We appreciate TIME magazine’s concern and support, i.e., “The Women of Iran” are TIME’s 2022 “Heroes of The Year,” but we cannot conceive why TIME entrusted an opinion to be coincidently published on December 7th, 2022 which is already transpired that this flowery style of penmanship is always a vague desire for change, while through street demonstrations, not only the Gen Z as the columnist intentionally numbered the protestors but all free fighters from under-age youth to bent-with-age seniors express their iron will and real desire, and are dying for a complete freedom from mob rule that power and wealth corrupted. The aforementioned piece deliberately gains readers’ trust (endorsing that the Islamic Republic‘s behavior toward children and women is cruel) to mislead them to a conclusion that degrades the women of Iran and depresses their ultimate goal. Such a political orientation is cruelty to Iranian women, especially those who were sexually assaulted, and some were beaten and raped to death by the Iran’s brutal regime. If we would be bullish about such an imperfect article, the impression these National Iranian American Council (NIAC)'s congenial tastes engrave is an uninformed complicity in whitewashing. NIAC's affiliates have been lobbying for Iran’s mob rule for years. NIAC's agenda tends to protect the medieval regime from the breakup, invariably opposed to the authentic voice of the free fighters.

Given our objection that the voice echoed over the TIME’s hills does not reflect the women of Iran’s outcry against the cruel treatment of protestors and prisoners, we are demanding that on the basis of journalism standardized ethics and correspondingly, the TIME's social responsibilities, we are entitled to our opinion to be published in TIME too.

Now that the flawed reasoning above printed and promoted on December 7th, 2022 by TIME dismissed our plan of FREEDOM (i.e., REGIME CHANGE), we urge TIME to either:

a) Reflect our ultimate goal by releasing the opinion submitted to TIME dated November 17th, 2022 as follows; or 

b) Design a research survey of public opinion as a simple examination to represent the voice of the people of Iran by conducting the following particular question and then extrapolate it within statistics’ confidence interval to see whether our denotation is supported by the simple majority, i.e., changing the regime to a truly secular democracy, where: no politician would ever include any personal religious affiliations; and no citizen would advocate a totalitarian system of government, or the vague connotations for changes subdued and restricted by the Islamic Republic’s systemic corruption and terrorism are voted, as official reformists within Iran، who are no more than a figurehead, and their arm-in-arm instruments NIAC affiliates try to lead the free world astray for the dissemination of concealment of their real identity.

The draft opinion to be released in TIME (option “a” above): 

Iranian Women Are Determined To Set Matters Right.

In the end, “when in disgrace with fortune and men's eyes,” one can only reap what s/he cultivates. What did the Islamic Republic of Iran’s brutal regime sow after decades of pent-up fury at the evil-natured regime and its cruel Supreme Leader? The seeds of hatred. In response to the freedom fighters’ rallying cry, a profoundly meaningful call to audiences around the globe, what the corrupt officers, the uniformed and plainclothes criminals in disguise, who have name tags as the members of the mobilization of the oppressed, disgrace to the human race though, are causing? The blood spilled into the gutters of one of the mothers of civilization, Iran, from Khorasan to Khuzestan and Kurdistan and from Azerbaijan to Baluchistan. What is the free world supposed to do, watching the deadly state violence against women and children toward the medieval regime, a real threat to civilization?

Human rights SHALL matter.

Mob rule involves systemic corruption and terrorism and massacres their citizens. The Principlists coerce Iranians “to live differently.”  The other political factions, purporting to be Reformists and Moderates, chose to be a limb of a deceitful theocracy of the conservatives. They were only a reflection of the original, the Principlists. They have been trying their best year-round to whitewash for almost half a century. Their “virtuous” signals protected the regime from the breakup. Now, they show indifference toward slaughtering our women and children and send underhanded posts full of falsities to support the bloodbath. The wickedness at the heart of the corrupt administration has been publicly exposed. The worn-out scaffolding of their corrupt religious system is crumbling quickly and at great cost to the people. Meanwhile, the insincere reformists could have a hand in reducing the bloody price of our freedom sooner if they step aside. “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws that degrade freedom and human rights.”  They should stop speaking for their own advantage and apologize for supporting the bloodthirsty government. If they were to do this – to break with the regime by resigning their post and supporting a national strike – they would be excellent examples to public servants.  The political network with a fictitious name, the reformist party, and their despicable NIAC lobbyists can no longer impress the world with their posts, speeches, and dishonorable lobbies. Perhaps it is not too late to rethink their position if they do not hold to the oligarchy’s course anymore.

The wild beast is breathing its last. The least more than five million Iranians living abroad, suffering from expatriation, say they can do to salute the Iranian citizens who gave their dear lives for freedom would be they would be united in not letting the corrupt regime renegotiate with western nations. They are urging the greater cooperation from the free world. They require no interference as in the past, except they are challenging the public and their governments across the globe engaging in observing moral principles, beginning with designating Iran Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization worldwide, expelling Iran’s ambassadors from embassies and international organizations and dismissing anyone who conceals their real identity connected to the regime engaging in espionage against Iranian protestors from abroad and involving with money laundering, banning all members and officials of the Islamic regime and their families from entering the rest of the world, and blocking the regime’s participation in celebrating international solidarity and peace. The immediate release of all prisoners of conscience in Iranian jails should be demanded. The protestors could be provided with tools to circumvent state surveillance and censorship —if they could speak out to the world, they might escape the carnage. It requires eventuating in the expulsion of Iran’s medieval state from the United Nations, given the regime’s brutal treatment of our children, women, students, and other citizens.

The moribund regime will not escape certain imminent death provided the western nations do not hammer out a deal with the mob rule again.

Protestors at home, the authentic voice of Iran, are challenging the reign of terror and relentless evil in order for real change to evolve where the most end values, i.e., love and happiness, and peace and integrity, can replace brutality for the overthrow of the absolute theocracy that can lead them to international engagement —to reconcile their ideals with reality.

Decided, new models will soon be created to place national happiness and the mitigation and conservation of the environment at the forefront of Iran’s policies and practices. It is understood that the transition processes to democracy cannot happen overnight. In place of going to extremes, protestors are bringing the international community together, connecting minds to create a better future for Iran with solutions to the fundamental challenges of the Middle East. Undoubtedly, this dawn will be the first experience of civil and political freedom, and indeed of religion. Two approaches are definite and predetermined. There will be no room for the roots of aversion and disgust: a) racialism, and b) the deeply-rooted medieval dissension of different sects of the religion that sets one against the other. Especially, the intricate problem of the proxies, the criminal parasites of the regional crop, nestled into the warm bed of Shiite and Sunnite, SHALL be purged.

Iranian citizens are not deterred by the ISIS scenarios plotted by the current interior ISIS regime against Iran’s territorial integrity when the regime is no longer in power. The moving train of the “constitutional revolution of Iran” started to run in 1905, opening the long way for fundamental change, heralding “modern values” of a new age. The totalitarianism of the Islamic Republic was just an imported short-term obstacle in Iranians’ progressive trajectory, which will soon be removed by their intrepid pioneers, the lovely Iranian women, who intended to stand firm to determine their fate.

However, it will not be narrowed down to the advocacy of women’s rights. In order to uphold the balance, it will comprise all socio-political movements, including the fight against gender stereotypes. It will embody democratic ideals. It will incorporate various views to embrace the opportunities for real reforms to build up, enrich, and beautify Iran.

Although the heroic confrontation of Iranian women with the thug men committing atrocious crimes against women could cost their lives, their battle for their freedom is strangely awe-inspiring. It will bring them to a safe home of the elimination of violence against women. They will be excellent examples for women across the Middle East and other Islamic countries and those worldwide suffering cruelties and violence. They will be regarded as deserving and free.

Iranian women will bring glory to Iran again.