Citizen Investigation Statements and Timeline

The financial information recently provided by Samantha and Aimee does not meet the level of transparency that was promised to parents and the community. Statements made by Aimee suggest a misunderstanding of what transparency entails—she referred to it as “a blanket statement,” which raises further concern about accountability and oversight.

September 19, 2025: “Transparency is a blanket term and specifics are needed to fulfill requests. Asking for transparency without clarification isn’t a true request.”

It also appears that Aimee has been functioning as the de facto president, as Samantha does not speak for the program or herself. Additionally, Aimee’s use of multiple last names—appearing alternately as “Halbert,” “Jones-Halbert,” and more recently “Jones”—creates confusion regarding her official identity in program records. Whether this inconsistency reflects a personal choice or an attempt to distance herself from familial or business associations, it raises legitimate questions about the accuracy of documentation and representation.

September 18, 2025: “This is actually the first time I have been asked by a parent/board member for detailed records. The only person to ask was Dan Edison, Parks and Rec secretary.”

Parents and a former board member had been asking for financial records for nearly two months at this point. One particular post made within the private Facebook group on September 2, which has since been deleted by page administrators, questioned, “How is league funding currently being allocated?” No answers were provided. Parks and Rec only became involved after this petition went live and they were made aware of the way the program was being run.

Cuba Parks & Recreation posted on their Facebook page on September 14, 2025, following the posting of this petition looking for information, in an attempt to help resolve the matter:

“The Cuba Parks and Recreation Board is seeking information about the Cuba Football Program.  If you are a Football Program board member, or you know a board member, please reach out to the Parks and Rec board in message. 

Thank you. 
Dan Eidson
Secretary 
Cuba Parks and Recreation Board”

 

Financial Documentation

The financial reports provided list general “income” and “expenses,” yet no comprehensive supporting documentation was included to substantiate these figures. While minimal receipts were provided, they do not account for the full amounts detailed in either category. There are also no records showing how much cash was collected after each spring flag game or practice. Based on the limited reports received, the concession stand appears to have averaged approximately $85 per game throughout a 48-game spring flag season—an unusually low figure considering that football concessions were the only ones operating during this period, as the soccer season was not active.

 

Nonprofit Status Concerns

September 14, 2025: Aimee claimed that CYF’s 501(c)(3) status was in good standing, stating: “That tax exemption is federal and not state and as such was not useful and/or never actually utilized. When taking over as treasurer, I was assured that our exemption status was active. I’m still waiting on paperwork to be shared. I did verify that our 501c3 status is in good standing and once I know more about the state exemption status, I’ll be able to clarify things.”

September 18, 2025: She later issued a conflicting statement: “Finally update on Federal Exemption status. Our 2024 990 is not on file. Even though our status is active, that’s why the website says it’s revoked. At year end when we turn the financial report into the city and parks board, I will use that information to complete a 990 and reinstate the federal exemption. It’s not really a benefit, but it doesn’t cost the program anything but time to have it.”

This explanation conflicts with IRS policy. The IRS explicitly states that exemption revocation only occurs after three consecutive years of missing 990 filings—not a single year. If CYF’s 2022 and 2023 forms were filed as claimed, why are they not publicly available on the IRS website, as they are for other local programs such as baseball? Furthermore, if the organization was truly “in good standing,” why was a reinstatement application submitted on September 22, 2025? Additionally, as a non-profit organization, federal tax exemption is required and is a huge benefit to not only the program itself, but also to the businesses and individuals that donate money to the program. It allows both entities a tax write-off on funds given to the program.

 

Board Changes and Leadership

New board members were announced at a meeting held on October 28, where it was stated that Kaytee is no longer part of the board. The new vice president, Earl Zweifel, is Aimee’s half-brother. The newly named secretary, Jimmie Todd, appeared uncertain of his exact role or title within the board. Aimee mentioned that one “member at large” was active but did not provide a name.

When asked how these board members were chosen, Aimee did not give a clear answer—only stating that they “reached out to coaches to ask if they were interested.” However, one current and active coach who was present stated that he never received such a message. Aimee further claimed they are seeking three additional “members at large,” but no interest was expressed by those attending the meeting.

Sponsorship Concerns

There were several other statements made during their “meeting” that were untrue. One statement claimed that they had no one pushing sponsorships this year. This is false. A former board member actively reached out to numerous local businesses seeking sponsorships, but nearly all declined—citing the program’s prior failure to uphold sponsorship agreements. Several sponsors from the past two years stated that they contributed funds and were promised banners and social media recognition, yet neither were fulfilled. The program currently has no sponsor banners to display at games, despite the fact that the sitting president is employed by a company that produces banners.

 

Equipment and Spending Discrepancies

Aimee also stated that a paint sprayer was purchased this season as part of the listed expenses. This is false. Only a replacement pump for the existing sprayer was purchased, costing approximately $110.

It was also stated to city council, on October 7, 2025, that new tackle equipment was purchased—specifically seven helmets, six chest pads, and six pairs of pants. However, in a message on July 26, 2025, Samantha stated that only three helmets, four pads, and five pairs of pants were purchased. The “receipt” shown as proof of purchase from Academy Sports on that date totals $749.72.

For reference, the approximate retail costs are:

Helmets: $165 × 3 = $495

Pads: $110 × 4 = $440

Pants: $30 × 5 = $150

— a total of $1,085.00.

This does not align with the total shown on the receipt, suggesting either missing documentation or incorrect reporting. Parents and the community deserve to see actual itemized receipts showing exactly what was purchased.

 

Record-keeping and Cash Handling

Aimee also stated in a message that no financial records were kept and, as she verbally told parents, she had no access to anything prior to September 1 and would not falsify records. Yet now she claims to possess records dating back to January, which remain incomplete at best.

September 18, 2025: “Detailed records have not been kept. I cannot provide what isn’t there... You have to keep in mind that cash transactions weren’t recorded anywhere either. I will do what I can with what I have.”

Why were there no detailed records kept? Why were cash transactions not recorded? And if this is true, how and where did they obtain the information used to create the “financial reports” they presented at their recent meeting?

Based solely on the information provided—and without knowing exactly how many player registration fees are included in each listed “income” statement—there appears to be roughly $8,000 unaccounted for.

 

Bank Account Irregularities

The program’s bank account was reportedly opened in an individual’s name— a direct violation of the IRS’s rules for nonprofit organizations.

September 18, 2025: “The current bank account is a personal bank account, like it has been for so many years, unfortunately. When Kaytee took over, the old account was closed and she started a new one like she was advised to do.”

We would like to know who advised Kaytee to open a new account in her name. The previous account, held at Marie’s County Bank, was not an individual account—another inaccurate statement made by Aimee.

Law Enforcement Involvement

It should also be noted that the so-called “thorough” investigation conducted by Detective Michael Centunzi was not as comprehensive as Aimee has claimed. Det. Centunzi reportedly did not request the names of the parents whom Aimee claims have not paid registration fees—nor did he contact those families to verify whether payment was made. This is concerning given that many cash-paying parents did not receive receipts, leaving no clear record of their payments. It raises a valid question: how many of the “unpaid” families actually paid in cash that is simply not being accounted for?

Furthermore, information has recently surfaced regarding two fall-season sponsors who paid in cash—one providing $80 and another $225—both without receiving receipts. Neither of these sponsorships are documented in the program’s financial reports, again calling into question the accuracy and completeness of CYF’s financial records.

If you have children who regularly participate in this program, I would strongly encourage you to conduct your own research and ask questions. Do not take them at their word. Ask for documentation, receipts…transparency. 

 

Defining Transparency

“Transparency” is not a blanket term. It’s a clearly defined standard of openness, honesty, and accessibility in how an organization operates and communicates with the public.

In the context of a nonprofit organization, transparency means:

•  Providing full and accurate financial documentation — including receipts, bank statements, and reports that show where every dollar goes.

•  Openly sharing decisions and policies with members, donors, and the community.

•  Allowing reasonable access to records that demonstrate accountability (for example, budgets, meeting minutes, and IRS filings).

•  Communicating truthfully and consistently — not selectively or vaguely.

Calling transparency, a “blanket term” minimizes its meaning. It’s not a vague concept; it’s a core ethical and legal obligation for any group that handles community funds, especially one claiming nonprofit status.

 

In Closing

While these concerns raise serious questions about the leadership and transparency of the current program, it’s important to recognize that our community now has a new, credible, and accountable option — Crawford County Youth Football (CCYF).

In just two months, CCYF has accomplished what many programs take years to achieve. The organization held a public meeting to elect a full board of directors made up of individuals from diverse backgrounds with skills in business management, marketing, accounting, CPR and first aid, and extensive experience in both flag and tackle football, as well as in working with children from all walks of life.

Since its formation, CCYF has adopted bylaws, a conflict-of-interest policy, filed articles of incorporation, obtained an EIN, filed articles of incorporation and filed its 1023EZ application with the IRS to obtain official 501(c)(3) nonprofit status. The board has also drafted and approved essential organizational policies, including liability waivers, codes of conduct for players, parents, coaches, volunteers, and board members, a photo ID retention policy, and a financial policy and procedures manual.

All of these items have been presented to City Council, as members of Crawford County Youth Football’s board of directors have attended the last four council meetings. They continue to ask for support and an update on the city’s decision as to which program they intend to enter into a contract for use of Hood Park with. The city appears to be dragging their feet in the decision making process. Advising that they have not completed their review of contracts and proposals yet. 

Prior to October 28, after CYF had observed Crawford County Youth Football’s presentation to the City Council—which clearly outlined the documents and policies the new organization had developed and submitted for review—only then did CYF begin “presenting” any policies to parents at their own meeting. Following that meeting, board members openly admitted they did not know where the previous bylaws were located or what they contained. This is particularly ironic, considering those same bylaws are posted in their private Facebook group. When assuming a position on a board of directors, it should be expected that one would first obtain, review, and understand the organization’s governing documents. To do otherwise demonstrates a lack of preparedness and responsibility in leadership.

It is deeply concerning that the City has yet to make a decision regarding which organization will be granted use of Hood Park. The delay in reaching a resolution has prolonged confusion within the community and undermined confidence in the process. We ask why the City would even consider supporting a program that continues to operate in this manner—under leadership uncertain of the definition of transparency, with a board that selectively determines its own members, and with minimal community backing. The question should not be which program to support, but rather why this continues to be a question at all.

Crawford County Youth Football is built on transparency, structure, and service to the community — values that reflect what youth sports should stand for. This new program is proof that with transparency, organization, and genuine community involvement, we can rebuild youth football in Crawford County into something we can all be proud of — one that truly puts our kids first. We encourage you to show them your support!

 

 

Disclaimer: All quoted material contained in this document is copied directly from written communications or public posts as originally stated, without alteration for clarity or context.