Punish CCP's "Judges"

Punish CCP's "Judges"

The issue

Case Study: How the CCP’s Courts Pervert Justice

 

Preface

From my personal experiences,  I would like to showcase to the world how the CCP has been lying in their propaganda about “rule of law” in the communist China, as well as their tricks to pervert justice and their own constitution and laws.  The purpose of these serial publications is to disclose the truth of the CCP’s so-called “judiciary”, and let the world think twice before investing, travelling or even engaging with the communist China ruled by the CCP.  Meanwhile, I hereby urge government of all nations to impose personal sanctions on the CCP's "judges".

 

Scenario 1 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – Luo Min

Luo Min, a CCP member, is also holding a Grade 3 so-called “senior judge” position of the Nansha District Court in Guangzhou.  When processing the case (ref.: 2022Y0191MC11914), he played with the following perversion tricks: 1. Directly Ignoring law provisions in black-and-white; 2. Inverting onus of proof against provision; 3. Deliberately legitimizing violence towards children; 4. Concealing criminal offence for a party concerned, i.e. perjury; 5. Contravening its own constitution.

Luo Min, as representation of the communist China’s so-called "judiciary", perverts justice arbitrarily, and is being sheltered by the Nansha District Court through rejecting investigation on the abovementioned criminal offences.

 

Scenario 2 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – Peng Guoqiang

Peng Guoqiang, a CCP member, is also a Grade 4 so-called “senior judge” position of the Guangzhou Intermediate Court.  When processing the case (ref.: 2023Y01MZ8288), he perverted justice by suppressing the key evidence in order to shelter the criminal offence of assaulting child.

 

Scenario 3 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – YE Jianwei

YE Jianwei, a CCP member, is also a Grade 4 so-called “senior judge” position of the Guangzhou Intermediate Court.  When processing the case (ref.: 2023Y01MS485), he perverted justice by stealthily switching the mandatory prerequisite into an ordinary condition, in order to legitimize the criminal offence of child-assaulting, as well as shelter his subordinate PENG Guoqiang from his misconduct of suppressing key evidences.

 

Scenario 4 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – SUN Yuanfeng

SUN Yuanfeng, a CCP member, is also a Grade 4 so-called “senior judge” position of the Guangzhou Intermediate Court.  When processing the case (ref.: 2023Y01MZ22425), he perverted justice by obstructing the collection of key evidences in this criminal offence, and meanwhile sheltering the perpetrator from compensating the victim's injuries by conjecturing the perpetrator's intention instead of factual consequences. 

 

Acknowledgment

Efforts with sweat and toil have been dedicated in preparing these serials, and your patronage with obtaining a Bybit Crypto Card - the best fee-free crypto card for supporting to end the CCP is greatly appreciated:- 

www.BybitCryptoCard.com

 

 

 

296

The issue

Case Study: How the CCP’s Courts Pervert Justice

 

Preface

From my personal experiences,  I would like to showcase to the world how the CCP has been lying in their propaganda about “rule of law” in the communist China, as well as their tricks to pervert justice and their own constitution and laws.  The purpose of these serial publications is to disclose the truth of the CCP’s so-called “judiciary”, and let the world think twice before investing, travelling or even engaging with the communist China ruled by the CCP.  Meanwhile, I hereby urge government of all nations to impose personal sanctions on the CCP's "judges".

 

Scenario 1 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – Luo Min

Luo Min, a CCP member, is also holding a Grade 3 so-called “senior judge” position of the Nansha District Court in Guangzhou.  When processing the case (ref.: 2022Y0191MC11914), he played with the following perversion tricks: 1. Directly Ignoring law provisions in black-and-white; 2. Inverting onus of proof against provision; 3. Deliberately legitimizing violence towards children; 4. Concealing criminal offence for a party concerned, i.e. perjury; 5. Contravening its own constitution.

Luo Min, as representation of the communist China’s so-called "judiciary", perverts justice arbitrarily, and is being sheltered by the Nansha District Court through rejecting investigation on the abovementioned criminal offences.

 

Scenario 2 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – Peng Guoqiang

Peng Guoqiang, a CCP member, is also a Grade 4 so-called “senior judge” position of the Guangzhou Intermediate Court.  When processing the case (ref.: 2023Y01MZ8288), he perverted justice by suppressing the key evidence in order to shelter the criminal offence of assaulting child.

 

Scenario 3 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – YE Jianwei

YE Jianwei, a CCP member, is also a Grade 4 so-called “senior judge” position of the Guangzhou Intermediate Court.  When processing the case (ref.: 2023Y01MS485), he perverted justice by stealthily switching the mandatory prerequisite into an ordinary condition, in order to legitimize the criminal offence of child-assaulting, as well as shelter his subordinate PENG Guoqiang from his misconduct of suppressing key evidences.

 

Scenario 4 – CCP Perversion “Judge” – SUN Yuanfeng

SUN Yuanfeng, a CCP member, is also a Grade 4 so-called “senior judge” position of the Guangzhou Intermediate Court.  When processing the case (ref.: 2023Y01MZ22425), he perverted justice by obstructing the collection of key evidences in this criminal offence, and meanwhile sheltering the perpetrator from compensating the victim's injuries by conjecturing the perpetrator's intention instead of factual consequences. 

 

Acknowledgment

Efforts with sweat and toil have been dedicated in preparing these serials, and your patronage with obtaining a Bybit Crypto Card - the best fee-free crypto card for supporting to end the CCP is greatly appreciated:- 

www.BybitCryptoCard.com

 

 

 

The Decision Makers

Donald Trump
President of the United States
Marco Rubio
Former U.S. Senate - Florida

Petition Updates

Share this petition

Petition created on 4 May 2024