Dear Neighbours,

A Public Hearing has been scheduled regarding the proposed Qualico development across from Crescent Park Elementary School. This is a critical opportunity for residents to have their voices heard.

Many serious concerns were raised at the October 2 community information session, including traffic safety, environmental impact, infrastructure strain, and neighbourhood character. Despite the depth of those concerns, Qualico’s response has not meaningfully addressed what residents clearly expressed.

Your attendance matters. City Council needs to see that our community is engaged and paying attention. Silence will be interpreted as support.

How to Participate:
• Register to speak at the Public Hearing (Register in person at city hall between 6:15-6:45)
• Attend in person to show support (Feb 23 7pm) 
• Submit written comments if you cannot attend

Please share this information widely with neighbours and community groups. The decisions made at this hearing will have long-term impacts on our neighbourhood and our children’s safety.

Thank you for standing up for Crescent Park and our community.

Send emails to:

mayor@surrey.ca, linda.annis@surrey.ca, harry.bains@surrey.ca, mike.bose@surrey.ca, doug.elford@surrey.ca, ghepner@surrey.ca, pardeep.kooner@surrey.ca, mandeep.nagra@surrey.ca, rob.stutt@surrey.ca, clerks@surrey.ca

Here is a letter you can copy and paste:

Subject: Against Application # 7925-0099-00

Dear Councillor,

I am writing to formally express my opposition to Application # 7925-0099-00.

After reviewing the proposal, I have significant concerns regarding the scale and impact of this development on our neighbourhood. The density proposed is excessive and does not align with the existing character, traffic patterns, infrastructure capacity, or safety realities of the surrounding community.

1. Density Concerns
The number of units proposed is disproportionate to the established neighbourhood pattern. This level of density will fundamentally alter the scale, livability, and character of the area.

In addition, the nearby Cressey condominium development is not yet complete. The full traffic, parking, and infrastructure impacts of that project have not yet been realized or measured. Proceeding with another high-density proposal before understanding the cumulative effect of the Cressey development would be premature and irresponsible planning. Council should fully assess the impact of existing approved developments before approving additional density in the same area.

2. Traffic and School Safety
The current road network and traffic patterns are not designed to accommodate this volume of additional vehicles. Increased congestion will create heightened safety risks, particularly for children walking or biking to nearby schools.

This concern applies not only to the elementary schools in the area, but also to the high school up the street. Secondary students walk, bike, and drive in significant numbers. School zones are already congested during peak drop-off and pick-up times. Adding substantial density without comprehensive traffic mitigation will increase risks to students of all ages and to families navigating these corridors daily.

3. Tree Loss and Environmental Impact
The anticipated removal of mature trees will have a lasting environmental impact. Tree canopy contributes to neighbourhood character, stormwater management, shade, and climate resilience. Once mature trees are removed, they cannot be meaningfully replaced within a reasonable timeframe. Development should prioritize preservation wherever possible.

4. Parking Spillover
The proposed parking allocation appears insufficient for the number of units planned. This will likely result in overflow parking onto neighbouring streets, increasing congestion, limiting emergency vehicle access, and negatively impacting residents’ quality of life.

5. Infrastructure Capacity
There has been no clear demonstration that existing infrastructure—including roads, drainage, utilities, and community amenities—can adequately support this level of intensification. Approving density without confirmed infrastructure capacity places undue strain on the community.

I respectfully urge Council to reject Application # 7925-0099-00 in its current form. Responsible planning requires thoughtful growth that prioritizes safety, environmental preservation, and infrastructure readiness before approving further density.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
[Full Name]
[Address]
[Date]