Open Letter by Dr. Akram Nadwi in the Wake of Social Media Slander of Nouman Ali Khan
This petition had 2,616 supporters
Dear Muslim Brothers and Sisters in Dallas, America, and around the world:
- Dr. Akram Nadwi wrote this Open Letter of advice in the wake of the international social media slander campaign some individuals unleashed against Ustadh Nouman Ali Khan on Sept. 21, 2017. At the end of the letter are prominent scholars and leaders who have co-signed the Open Letter itself.
- If you agree with Dr. Akram's message and reject the organizing of slanderous social media campaigns against any Muslim, especially our respected scholars and leaders, sign this petition and share widely and make dua.
- Scholars, Imams, and other respected Muslim community leaders are invited to join the co-signing scholars and leaders by emailing title (optional), name, organization (optional), and city as they wish it to appear to firstname.lastname@example.org. May Allah ta'aalaa bless and protect us all.
The Sin of Feasting on the Misfortune of a Fellow-Believer
by: Mohammad Akram Nadwi
September, 28, 2017
Every Muslim knows what God has said about slander. He has said that, if invited to join in backbiting other people, we should feel the same disgust that we would feel if we were invited to join in eating their dead flesh. Backbiting should be as horrid to us as cannibalism. Why then do so many Muslims not resist the invitation to join in backbiting, slander and gossip, when the opportunity for it is presented? What is the attraction of it?
Every Muslim also knows that if you see someone in misfortune, your first impulse should be to help them, not to rejoice in their misfortune. There is the famous saying– ‘if you see a man fallen in a ditch, reflect on how hard he must have tried to keep his balance before he lost it and fell’. Such reflection is dignifying; it helps you to try and help him up, rather than keep him down. Every Muslim knows this, and yet so many prefer to take part in circulating news that someone has been brought down. The more famous the person, the higher his reputation, the greater the delight some people show in his fall. What is the point of this behaviour, given that those who indulge in it gain nothing by it?
When a reputation is being ruined, the majority of those who take part in the ruining will say, ‘Oh, I always knew he would end this way. I always thought he was too good to be true. I always had my doubts, you know, but I did not like to say.’ The minority will pretend to be surprised and aggrieved at the man’s fall; we may hear them say: ‘I would never have believed such a thing about him, but it must be true. You know what they say –“no smoke without fire”. What a shame!’. If the grief were sincere they would not say this. Rather, they would say: ‘I have no reliable, detailed, first-hand information about this. So, no, I will not believe it on hearsay, and I will not report it’. And they would continue to hold the man in the same respect as before, encourage others to do so also, and comfort him as best they can. But, since their grief is not real, that is not what they do. They prefer to be disappointed in him, to lose trust in him. Since this distrust is indeed a loss for them, why do they choose it?
For sure, if a man is alleged to have done some wrong, there is a collective duty to test the allegation.There are procedures for doing so, procedures entrusted to particular individuals empowered to investigate and make a determination that the people are supposed to accept. Meanwhile those people must remain silent, must withhold judgement. The procedures include a fair hearing for the plaintiff (who alleges the wrong-doing) as well as for the defendant (the alleged wrong-doer). The procedures do NOT include trial by print or electronic media; rather, if such media get involved in an improper or excessive manner, there is a danger of invalidating the procedures. In this event, neither plaintiff nor defendant can be vindicated, so the trouble lingers like slow poison in the bloodstream, killing any hope the concerned parties had of mending any damage capable of being mended, and then moving forward with their lives. Slander based on the idea that there is no smoke without fire undermines the procedures through which personal conflicts can be resolved. What is the attraction of behaviour that leads only to loss for all concerned? What leads people to take part in public destruction of someone’s reputation, even when this neither clarifies nor in any other way helps the situation?
It is not that hard to produce a lot of smoke with next to nothing of actual flame. Every breath of slander, backbiting and gossip darkens, thickens and spreads the smoke, until we can hardly draw a breath of clean air or think, speak and act with the decency expected of believers. Decency is more than ‘expected’ since God has condemned slander and gossip in the most vivid terms. Why then do people not take the recommended option of being silent when they do not know? In fact, even when tempted to think we ‘know’ (i.e., when we elect to go along with the hearsay) silence is still the better course, because it is the way of least harm. Why then do so many prefer not to discipline their tongue? What were all the prayers and fasts and dhikr for, if we cannot do even this much? All Muslims know that if they intend a good outcome, the means they use must be good, as well as the desired end. Why do they not resist indulging in slander, when God has likened it to feeding on a brother’s corpse? Do they honestly believe that some good can come of it?
I have become concerned with these questions because the reputation of someone I know, Nouman Ali Khan, is being targeted for ruin by a means expressly forbidden to Muslims. He is a famous, popular teacher, highly successful in that he has a gift for explaining the faith and religion in the idioms most familiar to young Muslims brought up under the influence of Western culture. Since that culture is tactically and strategically hostile to tradition generally, and to religion particularly, Muslims need someone who can think and talk in its terms. Nouman Ali Khan has worked steadily over many years to acquire expertise in the traditional Islamic sciences and traditional discourses on how to live an Islamic life. And then, as I say, he has the skill and freshness of mind and speech, to make those discourses relevant for Muslims living (like most everybody else) through the stresses of ‘modernity’ and ‘post-modernity’.
I have met Nouman Ali Khan a number of times. He has visited me in my home in order to consult with me, over several days, on some difficult questions of Quran and hadith interpretation, and their application in the norms and rules of Muslim practice. I have found no harm in his curiosity, none. To the contrary, I have been enlightened by his questions, and benefited from our conversations. I therefore will not entertain the slander now being circulated about him in social media. I will not discuss what is alleged except to say that it is flimsy and unspecific – we all know the trick of this kind of speech, ‘I don’t want to say anything but people are saying that x’, and to ‘x’ are soon added ‘y’ and ‘z’ and the rest of the alphabet. As the slander is spread, the alleged wrong is amplified from mouth to mouth; then elaborated with fabricated details to provide substance where there is none. Very soon, a single minor lapse comes to be represented as an habitual practice, a settled flaw of character; that grows further until the flaw is the man’s dominant, determining characteristic, the driving force, the ‘true hidden’ motive, of whatever good he may have done or intended. It can go still further and touch any and every argument the man ever put forward, however good it seemed before the slander broke; and it may even touch anyone associated with the man, as teacher or student, co-speaker, co-worker…
No, I have not exaggerated the evil of slander, backbiting and gossip. If anything, I have understated it. The description of this sin in the Quran is not as it is for rhetorical effect; it is a just measure of the harms that flow from it.
It so happens that a couple of years ago Nouman Ali Khan gave a sermon on just this topic. In it, he explained the evils of slander with careful attention to the teaching of the Quran, and how that teaching has been understood and implemented down the centuries. The sermon is available as a video: the most directly relevant part runs from minutes 19 to 27. I urge those who initiated, and those who are still spreading, this gossip about him, to give 8 minutes to watch and listen, at www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB0fPgytIWc&t=0s They will be deeply embarrassed by what they have said and done, but also informed and (if God has willed good for them in this business) inspired to correct their practice.
I can only guess at the present distress of Nouman Ali Khan and those near to him. Perhaps it may help him to recall the response of the great scholar and faqihah, Umm al-Darda, when her students reported that people criticised her unjustly, and wondered why she did not permit them to respond. She said that, well, people also praised her unjustly, and so it all balanced out. She was not in the least inhibited in her teaching. I hope that Nouman may be able/allowed to respond in the same way, that is, carry on his good work unperturbed. If his following is briefly diminished or deterred by his current misfortune, it should soon recover in sha’a Allah, because hundreds of thousands of people have benefited from his teaching, and they and others should not be deprived of his energy and talent as a teacher. My advice to him would be to prepare his lectures as normal and make them available online, with no allusion whatever to the gossip. What is substantial necessarily defeats what is flimsy, just as what is true and real does, eventually, defeat and displace what is false and virtual. God has given repeated assurance of this; His assurance suffices a believer.
I turn then to what prompts gossip, slander and backbiting. Why do people indulge in it when it is always pointless for them, when they gain nothing by it? I think the root motive is hasad, or envious spite, though this root must produce many branches. The supreme or arch-hasid is Iblis. Iblis is not in any way diminished by the creation of mankind. But he disobeys God, and then asks for (and is given) permission to be the enemy of mankind. It is by his own disobedience that Iblis is diminished. He thinks himself made of a stuff superior to what man is made of; he resents the notion of mankind having some degree of favour with God that he and his kind do not have, and by this resentment he questions the wisdom and the will of God. He gains nothing by bringing mankind down, yet he devotes the whole of his time into eternity trying to achieve this, and God has permitted him some measure of success. A part of that success is the plentiful evidence of spite in the intentions and behaviours of human beings. Backbiting and slander are surely the most common, though not the only, manifestations of this spite, this appetite to bring someone down, or to enjoy their being down, even though there is no advantage, no gain, from indulging this appetite. Among the monsters in the Western imagination are powerful, fire-breathing dragons that delight in burning down human settlements and stealing their gold and precious goods. The dragons do not eat these goods nor in any other way benefit from them; they simply heap them up, content that they have deprived the humans of the fruits of their toil. So it is with human beings who will not turn away from any opportunity to ruin a reputation. Now, it may well be that in some cases a reputation deserves to be ruined; but there are means that can be legitimately employed to prove that it is so. And along with seeking proof, we are counselled to pray for the wrong-doer, to help him or her to repentance and to whatever undoing of the wrong is possible. By contrast, to use the forbidden means of spreading rumours, of dropping hints and innuendoes, inciting the weakness of human beings to do the rest – that is an evil proceeding that can satisfy only the arch-hasid.
Co-signed Scholars and other Leaders of the Muslim Community:
- Moulana Muhammad Salim Qasmi, Vice President, All-India Muslim Personal Law Board and Rector of Darul Uloom Deoband Waqf, India
- Dr. Muhammad Anas Nadwi, Sydney, Australia
- Dr. Muhammad Abullais, IIUM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Dr. Abdullah bin Hamid Ali, senior faculty at Zaytuna College and founder of Lamppost Initiative, USA
- Mufti Abdul Sattar, Chairman Chicago Hilal Committee, Imam Makki Masjid, Chicago
- Imam Zia ul Haque Sheikh, Dallas
- Imam Basit, MQI, North Dallas
- Zia Ahmed, WIC, Dallas-FW
- Asif Effendi, Crescent Foundation, Dallas-FW
- Abdullah Najjar, Hedayah Institute, Houston
- Amer Mirza, founder of Texas Muslims - Hunting & Fishing Group
- Imam Shamikh Sahadat, Atlanta
- Mufti Mohammed Samir Wahid, Atlanta
- Dr. Yasir Nadeem Al Wajidi, Institute of Islamic Education, Elgin, IL and founder of Darul Uloom Online
- Qari Ali Toft, Chicago
- Maulana Ahsen Waseem, Chicago
- Imam Qari Asim Abdul Aleem, Chicago
- Junaid Ahmed, Arafat Travel, Chicago
- Shaykh Abdul Afzol, Darul Uloom Detroit
- Sulaiman Saleem, Teacher of Fiqh and Hadith at Institute of Islamic Education, Elgin, IL
- Shaykh Shafayat, Principal of Darul Uloom Institute, FL; Founder of AlHikmat Services / AlHikmat TV
- Mufti Izhar Khan, Miami
- Imam Saad Baig, Director of the Islamic Center of the Quad Cities, Moline
- Mufti Abdul Muqtadir, New Jersey
- Mufti Idris Abdus Salam, New Jersey
- Ustadha Samia Qaiser, New Jersey
- Imam Morshad Saami Hossain, Voorhees Islamic Center, New Jersey
- Mufti Ubaidullah Awal, New York
- Maulana Ahmed Chowdhury, Masjid Manhattan, New York
- Qari Adnan Uddin, New York
- Abdullah al Andalusi, Muslim Debate Initiative
- Daniel Haqiqatjou, MuslimSkeptic.com
- Sadat Anwar, Muslim Debate Initiative, Canada; Street Da'wah, Toronto
- Zakia Usmani, Teacher/Religious Advisor, Toronto
- Zara Faris, Muslim Debate Initiative
- Justin Parrott, Librarian for Middle East Studies, New York University, Abu Dhabi
- Shaykh Mohammad Yasir al-Hanafi, Imam at Aylesbury Masjid, Buckinghamshire, UK
- Mufti Abu Layth al-Maliki, Birmingham, UK
- Adam Kelwick, Liverpool, UK
- Shaykh Nagib Khan, Quran Academy UK, Bristol, UK
- Imam Hassan Ghodawala, Gloucester Mosque
- Shaykh Abdul Hameed Ismail, Quran Academy, Leicester
- Imam Zubair, Al Falah Masjid, Manchester, UK
- Sulayman Van Ael, The Ark Institute, London, UK
- Muhammed Abdul Awal, Al Falah Primary School, London, UK
- Imam Qasim, Al-Khair Foundation, UK
- Ustadh Hamid Mahmood - Head Teacher of Fatimah Elizabeth Academy, UK
- Omar Mohammed Saleh, Executive Member, MSA, University of Nairobi, Kenya
Scholars, Imams, and other respected Muslim community leaders are invited to co-sign by emailing title (optional), name, organization (optional), and city as they wish it to appear to email@example.com.
Today: Kaukabun is counting on you
Kaukabun Durriyy needs your help with “Say No to Slandering of Scholars on Social Media!”. Join Kaukabun and 2,615 supporters today.