Phoenix Crossland has faced harsh punishment following an injury caused to Nathan Cleary. 

It's important to highlight that even the injured player acknowledged this was unintentional - a split-second occurrence that is part of the rough and fluid nature of rugby league. For such incidents, intent should be the defining factor for suspensions, and that is impossible to prove in this case, Phoenix's intent was purely competitive, not malicious.

The NRL has set a concerning precedent with its selective enforcement of penalties. In 2022, Tayla May was allowed to defer his suspension to participate in the grand final, with the justification that it was "for the fans". 

To deny Phoenix this momentous career opportunity is not only unjust but strips fans of one of the joys they've anticipated. We understand the importance of maintaining discipline and safety in the sport, but many question if the roles were reversed, would Nathan be missing the grand final.

It is critical for the integrity of the league that decisions are made based on consistent principles and transparent reasoning.

If the punishment stands, every hip drop, regardless of injury must accept a 4 week period of suspension immediately.

If this tackle had occurred in a one-on-one scenario, the resulting injury would arguably be absent, further emphasizing the randomness of the incident rather than its intentionality. Penalizing Phoenix based on the unfortunate outcome, rather than proven intent, contradicts the premise of fair gameplay.

We urge the NRL to reconsider their decision in light of these points.