Actualización de la peticiónRe-open the Railway between Matlock, Bakewell, Buxton and ManchesterManchester and East Midlands Rail Action Partnership (MEMRAP) Meeting Minutes
James WyattSmalley, ENG, Reino Unido
21 jun 2019

Here are this months minutes from our latest meeting.

Manchester and East Midlands Rail Action Partnership (MEMRAP)
10th June, 7.30pm, at Humanity House, Matlock Meeting No.5
Attendees: Robin Greenwood, Stephen Chaytow, Mike Hancocks, John Harpur, Janet Miller, Derek Bodey, Jane Taylor, Bill Woolley
Apologies: Jean Todd, Steve Caddy, Peter Stanton, Dave Shaw, Ian Clark, Steve Jones, Robin Lumb, Kirk Martin, Suzanne Pearson, Tina Heathcote
1) Minutes from Meeting No.4 – 18th April 2019
No adjustments requested
2) Actions Arising
• Tunnel gauge
– Stone trains most likely require W6 gauge, and it was thought that this would allow double track use in the tunnels, potentially without modification
‐ An additional cross Pennine route is highly sought after, per SELRAP project findings, there is simply a lack of capacity, so “The Peaks and Dales” route will be well used.
• Websites: updated status:
‐ Railfuture: railuser group site meets initial need, directing to an online summary
‐ FDVL: Digital filing cabinet of minutes, presentations and other documents is also a
valuable reference for online searching
‐ James Wyatt – petition site
‐ MEMRAP’s own website – no progress expected until MEMRAP is funded
· Peak Rail meeting – June 13th, 2pm Darley Dale waiting room
· Publicity actions ‐ deferred till after the Peak Rail meeting
· Fund raising work deferred till after incorporation completed and bank account opened
3) Reports from Recent Meetings
· SC tabled a schedule of meetings (attached as an appendix), as a record of the work that
had been carried out by MEMRAP over the last 2 months. Discussion about:
‐ Other approaches rather than standard heavy rail construction
‐ The meeting welcomed Jane Taylor, representing the Stourbridge rail operator, who
offered creative ways of looking at the project differently, including:
‐ Interlocked slab track for reduced cost of construction. Pre‐Metro also commented
on the use of Light Rail and Tram as other options
‐ For the new Monsal Trail, the possibility of the replacement as a braided system of
routes to cater for the needs of different groups.
‐ It was noted that rerouting of paths in Devon had seen sums of around £2m allocated
for the purpose
‐ Care about overstating value of project, due to northbound aggregates and also the
Earls sidings with cement trains which cannot be usefully rerouted
‐ It was said that councils are allowed to borrow against the increase in council tax from
new dwellings
‐ Buxton does want steam to return to the town
‐ MEMRAP advisor, Nick Gallop had stated that once the basic single track structure is
in place, it is relatively easy to take out and replace with a better grade
‐ Because there is no knowledge of how much additional freight might be generated,
there is considerable doubt about the capability of the single track and passing loops
to deal with a public service of any sort.
‐ It was noted that if both HS2 and Heathrow runway 3 were cancelled, this project
might become less attractive
4) Meeting with Peak Rail, June 13th, 2pm Darley Dale waiting room
· Attendees to be RG, SC, JH, JM
· No presentation was being prepared by MEMRAP. The purpose of the meeting will be to:
(1) ListentothePeakRailproposition
(2) Negotiateasuitablejointlyagreedoutcome
5) Joint Walk on Monsal Trail with the Peak National Park.
· It was confirmed that the walk the National Park was scheduled for 19th June, Action: RG
to check details with the Park / Tim Nicholson
6) Feasibility Study (Strategic Outline Business Case or SOBC)
· LEP (D2N2) had told SC that funding is not available for an SOBC, only build work.
· The group agreed that such a cost might be a suitable crowdfunding exercise.
7) Incorporation of MEMRAP
· Companies House has changed the website for registration of CIC again (since the last meeting), adding a challenge to agree what is outstanding, to complete the incorporation
· Directors re‐confirmed as RG (subject to articles), JH and SC. Action SC: Mike Rose to be
asked on return from holiday if he would like to join the board.
· Standard patterns of retiring by rotation were preferred, with 2 x 3 year terms of office
· It is our wish to use consensus decision-making, in the model rules there is
reference to vote-taking, which we prefer not to
do. RG to speak with the regulator to clarify and amend
· Humanity House articles used as the reference set of documents
· Choice of small versus large membership. It was decided that the large membership, to
elect directors would be the preferred route to go
· Action: RG to speak with the regulator to check the approach will work,
· Action: RG to liaise with JM to ensure that this agrees with her understanding –
· Action: SC then to complete incorporation of CIC, using new online application
· Action: SC ‐ After incorporation, meeting agreed to open bank account with Triodos
· Action: SC to seek funding, either via Amber Valley CVS or Foundation Derbyshire
� No AOB: SC wishes to note that HMRC relented and agreed that no tax return was due at this time
9) Date

Copiar enlace
WhatsApp
Facebook
X
Email