Allegations of Apprehended Bias NCAT in Connection with HNSW/LAHC

In the 7 May 2026 order, an NCAT member asserted that the Applicant had only one matter before NCAT.  This assertion contained a fundamental administrative error as it overlooked the 15 January 2026 mould infestation and asbestos dispute (the withheld order and PAS report), treating the 16 February 2026 ex Parte dismissal as final (concerning access, safety and security) without determining the pending set-aside application and relocation of the matter, and denying summonses essential to resolving intrinsically connected financial ledgers; the Tribunal committed jurisdictional errors and violated procedural fairness.  Essentially silencing the self-litigant (carer-advocate) from being heard before NCAT.  These actions satisfy the double-might test in Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, establishing a reasonable apprehension of bias and rendering the 7 May order subject to internal appeal or judicial review.  The Applicant seeks recusal and disqualification of the NCAT Member, reopening of the unfair ex parte dismissal, and production of the missing rent ledger, which is critical to the proceeding on 16 October 2026.  The Rent Ledger was refused on 16 January 2026 for the 16 March hearing, and it remains withheld from the Applicant despite another hearing for 16 October.

A letter to the NCAT President was submitted to bring attention to the matter alleged herein.  Given the critical issues alleged herein, the Parliament Oversight Committee must take action to conduct a formal investigation and public hearing.   I urge the public to put pressure on the Parliament to act now...