSSIBLE! THE STARS IN THE SKY ARE CLOSER TO HIM AFTER EVERYTHING HE HAS DONE AND CONTINUES TO DO AGAINST US. I have wasted 12 years of my life GIVE UP for everythings because I thought that was for my children’s benefits, unfortunately, he has taken benefits for himself. 3 years after, I was flighting to protect my kids from him. Now, after 15 years, NO ONE including a judge will force me to compromise after everything he has done to us in a manner that exceeds all boundaries! We are fighting to survive. The judge himself took a strange, suspicious, and questionable step BY REVERTING THE CASE TO THE FIRST STAGE OF COURT PROCEEDINGS (To be spoken to) instead of moving on to the next step (case conference settlement), which is the final stage before trial (if they intend to drag our lives into court and prolong the case—according to Canadian laws). It seems, Your Honor, that you are playing with the law according to your whims and interests, showing no respect for any law! MY CASE IS STILL IN (TO BE SPOKEN TO FOR MORE THAN TWO YEARS IN CANADA! WHILE IT IS NOT NEW CASE, IT IS A CASE TO RECOGNIZE THE FOREIGN ORDERS AND PROTECT US FROM THE FATHER IN CANADA!)
BUT WHAT IS STRANGE IS, WHERE ARE THOSE WHO SHOULD STOP THOSE WHO DO NOT RESPECT THE LAW? WHERE ARE THOSE WHO SAY NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW? WHAT I SEE IS THAT THOSE WHO ARE MANIPULATING “NOT ONLY” MY CASE IN COURT “BUT RATHER MANY CASES” WHICH I WENT THROUGH THE DETAILS AND THEY TOOK THE CHILDREN FROM THE MOTHER IN A STRANGE AND CONFUSED BASIS! They created whatever they want! THEY ARE ALL ABOVE THE LAW, AND NO ONE IS STOPPING THEM!
13.
Furthermore, it has been noted that I am "in agreement / consent" (despite the fact that I am not) to grant my ex-husband the opportunity to submit the documents he has refused to provide, despite a final court order from Judge Tobin mandating him to submit them by June 28, 2024, at the latest. In Canada, if an order is issued and not complied with, I have the right to proceed with the legal process without dispute. Additionally, if, after I have filed a request and opened the case, the defendant fails to respond within 60 days of being officially served (which was in 2022), I have the right to continue with the proceedings without opposition.
However, what is happening in my case is that my ex-husband is not submitting the required documents many times to exceed the time and make it for 10 years (maybe), and even though I have refused to grant him a consent to keep adjourn the matter (out of sheer generosity), the court has provided him with an extraordinary extension—three months, six months—while now he is requesting the opportunity to appeal the final ruling in the international abduction case that was issued nine months ago. According to Canadian law (which no one is above), he is permitted to appeal only within 30 days!
This blatant disregard for established legal procedures is both perplexing and deeply concerning. Someone appears to allow for significant delays and extensions THAT ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE RULE OF LAW, PARTICULARLY WHEN ONE PARTY IS ACTIVELY OBSTRUCTING THE PROCESS. The implications of this situation extend beyond mere inconvenience; they undermine the integrity of the legal framework designed to protect the rights and interests of all parties involved, particularly those of the children affected by these proceedings.
In light of these circumstances, it is crucial to advocate for the enforcement of the law as intended and to challenge any actions that contradict the principles of justice and accountability. This situation necessitates not only a careful examination of the legal precedents involved but also a commitment to ensuring that the rights afforded to each party under Canadian law are upheld without DISCRIMINATION.
14. Oh, the justice! It seems that those in power in the court are trampling on the law for someone who lives in Kuwait (outside of Canada) and has been deceiving Canada since 2010! This is very strange! Who is backing them in Canada? Who is violating the law, and no one is stopping them?
15. It seems that these individuals do not care about the children; all the CHILDREN’S NEED is to live a normal life! All the procedures are a mess and a violation of the law, and THEY THEMSELVES DO NOT RESPECT THE LAW! They are playing WITH THE CHILDREN FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH GOALS, AS IF IT IS A TRADE IN MINDS AND HUMAN BEINGS!
16. It seems that these individuals, just as they placed barriers in front of me last year and pressured me with illegal procedures before the trial by (Judge Kiran Sah), which prevented me from completing the academic semester necessary to bridge to my architectural engineering program in Canada, now wish to impose these barriers again to prevent me from continuing my current studies as a Law Clerk. Oh, the support, justice, and fairness! At least, whatever I will lost in this process, (INSHALLAH) I will not loss my kids and my motherhood.
17. Surely, this session taught me that the oppressor (should never be obeyed) because, simply put, THEY ARE THE ONES WHO DISRESPECTED THE LAW AND TRAMPLED ON IT, AND NO ONE (SO FAR) IS ABLE TO PUT ANY LIMITS ON THOSE WHO (VIOLATED AND TRAMPLED ON THE LAW) DUE TO THEIR PREJUDICE AGAINST A VEILED MUSLIM WOMAN!
18. The support from the federal government for me and my children and our move to Canada was clear, and they were aware of my religion, wearing the veil (niqab), and my beliefs! So, what has changed within Canada AT THE COURT, THEY SHALL THE HISTORY IN THE CONSIDERATION, the land of justice and equality (between men and women, and among all races, religions, and beliefs)? Does THE COURT LOOK TO a veiled Muslim woman NOT have a place in the diverse multicultural society of Canada? Is the goal to take three children from a single mother in Canada who is Muslim and veiled? (ALLAH forbids. Our Lord is with us and will protect us from the oppressors who violate the law, just as He has protected us from the oppressors and deceivers in Kuwait and elsewhere).
FINALLY:
I have the full right to PUT AN END to this racism and STOP the farce surrounding my case, and to complete the proper legal procedures after my file is transferred to Judge Sharon Hassan (I do not know if she is Muslim or even if she accepts the veil, and it does not matter—there are many Muslim individuals who do not accept it and asked me to remove it, unfortunately!). But at least she is a SPOUSE TO A MUSLIM, and surely, she does NOT have the OPPRESSIVE MINDSET AND HATRED AGAINST MUSLIMS!