Partnering for a stronger MAPS: A Community Call for Action

216

Let’s get to 500 signatures!
Petitions with 1,000+ supporters are 5x more likely to win!

The Issue

We are parents, former parents and former staff of Mankato Area Public Schools.  Some of us still have children in the district.  Some have transferred our children to other educational options, while some of us are considering leaving.

Our experiences are different, but we are hearing and seeing many of the same things.

We see students struggling with bullying and behavior while families feel consequences are inconsistent or concerns are not fully resolved.  We hear from staff who want to advocate for students but worry that speaking honestly about problems within their schools could jeopardize their jobs.  We hear from families struggling to obtain appropriate support for children with ADHD, disabilities or mental health needs.

Some parents have children that are not sufficiently challenged academically, while others say struggling students cannot get enough help.

We are asking for greater parental involvement in what students are taught.  Parents should not have to continuously monitor classroom materials for divisive topics and then submit an opt out request.  Families are asking MAPS to provide a clear, district wide form at the beginning of the year, allowing parents to affirmatively opt their elementary students into lessons specifically addressing sexuality or gender identity.  This would create a consistent process and give teachers clear direction from the beginning of the year.

We do not expect schools to eliminate every conflict or solve every problem.  We do expect concerns to be taken seriously and policies to be consistently followed.

We are asking the school board to hire an independent third party to review the district's bullying and disciplinary systems, including policy 506 and 542, and recommend improvements to those policies and how they are implemented.

Finally, policies 471 and 524 involving social media and monitoring of off campus speech need greater clarity.  The language should be narrow enough that it cannot be interpreted to mean a staff member is harming the district simply by raising concerns or advocating for their students.  Employees should be held accountable for genuine threats, harassment, confidentiality violations or other misconduct, while lawful and appropriate advocacy should not be treated as disloyalty or as harming the district simply because it is critical.

All of us want MAPS to succeed.  Some of us would like to return, and others want to feel confident keeping our children in the district.

Families cannot simply be asked why they are leaving.  When they answer, we need the district and school board to listen, and we do not feel heard.  Only one school board member mentioned the accountability and disciplinary concerns.  

What are incumbent candidates Kari Pratt and Patrick Baker along with candidates Joel Hollerich and Tracy Fredrick going to do to reverse student market share decline to other education options? Will they take our suggestions into consideration? We also challenge the Superintendent  and other board members to address our concerns.

Donations are not needed, and go to the website domain and not the cause 

The Decision Makers

Mankato School Board
7 Members
1 Responded
Elizabeth Hanke
Mankato School Board
“I agree with and have signed this petition. This petition is within the decision making ability of each and every one of the school board members at District 77, Mankato Area Public Schools. In fact, I am forwarding you part of an email from the State of Minnesota, which was forwarded to me by one of the signers of the petition you are referring: This was sent to a parent from the state of Minnesota in May of 2025, I have redacted names as per the law: (first three paragraphs redacted as they contain a lot of personal information) _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The resources I provided you are meant to support your next steps. The best way to do that is to make school board members aware that the admin team incorrectly applied school board policy when it determined your daughter was not a victim of bullying because she is not part of a protected class. That process of alerting the school board is how schools and school administrators are held accountable. Policies are locally controlled and locally enforced. The state (MDE) can determine whether they have a policy in place that meets state statute (which they do) and whether or not they followed their own policy (which is questionable given the argument above). We can conduct a formal investigation to make that determination and as a result we can send the school a determination letter stating as much. But even then, we cannot force schools to comply. Which is why I suggested filing a formal bully complaint, alerting the school board to the discrepancies between what you were told and what the policy states, and possibly filing a complaint related to the disciplinary actions assigned. All of which fall under the school board’s authority to act upon. Thank you for your follow up questions. I hope my response helps clear things up. Feel free to reach out again if you have further questions or concerns. In support, (Name Redacted) Safe & Supportive Schools Specialist Crisis Management Team (CMT) Equity, Diversity, & Inclusion Center 651-582- | @state.mn.us Minnesota Department of Education 400 NE Stinson Blvd., Minneapolis, MN 55413 education.mn.gov _________________________________________________________________________ Thanks, Elizabeth Hanke”
Patrick Baker
Mankato School Board
Christopher Kind
Mankato School Board

Supporter Voices

Petition Updates