Continuation to 52 State Child Protective Service Law Change Petition

Continuation to 52 State Child Protective Service Law Change Petition

The Issue

pfbps.doc      Petition to Pass into Law for Biological Parents

In the case of Child Protective Service or Police Dept. notifications inside/outside of the home setting such as school and public streets, agencies and facilities:

Child/Children are to stay in the home of the biological parent where the child/children originally were residing at his/her birth; with that specific parent or parents of that residence only.

If at the hour of return this parent/parents are unavailable child/children emergency contact must be contacted; biological parent must be notified by phone call, txt, and email. All four methods of contact must be used to provide thorough means of communication and proper procedure.

  For detain and or child removal, children are to not be held or removed from this residence and are to be immediately released and returned to the biological parents’ home from any and all other local, state, and federal agencies, police departments, curfew violation pick- ups,  partnering facilities or holding camps of any kind and are to be  placed in the residence where child/children lived  prior to the initial Cps/ Department of Social Services, and or any other Sister Partnership Agency report of complaint. Immediately return the child/Children to biological parent where the child/children resided from birth without detain.

 It is hereby understood to be null to the absent biological parent that has or would then gain custody or seeks custody through Child in Need of Assistance and all other emergency removal processes due to the misconduct of Child Protective Services and or any means of false or vindictive reporting for the intent of such purposes. Cases that are not resolved within the first year of investigation and procedures must then be transferred to a special unit for clearance and reunification of child/children and  biological parent as specified above or placed before special panel to decide the methods and strategies for this return of child/children to take place. Not to exceed 60days. [Family Law facilitates absent parent desires to gain or modify custody and care.] In the case custody has yet to be established by documentation and or regardless of documentation of guardianship gained through Child In Need of Assistance and or court proceedings

where Child Protective Service and exact replicas to custody was gained by these means are not to have precedence; Child/ Children are to reside in the residence they lived at Birth.

 

 The inaccuracies of Government and Agency judgments and biases toward single mothers, working class or lower economic class single mothers; or welfare recipient parents(male/female) regardless of race and ethnicity live within our countries stereotypical prejudices towards their temporary or above and below minimum wage statuses may have been the cause of the many low income cases that go unaddressed or not revisited due to these biases lacking consideration of their need to be reunified to their children in an expedient fashion with the belief of these cases being of less importance, which is untrue and unfair.

We petition that the above inequality: Are not allowed to impede or take precedence over single mothers, minimum wage status mothers, welfare recipient parents, African-American, White and or other nationalities and or ethnic background rights to parent and rights as the parent of child/children.

 We all must sustain this rethinking to change the negative imagery and perception of presumptions towards parents’ demographics, economic standing, or education levels, due to the sensitivity in nature of CPS involvement. However as a country of honor and respect for life, we must exclude this important concern by eliminating child/ parent separation and displacement plaguing communities altogether. The goal is to rid Child Protective Service involvement entirely. There is an immense drain on government money poured into this cycle without seeing match progressive and viable effective resource and source outcome for families, children or States nationwide. It does not therefore give injunction in any way to allow The Department of Social Services and or any other Agency or Government affiliate then rights to the child/children involved in current, on-going, and past cases conducted by the courts for Juvenile Services, Family Court under any condition as well. Otherwise hearing or ruling over such matters that end in custody transfer or temporary guardianship changes are also under this petitions protective and legally binding terms as law. The rights of single moms and biological parent/s as identified above are therefore protected by this law to prevent the separation and immediate return of child/children who were removed from their birth home residency back to this residence.

To prevent then placement in absent or other parents’ home of child/children where they were not raised for the following reasons: Child/Children may not have experienced contact with absent/other parent for the sake of protection of every caliber risk of harm or abuse, mental and emotional stress of being in a strange/unwanted environment, and for the reasons above defining ulterior motives. Children are not to be considered for foster care or any kind of relative placement outside of biological parents’ family guardianship transfers using the CINA and or similar law already in effect revised or created in the future. Children have the right to remain where stability had been established and not be subject to question of change unless child/children have been deemed that death and data tracking evidence discloses to be in life- threatening risk. Also if child has disclosed on many occasions the expression of where they prefer and want to live and have spoken with adults, peers of age and non- agency investigative staff of dissatisfaction of care telling of abuse, noticing of continuous lack of medical care, apparent non-dieting lack of eating well and/or drastic weight lose8-10pds or more, severely adverse of a normal range of mood and social play and development by the partnering non-agency monitoring and investigative staff defined in petition for Procedure and Parent/Child Protection.


 

avatar of the starter
Maisha BrightPetition StarterWelcome I am a mother of 2 children that was falsely accused cleared and am still going to court to reclaim them because of the misconduct of CPS. B4 having our lives rampaged by this we were a decent normal family giving bk2school events and to charities
This petition had 55 supporters

The Issue

pfbps.doc      Petition to Pass into Law for Biological Parents

In the case of Child Protective Service or Police Dept. notifications inside/outside of the home setting such as school and public streets, agencies and facilities:

Child/Children are to stay in the home of the biological parent where the child/children originally were residing at his/her birth; with that specific parent or parents of that residence only.

If at the hour of return this parent/parents are unavailable child/children emergency contact must be contacted; biological parent must be notified by phone call, txt, and email. All four methods of contact must be used to provide thorough means of communication and proper procedure.

  For detain and or child removal, children are to not be held or removed from this residence and are to be immediately released and returned to the biological parents’ home from any and all other local, state, and federal agencies, police departments, curfew violation pick- ups,  partnering facilities or holding camps of any kind and are to be  placed in the residence where child/children lived  prior to the initial Cps/ Department of Social Services, and or any other Sister Partnership Agency report of complaint. Immediately return the child/Children to biological parent where the child/children resided from birth without detain.

 It is hereby understood to be null to the absent biological parent that has or would then gain custody or seeks custody through Child in Need of Assistance and all other emergency removal processes due to the misconduct of Child Protective Services and or any means of false or vindictive reporting for the intent of such purposes. Cases that are not resolved within the first year of investigation and procedures must then be transferred to a special unit for clearance and reunification of child/children and  biological parent as specified above or placed before special panel to decide the methods and strategies for this return of child/children to take place. Not to exceed 60days. [Family Law facilitates absent parent desires to gain or modify custody and care.] In the case custody has yet to be established by documentation and or regardless of documentation of guardianship gained through Child In Need of Assistance and or court proceedings

where Child Protective Service and exact replicas to custody was gained by these means are not to have precedence; Child/ Children are to reside in the residence they lived at Birth.

 

 The inaccuracies of Government and Agency judgments and biases toward single mothers, working class or lower economic class single mothers; or welfare recipient parents(male/female) regardless of race and ethnicity live within our countries stereotypical prejudices towards their temporary or above and below minimum wage statuses may have been the cause of the many low income cases that go unaddressed or not revisited due to these biases lacking consideration of their need to be reunified to their children in an expedient fashion with the belief of these cases being of less importance, which is untrue and unfair.

We petition that the above inequality: Are not allowed to impede or take precedence over single mothers, minimum wage status mothers, welfare recipient parents, African-American, White and or other nationalities and or ethnic background rights to parent and rights as the parent of child/children.

 We all must sustain this rethinking to change the negative imagery and perception of presumptions towards parents’ demographics, economic standing, or education levels, due to the sensitivity in nature of CPS involvement. However as a country of honor and respect for life, we must exclude this important concern by eliminating child/ parent separation and displacement plaguing communities altogether. The goal is to rid Child Protective Service involvement entirely. There is an immense drain on government money poured into this cycle without seeing match progressive and viable effective resource and source outcome for families, children or States nationwide. It does not therefore give injunction in any way to allow The Department of Social Services and or any other Agency or Government affiliate then rights to the child/children involved in current, on-going, and past cases conducted by the courts for Juvenile Services, Family Court under any condition as well. Otherwise hearing or ruling over such matters that end in custody transfer or temporary guardianship changes are also under this petitions protective and legally binding terms as law. The rights of single moms and biological parent/s as identified above are therefore protected by this law to prevent the separation and immediate return of child/children who were removed from their birth home residency back to this residence.

To prevent then placement in absent or other parents’ home of child/children where they were not raised for the following reasons: Child/Children may not have experienced contact with absent/other parent for the sake of protection of every caliber risk of harm or abuse, mental and emotional stress of being in a strange/unwanted environment, and for the reasons above defining ulterior motives. Children are not to be considered for foster care or any kind of relative placement outside of biological parents’ family guardianship transfers using the CINA and or similar law already in effect revised or created in the future. Children have the right to remain where stability had been established and not be subject to question of change unless child/children have been deemed that death and data tracking evidence discloses to be in life- threatening risk. Also if child has disclosed on many occasions the expression of where they prefer and want to live and have spoken with adults, peers of age and non- agency investigative staff of dissatisfaction of care telling of abuse, noticing of continuous lack of medical care, apparent non-dieting lack of eating well and/or drastic weight lose8-10pds or more, severely adverse of a normal range of mood and social play and development by the partnering non-agency monitoring and investigative staff defined in petition for Procedure and Parent/Child Protection.


 

avatar of the starter
Maisha BrightPetition StarterWelcome I am a mother of 2 children that was falsely accused cleared and am still going to court to reclaim them because of the misconduct of CPS. B4 having our lives rampaged by this we were a decent normal family giving bk2school events and to charities

The Decision Makers

Petitioning Every American and Congress
Petitioning Every American and Congress

Petition Updates

Share this petition

Petition created on August 23, 2018