Request for Congressional Hearing on Guo Wengui’s case (case 1:23-cr-00118-AT)


Request for Congressional Hearing on Guo Wengui’s case (case 1:23-cr-00118-AT)
The Issue
Petition to the U.S. Congress: Request for a Formal Hearing on the Case of Guo Wengui (Case 1:23-cr-00118-AT)
Dear Esteemed Members of the U.S. Congress,
We, the undersigned citizens, respectfully urge Congress to convene a formal hearing to investigate the criminal case of Mr. Guo Wengui, also known as Miles Guo. Our petition arises from a steadfast commitment to ensuring judicial fairness, transparency, and the integrity of the American legal system. We present the following considerations to underscore the urgent need for congressional oversight.
Mr. Guo Wengui’s Background and Advocacy
Since 2017, Mr. Guo has distinguished himself as a resolute critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), openly pledging to dismantle its influence. His efforts have birthed impactful initiatives, including:
- The Whistleblower Movement
- The New Federal State of China
- The Rule of Law Foundation and Society
- The G-Series companies
- The Himalaya Farm Alliance
Mr. Guo was the first to expose the origins of COVID-19 and the murderous intent behind the vaccine. He has repeatedly cautioned against CCP infiltration into U.S. institutions—spanning government, judiciary, military, education, healthcare, and private sectors. These actions have cemented his status as a formidable CCP adversary, casting a shadow of potential political motives over his prosecution.
Case Summary
On March 15, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice, Southern District of New York, indicted Mr. Guo on charges of financial fraud. After a trial, a jury convicted him, and he now awaits sentencing—nearly two years since his arrest. Though the judicial process has concluded, serious doubts linger about its impartiality and adherence to due process.
Concerns Over Judicial Integrity
We call your attention to the following issues:
- Denial of Bail: Mr. Guo has been detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York without bail—an exceptional step demanding explanation.
- Collaboration with Chinese Authorities: The prosecution’s admitted cooperation with Chinese officials raises alarms about foreign influence, especially given Mr. Guo’s outspoken opposition to the CCP.
- Rejection of Political Context: The court dismissed the defense’s claim of political motivation without evident deliberation, despite its plausibility.
- No Personal Profit: Evidence indicates Mr. Guo gained no direct financial benefit from the G-Series companies at the heart of the allegations.
- Dubious Victim Claims: The prosecution’s shifting narrative—initially alleging thousands of victims, later settling on an unverified 8,000—lacks substantiation and invites skepticism.
- Intact Funds: The assets in question remain secure in frozen accounts or lawful investments, contradicting assertions of widespread damage.
- Pre-Indictment Operations: The implicated companies operated normally until the charges emerged.
- Flawed Testimony: Much of the prosecution’s witness testimony was tangential or mishandled, yet it was permitted to influence the jury’s decision.
- Unexamined Apartment Fire: A fire at Mr. Guo’s residence, potentially tied to the case, remains insufficiently investigated.
Risk of Judicial Weaponization
As Congress probes the alleged misuse of the justice system against former President Donald Trump, we beseech you to apply parallel scrutiny to Mr. Guo’s case. We seek an investigation into whether this prosecution reflects external pressure—possibly from the CCP—or a broader erosion of judicial impartiality. A comprehensive review, spanning indictment to verdict, is vital to affirm the rule of law.
Request for Action
A transparent congressional hearing offers the best path to uncover the truth, protect the autonomy of our judiciary, and uphold America’s dedication to justice. We earnestly implore Congress to act swiftly in determining whether Mr. Guo’s case meets the standards of fairness and legality the American people deserve.
Thank you for your unwavering commitment to justice and for heeding this critical matter.
Sincerely,
We the People
致美國國會請願書:請求對郭文貴案件(案件編號 1:23-cr-00118-AT)舉行正式聽證會
尊敬的美國國會成員:
我們,簽署此請願書的公民,謹此恭敬地請求國會召開正式聽證會,以審查郭文貴先生(又名郭邁爾斯)的刑事案件。我們的請願源於對維護司法公正、透明度以及美國法律制度完整性的堅定承諾。我們懇請您考慮以下內容,以評估國會監督的迫切需要。
郭文貴先生的背景與倡議
自2017年起,郭文貴先生成為中國共產黨(中共)的堅定批評者,公開誓言要「推翻中共」。他的努力促成了多項具影響力的倡議,包括:
- 爆料革命
- 新中國聯邦
- 法治基金會與法治社會
- G系列公司
- 喜馬拉雅農場聯盟
郭先生最早爆料了COVID-19的起源及其疫苗背後的殺人意圖。他多次警告中共對美國機構的滲透,涵蓋政府、司法、軍事、教育、醫療及私營領域。這些行動使他成為中共的第一號敵人,不由得令人質疑針對其法律訴訟是否帶有政治動機。
案件概要
2023年3月15日,美國司法部紐約南區以金融詐騙罪名起訴郭文貴先生。經審判,陪審團裁定其有罪,他目前正等待宣判,距其初次被捕已近兩年。雖然司法程序已結束,但對其公正性與程序正當性的嚴重疑慮依然存在。
對司法公正性的關注
我們謹請您關注以下問題:
- 拒絕保釋:郭先生被拘於紐約大都會拘留中心,未獲保釋機會,此舉異乎尋常,值得審視。
- 與中國當局合作:檢方承認與中國官員合作,這在涉及一位公開反對中共的人士的案件中,令人擔憂外國影響的可能性。
- 否決政治動機主張:法庭未經充分審議即駁回辯方關於案件具政治動機的說法,儘管該主張看似合理。
- 無個人收益:證據顯示郭先生未從案件核心的G系列公司中直接獲取經濟利益。
- 受害者指控存疑:檢方最初聲稱有數千受害者,後難以提供具體證據,最終定為8,000人,此數字未經證實,令人質疑。
- 資金完整:涉案資產仍安全存於凍結帳戶或合法投資中,與廣泛損害的說法相悖。
- 起訴前正常運營:相關公司在起訴前運作正常。
- 證詞缺陷:檢方證人證詞多與案情無關或處理不當,仍被允許影響陪審團裁決。
- 公寓火災未解:郭先生住所發生的火災可能與案件相關,其原因尚未充分調查。
司法武器化的風險
鑑於國會正調查針對前總統唐納德·特朗普的司法系統涉嫌武器化,我們懇請您對郭先生的案件予以同等審視。我們尋求調查此案是否反映外部壓力——或許來自中共——或司法公正的更廣泛侵蝕。從起訴到判決的全面審查,對確認法治至關重要。
行動號召
我們相信,一場透明的國會聽證會是揭示真相、保護司法獨立性並重申美國對正義承諾的最佳途徑。我們懇切請求國會迅速採取行動,評估郭先生案件的處理是否符合美國人民應得的公平與合法標準。
感謝您對正義的不懈奉獻,以及對此重大事項的關注。
此致,
We the People
2,917
The Issue
Petition to the U.S. Congress: Request for a Formal Hearing on the Case of Guo Wengui (Case 1:23-cr-00118-AT)
Dear Esteemed Members of the U.S. Congress,
We, the undersigned citizens, respectfully urge Congress to convene a formal hearing to investigate the criminal case of Mr. Guo Wengui, also known as Miles Guo. Our petition arises from a steadfast commitment to ensuring judicial fairness, transparency, and the integrity of the American legal system. We present the following considerations to underscore the urgent need for congressional oversight.
Mr. Guo Wengui’s Background and Advocacy
Since 2017, Mr. Guo has distinguished himself as a resolute critic of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), openly pledging to dismantle its influence. His efforts have birthed impactful initiatives, including:
- The Whistleblower Movement
- The New Federal State of China
- The Rule of Law Foundation and Society
- The G-Series companies
- The Himalaya Farm Alliance
Mr. Guo was the first to expose the origins of COVID-19 and the murderous intent behind the vaccine. He has repeatedly cautioned against CCP infiltration into U.S. institutions—spanning government, judiciary, military, education, healthcare, and private sectors. These actions have cemented his status as a formidable CCP adversary, casting a shadow of potential political motives over his prosecution.
Case Summary
On March 15, 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice, Southern District of New York, indicted Mr. Guo on charges of financial fraud. After a trial, a jury convicted him, and he now awaits sentencing—nearly two years since his arrest. Though the judicial process has concluded, serious doubts linger about its impartiality and adherence to due process.
Concerns Over Judicial Integrity
We call your attention to the following issues:
- Denial of Bail: Mr. Guo has been detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in New York without bail—an exceptional step demanding explanation.
- Collaboration with Chinese Authorities: The prosecution’s admitted cooperation with Chinese officials raises alarms about foreign influence, especially given Mr. Guo’s outspoken opposition to the CCP.
- Rejection of Political Context: The court dismissed the defense’s claim of political motivation without evident deliberation, despite its plausibility.
- No Personal Profit: Evidence indicates Mr. Guo gained no direct financial benefit from the G-Series companies at the heart of the allegations.
- Dubious Victim Claims: The prosecution’s shifting narrative—initially alleging thousands of victims, later settling on an unverified 8,000—lacks substantiation and invites skepticism.
- Intact Funds: The assets in question remain secure in frozen accounts or lawful investments, contradicting assertions of widespread damage.
- Pre-Indictment Operations: The implicated companies operated normally until the charges emerged.
- Flawed Testimony: Much of the prosecution’s witness testimony was tangential or mishandled, yet it was permitted to influence the jury’s decision.
- Unexamined Apartment Fire: A fire at Mr. Guo’s residence, potentially tied to the case, remains insufficiently investigated.
Risk of Judicial Weaponization
As Congress probes the alleged misuse of the justice system against former President Donald Trump, we beseech you to apply parallel scrutiny to Mr. Guo’s case. We seek an investigation into whether this prosecution reflects external pressure—possibly from the CCP—or a broader erosion of judicial impartiality. A comprehensive review, spanning indictment to verdict, is vital to affirm the rule of law.
Request for Action
A transparent congressional hearing offers the best path to uncover the truth, protect the autonomy of our judiciary, and uphold America’s dedication to justice. We earnestly implore Congress to act swiftly in determining whether Mr. Guo’s case meets the standards of fairness and legality the American people deserve.
Thank you for your unwavering commitment to justice and for heeding this critical matter.
Sincerely,
We the People
致美國國會請願書:請求對郭文貴案件(案件編號 1:23-cr-00118-AT)舉行正式聽證會
尊敬的美國國會成員:
我們,簽署此請願書的公民,謹此恭敬地請求國會召開正式聽證會,以審查郭文貴先生(又名郭邁爾斯)的刑事案件。我們的請願源於對維護司法公正、透明度以及美國法律制度完整性的堅定承諾。我們懇請您考慮以下內容,以評估國會監督的迫切需要。
郭文貴先生的背景與倡議
自2017年起,郭文貴先生成為中國共產黨(中共)的堅定批評者,公開誓言要「推翻中共」。他的努力促成了多項具影響力的倡議,包括:
- 爆料革命
- 新中國聯邦
- 法治基金會與法治社會
- G系列公司
- 喜馬拉雅農場聯盟
郭先生最早爆料了COVID-19的起源及其疫苗背後的殺人意圖。他多次警告中共對美國機構的滲透,涵蓋政府、司法、軍事、教育、醫療及私營領域。這些行動使他成為中共的第一號敵人,不由得令人質疑針對其法律訴訟是否帶有政治動機。
案件概要
2023年3月15日,美國司法部紐約南區以金融詐騙罪名起訴郭文貴先生。經審判,陪審團裁定其有罪,他目前正等待宣判,距其初次被捕已近兩年。雖然司法程序已結束,但對其公正性與程序正當性的嚴重疑慮依然存在。
對司法公正性的關注
我們謹請您關注以下問題:
- 拒絕保釋:郭先生被拘於紐約大都會拘留中心,未獲保釋機會,此舉異乎尋常,值得審視。
- 與中國當局合作:檢方承認與中國官員合作,這在涉及一位公開反對中共的人士的案件中,令人擔憂外國影響的可能性。
- 否決政治動機主張:法庭未經充分審議即駁回辯方關於案件具政治動機的說法,儘管該主張看似合理。
- 無個人收益:證據顯示郭先生未從案件核心的G系列公司中直接獲取經濟利益。
- 受害者指控存疑:檢方最初聲稱有數千受害者,後難以提供具體證據,最終定為8,000人,此數字未經證實,令人質疑。
- 資金完整:涉案資產仍安全存於凍結帳戶或合法投資中,與廣泛損害的說法相悖。
- 起訴前正常運營:相關公司在起訴前運作正常。
- 證詞缺陷:檢方證人證詞多與案情無關或處理不當,仍被允許影響陪審團裁決。
- 公寓火災未解:郭先生住所發生的火災可能與案件相關,其原因尚未充分調查。
司法武器化的風險
鑑於國會正調查針對前總統唐納德·特朗普的司法系統涉嫌武器化,我們懇請您對郭先生的案件予以同等審視。我們尋求調查此案是否反映外部壓力——或許來自中共——或司法公正的更廣泛侵蝕。從起訴到判決的全面審查,對確認法治至關重要。
行動號召
我們相信,一場透明的國會聽證會是揭示真相、保護司法獨立性並重申美國對正義承諾的最佳途徑。我們懇切請求國會迅速採取行動,評估郭先生案件的處理是否符合美國人民應得的公平與合法標準。
感謝您對正義的不懈奉獻,以及對此重大事項的關注。
此致,
We the People
2,917
Supporter Voices
Petition Updates
Share this petition
Petition created on February 11, 2025
