Quicker cancer diagnosis via blood tests
0 have signed. Let’s get to 1,000!
When someone has a blood test, no matter what the blood test is regarding, medics must always check for signs of cancer, as 1 in 2 people in the U.K. are diagnosed with some form of cancer.
Bare in mind THAT IS 1 in 2 people that have actually been DIAGNOSED, not 1 in 2 that actually have it but haven't been diagnosed!
So it should be a priority that when a blood test is administered and the results have come back from the lab to automatically check for signs of cancer - calcium levels, complete blood count, etc.
And if there are any concerning factors, these should be followed up with an immediate scan to detect any possible cancer.
If a person has blood tests often, it should be mandatory to check for cancer once every 2 month period, rather than with every single blood test - for relieving pressure off the medical profession.
Sources: (Both found 24th Dec 2016)
- Cancer research statistic - http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/risk/lifetime-risk
- National heart lung and blood institute - https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/bdt/types
Doing this so:
- Higher chance of surviving cancer by earlier diagnosis/prolonged life.
- Reduce family grievance where their close one with cancer cannot be cured.
- Families like mine do not have to go through it, as my grandmother had blood test results come back 'fine' and a month later, due to a fall, got diagnosed with cancer with no possibility of curing it.
Today: Chantelle is counting on you
Chantelle Hughes needs your help with “Quicker cancer diagnosis via blood tests”. Join Chantelle and 725 supporters today.